9

Date · Date 5/4/2010 Client Project Job # Design Philosophy ... explained in detail in "Foundation Design" Teng, 1962, 1st & only edition or in "Foundation Engineering

  • Upload
    buiminh

  • View
    213

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Organization

Designed By

Date 5/4/2010

Client

Project

Job #

TBWall Report

Project InformationDesigned ByOrganizationDateProjectJob #Client

Number of Tieback Levels

Units System

Geometryab

hL

PropertiesEfy

Max. Deflection

Beam Shape

Tieback DataAngle1

One

ft

9.0 ft16.0 ft

25.0 ft27.5 ft

29000 ksi50 ksi

0.5 in

W14X82

15

5/4/2010

Page 1 of 8SoilStructure.com

Organization

Designed By

Date 5/4/2010

Client

Project

Job #

Design Philosophy

The analysis is based on "Equivalent Beam Method" first proposed by Blum and

explained in detail in "Foundation Design" Teng, 1962, 1st & only edition or in

"Foundation Engineering" Jumikis, 1987 2nd ed.

The design is based on classical structural analysis:

* This program uses classic-beam-theory beam elements to solve the multispan

tieback design.

* The equivalent nodal loads for each span are determined by numerical

integration of the beam equations to allow for the non uniform loads.

* The equivalent nodal loads, the stiffness matrix, and the support conditions are

used to solve for the support reactions and the support rotations.

* The support reactions are then used to numerically integrate the entire span

for values to display in the plots, and to find the max/min values.

* Steel Shapes only include compact sections, If noncompact sections are

desired, additional design checks are required.

* The deflection output is based on structural analysis but an independent check

should be made by Finite Element method or by site surveying.

Page 2 of 8SoilStructure.com

Organization

Designed By

Date 5/4/2010

Client

Project

Job #

Reaction 1 Reaction 2-91.97 kips -30.12 kips

Maximum ShearMaximum MomentMaximum Deflection

-57.6 kip at 9.00 ft-169.8 kip-at 18.80 ft-0.3721 in at 18.62 ft

Required AwRequired ZxUtilized Ix

2.88 in268.07 in374%

Adequate for ShearAdequate for BendingAdequate for Deflection

Tieback ForceUnbonded Tieback LengthTest Load

R195.2 kips15.0 ft126.6 kips

Lateral Torsional Buckling CheckLbCbryIyh0JrtsLpLrFcrMn/Q

Axially-Loaded Member CheckPLKAKL/rFeFcrPn/Q

192 in12.48 in148.00 in413.45 in5.07 in42.8 in105.1 in396.7 in91 ksi307 kip-ft

0 kips16 ft0.824.0 in261.975 ksi38 ksi543 kips

Required EmbedmentTschebotarioff Check

Combined Forces Utilization

15.25 ft13.25 ft

55%

Page 3 of 8SoilStructure.com

Organization

Designed By

Date 5/4/2010

Client

Project

Job #

Page 4 of 8SoilStructure.com

Organization

Designed By

Date 5/4/2010

Client

Project

Job #

Page 5 of 8SoilStructure.com

Organization

Designed By

Date 5/4/2010

Client

Project

Job #

Page 6 of 8SoilStructure.com

Organization

Designed By

Date 5/4/2010

Client

Project

Job #

Page 7 of 8SoilStructure.com

Organization

Designed By

Date 5/4/2010

Client

Project

Job #

Page 8 of 8SoilStructure.com