Upload
justin-eaton
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Definition of Ecology 1866 Ernst Haeckel: the comprehensive
science of the relationship of the organism to the environment
1927 Charles Elton: Scientific natural history 1963 E. P. Odum: The study of the structure
and function of nature 1972 C. J. Krebs: The scientific study of the
interactions that determine the distribution and abundance of organisms
Ecological spectrum
Biosphere, Landscape, Ecosystem, Community, Population, Organism, Organ system, Organ, Tissue, Cell, Subcellular organelles, Molecules
Branches of EcologyChemical, Molecular, Physiological, Behavioral, Population, Community, Ecosystem, Landscape, Evolutionary, Theoretical, Conservation and management, Biodiversity
Journals: Behavioral Ecology, Biological Conservation, Chemical Ecology, Conservation Biology, Conservation Ecology, Ecological Application, Ecological Modeling, Ecological Monograph, Ecologist, Ecology, Environmental Management, Evolutionary Ecology, Functional Ecology, Journal of Animal Ecology, Journal of Applied Ecology, Journal of Wildlife Management, Landscape Ecology, Molecular Ecology, Oecologia, Oikos, Trends in Evolution and Ecology, etc.
Methods of studying ecology
To understand, describe, explain, predict and control
Scale
Lab experiment, field experiment, natural trajectory experiment, natural snapshot experiment, mathematical model
Ecology of forest birds
5 warbler sp. of similar ecological requirement
Feeding zones
In the presence or absence of other species
Competition and partitioning
Energy budget of bumblebee How to keep warm in cold environment?
Energy gain for feeding – energy loss from flying, feeding and keeping warm
Lab and field studies
Number and kinds of flower visited, sugar content of flower
Energy loss at different temperature
Brown trout v.s. Native Galaxias
Fish → Mayfly nymph → algae
Activity pattern (lab and field exp.)
Habitat preference (natural exp.)
Community effect (field exp.)
Trophic cascade – effects flowing down from one trophic level to the next and the next
Energy flow
Primary production: trout >> Galax
Secondary production: trout >> Galax
Succession of old fields
Natural trajectory vs. natural snapshot
Correlation vs. mechanism
within field comparison indicated introduced sp.↑and prairie sp.↓ as N↑
Field experiment
sp. composition and N supply
Nutrients in the rain forest canopy
Epiphytes mats ~ ½ to 4x of the nutrient content of the foliage of the canopy trees
Photosynthesis, migratory birds, bats
Fox-rabies (math model)
Assumptions: no recovery or immune, no migration, random contact
Biology: life span 2 yrs., 1 cub/yr, latent phase 28 days, die 5 days after becoming infectious
N = S + L + I
dS/dt = (b-d)S -αSI
dL/dt = αSI - dL - βL
dI/dt = βL - dI - γI
α - contact rate
β - reaction rate
γ - rabies-induced mortality
Merits of model
Summarizing current knowledge
Approximation and simplification
Hypotheses testing
Exploring scenarios and situations
Caution in evaluation and prediction
Factors affecting the abundance and distribution of species
Historical factors evolution and speciation continental drift geological and climatic changes
Abiotic factors
chemical and physical environment
Darwinian evolution by natural selection
individual variation
variation is heritable
differential reproductive rate
the interaction between the characteristics of individual and the environment
Fitness
a measure of biological success
# of gene or genome put into the next generation
the proportionate contribution that an individual makes to future generation
The fittest individual
those that leave the greatest # of descendants
those that transport more gene to the next generation
Example Model: an annual, only one gene, asexual
reproduction, reproduce only once in life time.
5 genotypes: A, B, C, D, and E
G, S, F = proportion of energy devoted to growth, survival (against predator), and fecundity
# of seed Genotypes Spring/Summer Fall Survival
10 A 2 large 2 seeds 4
10 B 9 small 1 seeds 9
10 C 2 small 4 seeds 8
10 D 4 medium 5 seeds 20
10 E 5 med-small 4 seeds 20
Total 61
G:F:S in A=6:1:1, B=1:1:6, C=1:6:1, D=1:1:1, E=1:1:2
Genotype frequency before after one generation
A 10/50=0.2 4/61=0.06
B 0.2 9/61=0.15
C 0.2 8/61=0.13
D 0.2 20/61=0.33
E 0.2 20/61=0.33
Fitness = # of gene/genome put into the next generation
Fitness of D&E = 20/10 = 2
Fitness of C = 8/10 = 0.8
Fitness of B = 9/10 = 0.9
Fitness of A = 4/10 = 0.4
Questions
Is the population biologically successful?
Are those genotypes equally successful?
What if increase herbivory?