Department of Middle & Secondary Education and Educational ...Sec+Ed+Lead+2019-2020+CPI+… · Department of Middle & Secondary Education and Educational Leadership Academic Year:

1

Department of Middle & Secondary Education and Educational Leadership Academic Year: 2019-2020

Continuous Program Improvement Report

BSED Middle Level Education

Objective Assessed Direct Measure Direct Measure Results Indirect

Measure

Indirect

Measure

Results

Proposed

Action Items

for

Assessment

Tool

Proposed Action

Items for Program

Action Items Implemented this year

Content knowledge

in Middle Level

Praxis II Please see attached. Skyfactor

Survey

Please see

attached.

N/A Comparative review

of required courses to

Praxis content to

identify gaps in skill

set that may be

attributed to

performance on the

exams.

N/A

Content

Knowledge:

Specific to field and

pedagogy according

to national, PA, and

EU standards

Grades Students continue to maintain a C

or better in all required content

courses. Students must have a 2.8

for candidacy and a 3.0 for

graduation.

N/A N/A

Ability to Plan Unit Plan Fall 2019

There were six candidates

enrolled in the undergraduate

Instructional Techniques for

Middle Level Education courses

who completed the required unit

plan culminating project. All

candidates scored at the Target or

Acceptable level on all standard

elements assessed.

Align all

rubrics with

INTASC

standards

A faculty content expert was assigned

for each certification area for all future

SPA reporting. The faculty member

was assigned to a SPA report based on

certifications held area and teaching

experience. The requirements for the

content expert include, but are not

limited to,

✓ Receive SPA reviewer

training

✓ Conduct annual SPA reviews

✓ Receive SPA report writer

training

✓ Stay abreast of changes and

updates to SPA standards or

reporting practices

Spring 2020

There was one candidate enrolled

in the undergraduate Instructional

Techniques for Middle Level

Education courses who completed

the required unit plan culminating

project. The candidate scored at

the Target or Acceptable level on

all standard elements assessed.

2



Appropriate

performance in the

classroom -

pedagogy

STPE Fall 2019

There were zero candidates


Student Teaching

✓ Collaborate with department

chair and faculty to revise

assessments as needed

✓ Serve as lead author of SPA

report

Spring 2020

There were five candidates

enrolled in undergraduate Student

Teaching. All candidates scored

at the Target or Acceptable level

on all standard elements assessed.

Positive Impact on

Student Learning

Instructional

Assessment Plan

Fall 2019



Student Teaching

Spring 2020

There were five candidates

enrolled in undergraduate Student

Teaching. All candidates scored


on all standard elements assessed.

Professional

Responsibility

Portfolio

Showcase/Interview

Fall 2019 There were six

candidates enrolled in Field

Experience. All candidates

scored at the Target or Acceptable

level on all standard elements

assessed in the Interview; Five

candidates scored at the Target or

Acceptable level on all standard

elements assessed in the Portfolio

Showcase

3



Spring 2020

There was one candidate enrolled

in the undergraduate Field

Experience. The candidate scored


on all standard elements assessed

on both the Showcase and

Interview.

4



Post Baccalaureate Middle Level Education

Objective Assessed Direct Measure Direct Measure Results Indirect

Measure

Indirect

Measure

Results

Proposed

Action Items

for

Assessment

Tool

Proposed Action

Items for Program


Content knowledge

in Middle Level


Survey

Please see

attached.

N/A Comparative review of

required courses to

Praxis content to

identify gaps in skill

set that may be

attributed to

performance on the

exams.

N/A

Content Knowledge:


pedagogy according

to national, PA, and

EU standards

Grades Students continue to maintain

a C or better in all required

content courses. Students

must have a 2.8 for

candidacy and a 3.0 for

graduation.

N/A N/A

Ability to Plan Unit Plan Fall 2019

There were two candidates

enrolled in the post-

baccalaureate Instructional

Techniques for Middle Level

Education courses. The

candidates scored at the

Target or Acceptable level on

all standard elements

assessed.

Align all

rubrics with

INTASC

standards

A faculty content expert was assigned for

each certification area for all future SPA

reporting. The faculty member was

assigned to a SPA report based on

certifications held area and teaching

experience. The requirements for the

content expert include, but are not

limited to,

✓ Receive SPA reviewer training


✓ Receive SPA report writer

training

✓ Stay abreast of changes and

updates to SPA standards or

reporting practices

Spring 2020



baccalaureate Instructional

Techniques courses.

