24
Decentralization Survey 2009 osce.org/ skopje

Decentralization Survey 2009

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

osce.org/skopje. Decentralization Survey 2009. osce.org/skopje. Contents. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Decentralization Survey 2009

Decentralization Survey 2009

osce.org/skopje

Page 2: Decentralization Survey 2009

General Status of the Decentralization ProcessProgress in Public Administration Reform at Municipal LevelDecision-Making Process in the Municipal CouncilsStatus of Local Economic DevelopmentProgress in Fiscal DecentralizationStatus of Inter-ethnic RelationsAchievements in Education Reform

osce.org/skopje

Contents

Page 3: Decentralization Survey 2009

Questionnaires sent by OSCE to all- mayors - municipal administration - municipal councils

Answers received from 69 municipalities (81.17 %)

Opinion poll conducted by Brima Gallup-Skopje among 1,547 citizens countrywide

osce.org/skopje

Methodology

Page 4: Decentralization Survey 2009

4

Implementation and Financing of Municipal Competencies

Page 5: Decentralization Survey 2009

5

Local government revenues 88% higher in 2008

Share of local government expenditures on GDP:

4.7% in 2008 (2.9% in 2007)

17 municipalities still in the first phase of fiscal decentralization

Fiscal disparities: revenues per capita (2008)> Skopje-Centar: 10,217 Denars> Plasnica: 416 Denars

Implementation and Financing of Municipal Competencies

Page 6: Decentralization Survey 2009

6

Implementation and Financing of Municipal Competencies

Most successfully performed competencies

Education 61 Urban planning 54 Communal services 48 Local economic development 45

Most problematic competencies Urban planning 25 Fire fighting 20 Environment protection 19 Local economic development 19

Municipal Survey

Page 7: Decentralization Survey 2009

7

Implementation and Financing of Municipal Competencies

Activities undertaken by the Municipalities to

further Local Economic Development in 2008

Activity Number of municipalities

Improved the local infrastructure 53

Promotional activities 38 Participate in the work of a regional economic associations 27

Improved and standardized administrative procedures 24

Lowering of communal fees for business legal entities 17

Established a private-public partnership 8

Other 4

Page 8: Decentralization Survey 2009

8

Anticipated problems in the implementation of competencies

Lack of financial resources

Lack of qualified staff

Unclear legislative provisions Insufficient assistance from the central government

Implementation and Financing of Municipal Competencies

Page 9: Decentralization Survey 2009

9

Recommendations

Revise the revenue redistribution allowing for a more equitable service delivery

Increase the share of municipal revenues

Encourage inter-municipal cooperation

Further local economic development – PPP as an avenue for reducing unemployment

Coordinate donor assistance in the area of decentralization

Promote transparency and accountability of local authorities towards citizens

Implementation and Financing of Municipal Competencies

Page 10: Decentralization Survey 2009

10

Professionalisation of Municipal Administration

Page 11: Decentralization Survey 2009

11

Professionalisation of Municipal Administration

Equitable Representation

47 municipalities comply with the requirements.

16 muncipalities do not comply due lack of qualified staff among underrepresented ethnic groups.

Page 12: Decentralization Survey 2009

12

Professionalisation of Municipal Administration

Staff changes in the municipal administration

Before the 2009 Elections After the 2009 Elections

Total number 2,807 2,833 Civil servants 1,200 1,230

Page 13: Decentralization Survey 2009

13

Professionalisation of Municipal Administration

Citizens’ opinion about their municipal administration

Page 14: Decentralization Survey 2009

14

Professionalisation of Municipal Administration

70% believed that employment was politically motivated.

Almost half believed that corruption existed in their municipalities.

Citizens’ perception about the municipal administration

Page 15: Decentralization Survey 2009

15

Measures to be undertaken to professionalize municipalities

Professionalisation of Municipal Administration

Page 16: Decentralization Survey 2009

16

Professionalisation of Municipal Administration

Recommendations

Standardize employment procedures:

recruitment, dismissal, promotion, retirement

Invest in staff training and staff qualification

Take measures to prevent and fight corruption

Page 17: Decentralization Survey 2009

17

Citizens’ Participation

Page 18: Decentralization Survey 2009

18

Citizens’ Participation

Informed citizen

74% of the citizens are not informed about the decisions taken by the municipal councils.

Page 19: Decentralization Survey 2009

19

Citizens’ Participation

Informed citizen

50% of the citizens do not know from which sources their municipalities are financed.

More than 60% of the informed citizens were not willing to pay more.

Page 20: Decentralization Survey 2009

20

Citizens’ Participation

Citizens’ communication with the municipal administration

Page 21: Decentralization Survey 2009

21

Citizens’ Participation

Participatory budgeting

36 out of 69 municipalities organized up to 10 meetings with their citizens.

13 municipalities held more than 10 meetings.

Page 22: Decentralization Survey 2009

22

Citizens’ Participation

Committees for Inter-Community Relations

Established in 19 out

of 20 municipalities that are required to do so.

Page 23: Decentralization Survey 2009

23

Recommendations

Undertake further efforts to improve communication with the citizens

> Reach out to the citizens through the media> Organise citizen gatherings (e.g. for each stage of the budgeting process and

throughout the fiscal year)

Encourage the Committees for Inter-Community Relations to take up their role as advisory body to the municipal decision makers

Citizens’ Participation

Page 24: Decentralization Survey 2009

Decentralization Survey 2009

osce.org/skopje