Department of DefenseOffice of Economic Adjustment

Defense CommunitiesTown Hall

June 5, 2014

BRAC Downsizing(Exclusive of Guard and Reserve Sites)

Alaska Hawaii GuamPuerto Rico

AF Research Lab Mesa Red River

Army DepotLone

Star AAP

Concord NWS Seal

BeachRiverbank

AAP

Umatilla Chemical

Depot

Chanute AFB

Grand Forks AFB

Buckley Annex

Pueblo Chemical

Depot

Niagara Falls

USARC

Kansas AAP

Newport Chem Depot

Walter Reed AMC

Fort Monroe

Fort Monmouth

Fort McPherson

Fort Gillem

Willow Grove NAS/JRB

Newport Naval

Station

Brunswick Naval Air Station

NSA New Orleans

Fort Lawton

Roosevelt Roads Naval

Station

Legend

BRAC

Base Realignment and Closure

• Community Assistance $115,149,644 in OEA grant assistance has been provided to BRAC 2005

• Property Disposal (as of 09/30/13)

75,000 BRAC 2005 excess acres

43,418 acres disposed (58%)

11 Economic Development Conveyances totaling 30,804 acres have been approved to support projected creation of 20,550 new jobs

Success stories

• Challenges HUD approvals

Transition from OEA assistance

Federal partners have limited funds

Environment

Property transfer delays

Benchmark local experiences

Compatible Use (JLUS)

Alaska Hawaii GuamPuerto Rico

Legend

JLUS

Sacramento

Camp Roberts

Maneuver TS

Travis AFB

Ventura County NB

Camp Rilea

Klamath Falls ANG

Kitsap NB

Lewis-McChord JB

Fallon NAS

Camp Williams TS

Fort William Harrison

Ellsworth AFB

Minot AFB

Fort Wainwright/Eielson AFB

PhoenixYuma Proving

Ground

Seal Beach NWS

El Centro NAF

San Diego Metro Region

Point Loma NB

San Diego NB

Coronado NB

White Sands Missile Range/ Holloman AFB/ Fort Bliss Camp Swift

Dyess AFB

NAS JRB Fort

Worth

Kingsville NAS/ Orange Grove NALF

Lackland AFB

Randolph AFB

San Antonio JB

Sheppard AFB

Maxwell AFB

Redstone Arsenal

Fort Riley

Camp Ashland

Greenlief TS

Offutt AFB

Camp Clark Nevada

MTA

Camp Crowder

Fort Leonard

Wood

Columbus AFB

NAS Meridian

Crane NSA

Boone NGC

New Orleans

NAS JRBGulfport NCBC

Keesler AFBTyndall AFB

Dobbins ARB

Fort Pickett

Seymour Johnson AFB/MTRs/MTAs

Cherry Point MCAS

Dare County Range

Fort A.P. Hill

Quantico MCB

Wallops Island SCSC

Yorktown NWS

Fort Indiantown GAP ARNG

Auburn TS

Andrews NAF/Washington JB

Stones Ranch MR

Mass. MR/JBCC

Hampton Roads NW Annex NSA

Charleston JB

Shaw AFB

Kings Bay NSB

Fort Gordon

Beaufort MCAS/ Parris Island MCRD

Raleigh

Ethan Allen Firing Range

South Potomac NSA/Indian Head NSF

Aberdeen Proving Ground

Patuxent River NAS

South Potomac NSA/Dahlgren NSF

Compatible Use

• Community Assistance $12,019,663 in assistance across 70+ projects (17 nominations in FY14)

• Partnering to Preserve Our Military Presence Prevent further encroachment of our local military operations

Only program where local military sits down with the local community (with Federal funds) to address compatibility issues

• Challenges Climate change adaptation

Energy siting decisions

Multi-jurisdictions

Environmental preservation

Benchmark local experiences

Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA)

Alaska Hawaii GuamPuerto Rico

Legend

DIA

Anniston Army Depot

State of Arizona

Solano County

University of Michigan,Ohio State University,

Purdue University

Texarkana

Oshkosh

State of Connecticut

Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Commonwealth of Virginia

Allen County

DoD Industry Adjustment Response

• Program Access– Communities self-identify and request assistance

• May 20, 2014 Federal Funding Opportunity announcement

• Eligibility – Job loss of 2,500 in an MSA, 1,000 outside MSA, or 1% of

local workforce

– Direct and significant adverse impact on a community or its residents

• Funding– $48.6M budgeted for FY14

– $58.1M requested for FY15

Public Schools on Military Installations (PSMI)

Alaska Hawaii GuamPuerto Rico

Legend

PMSI

Fort Riley

Fort Bliss

Fort SillKirtland AFB

Dugway Proving Ground

Edwards AFB

NAWS China Lake

San Diego NB

USMC Camp Pendleton

Travis AFB

NAS Lemoore

JB Lewis McChord

Wheeler/Schofield AAF

NSA HR/ Norfolk

Fort Belvoir

JB McGuire – Dix – Lakehurst

Fort Polk

Public Schools on Military Installations

Funding – OEA was provided $770M (FY2011: $250M; FY2012: $250M; FY2013: $270M) to construct, renovate, repair, or expand elementary and secondary public schools on military installations to address capacity or facility condition deficiencies identified on the Secretary’s Priority List.

Sequestration – $43.9M reduction due to FY13 sequestration. While there was no FY14 sequestration impact, unobligated funds remain subject to future sequestration reductions.

Obligations to Date – $371.3M

Average DOD Investment –$24.7M/project

Funding (in Millions)

Roads Program (RP)

Alaska Hawaii GuamPuerto Rico

Legend

RP

Walter Reed NMMC – Bethesda

JB Lewis McChord

JB San Antonio

Fort Belvoir

Transportation Infrastructure Improvements

• Transportation infrastructure improvements associated with medical facilities related to BRAC 2005 recommendations - $300M (available until expended)

• Program authority - Section 8110, P.L. 112-10

• Executed $290.13M, using competitive process, through grants to local and state governmental entities and Federal interagency arrangements with Department of Transportation

• 8 projects across several bases: Walter Reed Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; San Antonio National Military Medical Center, TX; Fort Belvoir Community Hospital, VA; and Madigan Army Medical Center, JB Lewis-McChord, WA

• OEA’s construction grant implementation and monitoring activity will extend beyond 2017

11

Total OEA Programs

Alaska Hawaii Puerto Rico

LegendBRACRTAJLUS PSMI MG RPDIAGuam

Guam

Northern Mariana Islands

Richmond

Andersen AFB

NCTS Finegayan

Tinian (North Field)

Saipan

OEA GRANTS ADMINISTRATION

• Revised Federal Grant Guidance OMB consolidated 8 Federal grants circulars into one “super circular”, effective 12/26/13

DoD issuance of implementation regulations targeted for 12/26/14

2 CFR part 200, “Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards”

• What This Means for OEA Grantees Changes ahead

Grantees need to be informed of the revised requirements (see OEA website)

Anticipate additional requirements and processes

Prior to grant award: pre-award risk assessment, grantee internal controls

Post-award: on-site monitoring visits, compliance documentation

• OEA Response OEA organization and personnel changes

Information and updates on OEA’s website and through Project Managers

“Kick-off meetings” with grantees to review grant award terms and conditions

Planned: webinars and tutorials on OEA’s website; improved user-friendly guidance, drop-down menus and templates in EADS II