5



Appropriate

performance in the

classroom -

pedagogy

STPE Fall 2019



baccalaureate Student

Teaching. The candidates

scored at the Target or

Acceptable level on all

standard elements assessed.

✓ Collaborate with department

chair and faculty to revise

assessments as needed

✓ Serve as lead author of SPA

report

Spring 2020

There was one candidate



Teaching. The candidate




Positive Impact on

Student Learning

Instructional

Assessment Plan

Fall 2019




Teaching. The candidates




Spring 2020

There was one candidate



Teaching. The candidate




Professional

Responsibility

Portfolio

Showcase/Interview

Fall 2019



baccalaureate Field

Experience. The candidates

6





standard elements assessed

on both the Showcase and

Interview.

Spring 2020


enrolled in post-baccalaureate

Field Experience

7



BSED Secondary Education

Objective Assessed Direct

Measure

Direct Measure Results Indirect

Measure

Indirect

Measure

Results

Proposed

Action Items

for Assessment

Tool

Proposed Action Items

for Program


Content knowledge in

Middle Level


Survey

N/A.

Response

rate n<6


required courses to

Praxis content to identify

gaps in skill set that may

be attributed to

performance on the

exams.

N/A

Content Knowledge:


pedagogy according to

national, PA, and EU

standards

Grades Students continue to

maintain a C or better in

all required content

courses. Students must

have a 2.8 for candidacy

and a 3.0 for graduation.

N/A N/A

Ability to Plan Unit Plan Fall 2019 Update rubrics

for new NCTM

and NCSS

Standards

Revise rubrics

based on NCTE

SPA feedback

Align all

rubrics with

INTASC

standards

A faculty content expert was assigned for each

certification area for all future SPA reporting.

The faculty member was assigned to a SPA

report based on certifications held area and

teaching experience. The requirements for the

content expert include, but are not limited to,



✓ Receive SPA report writer training

✓ Stay abreast of changes and updates

to SPA standards or reporting

practices

✓ Collaborate with department chair

and faculty to revise assessments as

needed

✓ Serve as lead author of SPA report

English: 1 candidate;

Scored Target or

Acceptable on all

standard elements

assessed.

Math: 2 candidates; Both

scored Target or

Acceptable on all

standard elements

assessed.

Science: 0 candidates

enrolled in Instructional

Techniques course

Social Studies: 2

candidates; Both scored

Target or Acceptable on


assessed.

Spring 2020

English: 0 candidates


Techniques course

8



Math: 1 candidate;

Scored Target or

Acceptable on all

standard elements

assessed.



Techniques

Social Studies: 0

candidates enrolled in

Instructional Techniques

course

Appropriate

performance in the

classroom - pedagogy

STPE Fall 2019

English: 2 candidates;

Scored Target or

Acceptable on all

standard elements

assessed.

Math: 0 candidates

enrolled in Student

Teaching


enrolled in student

teaching

Social Studies: 1

candidate; Scored Target

or Acceptable on all

standard elements

assessed.

Spring 2020


Scored Target or

Acceptable on all

standard elements

assessed.

9



Math: 1 candidate;

Scored Target or

Acceptable on all

standard elements

assessed.


enrolled in student

teaching

Social Studies: 1



standard elements

assessed.

Positive Impact on

Student Learning

Instructional

Assessment

Plan

Fall 2019


Scored Target or

Acceptable on all

standard elements

assessed.

Math: 0 candidates

enrolled in student

teaching


enrolled in student

teaching

Social Studies: 1



standard elements

assessed.

Spring 2020


Scored Target or

Acceptable on all

standard elements

assessed.

10



Math: 1 candidate;

Scored Target or

Acceptable on all

standard elements

assessed.


enrolled in student

teaching

Social Studies: 1



standard elements

assessed.

Professional

Responsibility

Portfolio

Showcase

Fall 2019


Scored Target or

Acceptable on all

standard elements

assessed.


scored Target or

Acceptable on all

standard elements

assessed.


enrolled in Field

Experience

Social Studies: 2




assessed.

