2
241 U.S. 646 36 S.Ct. 451 60 L.Ed. 1219 DAVID H. GLASS, Appellant, v. ALFRED H. WOODMAN 1  et al.  No. 721. Supreme Court of the United States  March 20, 1916 Death of Alfred H. Woodman suggested, and appearance of James P. Newell,  public admi nistrator o f the city of S t. Louis, and administra tor of the est ate of Alfred H. Woodman, deceased, filed and entered on March 13, 1916. Messrs. W. F. Guthrie and Emmet H. Gamble for appellant. Messrs. John S. Leahy, Walter H. Saunders, and Irvin V. Barth for appellees.  Per Curiam: 1 Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Bagley v. General Fire Extinguisher Co. 212 U. S. 477, 53 L. ed. 605, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 341; Omaha Electric Ligh t & P. Co. v. Omaha, 230 U. S. 123, 57 L. ed. 1419, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 974; St. Anthony Church v. Pennsylvania R. Co. 237 U. S. 575- 577, 59 L. ed. 1119-1123, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 729; (2) St. Louis, K. C. & C. R. Co. v. Wabash R. Co. 217 U. S. 247, 250, 54 L. ed. 752, 754, 30 Sup. Ct. Rep. 510; Railroad Commission v. Worthington, 225 U. S. 101, 104, 56 L. ed. 1004, 1006, 32 Sup. Ct. Rep. 653; Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 568, 56 L. ed. 1205, 1210, 32 Sup. Ct. Rep. 704. 2 The petition for Writ of Certiorari is denied. 1

David H. Glass v. Alfred H. Woodman 1, 241 U.S. 646 (1916)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

8/17/2019 David H. Glass v. Alfred H. Woodman 1, 241 U.S. 646 (1916)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/david-h-glass-v-alfred-h-woodman-1-241-us-646-1916 1/1

241 U.S. 646

36 S.Ct. 451

60 L.Ed. 1219

DAVID H. GLASS, Appellant,

v.ALFRED H. WOODMAN1 et al.

 No. 721.

Supreme Court of the United States

 March 20, 1916 

Death of Alfred H. Woodman suggested, and appearance of James P. Newell, public administrator of the city of St. Louis, and administrator of the estate of 

Alfred H. Woodman, deceased, filed and entered on March 13, 1916.

Messrs. W. F. Guthrie and Emmet H. Gamble for appellant.

Messrs. John S. Leahy, Walter H. Saunders, and Irvin V. Barth for 

appellees.

 Per Curiam:

1 Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Bagley v. General

Fire Extinguisher Co. 212 U. S. 477, 53 L. ed. 605, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 341;

Omaha Electric Light & P. Co. v. Omaha, 230 U. S. 123, 57 L. ed. 1419, 33

Sup. Ct. Rep. 974; St. Anthony Church v. Pennsylvania R. Co. 237 U. S. 575-

577, 59 L. ed. 1119-1123, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 729; (2) St. Louis, K. C. & C. R.

Co. v. Wabash R. Co. 217 U. S. 247, 250, 54 L. ed. 752, 754, 30 Sup. Ct. Rep.

510; Railroad Commission v. Worthington, 225 U. S. 101, 104, 56 L. ed. 1004,1006, 32 Sup. Ct. Rep. 653; Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 568, 56 L.

ed. 1205, 1210, 32 Sup. Ct. Rep. 704.

2 The petition for Writ of Certiorari is denied.

1