Dear CEO of Smith Inc., We understand this is a trying time for your company right now with the...
If you can't read please download the document
Dear CEO of Smith Inc., We understand this is a trying time for your company right now with the heavy media attention directed towards your organization
Dear CEO of Smith Inc., We understand this is a trying time for
your company right now with the heavy media attention directed
towards your organization. We here at The Parker Follett Consulting
group would like for you to know that it is possible to not only
survive this crisis, but thrive in the future as other companies
have done so. We have outlined a public relations strategy for your
company that we believe to be effective for both the current and
future crises. A Proposal on Crisis Management for Smith
Incorporated Presented by the Parker Follet Group Parker Follett
Consulting Group 2014
Slide 3
Jack in the Box E. Coli Outbreak of 1993 As your company
struggles to weather this crisis and thrive in the future, we give
you an example to aspire to. We will look at the company Jack in
the Box. Parker Follett Consulting Group 2014
Slide 4
Introduction When a public relations crisis erupts, it is
crucial that an organization react swiftly, decisively and speaks
directly to their consumers concerns. The 24/7 media cycle can
destroy the good will that corporation has built in a short period
of time. We advocate that every organization be aware of its
corporate social responsibility to its consumers. A term originally
coined by Bowen, the consequences that result from this for public
relations are well known as corporate social responsibility. It
suggests that organizations have an obligation to consider the
interests of customers, employees and other stakeholders in all
aspects of their organizations. (P 145) in short by creating a
strong public relations campaign in which your corporation takes a
strong stance focusing on the corporate and social responsibility,
we feel that this will create a long term good will effect to
survive this current crisis. Parker Follett Consulting Group
2014
Slide 5
Presentation of the Case Twenty one years ago, Jack in the Box
faced one of the worst public relations disasters that a food
organization can face. They had served undercooked hamburgers
containing E. coli bacteria to customers, causing a large scale
outbreak of food poisoning. This caused not only a very public
health crisis, but also a major threat to their continued success
as a purveyor of American fast food. What follows is a classic
study of a company that learned from their initial Public Relations
missteps, to take corrective measures that led them to be seen as a
leader in food safety, and they are now experiencing record
profits. In 1993, The State of Washington Department of Health sent
out a press release announcing that an E. coli outbreak was
occurring in the State and that it was likely linked to tainted,
undercooked hamburgers served at local Jack in the Box restaurants.
Eventually, the numbers of ill would be over 600, including the
deaths of four children and nearly 50 with acute kidney failure
Illnesses would be spread from California to Nevada and Idaho. So
how was this particular company able to weather a public relations
crisis? They took many major concrete steps in order to gain back
the trust of consumers. Ultimately, Although for many years, every
time E. coli came up the whole Jack in the Box story would
resurface - the company survived. By referring reporters to
articles regarding Jack in the Boxs food-safety innovations, the
company regained credibility. In 1994, they instituted the
fast-food industry's first comprehensive food-safety program, the
Hazard Analysis & Critical Control Points system. Today, they
are considered the leader in food safety in the fast-food industry
(Liddle, 1997) and they are the country's fifth-largest burger
chain (Goff, 1999). We will examine both the positive and negative
steps that this company took to not only get through the crisis but
become an industry leader.
Slide 6
Analysis of the Case According to Theory We have chosen to use
the Habermas Theory of Communicative Action that states that
Communication always happens as a multidimensional process. (p146)
Habermas also distinguishes between strategic and communicative
action. Strategic actions are success-oriented. Acting
strategically, means to orient ones behavior exclusively towards
intended consequences. Perhaps it may sound cold, but when we use
this in our communications to the public we are attempting to
accomplish a specific goal or an intended consequence, that is in
the best interest of the company. Our public relations is geared
toward the intended consequence of not only engaging consumers in a
communicative discourse, but directing that discourse in such a way
that they continue to be consumer of our company. As the public
began asking questions regarding the responsibility of Jack in the
Box in this health crisis, it was the companys responsibility to
respond and begin what Habermas terms a discourse or discussion.
Contentious as this discourse was for the company, it was the very
act of engaging in this discourse and giving a voice to the
victims, that helped retain consumers later on. Conflict is
inevitable. The public relations practitioners working for the
operators of the potential depot can expect to be scrutinized on
four levels of strategy. (p151) Parker Follett Consulting Group
2014
Slide 7
Habermas Theory of Communicative Action Strategies for
Developing Intelligibility and the Clearness of the Message the
message was clear and concise,particularly in the first week when
the company remained silent. However when they realized they must
respond, they emphasized the actions that they were taking by
changing internal procedures and communications, and paying for all
the illnesses of their victims. Strategies for Developing Truth of
Their Assertions Robert Nugent the CEO of Jack in the Box
originally denied responsibility by pointing the finger at the meat
supplier and also waited a week to respond, a mistake that did not
show any sense of concern or responsibility to its consumers and
victims. However further evidence proved that Jack in Box did not
cook the meat at the proper temperature, which would have killed
the bacteria and help them avoid the entire situation ever
occurring. Strategies for Developing Truthfulness of the
Communicators Involved - the consumer and particularly the victims
considering legal action, will be interested in hearing the
response of the company, however it will be met with skepticism
since it is the companies response. Robert Nugent the CEO of Jack
in the Box made a critical mistake in the very beginning. First, he
did not respond to the situation immediately, and when he did he
placed blame elsewhere, therefore not acknowledging any truth to
the situation. Strategies for Developing Legitimacy of the Interest
Under Discussion Because the crisis began to grow with more and
more evidence pointing to their company, Jack in the Box quickly
shifted strategy and Jack in the Box immediately suspended their
hamburger sales, recalled meat from distributors, increased cooking
times and temperatures, and pledged to pay all medical costs
related to the disaster. Jack in the Box also hired a Dr. David
Theno, a prominent food-safety consultant, to design an entirely
new food-handling system (Goff, 1999). This indicated not only a
shift in the companys actions, but also the attitude of consumers
who continued to patronize because the company took
responsibility.
Slide 8
Strategies to Take in the Future in a Similar Situation Act
immediately and as truthfully as possible Show Corporate Social
Responsibility towards your consumers Show willingness to improve
or change company policy in order to avoid similar situations in
the future Show flexibility and willingness to work with outside
agencies, who goal is also protection of the public. Parker Follett
Consulting Group 2014
Slide 9
In conclusion, we strongly advocate the use of a swift and
direct campaign using Habermas idea of Social Corporate
Responsibility that emphasizes your organizations awareness of its
own accountability to consumers. These consumers respond to an
organization that displays concern and responsibility to its
victims, while taking responsibility for the very situation that it
created. Jack in the Box ultimately proved successful on both
levels, enabling them not only to survive the crisis, but to
experience record profits today. Conclusion
Slide 10
References Parker Follett Consulting Group 2014 Habermas, J.
(1984). The theory of communicative action: Vol. 1. Reason and the
rationalization of society. In . Ihlen, B. van Ruler, & M.
Fredriksson (Eds.), Public relations and social theory: Key figures
and concepts (pp. 62-82). New York: Routledge.
http://www.marlerblog.com/legal-cases/20-years-ago-today-the-jack-in-the-box-e-coli-outbreak-was-
announced/#.UwnyU4W5GLc www.ou.edu/.../Jack%20in%20the%20Box.htm
http://www.sdbj.com/news/2013/nov/20/jack-box-posts-228-million-fourth-quarter-profit/
Slide 11
A Proposal on Crisis Management for Smith Incorporated
Presented by the Parker Follet Group Parker Follett Consulting
Group 2014