Spring 2020


enrolled in Field

Experience

11



Math: 1 candidate;

Scored Target or

Acceptable on all

standard elements

assessed.


enrolled in Field

Experience

Social Studies: 0


Field Experience

Professional

Responsibility

Exit Interview Fall 2019


Scored Target or

Acceptable on all

standard elements

assessed.


scored Target or

Acceptable on all

standard elements

assessed.


enrolled in Field

Experience

Social Studies: 2




assessed.

Spring 2020


enrolled in Field

Experience

Math: 1 candidate;

Scored Target or

Acceptable on all

12



standard elements

assessed.


enrolled in field

experience

Social Studies: 0


Field Experience

13



Post Baccalaureate Secondary Education

Objective Assessed Direct

Measure

Direct Measure Results Indirect

Measure

Indirect

Measure

Results

Proposed

Action Items

for Assessment

Tool


for Program


Content knowledge in

Middle Level


Survey

N/A.

Response

rate n<6


required courses to

Praxis content to identify

gaps in skill set that may

be attributed to

performance on the

exams.

N/A

Content Knowledge:


pedagogy according to

national, PA, and EU

standards

Grades Students continue to

maintain a C or better in

all required content

courses. Students must

have a 2.8 for candidacy

and a 3.0 for graduation.

N/A N/A

Ability to Plan Unit Plan Fall 2019 Update rubrics

for new NCTM

and NCSS

Standards

Revise rubrics

based on NCTE

SPA feedback

Align all

rubrics with

INTASC

standards

A faculty content expert was assigned for each

certification area for all future SPA reporting.

The faculty member was assigned to a SPA

report based on certifications held area and

teaching experience. The requirements for the

content expert include, but are not limited to,



✓ Receive SPA report writer training

✓ Stay abreast of changes and updates

to SPA standards or reporting

practices

✓ Collaborate with department chair

and faculty to revise assessments as

needed

✓ Serve as lead author of SPA report



Techniques

Math: 0 candidates


Techniques

Science: 2 candidates;

All scored Target or

Acceptable on all

standard elements

assessed.

Social Studies: 3

candidates; All scored



assessed.

Spring 2020

English:

Math: 0 candidates


Techniques

14





Techniques

Social Studies: 0


Instructional Techniques

Appropriate

performance in the

classroom - pedagogy

STPE Fall 2019


Scored Target or

Acceptable on all

standard elements

assessed.

Math: 1 candidate;

Scored Target or

Acceptable on all

standard elements

assessed.


enrolled in Student

Teaching

Social Studies: 0


Student Teaching

Spring 2020


Both scored Target or

Acceptable on all

standard elements

assessed.

Math: 0 candidates

enrolled in Student

Teaching

Science: 1 candidate;

Scored Target or

Acceptable on all

15



standard elements

assessed.

Social Studies: 3




assessed.

Positive Impact on

Student Learning

Instructional

Assessment

Plan

Fall 2019


Scored Target or

Acceptable on all

standard elements

assessed.

Math: 1 candidate;

Scored Target or

Acceptable on all

standard elements

assessed.


enrolled in Student

Teaching

Social Studies: 0


Student Teaching

Spring 2020


Both scored Target or

Acceptable on all

standard elements

assessed.

Math: 0 candidates

enrolled in Student

Teaching

Science: 1 candidate;

Scored Target or

Acceptable on all

16



standard elements

assessed.

Social Studies: 3




assessed.

Professional

Responsibility

Portfolio

Showcase

Fall 2019


enrolled in Field

Experience

Math: 0 candidates

enrolled in Field

Experience



Acceptable on all

standard elements

assessed.

Social Studies: 3




assessed.

Spring 2020


enrolled in Field

Experience

Math: 0 candidates

enrolled in Field

Experience


enrolled in Field

Experience

Social Studies: 0


Field Experience

17



Professional

Responsibility

Exit Interview Fall 2019


enrolled in Field

Experience

Math: 0 candidates

enrolled in Field

Experience



Acceptable on all

standard elements

assessed.

Social Studies: 3




assessed.

Spring 2020


enrolled in Field

Experience

Math: 0 candidates

enrolled in Field

Experience


enrolled in Field

Experience

Social Studies: 0


Field Experience

18



Program: M.Ed. Teacher Leadership

Objective

Assessed

Direct

Measure

Direct Measure

Results

Indirect

Measure

Indirect Measure

Results

Proposed Action

Items for Assessment

Tool

Proposed Action Items for

Program

Action Items Implemented

This Year

Content

Knowledge:

National

standards

Comp

Exam

Fall 2019

Spring 2020

All students

taking the

comprehensive

exam were

assigned the

established cut-

off score due to

the revisions

currently taking

place.

