12
The relationship between the legal system and child protection.

Defining abuse & the policy framework

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Defining abuse & the policy framework

The relationship between the legal system and child

protection.

Page 2: Defining abuse & the policy framework

As we have seen:

• The law governs the relationship between legal individuals; these are known as ‘Civil Cases’. The courts decide these cases on the basis of what probably happened between these legal individuals: ‘The balance of probability’.

• Events that a deemed to be so serious that they are a grave threat to the ‘social order’ are classified as ‘Criminal Cases’. In the UK, the figurehead of this social order is The Crown represented as ‘R’. The courts have to have a great deal of confidence in terms of what happened regarding the offence. ‘Beyond reasonable doubt’.

Page 3: Defining abuse & the policy framework

What counts as a legal individual?

• Health and Local authorities and their officers are classified as ‘legal individuals’ even though they are organisations rather than single individuals.

Page 4: Defining abuse & the policy framework

The legal remedies for abuse of children can be subject to civil and/or criminal proceedings.Most often these proceedings will be civil.The Local Authority (as a legal person) brings the case to court on behalf of the victim child. However, the respondent in the case is the child’s name usually anonymised to an initial:

A Local Authority v NL [2013]

Page 5: Defining abuse & the policy framework

The Children Act 1989 key point 1

In civil law, child welfare is the responsibility of local authorities and family courts. Under section 47 of the Children Act 1989, local authorities are charged with the “duty to investigate … if they have reasonable cause to suspect that a child who lives, or is found, in their area is suffering, or is likely to suffer, significant harm”.

Page 6: Defining abuse & the policy framework

The Children Act 1989 & Adoption of Children Act 2002: key point 2

• Harm, under section 31(9) of the Children Act 1989 is defined as "ill-treatment or the impairment of health or development". Section 120 of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 added to this definition: "… including for example, impairment suffered from seeing or hearing the ill-treatment of another". To decide whether harm is significant, the health and development of the child is "compared with that which could reasonably be expected of a similar child" (Children Act 1989).

Page 7: Defining abuse & the policy framework

The Children Act 1989: key point 3

Under Section 17 (10) of the Children Act 1989, a child is a Child in Need if:a) he is unlikely to achieve or maintain, or to have the

opportunity of achieving or maintaining, a reasonable standard of health or development without the provision for him of services by a local authority under this Part;

b) his health or development is likely to be significantly impaired, or further impaired, without the provision for him of such services; or

c) he is disabled.

Page 8: Defining abuse & the policy framework

Principles of The Children Act 1989

•the welfare of children must be the paramount consideration when the

courts are making decisions about them;

•the concept of parental responsibility has replaced that of parental rights;

• children have the ability to be parties, separate from their parents, in

legal proceedings;

•local authorities are charged with duties to identify children in need

and to safeguard and promote their welfare;• certain duties and powers are conferred upon local authorities to

provide services for children and families;

•a checklist of factors must be considered by the courts before reaching

decisions;

• orders under this Act should not be made unless it can be shown that

this is better for the child than not making an order;

• delay in deciding questions concerning children is likely to prejudice

their welfare.

Page 9: Defining abuse & the policy framework

In criminal law

It is the police and the criminal courts (The Crown; ‘R’) who prosecute offenders and protect the public, including children. Home Office Circular 16/2005 lists criminal offences against children. It includes the offence of cruelty to children, which was first established in section 1 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933:

Page 10: Defining abuse & the policy framework

• “If any person who has attained the age of sixteen years and has the custody, charge, or care of any child or young person under that age, wilfully assaults, ill-treats, neglects, abandons, or exposes him, or causes or procures him to be assaulted, ill-treated, neglected, abandoned, or exposed, in a manner likely to cause him unnecessary suffering or injury to health…that person shall be guilty of a misdemeanour…”.

Page 11: Defining abuse & the policy framework

In order to establish guilt in a criminal case, the prosecution must satisfy 2 conditions.

• Mens Rea (Guilty Mind) • Actus Reus (the criminal act)

Page 12: Defining abuse & the policy framework

Main Points

• Abuse against children can be dealt with in the civil courts and also the criminal courts.

• The Children Act 1989 continues to be the most important provision regarding children and families.

• The Adoption of Children Act 2002 and Children Act 2004 expanded this provision.

• Key concepts include ‘s.47 duty to investigate’, ‘significant harm’, ‘child in need’, and the overarching principles, esp. paramountcy.

• The criminal law may prosecute individuals found guilty of child abuse under s.1 Children and Young People’s Act 1933.