Graduate

Student

Satisfaction

Survey

The Educational

Leadership

program had low

response rate;

However, all of the

responses were

positive.

Direct Measure – the

comprehensive exam

continues to be

revised for the M.Ed.

Teacher Leadership

degree.

Indirect Measure –

None.

Direct Measure – program faculty

will continue their revision of

comprehensive exam questions.

Revisions to the course EDLR716

were just approved in spring 2020.

This is the final course revisions for

the current program. Plan to pilot

new comp exam and set new cut-off

score.

Indirect Measure – None.

Program faculty continues to

develop appropriate comp exam

questions based upon course and

program updates.

Content

Knowledge:

National, State,

and EU

standards

Vision

Essay

Program faculty

reviewed the

assessment

results and noted

the majority of all

candidates

scoring within the

Target

Expectations and

Meets

Expectations

performance

levels for all

rubric scoring

areas.

Graduate

Student

Satisfaction

Survey

Educational

Leadership

program had low

response rate;

However, all of the

responses were

positive.

Direct Measure –

None.


None.

Direct Measure – program faculty

will monitor the performance level

for ELCC standard 1.2.


Program faculty reviewed

performance level results for ELCC

standard 1.1. Candidate

performance increased from 85% of

candidates scoring at the Target

Expectations performance level to

100% of candidates scoring at the

target level. No further action taken

by program faculty.

19



Program: Principal K-12 Post Master’s Certification

Objective

Assessed

Direct Measure Direct

Measure

Results

Indirect

Measure

Indirect Measure

Results

Proposed

Action Items

for Assessment

Tool


Program


This Year

Content

Knowledge:

National

standards

Praxis II

6990

School Leaders

Licensure

Assessment

(SLLA)

PA has changed

the PRAXIS II

6011 to

PRAXIS II

6990.

All students

met the PA

established cut-

off score for

both tests

during the

2019-2020

academic year.

Graduate

Student

Satisfaction

Survey

The Educational

Leadership program

had low response

rate; However, all of

the responses were

positive.

Direct Measure

– None.

Indirect

Measure –

None.

Direct Measure –

Program faculty will monitor

PRAXIS II 6990 candidate

performance. New cut-off

score is 151. Indirect

Measure – None.

Transition to new required PRAXIS II

test. Program faculty properly informed

all candidates of the new required 6990

test.

Content

Knowledge:

National, State,

and EU

standards

Vision Essay Program faculty

reviewed the

assessment

results and

noted the

majority of all

candidates

scoring within

the Target

Expectations

and Meets

Expectations

performance

levels for all

Graduate

Student

Satisfaction

Survey

The Educational

Leadership program

had low response


the responses were

positive.

Direct Measure

– None.

Indirect

Measure –

None.

Direct Measure – Program

faculty will monitor

candidate performance level



Program faculty reviewed performance

level results for ELCC standard 1.1.

Candidate performance increased from

85% of candidates scoring at the Target

Expectations performance level to 100%

of candidates scoring at the target level.

No further action taken by program

faculty.

20



rubric scoring

areas.

Professional

and

Pedagogical

Knowledge,

Skill, and

Dispositions

(Application of

Knowledge)

Assessment #7

Leadership

Capacity Project.

Program faculty

reviewed the

assessment

results and

noted the

majority of all

candidates

scoring within

the Target

Expectations

and Meets

Expectations

performance

levels for all

rubric scoring

areas.

Graduate

Student

Satisfaction

Survey

The Educational

Leadership program

had low response


the responses were

positive.

Direct Measure

–

Assessment #7

ELCC Standard

2.3.

Indirect

Measure –

None.

Direct Measure –


candidate performance levels

for the same ELCC standard

2.3.


100% of students scored within the

Exceed Expectations (33%) and Meets

Expectations (67%) performance levels

for ELCC 2.3:

Candidates understand and can develop

and supervise the instructional and

leadership capacity of the school staff.

Program faculty discussed a slight

increase in Exceeds Expectations

performance levels (from 30% to 33% of

students). Program faculty feel this is an

appropriate % of candidates exceeding

expectations for this particular standard.

No further actions taken.

Ability to

support student

learning and

development

(Clinical

Experience

Internship)

Assessment #5

Focus Project on

Student

Achievement

Program faculty

reviewed the

assessment

results and

noted the

majority of all

candidates

scoring within

the Exceed

Expectations

and Meets

Expectations

performance

levels for all

rubric scoring

areas.

Graduate

Student

Satisfaction

Survey

The Educational

Leadership program

had low response


the responses were

positive.

Direct Measure

– Assessment

#5 ELCC

Standard 3.5.

Indirect

Measure –

None.

Direct Measure – program

faculty will continue to

monitor the candidate

performance level for ELCC

3.5 as it reflects the heart of

the focus project on student

achievement.



Exceed Expectations performance level

for ELCC 3.5:

Candidates understand and can ensure

teacher and organizational time focuses

on supporting high-quality school

instruction and student learning. Program

faculty feel this is an appropriate % of

candidates exceeding expectations for

this particular standard. No further

actions taken.

21



Program: Superintendent Letter of Eligibility Post-Master’s Certification

Objective

Assessed


Measure

Results

Indirect

Measure

Indirect Measure

Results

Proposed

Action Items

for

Assessment

Tool


for Program


This Year

Content

Knowledge:

National

standards

Praxis II

6991

School

Superintendent

Assessment

(SSA)

PA has changed

the PRAXIS II

6021 to

PRAXIS II

6991.

All students

met the PA

established cut-

off score for

both tests

during the

2019-2020

academic year.

Graduate

Student

Satisfaction

Survey

The Educational

Leadership

program had low

response rate;

However, all of the

responses were

positive.

Direct

Measure –

None.

Indirect

Measure –

None.

Direct Measure –

Program faculty will

monitor PRAXIS II 6991

candidate performance.

New cut-off score is 162.


None.

Transition to new required PRAXIS II test.

Program faculty properly informed all

candidates of the new required 6991 test.

Content

Knowledge:

National, State,

and EU

standards

Assessment #2

Vision Essay

Program faculty

reviewed the

assessment

results and

noted the

majority of all

candidates

scoring within

the Exceeds

Expectations

and Meets

Expectations

performance

levels for all

Graduate

Student

Satisfaction

Survey

The Educational

Leadership

program had low

response rate;

However, all of the

responses were

positive.

Direct

Measure –

None.

Indirect

Measure –

None.

Direct Measure –


monitor candidate

performance level for

ELCC standard 1.2.


None.

Program faculty reviewed performance level

results for ELCC standard 1.1. Candidate

performance remained the same with 100% of

candidates scoring at the Meets Expectations.

No candidates (n=5) were scored at the

Exceeds Expectations performance level.

Program faculty discussed this level of

performance is acceptable in this first course

in the program. No further action taken by

program faculty.

22



rubric scoring

areas.

Professional

and

Pedagogical

Knowledge,

Skill, and

Dispositions

(Application of

Knowledge)

Assessment #3

Contract Review

Program faculty

reviewed the

assessment

results and

noted the

majority of all

candidates

scoring within

the Exceeds

Expectations

and Meets

Expectations

performance

levels for all

rubric scoring

areas.

Graduate

Student

Satisfaction

Survey

The Educational

Leadership

program had low

response rate;

However, all of the

responses were

positive.

Direct

Measure –

None.

Indirect

Measure –

None.

Direct Measure –


continue to monitor

candidate performance

levels for the same ELCC

standard 5.1.


None.

100% of students scored within the Exceed

Expectations (8%) and Meets Expectations

(92%) performance levels for ELCC 5.1:

Candidates understand and can act with

integrity and fairness to ensure a district

system of accountability for every student’s

academic and social success.

Program faculty discussed a slight increase in

Exceeds Expectations performance levels

(from 0% to 8% of candidates). Program

faculty noted this % reflects one out of 13

candidates being scored at this performance

level. Program faculty feel this standard

continues to be consistently scored over the

two most recent assessments. No further

actions taken.

Ability to

support student

learning and

development

(Clinical

Experience

Internship)

Assessment #5

Focus Project on

Student

Achievement

Program faculty

reviewed the

assessment

results and

noted the

majority of all

candidates

scoring within

the Exceed

Expectations

and Meets

Expectations

performance

levels for all

rubric scoring

areas.

Graduate

Student

Satisfaction

Survey

The Educational

Leadership

program had low

response rate;

However, all of the

responses were

positive.

Direct

Measure –

Assessment #5

ELCC

Standard 3.5.

Indirect

Measure –

None.

Direct Measure –

program faculty will

continue to monitor the

candidate performance

level for ELCC 3.5 as it

reflects the heart of the

focus project on student

achievement.


None.

100% of students scored within the Exceed

Expectations performance level for ELCC

3.5:

Candidates understand and can ensure that

district time focuses on supporting high-

quality school instruction and student

learning.

Program faculty feel this is an appropriate %

of candidates exceeding expectations for this

particular standard. No further actions taken.

23



Program: Supervisor of Special Education Post Master’s Certification

Objective

Assessed


Measure

Results

Indirect

Measure

Indirect Measure

Results

Proposed

Action Items

for Assessment

Tool


Program


This Year

Content

Knowledge:

National

standards

Praxis II

5412

School Leaders

Licensure

Assessment

(SLLA)

PA has changed

the PRAXIS II

5411 to

PRAXIS II

5412.

All students

met the PA

established cut-

off score for

both tests

during the

2019-2020

academic year.

Graduate

Student

Satisfaction

Survey

The Educational

Leadership program

had low response


the responses were

positive.

Direct Measure

– None.

Indirect

Measure –

None.

Direct Measure –


PRAXIS II 5412 candidate

performance. New cut-off

score is 146. Indirect

Measure – None.

Transition to new required PRAXIS II

test. Program faculty properly informed

all candidates of the new required 5412

test.

Content

Knowledge:

National, State,

and EU

standards

Vision Essay Program faculty

reviewed the

assessment

results and

noted the

majority of all

candidates

scoring within

the Target

Expectations

and Meets

Expectations

performance

levels for all

Graduate

Student

Satisfaction

Survey

The Educational

Leadership program

had low response


the responses were

positive.

Direct Measure

– None.

Indirect

Measure –

None.

Direct Measure – Program

faculty will monitor

candidate performance level



Program faculty reviewed performance

level results for ELCC standard 1.1.

Candidate performance increased from

85% of candidates scoring at the Target

Expectations performance level to 100%

of candidates scoring at the target level.

No further action taken by program

faculty.

24



rubric scoring

areas.

Professional

and

Pedagogical

Knowledge,

Skill, and

Dispositions

(Application of

Knowledge)

Assessment #7

Leadership

Capacity Project.

Program faculty

reviewed the

assessment

results and

noted the

majority of all

candidates

scoring within

the Target

Expectations

and Meets

Expectations

performance

levels for all

rubric scoring

areas.

Graduate

Student

Satisfaction

Survey

The Educational

Leadership program

had low response


the responses were

positive.

Direct Measure

–

Assessment #7

ELCC Standard

2.3.

Indirect

Measure –

None.

Direct Measure –


candidate performance levels

for the same ELCC standard

2.3.



Exceed Expectations (33%) and Meets

Expectations (67%) performance levels

for ELCC 2.3:

Candidates understand and can develop

and supervise the instructional and

leadership capacity of the school staff.

Program faculty discussed a slight

increase in Exceeds Expectations

performance levels (from 30% to 33% of

students). Program faculty feel this is an

appropriate % of candidates exceeding

expectations for this particular standard.

No further actions taken.

Ability to

support student

learning and

development

(Clinical

Experience

Internship)

Assessment #5

Focus Project on

Student

Achievement

Program faculty

reviewed the

assessment

results and

noted the

majority of all

candidates

scoring within

the Exceed

Expectations

and Meets

Expectations

performance

levels for all

rubric scoring

areas.

Graduate

Student

Satisfaction

Survey

The Educational

Leadership program

had low response


the responses were

positive.

Direct Measure

– Assessment

#5 ELCC

Standard 3.5.

Indirect

Measure –

None.

Direct Measure – program

faculty will continue to

monitor the candidate

performance level for ELCC

3.5 as it reflects the heart of

the focus project on student

achievement.



Exceed Expectations performance level

for ELCC 3.5:

Candidates understand and can ensure

teacher and organizational time focuses

on supporting high-quality school

instruction and student learning. Program

faculty feel this is an appropriate % of

candidates exceeding expectations for

this particular standard. No further

actions taken.

Documents

Department of Middle & Secondary Education and Educational ...Sec+Ed+Lead+2019-2020+CPI+… · Department of Middle & Secondary Education and Educational Leadership Academic Year: