Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Daily Report Wednesday, 8 May 2019
This report shows written answers and statements provided on 8 May 2019 and the
information is correct at the time of publication (06:35 P.M., 08 May 2019). For the latest
information on written questions and answers, ministerial corrections, and written statements,
please visit: http://www.parliament.uk/writtenanswers/
CONTENTS
ANSWERS 6
ATTORNEY GENERAL 6
Prosecutions: West Midlands 6
BUSINESS, ENERGY AND
INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY 7
[Subject Heading to be
Assigned] 7
Artificial Intelligence:
Employment 7
Carbon Emissions: Northern
Ireland 8
Drax Power Station: Biofuels 9
Energy 10
Energy: Meters 10
Fracking: Water 10
Heating: Housing 11
Liquefied Petroleum Gas and
Natural Gas: Competition 11
Liquefied Petroleum Gas:
Competition 12
Post Office 12
Post Office: Civil Proceedings 13
Retail Trade 13
Whirlpool Corporation: Tumble
Dryers 14
CABINET OFFICE 15
Cabinet Office: Departmental
Responsibilities 15
Cabinet Office: Written
Questions 15
Constituencies 15
Huawei: 5G 15
Politics and Government 16
Public Sector: Procurement 16
DEFENCE 17
Armed Forces: Scotland 17
Armed Forces: Wales 17
Electronic Warfare 18
France: Military Decorations 19
DIGITAL, CULTURE, MEDIA AND
SPORT 19
5G 19
5G: Rural Areas 19
Broadcasting Programmes 20
Data Protection 20
National Holocaust Memorial
Centre and Learning Service 21
EDUCATION 21
Children: Protection 21
Children: Social Services 21
Children's Play 22
Disabled Students' Allowances 23
Erasmus+ Programme 23
GCE A Level 25
Higher Education 26
Outdoor Education 27
Pupils: Per Capita Costs 27
Special Educational Needs 28
Teachers: Females 28
Teachers: Pay 29
Universities: Finance 29
ENVIRONMENT, FOOD AND
RURAL AFFAIRS 30
Agriculture and Waste
Disposal: Carbon Emissions 30
Birds: Pest Control 31
Circuses: Wildlife 32
Pesticides: Regulation 33
Pigeons 34
EXITING THE EUROPEAN
UNION 34
Department for Exiting the
European Union: Emerdata 34
FOREIGN AND
COMMONWEALTH OFFICE 35
Democracy and Human
Rights: Annual Reports 35
Firearms: Regulation 35
Foreign and Commonwealth
Office: Emerdata 35
Iraq: Islamic State 35
Libya: Undocumented
Migrants 36
Malaysia: Institute for
Democracy and Economic
Affairs 36
Tobacco 36
HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE 37
Cancer 37
Cancer: Drugs 37
Cannabis: Medical Treatments 38
European Reference Networks 38
Four Seasons Health Care:
Insolvency 39
Health Services: Immigrants 40
Hospitals: Construction 41
NHS: Capital Investment 43
NHS: Lancashire 43
Obesity: Children 43
Pathology 44
Pathology: Greater London 44
Pathology: Private Sector 45
Preventive Medicine 46
Rare Diseases: Medical
Treatments 46
Social Services 46
Vaccination: Disinformation 47
WHO Framework Convention
on Tobacco Control 48
HOME OFFICE 48
Animal Experiments 48
Asylum: Dublin Regulations 49
Asylum: Glasgow 49
Cars: Theft 49
Cash Dispensing: Theft 50
Fire and Rescue Services:
Suicide 50
Genocide: Rwanda 52
Hoaxes and False Alarms 52
Offensive Weapons: Arrests 53
Police: Football 53
Police: Pensions 53
Police: Suicide 54
Religious Buildings: Security 55
Stalking: Victims 55
Visas: Married People 56
HOUSING, COMMUNITIES AND
LOCAL GOVERNMENT 56
Fracking: Planning 56
High Rise Flats: Insulation 57
Leasehold: Unfair Practices 57
National Holocaust Memorial
Centre and Learning Service 58
Private Rented Housing:
Evictions 59
Solar Power: Non-domestic
Rates 60
Temporary Accommodation:
Children 60
INTERNATIONAL
DEVELOPMENT 60
Department for International
Development: Secondment 60
Developing Countries: Climate
Change 61
Developing Countries: English
Language 61
Developing Countries: Plastics 61
Developing Countries:
Vaccination 62
Humanitarian Aid 62
Mozambique: Storms 63
Pakistan: Tobacco 63
INTERNATIONAL TRADE 63
Department for International
Trade: Emerdata 63
Drugs: Exports 63
Food: Exports 64
Foreign Investment in UK:
Northern Ireland 64
Free Trade: Dominica 64
Free Trade: Lesotho 65
JUSTICE 65
Children: Protection 65
Coroners 65
Drugs: Crime 66
Offenders: EU Nationals 66
Parole 67
Prison Sentences: Females 67
Prisons: Discipline 68
Prisons: Education 69
Rape: British Nationals Abroad 70
Segregation of Prisoners 70
Stalking 71
NORTHERN IRELAND 71
Historical Institutional Abuse
Inquiry 71
Northern Ireland Government 72
Northern Ireland Office:
Secondment 72
SPEAKER'S COMMITTEE ON
THE ELECTORAL COMMISSION 72
Electoral Register 72
TRANSPORT 73
Airports: Unmanned Air
Vehicles 73
Bus Services: Per Capita
Costs 73
Civil Aviation Authority 74
Department for Transport:
Secondment 74
Driver and Vehicle Standards
Agency 75
Driving Tests: Rural Areas 75
East Midlands Rail Franchise 75
East Midlands Rail Franchise:
Pensions 76
East Midlands Rail Franchise:
Rolling Stock 76
East Midlands Trains:
Pensions 76
Electric Vehicles: Charging
Points 77
High Speed 2 Railway Line 77
Low Emission Zones 78
Motorways 78
Motorways: Accidents 80
Motorways: Laybys 81
Offshore Industry: Helicopters 81
Public Transport 82
Railways: Disability 83
Railways: Franchises 84
Railways: Operating Costs 84
Railways: Sheffield 84
Railways: Standards 85
Roads: Standards 85
Stagecoach Group 86
Stagecoach Group and Virgin
Trains: Pensions 86
Transport: Infrastructure 86
Virgin Trains: Staff 87
Volkswagen 87
West Coast Partnership Rail
Franchise 88
TREASURY 89
101 Calls: VAT 89
Cash Dispensing: Fees and
Charges 89
General Anti-abuse Rule
Advisory Panel 91
Social Security Benefits 91
Tax Avoidance 92
Taxation: Multinational
Companies 92
Taxation: Self-assessment 92
Welfare Tax Credits:
Overpayments 92
WORK AND PENSIONS 93
Construction: Silicosis 93
Food Poverty: Disability 94
Social Security Benefits 95
State Retirement Pensions:
British Nationals Abroad 95
Universal Credit: Disability 96
Universal Credit: Private
Rented Housing 96
Universal Credit: Wales 97
WRITTEN STATEMENTS 98
HOME OFFICE 98
Home Office funding for local
authorities supporting
Unaccompanied Asylum-
Seeking Children 98
INTERNATIONAL
DEVELOPMENT 98
Contingent Liability arising
from the Loan Guarantee
Agreement with the World
Bank Group Covering an IBRD
Loan to the Government of
Jordan 98
LEADER OF THE HOUSE 99 Parliamentary Buildings
(Restoration and Renewal) Bill 99
Notes:
Questions marked thus [R] indicate that a relevant interest has been declared.
Questions with identification numbers of 900000 or greater indicate that the question was originally tabled as an
oral question and has since been unstarred.
ANSWERS
ATTORNEY GENERAL
Prosecutions: West Midlands
Preet Kaur Gill: [249931]
To ask the Attorney General, in how many cases did the West Midlands Crown
Prosecution Service decide not to charge a suspect on the grounds of (a) the evidential
test and (b) the public interest test in each of the last five years.
Robert Buckland:
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) maintains a central record of the number of
suspects referred to prosecutors for a pre-charge decision and the number of
decisions not to prosecute suspects following the charging decision.
When prosecutors make decisions on cases, they refer to The Code for Crown
Prosecutors. The Code contains a two stage test which has to be met before a
suspect can be charged; the evidential stage followed by the public interest stage.
When deciding whether there is enough evidence to charge, prosecutors must
consider whether evidence can be used in court and is reliable and credible, and
there is no other material that might affect the sufficiency of evidence. Prosecutors
must be satisfied there is enough evidence to provide a "realistic prospect of
conviction" against each defendant. At the public interest stage the prosecutor must
consider whether a prosecution is required in the public interest. A prosecution will
usually take place unless the prosecutor is sure that the public interest factors
tending against prosecution outweigh those tending in favour.
The table below shows the volume and percentage of decisions not to prosecute for
evidential and public interest reasons for the West Midlands Area in each year from
2013/14 to 2017/18.
2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
Volume % Volume % Volume % Volume % Volume %
No
Prosecution
- Evidential
4,760 18.8% 5,396 16.1% 4,580 18.7% 4,479 17.4% 3,589 13.8%
No
Prosecution
- Public
Interest
152 0.6% 584 1.7% 165 0.7% 164 0.6% 183 0.7%
Total of
Evidential
& Public
Interest
4,912 19.4% 5,980 17.8% 4,745 19.3% 4,643 18.1% 3,772 14.5%
Total
Decisions
Made
25,360
33,600
24,542
25,708
26,026
Data Source: CPS
Management Information
System
BUSINESS, ENERGY AND INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY
[Subject Heading to be Assigned]
Tom Brake: [910792]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what
assessment he has made of the potential effect on the environment of carbon capture
technology.
Claire Perry:
The Government believes that carbon capture usage and storage (CCUS) has the
potential to play an important role in meeting the UK’s climate targets. CCUS can add
value to the economy and help tackle hard to decarbonise sectors.
Our CCUS Action Plan is designed to progress CCUS in the UK, including enabling
the UK’s first CCUS facility to be operational from the mid-2020s. CCUS is also likely
to play an important role in achieving our Industrial Clusters Mission, creating the
world’s first net-zero industrial cluster by 2040.
In progressing CCUS, the UK has already established a robust regulatory framework
for CCUS, with regulations applying to licensing, environmental inspection and CO 2
storage, operation and monitoring activities. This means that any CCUS project will
need to comply with a rigorous health and safety assessment and require permits
and approval from relevant environment agencies, the Health and Safety Executive
and the Oil and Gas Authority.
Artificial Intelligence: Employment
Paul Farrelly: [248599]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what recent
steps he has taken to train and prepare workers for the impact of artificial intelligence.
Kelly Tolhurst:
The Industrial Strategy sets out the Government’s vision to make the UK a global
centre for AI and data innovation, alongside measures to ensure our people are
equipped to capitalise on those opportunities.
We are improving the UK's system for training in digital skills and lifelong learning to
ensure that working people have the support they need to navigate the challenge of
automation to a higher-wage future. Through the Industrial Strategy we are
delivering:
• 16 New Centres for Doctoral Training at universities across the country, delivering
1,000 new PhDs over the next 5 years;
• New prestigious AI fellowships to attract and retain the top AI talent, underpinned
by up to £50m of funding agreed at Autumn Budget
• Industry-funding for new AI Masters places;
• Invested £406m in maths, digital and technical education; and
• Committed £100m for the first phase of developing the National Retraining Scheme
to support people vulnerable to technological change.
The Government’s Good Work Plan was published in December 2018 and will ensure
that the labour market continues to work for everyone. The Plan commits to a wide
range of policy and legislative changes to ensure that workers can access fair and
decent work, that both employers and workers have the clarity they need to
understand their employment relationships, and that the enforcement system is fair
and fit for purpose.
Carbon Emissions: Northern Ireland
Lady Hermon: [249878]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, with reference
to the oral contribution of the Minister for Energy and Clean Growth of 23 April 2019,
Official Report, column 690, what are the market mechanisms put in place to deliver CO2
reductions in Northern Ireland since the closure of the Renewable Heat Incentive
scheme; and if she will make a statement.
Claire Perry:
Energy policy, including heat, is devolved for Northern Ireland. Section 113 of the
Energy Act 2011 contains provisions enabling the Northern Ireland Executive to make
regulations to introduce and operate a RHI scheme in Northern Ireland. The GB RHI
scheme is completely separate to the NI RHI scheme, with different scheme rules.
Between 1990 and 2016, Northern Ireland reduced its greenhouse gas emissions by
16%[1].
The Government has been working with Northern Ireland’s Executive in areas such
as the future of carbon pricing after we leave the European Union.
The UK Government and the Devolved Administrations (the Scottish Government;
the Welsh Government; and the Northern Ireland Executive) have jointly published a
consultation document on the UK’s future approach to carbon pricing. The
consultation plays a vital role in helping the government fulfil its commitment to
carbon pricing as an effective emissions reduction tool, as outlined in the Clean
Growth Strategy
This is a joint consultation and the Devolved Administrations are co-authors and
Government officials have worked with devolved administration’s counterparts
throughout the process. At ministerial level I have regular quadrilaterals and Northern
Ireland is represented by senior civil servants.
[1] Source: http://naei.beis.gov.uk/reports/reports?report_id=958
Drax Power Station: Biofuels
Sammy Wilson: [250019]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what sums
have been paid in subsidy in each of the last five years to Drax power station for burning
wood pellets.
Claire Perry:
Over the last five years, Drax’s renewable electricity generation from the co-firing of
biomass and the conversion of coal-fired units to 100% biomass has been supported
under the Renewables Obligation (RO) scheme. From 21 December 2016, Drax’s 3rd
Conversion Unit (Unit 1) has received support under the Contracts for Difference
(CfD) scheme. Units 2, 3 and 4 remain under the RO.
Information is not available on support under the RO specifically for burning wood
pellets. Therefore, the figures in the table below give the value of support for all of
Drax’s renewable electricity generation under the scheme, to the nearest million
pounds.
2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18
Renewables
Obligation[1]
£181m £399m £548m £548m £399m
Payments to individual projects are not reported separately under the CfD scheme.
The total value of payments to all the CfD supported projects is available in the
annual reports from the Low Carbon Contracts Company, the CfD scheme
administrator, at:
https://www.lowcarboncontracts.uk/publications?f%5B0%5D=field_publications_cate
gory%3A29
[1] The Renewables Obligation figures are the notional value of support, based on
Ofgem’s certificate report as at 01/05/2019 from their Renewables and CHP Register.
Energy
Vicky Foxcroft: [248725]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what steps he
is taking to protect customers from the potential negative effects of collapse of energy
retail companies.
Claire Perry:
Where an energy supplier fails its customers are quickly transferred to another
supplier appointed by Ofgem and their account balances are protected. Ofgem are
considering a range of options to limit consumers’ exposure to the costs of supplier
failures and plan to consult further in the summer.
The choice for consumers has increased from 13 suppliers in 2010 to around 60 now,
with a wide range of innovative tariffs, competitive prices and low-carbon products.
Energy: Meters
Andrew Rosindell: [249874]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what steps he
is taking to ensure the affordability of electrical smart meters.
Claire Perry:
Energy suppliers are responsible for the procurement of smart meters and have
commercial incentives to drive down the costs of metering. Moreover, a number of
meter manufacturers operate in the GB energy market and competition in the supply
of meters also helps to exert downward pressure on costs.
Consumers pay for metering costs (whether traditional or smart) as part of their
energy bills. The Government has put measures in place to prohibit energy suppliers
from charging households upfront for the costs of a smart meter and its installation.
Fracking: Water
Lee Rowley: [248068]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what
information his Department holds on when in hydraulic fracturing operations the operator
knows which type of water treatment and disposal facilities will be needed for the (a)
treatment and (b) disposal of the waste water.
Claire Perry:
As part of the environmental permit application, and before any hydraulic fracturing
can take place, operators must submit a waste management plan to the Environment
Agency for approval. This describes the processes and the types of extractive waste
that will be generated at the site. The plan must set out how the operator will
manage, minimise, reuse, recycle and dispose safely of the extractive waste, and
how they will monitor the extractive waste.
Heating: Housing
Paul Farrelly: [246479]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what steps his
Department is taking to encourage householders to change from gas heating to (a)
electric heating, (b) heat pumps and (c) hydrogen-burning radiators.
Claire Perry:
Transforming how we heat our homes is one of the most difficult decarbonisation
challenges facing the country. A number of options have the potential for achieving
this, including heat networks, heat pumps, hydrogen and biogas. We need to
continue exploring and testing different approaches to heat decarbonisation.
Through the Renewable Heat Incentive scheme we are spending £4.5 billion between
2016 and 2021 to support innovative low-carbon heat technologies in homes and
businesses, including heat pumps. BEIS is considering the future policy framework
for supporting electrification of heat and we are looking to launch an electrification of
heat demonstration project in 2019 to inform our thinking on the feasibility of a large-
scale transition to heat pumps.
For hydrogen as an option for decarbonising heat, more work is needed to prove the
safety and feasibility case as well as to gain a better understanding of the costs and
benefits. BEIS is currently working towards building a programme of work to address
these evidence gaps in partnership with industry, academia and other key
stakeholders. This includes the £25m BEIS-funded Hy4Heat programme, which is
exploring the safety of using 100% hydrogen for heating in buildings and the
development of domestic hydrogen boilers.
Liquefied Petroleum Gas and Natural Gas: Competition
Rebecca Long Bailey: [248702]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what
comparative assessment his Department has made of the number of customers who
switched suppliers of (a) LPG and (b) mains gas in each of the last three years for which
data is available.
Claire Perry:
According to data held by the Competition and Markets Authority, the annual
switching rate for suppliers of Liquified Petroleum Gas in 2016, 2017 and 2018 is:
YEAR TO 31 MAY METERED ESTATES (%)* SINGLE TANKS (%)*
2016 1.14 3.72
2017 1.35 4.58
2018 1.67 5.27
* Calculated as the percentage of customers switching away compared to the size of
the customer base at the start of the year.
The data regarding mains gas switching is publicly available information, and can be
found at https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/data-portal/number-domestic-customers-
switching-supplier-fuel-type-gb
Liquefied Petroleum Gas: Competition
Rebecca Long Bailey: [248703]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what
assessment his Department has made of the effectiveness of the regulation of the LPG
market by the Competition and Markets Authority.
Kelly Tolhurst:
The monitoring of the liquefied petroleum gas supply market for domestic suppliers is
a matter for the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) exercising its role as an
independent competition authority.
Domestic bulk LPG suppliers remain subject to regulation under the CMA Statutory
Orders and the CMA continues to monitor compliance with these Orders and the
2012 voluntary agreements. More information is available at
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/liquefied-petroleum-gas-lpg-market-
orders-and-calculator
In February 2018 the CMA published a factsheet and short animation explaining
switching rights for new and existing Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) customers on
metered estates: www.gov.uk/government/news/cma-advises-liquefied-petroleum-
gas-customers-on-switching-rights. This was accompanied by updated guidance from
the sector trade association UKLPG for its members about how best to communicate
with residents of metered estates about their supply and switching options and a Q&A
for residents on their website.
Post Office
Mr Kevan Jones: [246964]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, how many
times Ministers in his Department have met the Chair of the Post Office in the last 12
months.
Kelly Tolhurst:
The Chair of Post Office, Tim Parker has met with Ministers twice in the last 12
months.
Mr Kevan Jones: [247614]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, how many
times Ministers in his Department have met the Chief Finance & Operations Officer of
Post Office Limited in the last 12 months.
Kelly Tolhurst:
As the Special Shareholder of Post Office Limited, my rt. hon. Friend the Secretary of
State appoints a Non-Executive Representative to the Post Office board to provide
shareholder oversight of the company. Ministers have also met the Chief Finance and
Operations Officer of Post Office Limited once and had a telephone conversations
with him in the last 12 months.
Mr Kevan Jones: [247615]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, how many
times Ministers in his Department have met each of the four Non-Executive Directors of
Post Office Limited in the last 12 months.
Kelly Tolhurst:
As the Special Shareholder of Post Office Limited, my rt. hon. Friend the Secretary of
State nominates one Non-Executive Director, and ministers have met him regularly
over the last 12 months. Ministers have also met with the chairman of the board and
had a telephone conversation with him in the last 12 months.
Mr Kevan Jones: [247616]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, how many
times Ministers in his Department have met the Company Secretary of Post Office
Limited in the last 12 months.
Kelly Tolhurst:
As the Special Shareholder of Post Office Limited, my rt. hon. Friend the Secretary of
State appoints a Non-Executive Representative to the Post Office board to provide
shareholder oversight of the company. Ministers have also met the Company
Secretary of Post Office Limited and had a telephone conversation with her once in
the last 12 months.
Post Office: Civil Proceedings
Mr Kevan Jones: [246965]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, how many
times Ministers in his Department have met Post Office (a) directors and (b) officials to
discuss the ongoing group litigation order taken by subpostmasters against the Post
Office.
Kelly Tolhurst:
Ministers have met with directors and officials of the Post Office four times in the last
12 months to discuss a number of topics including the ongoing group litigation.
Retail Trade
Mr Jim Cunningham: [249204]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what steps his
Department has taken to promote the retail industry through the Government's Industrial
Strategy.
Kelly Tolhurst:
[Holding answer 7 May 2019]: At Autumn Budget 2018, my rt. hon. Friend Mr
Chancellor of the Exchequer announced the Future High Streets Fund, which aims to
invest £675m in England to support local areas to develop and fund plans to make
their high streets and town centres fit for the future. Autumn Budget also announced
a cut in business rates by one third for the next two years for all retailers in England
with a rateable value below £51,000, worth almost £1bn to retailers.
The industry-led Retail Sector Council has agreed its priority work areas for the next
two years, focusing on: costs to business, skills and lifelong learning, employment
protections, the circular economy, consumer protections, and retail and the Industrial
Strategy.
A senior industry figure is leading each of these work groups and will bring proposals
for action for both industry and government back to the Council for consideration. The
Industrial Strategy workstream is led by Sir Charlie Mayfield, Chairman of the John
Lewis Partnership and member of the Industrial Strategy Council, and will look at how
the Industrial Strategy can work to the benefit of the retail sector.
As part of the Industrial Strategy, and following the Taylor Review of Modern Working
Practices, the Government responded with the Good Work Plan, which will bring
forward legislation to extend workers’ rights, including for people who work in the
retail sector. This includes the introduction of new guidance to support the
interpretation of holiday pay rules, as well as the biggest ever increase to the National
Living Wage. An awareness campaign will be launched, targeted at both individuals
and employers, to boost awareness and understanding to help ensure all workers are
benefiting from their paid entitlement to leave. All these measures will improve the
wages and working contracts of many of those working in the retail sector.
Whirlpool Corporation: Tumble Dryers
Alison Thewliss: [245840]
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what recent
steps he has taken to increase consumer awareness of the risks associated with
unmodified Whirlpool tumble dryers.
Kelly Tolhurst:
The Office for Product Safety and Standards (OPSS) published the findings of its
review of Whirlpool’s tumble dryer modification programme on 4 April. This included
reviewing whether Whirlpool’s consumer outreach programme was adequate.
OPSS has written to Whirlpool setting out the actions it must take, including using
more creative ways to reach affected consumers who have not yet come forward to
minimise the risk of unmodified machines still being in people’s homes. Whirlpool has
28 days to respond from the date of the letter setting out what further actions it will
take. OPSS will hold Whirlpool to account in regard to these requirements.
Consumers also have access to a central recalls website covering all electrical recalls
via GOV.UK.
CABINET OFFICE
Cabinet Office: Departmental Responsibilities
Stephen Twigg: [237584]
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, how many ministerial requirements have been
issued by the Cabinet Secretary in each year since 2010.
Mr David Lidington:
I refer the honourable gentleman to recent correspondence from Justin Tomlinson
MP, Minister for Disabled People, Health and Work, a copy of which has been placed
in the library of the House, which clarifies previous answers on this subject.
As the Prime Minister’s most senior policy adviser and Secretary to the Cabinet, the
Cabinet Secretary provides advice on a wide range of policy issues. Policy decisions
are taken by ministers, within the framework of collective Cabinet responsibility, on
the advice of the Civil Service.
Cabinet Office: Written Questions
Stephen Twigg: [249843]
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, when he plans to respond to Question 237584
on Departmental Responsibilities, tabled on 27 March 2019 by the hon. Member for
Liverpool West Derby.
Mr David Lidington:
I refer the Right Honourable Member to my answer given to Question 237584 on 8
May 2019.
Constituencies
Cat Smith: [248714]
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, how much the last Boundary Commission
reviews for (a) England, (b) Northern Ireland, (c) Scotland and (d) Wales cost the public
purse.
Kevin Foster:
The expenditure by each Boundary Commission on the conduct of the Boundary
Review which reported in September 2018 includes costs incurred in the 2018-19
financial year, and the figures are therefore subject to final confirmation of the 2018-
19 accounts. The National Audit Office is currently auditing Departmental accounts
for 2018-19 and once it has produced its report on them, it will be possible to confirm
the final costs incurred by the four Boundary Commissions in the boundary review.
Huawei: 5G
Jo Platt: [250002]
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, if he will publish the 5G operators which (a)
use and (b) do not use the Huawei Cyber Security Evaluation Centre advice.
Mr David Lidington:
The UK government works with telecoms operators to manage cyber security risks
while ensuring the UK can continue to benefit from new technology. The annual
report from the Huawei Cyber Security Evaluation Centre Oversight Board is made
publicly available to help all operators assess risks in their networks.
Politics and Government
Tommy Sheppard: [250005]
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether his Department has contracted Ipsos
Mori to carry out polling on the public perception of the state of the union in the last six
months.
Kevin Foster:
The Government regularly contracts research to understand public perceptions
towards government policy. Government contracts can be found on GOV.UK.
Tommy Sheppard: [250006]
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether his Department has commissioned
any research on the public perception of the state of the union in the last three months.
Kevin Foster:
The Government regularly contracts research to understand public perceptions
towards government policy. Government contracts can be found on GOV.UK.
Public Sector: Procurement
Peter Dowd: [249980]
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, how many public procurement contracts were
awarded to foreign companies in 2018.
Oliver Dowden:
Information on the nationality of suppliers is not routinely held centrally.
Statistics on cross-border public procurement between EU Member States are
collated and published periodically by the European Commission. The latest report is
available at https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-
/publication/5c148423-39e2-11e7-a08e-01aa75ed71a1
Peter Dowd: [249984]
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, how many public infrastructure contracts were
awarded to foreign companies in the last 12 months.
Oliver Dowden:
Information on the nationality of suppliers for infrastructure contracts is not routinely
held centrally
Statistics on cross-border public procurement between EU Member States are
collated and published periodically by the European Commission. The latest report is
available at https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-
/publication/5c148423-39e2-11e7-a08e- 01aa75ed71a1
Jo Stevens: [249990]
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what enforcement and review mechanisms are
in place to ensure 30-day payment clauses are in place for suppliers and subcontractors
contracted to work with private sector companies on outsourced public sector contracts.
Oliver Dowden:
The Public Procurement Regulations require public sector buyers to pay their
suppliers within 30 days and require these payment terms to be passed down the
supply chain
Where this is not happening, businesses are encouraged to raise this with the Public
Procurement Review Service, who will investigate. The Public Procurement Review
Service will also proactively ensure that 30-day payment terms are being passed
down the supply chain by carrying out spot checks on contracting authorities
From September, suppliers who do not pay their subcontractors on time may face
exclusion from winning government contracts.
DEFENCE
Armed Forces: Scotland
Deidre Brock: [248706]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 4 April 2019 to
Question 238377, whether he plans to make mitigation payments to lower-paid MoD
personnel based in England in relation to the Scottish rate of income tax.
Mr Tobias Ellwood:
Our approach to mitigation payments was in direct response to concerns expressed
by Service personnel adversely affected as Scottish taxpayers. Similar concerns
were not raised by others living outside Scotland. Accordingly, there are no plans to
provide any form of financial mitigation for those Service personnel outside Scotland
who found themselves, for example in Tax Year 2018-19, paying slightly more tax (up
to £20 a year) than their equivalents who are resident in Scotland and, therefore,
Scottish taxpayers.
Armed Forces: Wales
Jonathan Edwards: [249932]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what proportion of (a) Royal Navy, (b) Royal
Air Force and (c) army personnel resided in Wales before assuming active service in the
last five years.
Mr Tobias Ellwood:
The requested information is provided in the following table:
Proportion of Welsh Intake to the Untrained Regular Armed Forces, by
Financial Year and Service
FINANCIAL
YEAR 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Royal
Navy/Royal
Marines
3.9% 4.6% 4.9% 4.8% 4.9%
Army 4.1% 5.9% 5.6% 5.4% 5.9%
Royal Air
Force
5.5% 5.6% 5.4% 4.0% 4.9%
Notes:
1) UK Regulars are Full-time Service personnel, including Nursing Services, but
excluding Full Time Reserve Personnel, Gurkhas, mobilised Reservists, Military
Provost Guard Service, Locally Employed Personnel and Non Regular Permanent
Staff.
2) Figures include both Officers and Other Ranks.
3) Figures may include personnel who have joined more than once during the time
period.
4) For Army, figures have been provided based on postcode at the time of
recruitment, with input provided by both Defence Statistics(Army) and Army
Recruiting and Initial Training Command. It was not possible to match the location for
around 8% of Army personnel, some of whom could have resided in Wales.
5) Royal Navy/Royal Marines and Royal Air Force recruits have been interpreted as
those who joined through Welsh Armed Forces Careers Offices.
Electronic Warfare
Stephen McPartland: [249270]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what steps his Department is taking to
increase the effectiveness of the UK’s offensive cyber capabilities.
Mark Lancaster:
The Ministry of Defence works in partnership with the Government Communications
Headquarters to deliver the National Offensive Cyber Programme, harnessing the
expertise of both organisations to establish a world-class offensive cyber capability
delivered through a "Joint Mission" construct.
France: Military Decorations
Emily Thornberry: [250007]
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 22 March 2019 to
Question 234103 on France: Military Decorations, how many surviving British veterans
who fought for the liberation of France during the second world war are waiting (a) to
have their applications to receive the French Legion d'Honneur processed by his
Department and (b) to receive the award of the Legion d'Honneur for which they have
been certified as eligible by his Department.
Mr Tobias Ellwood:
The Ministry of Defence currently has seven applications for the Legion d'Honneur.
There are currently 71 cases for the award being processed by the French
authorities.
DIGITAL, CULTURE, MEDIA AND SPORT
5G
Tom Watson: [249977]
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, whether his
Department has carried out an impact assessment on the effect of banning Huawei
equipment from non-core components of the 5G network on the speed of 5G rollout.
Tom Watson: [249979]
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, whether the
Government plans to change its 5G roll-out targets in light of the reported decision to limit
the use of Huawei equipment in the UK's 5G infrastructure.
Margot James:
The Future Telecoms Infrastructure Review in July 2018 set out the Government’s
strategy for delivering 5G ambitions. The ambitions on 5G are for the UK to become a
world leader in the technology and for the majority of the population to have access to
a 5G signal by 2027.
The terms of reference for the Telecoms Supply Chain Review were published on
gov.uk on 8 November 2018. The decisions of the Review will be announced in due
course and to Parliament.
5G: Rural Areas
Mr Alistair Carmichael: [249242]
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what discussions he
has had with Ofcom on helping to ensure that the next auction of 5G spectrum promotes
coverage of rural communities which might sit beyond mobile operators' roll-out plans.
Margot James:
Ministers and officials have regular discussions with Ofcom on a range of subjects.
We welcome the proposals for coverage obligations within Ofcom’s latest
consultation on the auction of 700 MHz and 3.6-3.8 GHz spectrum and remain
committed to working with Ofcom and the mobile industry to ensure that the
manifesto commitment to provide 95% geographic mobile coverage across the UK is
met.
Broadcasting Programmes
Dr David Drew: [249191]
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, if he will hold
discussions with broadcast media on ensuring balanced coverage of people who claim
benefits.
Margot James:
The government does not influence programming decisions, as broadcasters are
editorially independent of government. Ofcom, as the independent communications
regulator, is responsible for enforcing the Broadcasting Code which sets rules for
licensed broadcasters to follow. This includes a requirement for broadcasters to treat
individuals within programmes fairly, and material facts must not be presented in a
way that is unfair to an individual.
The government is committed to supporting the broadcasting sector to ensure that it
provides for and reflects the whole of the UK population, including individuals from
different socioeconomic backgrounds.
Data Protection
Mrs Anne Main: [249256]
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, how many private
organisations have been found in breach of General Data Protection Regulations by the
Information Commissioner's Office since May 2018.
Mrs Anne Main: [249257]
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, if he will publish (a) a
list of the public bodies and agencies who have been found in breach of the General Data
Protection Regulations since they came into force in May 2018 and (b) details of any
fines that may have been imposed by the Information Commissioner's Office as a result
of any breaches.
Margot James:
The Government takes the protection of personal data and the right to privacy
extremely seriously.
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is the independent regulator for data
protection in the UK and is responsible for regulating compliance with data protection
legislation. The Information Commissioner has the power to serve fines on a data
controller as a result of a data breach. Details of enforcement action, including fines,
are published on the ICO website at www.ico.org.uk/action-weve-taken
National Holocaust Memorial Centre and Learning Service
Sir Edward Leigh: [248586]
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what conditions he
has (a) imposed and (b) indicated an intention to impose on the planned use of part of
Victoria Tower Gardens for the Holocaust Memorial and Learning Centre.
Michael Ellis:
The Government decided to locate the Holocaust Memorial and Learning Centre in
Victoria Tower Gardens so that the view of Parliament from the Memorial will serve
as a permanent reminder of the far-reaching consequences of political decisions. The
development of plans will take proper account of relevant legislation and regulations.
EDUCATION
Children: Protection
Tim Loughton: [249795]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, (a) which and (b) how many safeguarding
boards are currently without a permanent chairperson.
Nadhim Zahawi:
The information requested is not held centrally. Following commencement of
provisions in the Children and Social Work Act 2017, Local Safeguarding Children
Boards are currently being phased out and replaced by safeguarding partners (police,
health and local authority). There is no requirement to have an independent chair of
the new arrangements, which must be in place by September 2019.
Children: Social Services
Angela Rayner: [249317]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what recent assessment he has made of the
financial sustainability of children's services in Northamptonshire.
Nadhim Zahawi:
As was announced to the House on 10 May 2018, my right hon. Friend, the Secretary
of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, has appointed
Commissioners to Northamptonshire County Council. One of their responsibilities is
to oversee financial strategy at the Council. Thanks to their work and that of the new
senior team, the Council finished 2018-19 in credit and has set a balanced budget for
2019-20.
We have also appointed a Children’s Commissioner to work with Northamptonshire
on improving children’s services. The Commissioner’s first report will be published
shortly.
More generally, funding for children’s services is made available through the Local
Government Finance Settlement. We are in the final year of a multi-year settlement
deal and have made £46.4 billion available this year for local services including those
for children’s services.
The government has made an additional £410 million available to local authorities
this year, for adult and children's social care.
The government will continue to work closely with the sector to consider long-term
children’s services funding as part of the Spending Review.
Tim Farron: [249929]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, pursuant to the Answer of 23 April 2019 to
Question 243378 on Children: Social Services, what analysis has been (a) carried out
and (b) commissioned by his Department to estimate the funding needed by local
authorities to meet demand for children’s social care services in each year of the period
covered by the forthcoming Spending Review.
Nadhim Zahawi:
My department is working with the sector, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and
Local Government (MHCLG) and with HM Treasury, as part of our preparation for the
next Spending Review, to understand the level of funding local government needs to
meet demand and deliver statutory duties.
My department is also working closely with MHCLG on the Review of Relative Needs
and Resources to develop a robust, up-to-date approach to funding distribution for
children's services at local government finance settlements.
Children's Play
Steve McCabe: [249200]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether his Department has made an
assessment of the (a) quality, (b) number and (c) adequacy of the content of local
authority play strategies throughout England.
Nadhim Zahawi:
The Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) Statutory Framework sets the regulatory
standards for ‘learning and development’ and ‘safeguarding and welfare’
requirements for all early years providers caring for children from birth to 5. The
framework defines 7 areas of learning and development and is clear that each area
must be implemented through planned, purposeful play and through a mix of adult-
led and child-initiated activity.
The department is not currently reviewing local authority play strategies in England.
The EYFS does not promote a particular pedagogical approach - instead, it is for
individual early years settings to determine how the areas of learning should be
implemented to support children to meet the expected level of development by the
end of the reception year.
Disabled Students' Allowances
Layla Moran: [248764]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether his Department has made an
assessment of the effect of the Disabled Students' Allowance assistive technology
procurement proposal on students with (a) low incidence disabilities and (b) vision
impairment.
Chris Skidmore:
The new arrangements being introduced by the Student Loans Company (SLC) to
procure assistive technology equipment and training for students in receipt of
Disabled Students’ Allowances (DSA) will not affect the level or range of support
available to any student.
The SLC has engaged with groups within the sector to ensure that the procurement
process will ensure that the needs of all students in receipt of DSA can continue to be
met, and over 40 different organisations, including those representing students with
vision impairment, have provided responses to the SLC, which are currently being
considered.
Layla Moran: [248765]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, if he will publish the list of approved
equipment for Disabled Students' Allowance.
Chris Skidmore:
Section 6 of the Student Loans Company’s (SLC) Disabled Students’ Allowances
(DSA) guidance contains advice on the types of equipment that are available to
recipients of these allowances. This is available at:
https://www.practitioners.slc.co.uk/media/1646/1819-guidance-dsa-new-students-
from-ay-201617.pdf.
The SLC maintains a list of assistive technology software products that have
attracted DSA funding, which is available at:
https://www.practitioners.slc.co.uk/media/1457/product-list.pdf.
Erasmus+ Programme
Gordon Marsden: [249844]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether it remains the Government’s policy
to guarantee (a) Erasmus+ bids approved in May 2019 and (b) cover students’ study
costs for the academic year 2020-21 following the extension to the Article 50 process to
October 2019.
Chris Skidmore:
The government guarantee still stands. It will cover the payment of awards to UK
applicants for all successful Erasmus+ bids submitted before the end of 2020 and it
commits to underwrite funding for the entire lifetime of the projects. Successful bids
are ones that are approved directly by the Commission or by the UK National Agency
and ratified by the Commission.
In the event that the UK leaves the EU without a deal, the government will engage
with the European Commission with the aim of securing the UK’s participation in
Erasmus+ until the end of 2020.
If discussions with the European Commission to secure the continued ability of UK
institutions to participate in the programme are unsuccessful, the government will
engage with individual member states and key institutions to seek to ensure that UK
participants can continue with their planned activity as far as possible on a bilateral
basis.
In terms of participation beyond 2020, the UK government has repeatedly made clear
that it values international exchange and collaboration in education and training as
part of its vision for a global Britain.
We are open to exploring participation in the successor scheme to the current
Erasmus+ Programme and we will continue to be involved in discussions about that
programme while we remain in the EU. Ultimately, our participation in that successor
programme is a matter for negotiations to come about our future relationship with the
EU.
The government will need to fully consider the balance between supporting
international mobility and ensuring value for money for the tax payer.
Gordon Marsden: [249896]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what recent discussion (a) he and (b)
Ministers in his Department have had with education sector stakeholders on a potential
domestic alternative to the Erasmus+ Programme.
Chris Skidmore:
We have made clear that we value international exchange and collaboration in
education and training as part of our vision for a global Britain. The White Paper on
the Future Relationship between the UK and the EU proposed that the UK and EU
should continue to give young people and students the chance to benefit from each
other’s world leading universities.
Ministers and I meet with representatives of the education sector regularly to discuss
the Department for Education agenda, and that has included the questions of the
Erasmus+ programme and international mobility more widely.
Ultimately, participation in the future Erasmus+ programme (2021-2027) is a matter
for negotiations to come about our future relationship with the EU and, as is the duty
of a responsible government, we are preparing for a range of potential outcomes.
This includes consideration of domestic alternative options for supporting
international mobility outside Erasmus+. My officials have had observer status on
work done by UK and members of the sector on what form a domestic alternative to
Erasmus+ could take. We are listening to stakeholder views on this issue. Our
stakeholder engagement will be ongoing.
GCE A Level
Ben Bradley: [248071]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, how many and what proportion of pupils who
(a) were and (b) were not eligible for pupil premium in their last year of compulsory
secondary school (i) entered at least one A level, (ii) achieved three or more A-levels, (iii)
achieved grades ABB or better at A level, and (iv) achieved A*A*A or better at A-level in
the last year for which figures are available.
Nick Gibb:
The Department publishes student’s achievements in A levels, in different grade
combinations, split by characteristics. This information is available here:
https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/a-level-and-other-16-to-18-results-2017-to-
2018-revised.
Table 1, attached below uses this data to provide the number[1] of students entering
at least one A level[2] and those who achieved A*/A*/A, A/B/B and E/E/E[3] ,[4],[5] or
better, split by their disadvantaged status[6] at the end of key stage 4. Figures are
based on 2017/18[7] revised data, for students in state-funded schools and colleges.
The Department does not publish estimates of the proportion of key stage 4
disadvantaged pupils who go on to enter and achieve these different A level
combinations by the end of 16-18 study. However, an estimate can be derived by
comparing the published numbers to the size of the disadvantaged and non-
disadvantaged groups from two years previously in 2016. These are shown in table 2,
attached.
[1] The cohort of students is based on those who are eligible for inclusion in the AAB
measure, however this is further restricted (see footnote 2). Inclusion in the AAB
measure refers to those who entered at least one full size A level, excluding applied
A levels (this includes double award A levels, but does not include AS levels, general
studies or critical thinking)). If students are entered for less than three full size A
levels, they are only included in the measure if they have not entered for other
academic, applied general and tech level qualifications greater than or equal to the
size of an A level. Where a student has only been at a provider for one year, they
need to have entered three A levels to be included.
[2] This includes A level entries only (excludes double awards, AS levels and Applied
A levels); it excludes general studies and critical thinking.
[3] Each student's total grades are taken and compared to the requested groupings.
Inclusion in each group occurs when the student has the exact grades, or when three
(or more) of their grades match or are higher than the required grades. Therefore,
students with only 1 or 2 grades are excluded as they do not match or beat all three
required grades. These figures will differ slightly from measures published for all
students nationally, due to this slight methodological difference.
[4] Only includes students with pass grades (A* to E). Discounting has been applied
in line with performance tables methodology
(https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/16-to-19-qualifications-discount-codes-
and-point-scores).
[5] The E/E/E combination identifies those who achieved 3 or more A levels as an E
grade is the lowest passing grade.
[6] Students disadvantaged status is taken from the census recorded completed in
their final year of key stage 4 year study. Students who completed their key stage 4
study in independent schools will not have been included in the census and are
grouped as 'unknown disadvantaged status'.
[7] Based on students who finished their 16 to 18 study in 2017/18. Covers results
achieved during all years of 16-18 study (up to three years, i.e. the 2015/16, 2016/17
and 2017/18 academic years).
Attachments:
1. 248071_Tables [248071_tables_disadvantage_attainment.docx]
Higher Education
Gordon Marsden: [249897]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether postgraduate (a) loans and (b) other
financial assistance will be included in his Department's response to the review of post-18
education.
Chris Skidmore:
The government’s review of post-18 education and funding is looking at how we can
ensure there is choice and competition across a joined-up post-18 education and
training sector. The review’s focus includes how we can encourage learning that is
more flexible (for example, part-time, distance learning and commuter study options)
and complements ongoing government work to support people at different times in
their lives.
The independent panel will report shortly, and the government will then conclude the
overall review later this year. We will not speculate about potential recommendations,
as we do not wish to pre-judge the outcome of the review.
Gordon Marsden: [249898]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what recent discussions his Department has
had with the higher education sector on potential future (a) immigration policies and (b)
student exchange programmes.
Chris Skidmore:
Department officials engage regularly with stakeholders across the higher education
sector, including Universities UK (UUK), the Russell Group, Universities Alliance,
MillionPlus, Guild HE, Independent HE and others, on a wide range of issues
including the future immigration system and student exchange programmes.
We have made clear that we value international exchange and collaboration in
education and training as part of our vision for a global Britain, and are listening to
stakeholder views on this issue. My officials have had observer status on work done
by UUK and members of the sector on what form a domestic alternative to Erasmus+
could take.
The Home Office has initiated an extensive programme of engagement across the
UK on the Immigration White Paper proposals. The Home Office’s Education
Advisory Group will meet regularly throughout the engagement period to capture
views from the education sector and ensure the government designs a future
immigration system that works for the whole of the UK.
Outdoor Education
Paul Farrelly: [249239]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment he has made of the
potential merits of ensuring that the national curriculum includes outdoor learning on the
natural environment.
Nick Gibb:
Outdoor education can play an important role for many subjects in the school
curriculum. It can include cultural trips, environmental and countryside education,
science and geography fieldwork, and visits to museums and heritage sites. For
some subjects such as biology and geography, fieldwork is a part of the national
curriculum and a requirement of GCSE subject content.
In recognition of these benefits, the Government’s 25 Year Environment Plan,
published in January 2018, included £10 million funding from the Department to help
more children from disadvantaged backgrounds to have contact with nature.
The Government does not prescribe how schools should teach or what outdoor
activities they should offer. They have the freedom to plan and deliver curricula that
meet the educational needs and interests of their pupils, provided they meet any
statutory requirements.
Pupils: Per Capita Costs
Helen Jones: [249221]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what estimate he has made of the level of
per pupil funding for each child in (a) primary and (b) secondary education in Warrington
in each year since 2010.
Nick Gibb:
[Holding answer 7 May 2019]: The revenue funding allocated for schools for each
financial year from 2009 to 2019 for Warrington local authority are shown in the
attached table. For financial year 2019/20, only the dedicated schools grant (DSG)
has been allocated at this time, though this makes up the bulk of schools funding.
The DSG for Warrington this year is £166.7 million. Other grants will be allocated at
later points in the year.
Attachments:
1. 249221_Table
[249221_Revenue_amounts_primary_and_secondary_education_Warrington_local_authorit
y.xls]
Special Educational Needs
Stephen McPartland: [249268]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what recent steps his Department has taken
to improve the outcomes of children with special educational needs and disability.
Nadhim Zahawi:
The department is taking steps to ensure every child and young person with special
educational needs and disabilities (SEND) can achieve highly in education, find
employment and lead happy and fulfilled lives.
We have established a SEND System Leadership Board that will focus on improving
how local health, education and social care partners can plan better, commission
strategically and work jointly to provide services and improve outcomes for children
and young people with SEND.
Ofsted and the Care Quality Commission continue to inspect local areas to identify
strengths and weaknesses in relation to children and young people with SEND.
Where there are concerns, the local area is required to produce a Written Statement
of Action. The area will be revisited within 18 months to ensure improvements have
been made.
To support local authorities, we have provided an additional £250 million in high
needs funding up to 2020 on top of the funding increases we had already committed.
This brings the total allocation for high needs in 2019-20 to £6.3 billion and will help
local authorities to manage the significant pressures on their high needs budgets.
Teachers: Females
Janet Daby: [248075]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, if his Department will estimate the cost of
equalising widows’ and children’s pension benefits for female teachers who served prior
to 6 April 1988.
Nick Gibb:
This Department has not made an estimate of the costs of equalising widowers’ and
children’s pension benefits.
As part of the Government’s review of survivor benefits in occupational pension
schemes in 2014, the Government Actuary’s Department estimated the expected
additional cost for public service schemes if scheme benefits were retrospectively
enhanced. The review looked at all survivor benefits, for example those for civil
partners, same-sex married couples and widowers. It was estimated that the total
cost would be in the region of £2.9 billion across the public sector, which equates to
£600 million for the Teachers’ Pension Scheme. Included in the £600 million figure is
an immediate payment in relation to those who are already in receipt of a survivor
pension of approximately £200 million.
Teachers: Pay
Tim Loughton: [249793]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what plans he has to fund the two per cent
pay increase for teachers in 2019-20; and what assessment he has made of the effect of
that pay increase on school budgets.
Nick Gibb:
The School Teachers’ Review Body (STRB) is responsible for reviewing and making
recommendations on teacher pay. The STRB is currently considering the appropriate
pay award for the 2019-20 academic year and is expected to make its
recommendations at the end of May 2019.
In January 2019, the Department submitted written evidence to the STRB. In this it
was noted that a 2% increase in teachers’ pay, in line with forecast inflation, is
affordable nationally within the overall funding available to schools for the 2019/20
financial year.
Alongside this evidence the Department published an assessment of teacher pay
affordability in a schools’ costs technical note. This note provides information on
costs for schools in the financial years 2018/19 and 2019/20, and can be found here
on GOV.UK: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/schools-costs-technical-
note.
It is important to note that the effects of the 2018 pay award will continue to be
supported through the £321 million Teachers’ Pay Grant in 2019/20.
Universities: Finance
Bambos Charalambous: [248752]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether he has made an assessment of the
potential effect of a reduction in per student funding for universities on their ability to
collaborate and partner with local employers; and if he will make a statement.
Bambos Charalambous: [248753]
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, if he will ensure that universities continue to
be sustainably funded to enable them to expand the partnerships they have with local
business and employers as set out in the recent HE business and community interaction
survey by the Higher Education Statistics Agency.
Chris Skidmore:
Business-university collaboration is increasingly important, both in the development
of work-ready, highly skilled graduates, and in contributing to local and regional
economic growth.
My right hon. Friend, the Prime Minister announced a major review of post-18
education and funding that will ensure we have a joined up education system that is
accessible to all and encourages the development of the funding and skills we need
as a country. The independent panel will report shortly. The government will consider
their recommendations, but we remain committed to ensuring that universities are
funded on a sustainable basis.
The government is committed to ensuring that funding is available to support
sustainable collaboration between universities and businesses in local areas and is
supporting this work in a number of ways:
• The Office for Students (OfS), through its Industrial Strategy and Skills Challenge
Competition is funding providers (including in collaboration with employers) to
develop and implement projects to improve outcomes for graduates who seek
employment in their home region. Details of which can be found at:
https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/publications/ofs-challenge-competition-
industrial-strategy-and-skills-support-for-local-students-and-graduates/.
• Similarly, the UK Research and Innovation 'Strength in Places Fund' is a
competitive fund for collaborative bids between research institutions and
businesses to support significant regional growth through research and innovation.
Details can be found at: https://www.ukri.org/funding/funding-
opportunities/strength-in-places-fund/.
• The OfS is providing £20 million for the Institute of Coding which will target a skills
gap in digital skills and involves collaboration between education providers and
industry. This includes working together to create core content and introducing
flexible ways to learn.
• The government also part funds the National Centre for Universities and Business
which promotes, develops and supports university and business collaboration
across the UK.
ENVIRONMENT, FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS
Agriculture and Waste Disposal: Carbon Emissions
Mr Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi: [249917]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what steps he is
taking to reduce emissions in agriculture and waste management.
Dr Thérèse Coffey:
Defra is committed to take action to mitigate climate change and to adapt to its
impact. As the cornerstone of our future agriculture policy, the new Environmental
Land Management (ELM) system will pay public money for the provision of
environmental public goods, including mitigation and adaption to climate change. Our
Clean Growth Strategy (CGS) and 25 Year Environment Plan also set out a range of
specific commitments to reduce emissions from agriculture.
This year we have started to develop a new emissions reduction plan for agriculture,
which will set out our long-term vision for a more productive, low-carbon farming
sector. This policy development will be informed by research, modelling, stakeholder
engagement and feasibility studies. We are establishing a Lowland Agricultural Peat
Taskforce to identify how to protect our peat carbon stores and prevent further
emissions. In addition we are making progress towards our target to plant 11 million
new trees in this parliament and continuing to phase down fluorinated gases.
For waste, the majority of our emissions are in the form of methane generated by
biodegradable waste breaking down anaerobically in landfill. We have made
significant improvements in this area, with emissions from the waste sector falling by
70% since 1990. This is mostly due to the implementation of methane recovery
systems at UK landfill sites, as well as policies such as the landfill tax reducing the
amount of waste disposed of here.
Further improvements will come from policies announced in the recent Resources
and Waste Strategy, which are currently being consulted on. For example, we want to
introduce a consistent set of materials to be collected across local authorities and
municipal businesses, which would include food waste being collected separately.
This is expected to divert a significant amount of biodegradable waste away from
landfill and therefore lead to a reduction in the associated emissions.
Birds: Pest Control
Sir Nicholas Soames: [249792]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment
he has made of the effect on (a) pest control, (b) agriculture and (c) animal welfare of
Natural England’s withdrawal of three General Licences for pest control.
Sir Nicholas Soames: [249796]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what estimate he
has made of the number of people that control pests under the terms of the General
Licence.
Dr Thérèse Coffey:
Defra fully recognises the implications of the withdrawal of these licences for pest
controllers, farmers and gamekeepers. For this reason, the Secretary of State has
taken back decision making powers with respect to the three licences in question.
Defra has initiated a call for evidence in order to better understand the impact of the
withdrawal, which closes on Monday 13 May. Due to the nature of the general
licences, Natural England does not hold records of the numbers of people who rely
on them but it estimates up to 50,000 people may be affected.
Sir Nicholas Soames: [249799]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, whether he met
with the interim Chair of Natural England to discuss the recent withdrawal of General
Licences in England.
Sir Nicholas Soames: [249800]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, whether he has
met the new Chairman of Natural England to discuss the withdrawal of General Licences
in England.
Dr Thérèse Coffey:
The Secretary of State has discussed Natural England’s approach to the withdrawal
of general licences with both Chief Executive Marian Spain and new Chair Tony
Juniper.
Circuses: Wildlife
Sir Christopher Chope: [249841]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, how many wild
animals of each species are currently licensed for use in travelling circuses in England;
and which of those wild animals are classified as dangerous.
Sir Christopher Chope: [249842]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, how many
travelling circuses are currently licensed to use wild animals in England; and how many
licences for such use have been breached in each of the last five years.
David Rutley:
There are currently 19 wild animals licensed by Defra for use by two travelling
circuses in England. The 19 wild animals are 6 Reindeer; 4 Camels; 4 Zebras; 2
Racoons; 1 Fox; 1 Macaw; and 1 Zebu.
Under the Dangerous Wild Animals Act 1976; Camels, Zebra and Reindeer (domestic
Reindeer excepted) are classified as dangerous animals.
In each of the last five complete calendar years the following number of breaches (as
defined as a significant breach of one of the 17 different licensing conditions or
standards assessed at each inspection) were identified in the two licensed circuses:
2014 – 1
2015 – 2
2016 – 0
2017 – 0
2018 – 0
Each licensed circus is inspected at least three times a year, with at least one
inspection being unannounced. Where any breaches were found, the circuses were
required to undertake remedial actions to address the issues identified.
Pesticides: Regulation
Dr David Drew: [249194]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, whether he plans
to set up a new pesticides as a result of the resignation of key members from the
Pesticides Forum and Voluntary Initiative.
Mr Robert Goodwill:
The Pesticides Forum was set up by Government to bring together a range of
organisations with an interest in how pesticides are used and the impact of their use.
It plays a helpful role in supporting the National Action Plan (NAP) for pesticides by
identifying issues and possible solutions across a range of pesticides issues. The
Voluntary Initiative is an industry-led group which has done useful work in developing
and promoting best practice in the use of pesticides. We regret that the Wildlife and
Countryside Link and the Pesticides Action Network UK have decided to withdraw
from these groups, which benefit from having a range of views around the table.
As set out in the 25 Year Environment Plan, the Government will develop its
approach to pesticides, putting Integrated Pest Management at its heart. In doing so
we will continue to reduce the impacts of pesticide use and maintain dialogue with all
those that can help us to make further progress. As part of this process we will review
the NAP and update it as necessary. This will involve public consultation and we
hope that environmental and farming groups will engage actively with this.
Mr Laurence Robertson: [249195]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what steps he is
taking to ensure that future bans on the use of pesticides are based on scientific
research; and if he will make a statement.
Mr Robert Goodwill:
The Government’s priority is to protect people and the environment, and pesticides
are only authorised if scientific evidence shows that they will not harm human health
or have unacceptable effects on the environment.
We carry out a thorough assessment of the scientific evidence, drawing on advice
from scientists in the Health and Safety Executive and the UK Expert Committee on
Pesticides. Regulatory decisions are regularly reviewed so that safety can be
reassessed using the latest data and scientific knowledge.
Decisions on the use of pesticides will continue to be based on a careful scientific
assessment of the risks and we will ensure that the regulation of pesticides continues
to be robust and fit for purpose as our scientific knowledge develops.
Pigeons
Sir Nicholas Soames: [249797]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what information
his Department holds on the (a) value and (b) amount of the agricultural damage done by
wood pigeons in England.
Dr Thérèse Coffey:
The current costs of woodpigeon damage to the individual grower sectors are not
known.
A 2014 estimate of woodpigeon damage to the overall UK oilseed rape crop was
approximately £2 million for a ‘low impact’ year (2% of national crop severely
damaged) and approximately £5 million for a ‘high impact’ year (5% of national crop
severely damaged). This is based on an average loss of £131 per hectare for
severely damaged crop. These figures were presented at a National Farmers Union
bird deterrent event held in December 2014.
We do not have figures or estimates for damage overall to other UK crops. However,
a small scale consultation in 2014 with growers produced estimates of economic loss
associated with woodpigeon crop damage ranging from £125 per hectare for oilseed
rape to £250 per hectare for peas and £330-£1,250 per hectare for brassicas. It
should be noted that general estimates were often broad, lacked detail or in some
cases were not provided.
Sir Nicholas Soames: [249798]
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment
he has made of trends in the number of woodpigeons in England.
Dr Thérèse Coffey:
The Breeding Birds Survey 2017 estimates that the number of woodpigeons in
England has increased by 39% from 1995 to 2017.
EXITING THE EUROPEAN UNION
Department for Exiting the European Union: Emerdata
Deidre Brock: [250042]
To ask the Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, whether (a) his
Department, (b) his Department's agencies and (c) his Department's associated public
bodies have entered into contracts with Emerdata Limited in the last year.
Kwasi Kwarteng:
No contracts have been entered into with Emerdata Limited in the last year.
FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH OFFICE
Democracy and Human Rights: Annual Reports
Ann Clwyd: [249853]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, when his
Department plans to publish the next annual Human Rights and Democracy report.
Mark Field:
The 2018 Human Rights and Democracy report is due to be published in early June
2019.
Firearms: Regulation
Mr Jim Cunningham: [249835]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what steps he is
taking to promote stronger gun control laws throughout the world.
Sir Alan Duncan:
Domestic gun laws elsewhere are a matter for those respective countries.
Foreign and Commonwealth Office: Emerdata
Deidre Brock: [250036]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, whether (a) his
Department, (b) his Department's agencies and (c) his Department's associated public
bodies have entered into contracts with Emerdata Limited in the last year.
Sir Alan Duncan:
The Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) has not entered into any contracts
with Emerdata Limited.
Information relating to FCO Executive Agencies and public bodies is not held
centrally and therefore not readily available.
Iraq: Islamic State
Mr Jim Cunningham: [249837]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what steps his
Department is taking to ensure that children born under Isis in Iraq are formally
recognised.
Mark Field:
Children born under Daesh in Iraq remain particularly vulnerable and present
significant protection challenges. We continue to raise with the Iraqi authorities the
importance of formal recognition of children born under Daesh. We welcome the
steps recently taken by the Iraqi government to address the specific problem of the
legal status of children born to Yezidi survivors as a result of sexual violence.
Libya: Undocumented Migrants
Dan Carden: [248761]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, if his Department
will support search and rescue operations in the Mediterranean for people trying to flee
Libya.
Sir Alan Duncan:
The UK Government currently supports the EU's Operation Sophia through the
provision of staff to its Operational Headquarters, although Operation Sophia's naval
operations are currently suspended. There is no evidence of an increase in the
volumes of migrants seeking to cross the central Mediterranean from Libya to
Europe. However, we are monitoring this situation closely. The UK Government
continues to call on all parties to the conflict in Libya to commit to a ceasefire, ensure
humanitarian access to aid the voluntary evacuation of civilians, and a return to the
political process.
Malaysia: Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs
Martyn Day: [249957]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what assessment
he has made of the validity of reports that the British High Commission in Malaysia
provided financial support to the Kuala Lumpur think tank Institute for Democracy and
Economic Affairs while that institute argued against tobacco control legislation, including
tobacco taxes and plain packaging.
Mark Field:
The British High Commission in Kuala Lumpur has, in the past, commissioned the
Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs (IDEAS) to undertake projects that
support the UK’s prosperity, economic and political agenda in Malaysia. These
projects were delivered between 2013 and 2017 and were not associated in any way
with the promotion of tobacco products. The Government takes very seriously its
obligations as a Party to the World Health Organization’s Framework Convention on
Tobacco Control. HMG in Malaysia has not co-financed or partnered in any way with
tobacco companies whether through our Prosperity or Global Britain Funds.
Foreign and Commonwealth Office-led programmes follow the standards set out by
Her Majesty's Treasury. They receive robust scrutiny to ensure that all spend
represents value for money for UK taxpayers and advances the UN’s sustainable
development goals and our foreign policy objectives.
Tobacco
Martyn Day: [249959]
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what steps he is
taking to ensure that officials of his Department comply with his Department's guidance
on support in relation to the tobacco industry; and whether overseas diplomatic staff of
his Department have met with representatives of the tobacco industry.
Mark Field:
The Government takes very seriously its obligations as a Party to the World Health
Organization's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC). This includes the
treaty commitment at Article 5.3 to protect public health policies with respect to
tobacco control from commercial and other vested interests of the tobacco industry.
The FCTC does not prohibit meetings with representatives of the tobacco industry but
the Foreign and Commonwealth Office issues guidance annually to all staff on
limiting support to the tobacco industry to ensure FCTC compliance. We do not hold
a central record of staff meetings with third parties.
HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE
Cancer
Paul Farrelly: [249893]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, with reference to the recent
MacMillan Cancer Support Survey, what steps is he taking to ensure that there is
adequate care and support from health or social services for cancer patients during their
treatment.
Seema Kennedy:
The National Health Service Long Term Plan published in January 2019 set out that
by 2021, where appropriate, every person diagnosed with cancer will have access to
personalised care, including needs assessment, a care plan and health and wellbeing
information and support. This will be delivered in line with the NHS Comprehensive
Model for Personalised Care. This will empower people to manage their care and the
impact of their cancer, and maximise the potential of digital and community-based
support. Over the next three years every patient with cancer will get a full assessment
of their needs, an individual care plan and information and support for their wider
health and wellbeing. All patients, including those with secondary cancers, will have
access to the right expertise and support, including a Clinical Nurse Specialist or
other support worker.
Cancer: Drugs
Mr Clive Betts: [R] [249828]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, pursuant to the Answer of 25
April 2019 to Question 245610, how many forms of cancer have no maintenance drug
available at any stage in the treatment plan.
Seema Kennedy:
The information requested is not available.
Cannabis: Medical Treatments
Sir Mike Penning: [248610]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what the timeframe is for the
process evaluation being undertaken by the NHS on prescribing cannabis-based
products for medical use; and if he will he make a statement.
Sir Mike Penning: [248611]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, who he will be engaging with in
the process evaluation on prescribing cannabis-based products for medical use.
Seema Kennedy:
NHS England has been asked to provide an interim report to the Secretary of State
for Health and Social Care by the end of May 2019. The review will be clinically led
by the NHS England and NHS Improvement Medical Director and Chief
Pharmaceutical Officer, drawing on further specialist support as required.
NHS England will work with patient groups and the All Party Parliamentary Group on
Medical Cannabis under Prescription to identify a sample of patients that have been
seeking to access cannabis-based products for medicinal use through the National
Health Service. Case reviews will involve interviews with relevant individuals who are
involved in the decision to prescribe cannabis-based products for medicinal use,
including patients, carers and relevant trust staff.
Sir Mike Penning: [248612]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how the National Institute for
Health Research will identify patients with severe intractable epilepsy to use as a placebo
in research into the safety and clinical efficacy and effectiveness of cannabis-based
products for medical use in humans.
Seema Kennedy:
To stimulate research proposals, the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
has issued two calls for research into cannabis-based products for medicinal use and
has taken steps to advertise the call to all manufacturers interested in supplying the
United Kingdom market.
The NIHR also remain open to the submission of proposals outside of these specific
calls. Proposals made to NIHR are assessed for scientific rigour, which will include
the design of the trials, before funding is allocated to the applicants.
The process for selecting people for inclusion in any trials will be determined by the
researchers and will be dependent on the study design used in the trial.
European Reference Networks
Catherine West: [248746]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assurances he has (a)
sought and (b) received from the European Commission that the UK will be allowed to
continue to participate in European Reference Networks in the event that the UK leaves
the EU without a deal.
Caroline Dinenage:
The Government remains focused on ensuring our smooth and orderly withdrawal
from the European Union with a deal as soon as possible. The United Kingdom would
like to explore participation in European Reference Networks beyond 2020 as part of
detailed negotiations on our future relationship. However, in the event of no-deal,
current EU legislation states that only EU and European Economic Area Member
States are permitted to participate in the European Reference Networks. The UK is
considering potential alternatives to participation in the European Reference
Networks as part of no deal preparations.
Four Seasons Health Care: Insolvency
John Spellar: [249829]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what contingency plans his
Department has made for the maintenance of the provision of services as a result of Four
Seasons Care Homes going into administration.
Caroline Dinenage:
The Department and the Care Quality Commission (CQC) have been and will
continue to monitor the administration and sales process of Four Seasons Health
Care Group closely over the coming weeks and months. There will be no immediate
impact on people receiving care from Four Seasons Healthcare Group, nor the
company’s 22,000 employees.
The CQC’s Market Oversight regulatory responsibility is to advise local authorities if
they believe that there will be likely service cessation as a result of business failure.
They have been monitoring the company’s position and will continue to do so until the
sale is completed. They are clear that there is no risk to continuity of care at this time.
The Care Act 2014 places duties on local authorities to intervene to protect
individuals where their care provider is no longer able to carry on because of
business failure. There should never be a gap in the care that an individual receives.
Departmental officials are working closely with the CQC, the Local Government
Association, the Association of Directors of Adult Social Services, NHS England and
Four Seasons Healthcare Group to ensure that individuals’ care and support needs
continue to be met.
Ms Angela Eagle: [249858]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment he has made
of the effect on NHS Trusts of the announcement that Four Seasons Healthcare has
gone into administration; and if he will make a statement.
Caroline Dinenage:
There has been no reported impact on NHS services. NHS England and NHS
Improvement have been working closely with Four Seasons Health Care and other
organisations to ensure the continued running of services and have established a
reporting system for the National Health Service to report any concerns. To date, no
concerns have been reported, but NHS England and NHS Improvement will continue
to monitor the situation.
Ms Angela Eagle: [249859]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department took
to monitor the financial viability of Four Seasons Healthcare before that company entered
administration; and whether NHS contracts were awarded to that company after financial
health warnings were issued; and if he will make a statement.
Caroline Dinenage:
Four Seasons Health Care Group has been going through financial restructuring
negotiations since December 2017. The announcement that the Group will be
entering an independent sales process, facilitated by the appointment of
administrators to the business’ two debt holding companies, marks the next stage in
what has been a complex and protracted process. At no point in this process were
warnings regarding the financial health of the company issued. The administration
appointment and planned sales process will bring greater certainty to those in care,
their families, and the 22,000 people employed by the company.
The Care Quality Commission’s Market Oversight regulatory responsibility is to
advise local authorities if they believe that there will be likely service cessation as a
result of business failure. They have been monitoring the company’s position and will
continue to do so until the sale is completed. They are clear that there is no risk to
continuity of care at this time.
Details of individual contracts held by local National Health Service organisations with
private providers are not held centrally. It is the responsibility of the local NHS to
check the financial viability of their service providers.
A Written Ministerial Statement ( HCWS1532 ) on the position of Four Seasons
Healthcare Group was laid before the House on Wednesday 1 May 2019.
Health Services: Immigrants
Mrs Sharon Hodgson: [248607]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment his
Department has made of the implications for his policies of the conclusions of the
Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration’s report: An Inspection of the
Home Office Borders, Immigration and Citizenship System’s policies and practices
relating to charging and fees.
Stephen Hammond:
The Department will consider the implications of the Independent Chief Inspector of
Borders and Immigration’s report: ‘An Inspection of the Home Office Borders,
Immigration and Citizenship Systems’ as part of its ongoing commitment to keep the
charging regulations under review and will take any action it deems necessary.
Mrs Sharon Hodgson: [248608]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if he will make an assessment
of the (a) equity and (b) effectiveness of the immigration health surcharge.
Mrs Sharon Hodgson: [248609]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether he has made an
assessment of the potential merits of exempting doctors from the immigration health
surcharge; and if he will make a statement.
Stephen Hammond:
The immigration health surcharge applies to non-European Economic Area nationals
subject to immigration control coming to live, work and study in the United Kingdom
and is payable as part of their visa application. The surcharge provides
comprehensive access to NHS services regardless of the amount of care needed
during a person’s time in the UK, and includes treatment for pre-existing conditions.
This represents excellent value when compared to the alternatives and ensures that
individuals do not need to worry about insurance or pay for unexpected treatment
whilst they are here. The surcharge also reduces the administrative burden on the
NHS frontline associated with identifying chargeable patients and recovering charges.
Whilst the Government fully recognises the contribution that international
professionals make to the UK and to our health service, it is only right that all those
who come to the UK to live, work and study should contribute to the running of the
NHS.
Hospitals: Construction
Mark Menzies: [248655]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what major hospital
redevelopments are planned in the next 24 months; and whether those redevelopments
include the centralisation of acute hospital sites.
Stephen Hammond:
The following table shows a list of major hospital redevelopments that have confirmed
capital funding from the sustainability and transformation partnership programme and
other funding sources.
LEAD ORGANISATION SCHEME
TOTAL SCHEME VALUE £
MILLION
Under Construction
Brighton and Sussex
University Hospitals NHS Trust
3Ts Scheme - three-phase
building works to deliver a
Regional Centre for Teaching,
Trauma and Tertiary Care.
484
Royal Liverpool and A new hospital development to 450
LEAD ORGANISATION SCHEME
TOTAL SCHEME VALUE £
MILLION
Broadgreen University
Hospitals NHS Trust
deliver more care outside
hospital, whilst ensuring a
world class facility for urgent
and specialist treatment.
Sandwell and West
Birmingham Hospitals NHS
Trust
Midland Metropolitan Hospital -
new acute hospital at Grove
Lane, Smethwick site and
community facilities.
340
Subject to business case approval
Shrewsbury and Telford
Hospital NHS Trust
Sustainable Services Project. 312
Poole Hospital NHS
Foundation Trust and The
Royal Bournemouth and
Christchurch Hospitals NHS
Foundation Trust
One Acute Network – Acute
Reconfiguration in Dorset
147
MSB Hospital Group Reconfiguration of hospital
services at the Mid-and-South
Essex Acute Hospitals
118
Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS
Foundation Trust
Project Oriel - a new eye care,
research and education facility
344
Calderdale and Huddersfield
NHS Foundation Trust
Reconfiguration of hospital
services
196.5
Cambridge University
Hospitals NHS Foundation
Trust
Cambridge Children’s Hospital Up to £100 million
With regard to the centralisation of acute hospital sites, NHS England guidance on
service change is clear that schemes should not progress to consultation without
explicit support from NHS Improvement and NHS England.
This evidence is available at the following link:
https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/planning-assuring-
delivering-service-change-v6-1.pdf
NHS: Capital Investment
Mark Menzies: [248653]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether he plans in the 2019
spending review to allocate funding to provide for the work required on NHS critical
infrastructure; and if he will make a statement.
Stephen Hammond:
The Spending Review, which is expected to be later this year, will set future years
capital budgets. This will consider the case and options for capital investment in the
National Health Service, including in supporting and maintaining critical infrastructure
in the NHS.
The majority of NHS capital assets are owned by individual NHS trusts and NHS
foundation trusts, who in aggregate make capital investments of around £3 billion
annually. NHS planning guidance for 2019-20 has been clear that local organisations
should set out how their proposed capital investments are consistent with their clinical
strategies and how they demonstrate the delivery of safe, productive services that are
affordable to the organisation.
NHS: Lancashire
Mark Menzies: [248654]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many and what type of
NHS positions were vacant in Lancashire as of 31 March 2019.
Stephen Hammond:
The data is not available in the format requested.
The number of National Health Service vacancies in England as at 31 March 2019
will become available on 30 May 2019, when NHS Improvement and NHS Digital are
due to produce a joint vacancy statistics report.
Obesity: Children
Frank Field: [249880]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he plans to take to
promote the child-obesity strategy developed by Leeds City Council to improve levels of
nutrition among children from disadvantaged households in other areas of the UK.
Seema Kennedy:
Through ‘Childhood obesity: a plan for action, Chapter 2’, we are delivering a
Trailblazer Programme in partnership with the Local Government Association and
Public Health England, working with local authorities to address childhood obesity at
local level.
The programme has a strong focus on inequalities and ethnic disparities in childhood
obesity and in the next phase that begins this spring, the Trailblazer Programme will
support five local authorities with £100,000 a year in funding to take innovative action
to address these issues in their community.
Brilliant, innovative projects are already taking place across the country, and we will
look closely at what has worked in Leeds, and with our Trailblazer councils to
consider what more the Government can do to enable ambitious local action.
Pathology
Helen Hayes: [250023]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment his
Department has made of the effect of pathology networks on (a) patient care and (b) NHS
England’s finances.
Stephen Hammond:
By 2021, all pathology services across England will be part of a pathology network.
Pathology networks will mean quicker test turnaround times, improved access to
more complex tests at a lower overall cost and better career opportunities for
healthcare scientists and clinicians. This will improve the quality of the service offered
to patients and benefit patient care. NHS Improvement estimates have suggested a
single network is predicting to make savings of £26 million during the next five years,
while others forecasting their average cost per test drop by a fifth, and overall the
National Health Service hopes to save £200 million through the project by 2021.
Pathology: Greater London
Helen Hayes: [250021]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what plans his Department and
NHS England have to consult with the public on (a) plans to merge pathology services in
South East London hospitals into a single network and (b) plans to tender that contract to
private companies.
Stephen Hammond:
The South East London pathology network will reduce costs and boost quality of
pathology service provision through collaboration and networking. This is part of a
national strategy to network all National Health Service pathology services in
England, due to the significant benefits identified in the 2016 Carter review.
Due to the significant benefits to quality and cost of service, all NHS trusts are
expected to network as per the direction set out by NHS Improvement in September
2017. NHS Improvement has set out guidance that includes a range of acceptable
operating models for networks, including enabling them to work with any qualified
provider. It is for individual Trust boards to assess and select the model that best
serves their patients and that organisation. Informing this decision, NHS
organisations have policies to ensure consultation around change with the community
that they serve. The decision about consultation in this instance will sit with the South
East London hospitals involved. Neither the Department or NHS England have plans
to consult on this specific network.
Helen Hayes: [250022]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if he will publish any (a) impact
and (b) risk assessments his Department has carried out on the proposed pathology
network for South East London NHS Trusts and Foundation Trusts.
Stephen Hammond:
The South East London pathology network will reduce costs and boost quality of
pathology service provision through collaboration and networking. This is part of a
national strategy to network all National Health Service pathology services in
England, due to the significant benefits identified in the 2016 Carter review.
All trusts involved in pathology network creation will need to submit clear business
cases to support any proposed changes. NHS Improvement and the Department will
review these cases with subject matter experts, to ensure changes will be of benefit
to the NHS and deliver the services that patients expect and need. These business
cases will contain commercially sensitive information and so will not be made public.
Pathology: Private Sector
Helen Hayes: [250020]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what plans his Department has
to ensure pathology service standards are protected in the event of a successful private
bidder experiencing financial or leadership difficulties.
Stephen Hammond:
As part of the pathology networking programme, NHS Improvement has issued a
number of toolkits and guidance documents to support the clinical and commercial
relationships that trusts enter into, whether they are between public sector
organisations or with commercial organisations. This guidance has been drawn from
lessons learnt by the sector from successful and unsuccessful networking
programmes across England. It will be expected that all hospital trusts ensure
adequate performance and review policies and commercial contract terms to provide
assurance that the provider will take action in the event of any difficulty.
In addition to this, NHS Improvement will be reissuing the Pathology Quality
Assurance Dashboard (PQAD) (as recommended following the 2012 Barnes review
into the King's Mill quality failure). This dashboard, aimed toward trust executives and
boards, seeks to demonstrate the clinical, operational and commercial performance.
The National Pathology Optimisation and Delivery Group is the oversight board for
the pathology networking programme and includes members of the pathology
community, arm’s length bodies and commissioners. It will be developing a
governance role to ensure the network formation and PQAD are fit for purpose to
enable individual trusts to identify issues early and in advance of them impacting
upon patient care.
Preventive Medicine
Dr Sarah Wollaston: [248665]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, with reference to the Prevention
is better than cure vision published by his Department in November 2018, whether the
forthcoming prevention Green Paper will include oral health.
Seema Kennedy:
We are considering a number of policy options for the prevention green paper and
will be mindful of oral health opportunities.
Chris Ruane: [249892]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, when he plans to publish the
prevention is better than a cure Green Paper; and whether that Green Paper will include
provisions to improve vaccination rates in the UK.
Seema Kennedy:
Last November, we published ‘Prevention is Better than Cure’; the Government vision
on prevention. This set out a clear Government position on why prevention matters,
and the role we all have to play in living healthier, happier lives. This year, we will
publish a prevention Green Paper, setting out our plans in greater detail; drawing
from evidence on the main causes of ill-health and disability.
Rare Diseases: Medical Treatments
Catherine West: [248747]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he has taken to
ensure that the UK will (a) be able to continue to participate in European Reference
Networks and (b) co-operate with the EU on the development of rare disease care and
treatment in the event that the UK leaves the EU without a deal.
Caroline Dinenage:
In the July 2018 white paper ‘The future relationship between the United Kingdom
and the European Union’, the Government set out its aim to explore continued
participation in European Reference Networks as part of a future agreement on
science and innovation. The European Commission have shown that they recognise
the significant expertise of UK clinicians. Both sides appreciate the importance of
maintaining UK participation. The UK and the EU have a long track record of jointly
tackling global challenges with strong existing links between our research and
innovation communities. The Government wants to continue the joint EU and UK
benefit realised from this shared collaboration on research and innovation.
Social Services
Mr Steve Reed: [248692]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether local authorities have a
duty to identify the role of companion animals in an individual’s care and support plan and
needs assessment.
Mr Steve Reed: [248694]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether getting a cat as a pet is
recommended to individuals as part of their individual care and support plan.
Mr Steve Reed: [248695]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether an individual in receipt
of a personal budget as part of a care and support plan can allocate funds from that
budget to funding care for their pets.
Caroline Dinenage:
Personal budgets (particularly direct payments) are designed to be used flexibly and
innovatively and so there should be no unreasonable restriction placed on the use of
the payment, as long as it is being used to meet eligible care and support needs in
line with the care and support plan agreed between those requiring care and their
local team which includes healthcare professionals. The local authority then has a
duty to ensure that their care meets the needs of the eligible person, and to continue
to oversee that care to ensure it addresses the identified needs.
The Department does not make specific recommendations on what should be
included in care and support plans, nor do we require local authorities to identify the
role of companion animals. Instead, there are exclusions listed within the regulations.
Taking this into account, it is the responsibility of clinicians and local teams, in co-
operation with patients, their families and carers, to determine what will be included in
the care and support plan.
Vaccination: Disinformation
Chris Ruane: [249890]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what recent discussions he has
had with the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport on the sharing of
misinformation about vaccines on digital and social media platforms.
Seema Kennedy:
We take the matter of misinformation about vaccines very seriously. That is why we
are working with the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport and media
companies, as outlined in the Online Harms White Paper, as part of wider work in
challenging online misinformation
Chris Ruane: [249891]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department is
taking to tackle the misinformation on vaccination on digital and social media platforms.
Seema Kennedy:
I refer the hon. Member to the answer given to the hon. Member for Romford
(Andrew Rosindell MP) on 26 March 2019 Question 233488.
We want to ensure that parents have the right information when making important
choices such as vaccinations for their children – as well as for people of all ages
eligible for vaccines against diseases such as meningitis and shingles. The
Department is working with Public Health England to help remind people about the
dreadful diseases vaccines protect against.
We have also been in discussion with major social media companies such as
Facebook, Twitter and Instagram about the issue of misinformation and proliferation
of harmful content and its impact on people’s mental health, holding a summit on
Monday 28 April, where vaccines were also raised. We intend to follow this with
another meeting in the summer.
WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control
Martyn Day: [249956]
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department is
taking to support the FCTC 2030 group of countries implement the provisions of the
World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control relating to the
tobacco track and trace system.
Seema Kennedy:
The World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO
FCTC) is delivering the FCTC 2030 project, including supporting fifteen low and
middle-income countries to accelerate the implementation of the WHO FCTC.
Implementation of the Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products,
including tobacco track and trace systems, is not a specific area of focus for the
FCTC 2030 project. However, several FCTC 2030 countries have joined the Protocol.
The Secretariat of the WHO FCTC is encouraging all countries that are Parties to the
WHO FCTC to also join the Protocol.
HOME OFFICE
Animal Experiments
Paul Farrelly: [249864]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what progress his Department is
making on reducing the use of animals in experiments and replacing such experiments
with machine learning.
Mr Ben Wallace:
The Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 requires project licence holders to
ensure that their programme of work does not involve any regulated procedures for
which there is a scientifically satisfactory alternative method or testing strategy that
does not entail the use of a protected animal.
The government is committed to the replacement, reduction, and refinement of the
use of animals in research - the ‘3Rs’. Implementing the 3Rs requires that, in every
research proposal, animals are replaced with non-animal alternatives wherever
possible; that the number of animals is reduced to the minimum needed to achieve
the results sought; and that, for those animals which must be used, procedures are
refined as much as possible to minimise their suffering.
Asylum: Dublin Regulations
Jessica Morden: [249253]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many cases remain
outstanding in the Third Country Unit in her Department.
Jessica Morden: [249254]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what the (a) average length of
time and (b) current longest time is for cases awaiting consideration by the Third Country
Unit
Caroline Nokes:
The Home Office is unable to report on how many cases remain outstanding,
average length of time and current longest time for cases awaiting consideration by
the Third Country Unit as this information is not held electronically in a reportable
format.
Asylum: Glasgow
Mr Paul Sweeney: [249938]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether Mears Group plans to
rule out the use of lock-change evictions when it commences the contract for providing
housing for asylum seekers in Glasgow in September 2019.
Caroline Nokes:
Asylum seekers who would otherwise be destitute are provided with free, furnished
accommodation whilst their asylum claim is under consideration. Where they are
granted leave to remain they are free to live and work in the United Kingdom.
Those who have been unsuccessful in their asylum claim and do not have leave to
remain in the UK are no longer entitled to asylum accommodation and should take
steps to leave the UK. UKVI will continue to work with Serco, Mears and Glasgow
City Council to ensure that those with no right to be in the UK leave their
accommodation in a safe and secure way and that they are provided with the
necessary support and advice to make an informed decision about their future.
Cars: Theft
David Simpson: [248627]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many cars were reported
stolen in the last two years.
Mr Nick Hurd:
The Home Office does not hold data specifically on the number of cars that were
reported stolen. However, information about all stolen vehicles recorded by police in
the last 2 years is available and have been released in the Police Recorded Crime
Open Data tables, which can be found here:
https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/police-recorded-crime-open-data-tables
Cash Dispensing: Theft
David Simpson: [248626]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps is his Department
taking to tackle gangs using diggers to rip out ATM machines from rural shops.
Victoria Atkins:
Justice and policing is devolved to Northern Ireland and Scotland and policing
priorities are determined by these areas.
Across England and Wales, the Government has ensured that, through the election
of Police and Crime Commissioners (PCCs), communities have a strong voice in
determining how police resources are allocated to tackle the crimes that matter most
to them, including those in rural areas. Chief Constables and PCCs are responsible
for setting priorities in tackling crime in their areas.
The Government is determined to prevent and defend against serious and organised
crime. Our new strategy, published in November 2018, sets out how we will mobilise
the full force of the state and align our collective efforts.
Fire and Rescue Services: Suicide
Luke Pollard: [248772]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what information his Department
holds on the number of fire fighters who have taken their own lives in each of the last ten
years.
Mr Nick Hurd:
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) publishes suicide statistics for the UK for
each calendar year. The latest available figures were published by ONS in
September 2018 and covered calendar years up to 2017[1].
Table 1 below provides the number of deaths caused by suicide in firefighters of a
working age (20-64 years old) based on information attained on the death certificate.
Please note, data on firefighters in managerial roles has also been provided but this
category also includes senior officers in ambulance, prison and related services.
YEAR FIRE SERVICE OFFICERS
SENIOR OFFICERS IN FIRE,
AMBULANCE, PRISON AND
RELATED SERVICES
2008 6 0
2009 5 2
2010 3 1
YEAR FIRE SERVICE OFFICERS
SENIOR OFFICERS IN FIRE,
AMBULANCE, PRISON AND
RELATED SERVICES
2011 9 0
2012 3 0
2013 7 3
2014 9 2
2015 10 0
2016 6 0
2017 5 0
Source: Office for National Statistics
Box 1. International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes
used to define suicide
ICD-10 CODES DESCRIPTION
X60-X84 Intentional self-harm
Table 1: Deaths caused by suicide in fire service officers and senior officers in
fire, ambulance, prison and related services, aged 20 to 64 years, England and
Wales, deaths registered 2008 to 2017 [2] , [3], [4], [5], [6]
[1]
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/d
eaths/bulletins/suicidesintheunitedkingdom/2017registrations
[2]Cause of death was defined using the International Classification of Diseases,
Tenth Revision (ICD-10). This includes all deaths from intentional self-harm for
persons aged 10 years and over, and deaths where the intent was undetermined for
those aged 15 years and over. The ICD codes used to select the deaths are show in
Box 1.
[3]Figures are for those aged 20 to 64 years based on usual working age. However,
information from the death certificate does not ascertain if the individual was actively
in work or retired.
[4]Figures for England and Wales include the deaths of non-residents.
[5]Figures are for deaths registered, rather than deaths occurring in each calendar
year. Due to the length of time it takes to complete a coroner’s inquest, it can take
months or even years for a suicide to be registered. More details can be found in the
‘Suicides in the UK’ statistical bulletin.
[6]Occupations defined using the Standard Occupation Classification (v.2010). 'Fire
service officers' are defined by SOC code 3313 and 'Senior officers in fire, ambulance
and prison related services' are defined by SOC code 1173. For information on the
classification hierarchy, follow the link below:
Information on the Standard Occupation Classification
Genocide: Rwanda
Stephen Morgan: [249920]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what recent steps he has taken
to (a) apprehend and (b) bring to justice people living in the UK who took part in the
Rwandan genocide between April and July 1994.
Mr Nick Hurd:
The Government is committed to upholding international law and holding those who
commit the most serious crimes accountable for their actions.
Apprehending and bringing to justice those suspected of crimes is a matter for the
police and courts.
Extradition requests from Rwanda for five people accused of involvement in the
genocide were refused by the courts in July 2017. These individuals are currently
under investigation. Any decision to bring charges under UK law will be a matter for
the CPS following the investigation.
The Government has published guidance to clarify the role of prosecutors and the
police on the investigation and prosecution of crimes of universal jurisdiction.
The Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) War Crimes Unit is a dedicated specialist unit
which investigates and prosecutes people living in the UK suspected of committing
war crimes and crimes against humanity in line with universal jurisdiction and the
CPS Counter Terrorism Division has the responsibility for prosecuting such crimes.
Hoaxes and False Alarms
David Simpson: [248629]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps his Department is
taking to tackle prank calls made to the emergency services.
Mr Nick Hurd:
The handling of 999 calls is an operational matter for the police and fire and rescue
services. It is for Chief Constables, elected Police Crime Commissioners and Police,
Fire and Crime Commissioner and Fire and Rescue Services and Authorities to
decide how best to manage their communications and response to the public.
Offensive Weapons: Arrests
David Simpson: [248628]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many people were arrested
for carrying a dangerous weapon in 2018.
Mr Nick Hurd:
The Home Office collects and publishes data on the number of arrests at the offence
group level, including ‘possession of offensive weapons’ offences.
Data on the number of arrests for ‘possession of offensive weapons’ are published
annually, on a financial year basis, in the ‘Police Powers and Procedures, England
and Wales’ statistical bulletin. The latest data, covering the period up to March 2018,
can be accessed here: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/police-powers-and-
procedures-england-and-wales-year-ending-31-march-2018
Police: Football
Stephanie Peacock: [248750]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what estimate he has made of
the overall cost to the police service of policing football matches in each of the last three
years.
Stephanie Peacock: [248751]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what financial support his
Department provides to police forces for the policing of football matches.
Mr Nick Hurd:
The 2019/20 police funding settlement provides the biggest increase in police funding
since 2010. Total police funding is increasing by over £1 billion in 2019/20 compared
with last year including council tax and funding to tackle serious violence.
Event organisers are responsible for the safety and security of their events, but they
are able to request ‘Special Police Services’ from the relevant police force, which the
force can charge for. Police forces estimate that it costs around £48m to police
football matches in England and Wales.
The Home Office UK Football Policing Unit will provide additional funding of up to
£521,000 in 2019/20 to support local police operations gathering evidence and
obtaining preventative football banning orders against individuals involved in violence
or disorder in connection with football matches.
Police: Pensions
Tim Farron: [249999]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what estimate his Department
has made of the cost of paying pensions to police widows and widowers for life in the
event of their re-marriage or co-habitation.
Tim Farron: [250000]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many widows and widowers
of police officers in England and Wales whose spouses were killed on duty or as a result
of injuries sustained on duty have had their pensions revoked as a result of their
remarriage or cohabitation before 1 April 2015.
Mr Nick Hurd:
The Home Office has estimated with the Government Actuary’s Department that the
cost of retaining benefits for all police survivors would increase the police scheme
liabilities by around £144m. It is estimated that retaining benefits for all police
survivors, including reinstatement of pensions already surrendered, would increase
the police scheme liabilities by around £198m.
The Home Office does not hold information on the number of survivors’ pensions
surrendered on remarriage or cohabitation, as police pensions are administered at
police force level by the relevant Police Pension Authority.
Police: Suicide
Luke Pollard: [248770]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what information his Department
holds on the number of police officers who have taken their own lives in each of the last
ten years.
Luke Pollard: [248771]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many police forces hold
statistics on the number of (a) police officers, (b) police community support officers and
(c) police staff taking their own lives.
Luke Pollard: [248773]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether his Department has
issued guidance to police forces on the collection of statistics on the number of police
officers taking their own lives; and if he will make a statement.
Mr Nick Hurd:
The Home Office does not centrally hold the information requested.
The Office for National Statistics publish data on suicide by occupation in England.
The latest release can be found here:
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/d
eaths/datasets/suicidebyoccupationenglandsupplementarydatatables
The Home Office has not issued any guidance to police forces on the collection of
statistics on the number of police officers taking their own lives.
Religious Buildings: Security
Catherine West: [248748]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, with reference to the recent
shooting at the San Diego synagogue, what urgent steps he is taking to provide
additional funding for security at places of worship.
Mr Ben Wallace:
The police are aware of events taking place around the world such as San Diego, Sri
Lanka and Christchurch and adapt their operational policing plans, including
increased high visibility patrolling, to protect and reassure all our faith communities.
On 19 March, the Home Secretary announced a boost in funding for the hate crime
Places of Worship Protective Security Funding Scheme to £1.6 million for 2019/20
(excluding synagogues). This is double the amount awarded in 2018/19.
Furthermore, £5 million over three years has also been committed to providing
security training to places of worship in England and Wales. This will enable staff and
volunteers to develop the security understanding necessary to make security
measures work more effectively.
On 27 February, the Home Secretary announced increased funding for the Jewish
Community Protective Security Grant to £14 million for 2019/20. Although this fund is
focussed primarily on security at Jewish Schools a proportion of funding is allocated
to the security of synagogues. This Grant was introduced in 2015 following a number
of terrorist attacks on Jews and Jewish sites in Europe.
More widely, the Home Secretary has committed to consulting with faith communities
to understand what more could and should be done to help protect faith communities
at their places of worship.
Stalking: Victims
Jo Stevens: [249991]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps his Department is
taking to support victims of stalking.
Victoria Atkins:
Stalking is an insidious crime that has a deep and significant impact on vic-tims’
wellbeing. Both online and offline, perpetrators leave victims feeling constantly at risk
and looking over their shoulder. This Government is committed to ensuring that
victims are supported.
Our National Statement of Expectations for Violence Against Women and Girls
(VAWG), published in December 2016, sets out the standards which local
commissioners should meet when putting in place services to respond to VAWG,
including stalking. This includes the need to put the victim at the cen-tre of service
delivery.
The Home Office part-funds the National Stalking Helpline, operated by the Suzy
Lamplugh Trust, which has helped over 30,000 people since its inception. Through a
grant of £4.1m under the Police Transformation Fund, the Government is also
funding the Multi-Agency Stalking Intervention Programme. This aims, across three
sites, to test and compare strategies to reduce recidivism on the part of stalking
perpetrators and to develop best practice. This should improve the response to
victims of stalking, ensuring that they receive consistently high-quality service and
improving their satisfaction with police and across the criminal justice system.
The Stalking Protection Act 2019, which received Royal Assent on 15th March, will
introduce Stalking Protection Orders. These will provide protection to victims at an
early stage. Restraining orders can also be issued to those who have been
prosecuted for stalking offences, to prevent continued stalking behaviour.
Visas: Married People
Grahame Morris: [249944]
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what the average time taken is
for a spousal visa appeal to be considered by UK Visas & Immigration.
Caroline Nokes:
Statistics on appeal clearance timescales are published by HM Courts and Tribunals
Service on a quarterly basis. The most recent edition (Tribunals and gender
recognitions certificates statistics quarterly: October to December 2018) is available
at https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/tribunals-and-gender-recognition-
certificate-statistics-quarterly-october-to-december-2018. Table T_3 contains the
closest match to the requested data.
HOUSING, COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Fracking: Planning
Carol Monaghan: [248718]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what
steps he is taking to help ensure the (a) interests and (b) safety of local communities is
fully considered in decisions on planning for shale gas fracking; and if he will make a
statement.
Kit Malthouse:
The Government is firmly committed to ensuring that local communities are fully
involved in planning decisions that affect them. Planning applications for shale
development proposals require consultation with local communities, ensuring that
planning concerns about potential impacts raised by local people are taken into
account in the determination of such applications.
The Government takes the safety of the public and environmental protection very
seriously and are confident we have a robust regulatory framework in place. We have
been clear that shale gas exploration development must be safe and environmentally
sound. The UK has world-class regulation to ensure that shale gas exploration can
happen safely, respecting local communities and safeguarding the environment.
National planning policy makes clear that in considering planning applications,
mineral planning authorities should ensure that there are no unacceptable adverse
impacts on the natural and historic environment or on human health.
High Rise Flats: Insulation
Sarah Jones: [250034]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, pursuant
to his Answer of 25 March 2019 to Question 234774 on High Rise Flats: Insulation, if he
will provide a regional breakdown for the 16,600 dwellings in private blocks with
Aluminium Composite Material cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations
which are yet to be remediated.
Kit Malthouse:
For the latest data, as at 31 March 2019 there are approximately 16,500 dwellings in
private sector high-rise residential blocks with Aluminium Composite Material
cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations yet to be remediated. The
regional breakdown is in the table below:
REGIONNO OF DWELLINGSLONDON10,600YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER2,000NORTH
WEST2,000SOUTH EAST900SOUTH WEST400EAST OF ENGLAND300EAST MIDLANDS200GRAND
TOTAL16,400
* rounded to nearest 100
Leasehold: Unfair Practices
Stephen McPartland: [249274]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what
steps is he taking to tackle unfair practises in the leasehold system.
Mrs Heather Wheeler:
This Government is committed to tackling unfair practices in the leasehold market.
We have committed to banning new leasehold houses and restricting ground rents to
a peppercorn and launched a technical consultation on the details of these proposals
which closed on 26 November. We will publish the Government response in due
course and bring forward primary legislation as soon as Parliamentary time allows.
We are also working with the Law Commission to make it faster, fairer and cheaper
for existing leaseholders to extend their lease or buy the freehold. The Law
Commission have also consulted on making Right to Manage legislation so that
leaseholders can more easily take control of running their buildings. The Government
will consider next steps when the Law Commission reports later this year
In addition, we have also set up a Working Group, chaired by Lord Best, to look at
how property agents can be improved, including a single, mandatory Code of
Practice for managing agents and whether any fees should be capped or banned. We
expect to receive the Working Group's recommendations this summer and we will
respond with our plans later this year.
We recently announced a new government-backed industry pledge to make sure that
leaseholders whose leases contain onerous terms such as doubling ground rents
within 20 years, get the support they need. The new pledge announced on 28 March
has been signed by more than forty leading property developers and freeholders.
National Holocaust Memorial Centre and Learning Service
Sir Edward Leigh: [248580]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, pursuant
to the Answer of 10 April 2019 to Question 239872, for what reason the Prime Minister’s
announcement on 27 January 2016 on locating the Holocaust Memorial in Victoria Tower
Gardens did not refer to the UK Holocaust Memorial Foundation’s recommendation that
the Memorial and the Learning Centre should be co-located.
Mrs Heather Wheeler:
Co-location was recommended by the Prime Minister’s Commission in January 2015
and reflected in the Foundation’s document on the search for a site published in
September 2015. The Government press release on 27 January 2016, following the
PM announcement, also noted that plans for the learning centre would be announced
in the coming months.
Sir Edward Leigh: [248581]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, pursuant
to the Answer of 10 April 2019 to Question 239870, on what dates the UK Holocaust
Memorial Foundation first spoke to representatives of the (a) Royal Parks, (b)
Department of Culture, Media and Sport and (c) Westminster City Council about the
possibility of the Holocaust Memorial being located in Victoria Tower Gardens; and
whether in each case the conversation also covered the proposed Learning Centre.
Mrs Heather Wheeler:
The Foundation engaged with representatives of The Royal Parks, Department of
Culture, Media and Sport and Westminster City Council in the early stages of this
project and continue to engage with them on a regular basis.
Sir Edward Leigh: [248582]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, pursuant
to the Answers of 7 March 2019 to Question 229626 and 10 April 2019 to Question
239872, on what date in January 2016 the Government received from the UK Holocaust
Memorial Foundation its recommendation that the Holocaust Memorial and the Holocaust
Learning Centre should be located in Victoria Tower Gardens.
Mrs Heather Wheeler:
13 January 2016.
Sir Edward Leigh: [248583]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, pursuant
to the Answer of 10 April 2019 to Question 239868 on the Holocaust Memorial and
Learning Centre, for what reason the answer did not indicate whether the criteria for the
site were altered.
Mrs Heather Wheeler:
The objective throughout has been to build a striking new national memorial co-
located with a world class learning centre.
Sir Edward Leigh: [248584]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, pursuant
to the Answer of 10 April 2019 to Question 239869 on the location of the National
Holocaust Memorial Centre and Learning Centre, for what reason that Answer did not
indicate which of the criteria were met.
Mrs Heather Wheeler:
The answer of 10 April to Question UIN 239869 referred to an earlier answer to
Question UIN 203298, answered on 21 December, which provided a clear
explanation of the reasons for selecting Victoria Tower Gardens.
Sir Edward Leigh: [248585]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether
it is the Government’s policy that all the existing entrances to Victoria Tower Gardens will
continue to be available to the public during the same hours as they are currently after
the Holocaust Memorial and Learning Centre have been built.
Mrs Heather Wheeler:
Yes.
Private Rented Housing: Evictions
Sir David Evennett: [249232]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what
deterrents are in place to stop rogue landlords illegally evicting a tenant.
Mrs Heather Wheeler:
Tenants are protected from illegal eviction through the Protection from Eviction Act
1977, the Housing Act 1988, and the retaliatory eviction provisions in the
Deregulation Act 2015. Under the Eviction Act 1977, local authorities have the power
to prosecute landlords in the criminal courts who break the law.
We want to go further, and we recently announced that we will abolish ‘no-fault’
evictions by repealing section 21 of the Housing Act 1988. By ending ‘no fault’
evictions, landlords will always have to provide a reason for ending a tenancy. This
more secure tenancy framework will give tenants greater confidence that they can
complain about problems with their home without the fear of eviction.
Solar Power: Non-domestic Rates
Alex Sobel: [249356]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, whether
the business rates exemption for <50kW solar systems will be maintained under the
smart export guarantee scheme.
Rishi Sunak:
The Government is continuing business rates relief for solar microgeneration plant
and machinery of less than 50kW. These arrangements would also apply under the
Smart Export Guarantee as proposed. The current relief provides a 100 per cent
business rates exemption for qualifying solar plant and machinery between the
installation of the equipment and the next revaluation for business rates planned in
2021.
Temporary Accommodation: Children
Stella Creasy: [250035]
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, how
many children there were in temporary accommodation in another local authority district,
for each local authority in the last three years.
Mrs Heather Wheeler:
This information is currently collected. As these are experimental statistics, the
information provided is not of sufficient quality to be published but will be available in
future.
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Department for International Development: Secondment
Chris Ruane: [249906]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, how many civil servants in
his Department have been seconded to (a) the Department for Exiting the European
Union and (b) the Department for International Trade in each of the last three years.
Harriett Baldwin:
The below table details the number of DFID staff who have been seconded to the
Department for Exiting the European Union and the Department for International
Trade in each of the last three financial years.
OGD 2016/17 2017/18 2018/19
DEXEU 3 1 28
DIT 4 5 26
Total 7 6 54
Developing Countries: Climate Change
Mr Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi: [250013]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, what steps her Department
is taking to ensure that all Official Development Assistance spending is aligned with the
Paris climate agreement objective of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees.
Harriett Baldwin:
Tackling climate change is a priority for this Government and for the Department of
International Development. In ratifying the Paris Agreement, the UK agreed to work
towards making all financial flows consistent with lowering greenhouse gas emissions
and supporting climate-resilient development.
The UK has committed to provide at least £5.8bn of our aid over the period 2016-
2021 to tackle climate change. We are supporting many programmes which
contribute to this goal, including those for example which deliver clean energy. Since
2011, these resources have helped reduce or avoid 10.4 million tonnes of carbon
emissions from entering the atmosphere and supported 17 million people to access
clean energy.
Developing Countries: English Language
Andrew Rosindell: [249873]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, what steps her Department
is taking to increase the level of English language training in under-developed countries.
Harriett Baldwin:
The UK has significant investments in English language, especially through the
British Council and the BBC World Service. In DFID we support a range of
programmes including: improving the quality of English language teaching in
Rwanda, a skills hub supporting the biggest African economies (including Kenya,
South Africa and Nigeria) to scale up English language learning and providing
opportunities for UK teachers to volunteer in schools overseas. The Foreign
Secretary launched English Connects for francophone countries in West Africa on his
recent visit.
Developing Countries: Plastics
Alex Sobel: [249354]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, what steps her Department
is taking to support the recycling of plastic throughout the developing world.
Harriett Baldwin:
The Department for International Development is committed to helping developing
countries tackle the problem of plastic pollution. We are doing this with a programme
of technical assistance in twenty developing countries. We are starting to work with
businesses and NGOs to trial new approaches to increase plastic recycling rates
manage waste, thereby helping the environment while creating new jobs. We are also
investing in finding ways in which manufacturing processes can reduce plastic
pollution. For example, we are match funding Tearfund’s plastic appeal to set up
recycling hubs in Pakistan.
In addition, the UK provides considerable funding to multilateral organisations who
are working with countries to tackle this problem, including some major investments
in better waste management services.
Developing Countries: Vaccination
Chris Ruane: [249894]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, what assessment she has
made of the effectiveness of her Department's spending on improving global vaccination
rates in each year for which data is available.
Harriett Baldwin:
Vaccination represents one of the most cost-effective health interventions. The UK is
a global leader in ensuring children across the world benefit from the life-saving
power of one of humankind’s greatest achievements. For every US$1 spent on
immunisation in the world’s lowest-income countries, there is an estimated saving of
US$16; from reduced health care costs for the individual and from the resulting
increase in that individual’s contribution to the economy and to society.
Diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis (DTP) vaccination rates are a key indicator of
immunisation performance. Through UK support to Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, DPT
vaccination rates in the world’s poorest countries have now increased from 66% in
2000 to 80% in 2017. These efforts have helped vaccinate over 700 million children,
saving over 10 million lives against vaccine-preventable diseases. The UK will not
rest on its laurels. The UK will host the Gavi replenishment conference in 2020 where
we will lead efforts to drive even greater vaccination coverage; including for children
in the most fragile, hardest to reach countries.
Humanitarian Aid
Mr Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi: [250012]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, what steps she is taking to
ensure that humanitarian aid is always delivered based on need and not used as a tool
for other political interests.
Harriett Baldwin:
As set out in the UK’s Humanitarian Reform Policy, DFID ensures humanitarian
assistance is underpinned by humanitarian principles, including neutrality and
impartiality, and is targeted to meet the most acute needs of those affected by crises.
To meet urgent needs DFID works with local, regional and international partners to
rapidly provide funding, relief supplies, and expertise, saving lives and reducing the
suffering of many across the globe.
Mozambique: Storms
Joan Ryan: [249813]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, what the outcome was of
her meeting at the World Bank to attract donors to make long-term reconstruction
investments in Mozambique following Cyclone Idai and Cyclone Kenneth.
Harriett Baldwin:
The meeting was successful in raising international awareness, coordinating support
and increasing funding for the Cylone Response including reconstruction. Following
the meeting a number of donors substantially increased their support. The World
Bank have set out plans for a regional operation, covering Mozambique, Zimbabwe
and Malawi. This will focus on “building back better” and climate resilient
infrastructure. The UK also welcomes the news that Mozambique plans to host a
reconstruction conference in the coming months. On 3 May, the World Bank
announced that it had mobilised over half a billion dollars in new resources to help
people in Mozambique, Malawi and Zimbabwe.
Pakistan: Tobacco
Martyn Day: [249955]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Development, what funding her
Department has allocated to programmes in Pakistan to promote control of the tobacco
industry.
Harriett Baldwin:
The DFID Pakistan programme has not allocated specific funding to promote the
control of the tobacco industry in Pakistan.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
Department for International Trade: Emerdata
Deidre Brock: [250043]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Trade, whether (a) his Department, (b) his
Department's agencies and (c) his Department's associated public bodies have entered
into contracts with Emerdata Limited in the last year.
George Hollingbery:
The Department for International Trade (DIT) has not held any contracts with
Emerdata Limited in the last year. DIT does not currently have any agencies or public
bodies.
Drugs: Exports
David Simpson: [248632]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Trade, what recent discussions has he had
with his counterparts overseas on the export of UK pharmaceutical products.
Graham Stuart:
The United Kingdom pharmaceutical sector is a major exporter with exports of £24.8
billion in 2018. Support to exports by United Kingdom pharmaceutical companies is
co-ordinated by the Department for International Trade. We work closely with the
sector to identify when Ministerial or official discussions with overseas counterparts
are required and there is regular senior level engagement with the major UK
pharmaceutical exporters.
Food: Exports
David Simpson: [248631]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Trade, what steps his Department is taking
to increase food and drink exports from Northern Ireland to (a) Asia (b) South America
and (c) Africa.
Graham Stuart:
The Department for International Trade (DIT) collaborates closely with Invest
Northern Ireland both here in the UK and overseas to support companies from the
region to export globally. We encourage companies to take advantage of overseas
opportunities via initiatives such as our Exporting is GREAT campaign, our
Tradeshow Access Programme, bespoke “Meet the Buyer” events alongside
providing financial support to exporters via UK Export Finance.
Her Majesty’s Trade Commissioners, including those for South Asia, Latin America
and Africa provide a wealth of export opportunities on Great.gov.uk for companies to
access.
Foreign Investment in UK: Northern Ireland
David Simpson: [248633]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Trade, what recent steps his Department
has taken to increase foreign direct investment into Northern Ireland.
Graham Stuart:
I refer the Hon. Member for Upper Bann to the answer given by my Hon. Friend, the
Minister of State for Trade Policy, on 12 March to the Hon. Member for Strangford,
UIN: 228744.
Free Trade: Dominica
Andrew Rosindell: [249870]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Trade, what recent steps he has taken to
enable free trade with Dominica after the UK leaves the EU.
George Hollingbery:
On 22 March, the UK signed an Economic Partnership Agreement with CARIFORUM
States, including Dominica. This will provide continuity for businesses, exporters and
consumers as the UK prepares to leave the EU.
Free Trade: Lesotho
Andrew Rosindell: [249871]
To ask the Secretary of State for International Trade, what recent steps he has taken to
enable free trade with Lesotho after the UK leaves the EU.
George Hollingbery:
We are continuing to work with the Southern African Customs Union and
Mozambique partner countries, including Lesotho to replicate the effects of the EU’s
Economic Partnership Agreement.
In addition, the Taxation (Cross-Border Trade) Act enables the UK to put in place a
trade preferences scheme for when we leave the EU. This will grant duty-free, quota-
free access to Least Developed Countries, including Lesotho.
JUSTICE
Children: Protection
Tim Loughton: [249794]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what plans he has to extend the position of trust
law to sports coaches and youth justice workers with positions of influence over children.
Lucy Frazer:
Any sexual activity with a child under 16 is a criminal offence, regardless of whether
consent is given. Any non-consensual sexual activity is also a crime, whatever the
age of the victim and whatever the relationship between the victim and perpetrator.
I recognise that there are concerns about those who might abuse their position of
power over a 16 or 17-year-old to pressure them into engaging in a sexual
relationship. Such behaviour is very likely to be caught by the robust laws we already
have in place,
However, we remain absolutely committed to protecting children and young people
from sexual abuse and we want to ensure that existing offences are being used
effectively to tackle this behaviour, and that those working with young people
understand their responsibilities and act appropriately.
My department, working closely with colleagues across government, is taking forward
a review of the existing law, to check that that it is working effectively and ensuring
young people are protected.
Coroners
Sir Christopher Chope: [249839]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many notices were issued by coroners in
England and Wales under Schedule 5 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 requiring the
production of documents in each of the last three years for which information is available.
Sir Christopher Chope: [249840]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, if he will direct the Coroner for Dorset
conducting the investigation into the death of the late Gordon Munday who died on 11
October 2017 to issue a notice under Schedule 5 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 to
require Dr Borek to produce the documents in her possession relevant to that
investigation; and if he will make a statement.
Edward Argar:
Coroners are independent judicial office holders. As such it would not be appropriate
for Ministers to comment on or seek to influence the conduct of their investigations.
The Ministry of Justice does not hold information on the number of notices issued by
coroners under schedule 5 to the Coroners and Justice Act 2009.
Drugs: Crime
David Simpson: [248630]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many people were convicted for selling
drugs in the last two years.
Edward Argar:
Available data show the number of offenders found guilty of supplying drugs in
England and Wales. This can be found in the Experimental statistics: Principal
offence proceedings and outcomes by Home Office offence data tool in the annual
criminal justice statistics publication, linked below. From the Offence drop down box,
select 92A.09, 92A.10, 92A.11 and 92A.12, then drag the Detailed offence filter into
the row box for the pivot table. The table will display figures for possession,
production and supply of drugs including intent to supply drugs offences separately.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachm
ent_data/file/738814/HO-Code-Tool-2017.xlsx
Court proceedings and convictions data for 2018 are planned for publication on 16
May 2019
Offenders: EU Nationals
Preet Kaur Gill: [249930]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many non-UK EU nationals received a (a)
caution, (b) community order and (c) another court disposal in each of the last five years.
Edward Argar:
Information on the nationality of the offenders sentenced is not held centrally by MoJ
and would only be obtainable at disproportionate cost. Therefore, it not possible to
provide this information.
Parole
Sir Christopher Chope: [249838]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps are being taken to ensure that the
probation reports required for the parole hearing of Liam Vare A9035AH scheduled for 10
May 2019 are available in time for that hearing.
Edward Argar:
The independent Parole Board had listed an oral hearing for the purposes of Mr
Vare’s case on 10 May. However, on learning that a new offender manager had been
appointed for Mr Vare, the Parole Board decided on 27 April to defer the oral hearing
to allow the offender manager time to meet Mr Vare and to produce a report on him.
The hearing has now been listed for the first available date after 24 June. The Board
has directed that all outstanding reports be provided by 3 June. The Public Protection
Casework Section, which oversees the delivery of the Secretary of State’s obligations
in relation to the parole process, is liaising with the offender manager and others to
ensure that the reports are indeed provided by 3 June.
Prison Sentences: Females
David Hanson: [249224]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many women were sent to immediate
custody from the (a) Crown Court and (b) Magistrates' Courts for sentences of (i) less
than and (ii) more than six months for each offence classification in each police force
area in England and Wales in 2018-19.
David Hanson: [249225]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many women with no previous convictions
were sent to immediate custody from the (a) the Crown Court and (b) Magistrates' Courts
for sentences of (i) below 6 months and (ii) 6 months and above in each police force area
in England and Wales in 2018-19; and what the offence classification was in each of
those cases.
David Hanson: [249226]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many women in the North Wales police
force area received an immediate custodial sentence of (a) less than and (b) more than
six months for each category of offence from the (i) Crown Courts and (ii) Magistrates
Courts in 2018-19.
Edward Argar:
The number of female offenders sentenced to custody by court level and police force
area, including North Wales, in 2017, can be found in the Court outcomes by Police
Force Area data tool, which can be found at the below link:-
https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/criminal-justice-system-statistics-quarterly-
december-2017
Select the drop down boxes referring to custodial sentence length in order to
establish sentence lengths. Select female from the sex drop box and, once having
done this, young adults and adults to establish women. Offence classification can be
found in both the Offence Type and Offence group boxes, depending on which
specific definition applies here.
The number of female offenders with no previous convictions sentenced to immediate
custody by court type, sentence length, and offence type in England and Wales in
2017 can be found in the attached table.
Court proceedings data for 2018 are planned for publication on 16 May 2019, with
data for 2019 planned for publication in May 2020.
Our vision, as set out in our Female Offender Strategy, is to see fewer women
coming into the criminal justice system and a greater proportion managed
successfully in the community.
There is persuasive evidence showing community sentences, in certain
circumstances, are more effective than short custodial sentences in reducing
reoffending. The MoJ study ‘The impact of short custodial sentences, community
orders and suspended sentence orders on re-offending’ published in 2015 involved
around 350,000 sentencing occasions over 4 years and used 130 different variables
to construct matched groups of offenders and examine the effect of short sentences
relative to community sentences. This study found a reduction of around 3
percentage points in proven reoffences if offenders receiving sentences of less than
12 months were to get a community order instead. This is statistically significant and
equates to around 30,000 proven reoffences in total over a one-year period. This
means fewer victims of crime.
Unless we tackle the underlying causes of offending, we cannot protect the public
from being victims of crime. Effective community orders can address offenders’
behaviour, answer their mental health and alcohol or drug misuse needs, and provide
reparation for the benefit of the wider community.
Attachments:
1. Table [Copy of PQ 249225 Table.xlsx]
Prisons: Discipline
Imran Hussain: [248701]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many days prisoners were locked in cells
for 22 hours or more in each prison in each month of (a) 2016, (b) 2017, (c) 2018, and (d)
2019.
Lucy Frazer:
The information requested is not held.
Prison officer numbers are at their highest since March 2012, which is vital to
ensuring prisons are safe, secure and decent. We have recruited over 4,700 new
prison officers across the country since October 2016 to improve safety and help turn
offenders’ lives around. The recruitment drive will continue until we reach required
levels across the prison estate, ensuring prisons can fulfil their purpose - protecting
the public, reducing reoffending and crucially, rehabilitating offenders.
As part of the Offender Management in Custody model (OMiC), Key Worker roles are
being introduced to support the rehabilitative culture and relationship between Prison
Officers and prisoners.
Prisons: Education
Richard Burgon: [248729]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment he has made of the
availability of courses for prisoners serving Imprisonment for Public Protection sentences
to prepare to demonstrate their suitability for release to the Parole Board.
Edward Argar:
Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) and the Parole Board work
closely to improve the progression of prisoners serving sentences of Imprisonment
for Public Protection (IPP). Consequently, there is a joint action plan in place, co-
owned by HMPPS and the Parole Board, with the specific aim of providing
opportunities for prisoners serving IPP sentences to progress to safe release. We are
prioritising post-tariff prisoners in accessing rehabilitative interventions, including
psychology service-led reviews in cases where there has not been satisfactory
progression, and enhanced case management for those prisoners sentenced with a
complex set of risks and needs. We have also developed progression regimes at four
prisons across the country, which are dedicated to progressing indeterminate
prisoners struggling to achieve release via the usual routes.
It is important to note that accredited programmes are offered to prisoners based on
risk, need and responsivity for a particular programme. For IPP prisoners, suitability
for any accredited programmes will be considered as part of their wider sentence
plan. A wide range of accredited programmes are available and IPP prisoners are
one of the groups prioritised for participation on accredited programmes where they
are identified as suitable. However, the completion of accredited programmes is not a
mandatory requirement for IPP prisoners to secure release.
While HMPPS is focused on giving all prisoners serving IPP sentences opportunities
to progress towards release, public protection must remain our priority.
Jim Shannon: [249291]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 5 March 2019 to
Question 225506 on Prisons: Education, what proportion of the prison population was
engaged in offender learning and skills in prisons in each of the last five years.
Jim Shannon: [249292]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 5 March 2019 to
Question 225506 on Prisons: Education, how many offenders were engaged in learning
that falls outside of core prison education provision in each of the last five years.
Edward Argar:
The Department for Education publishes data on prison education participation and
completion rates. Details for the academic years 2010-11 to 2017-18 can be found at
the following link:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachm
ent_data/file/761349/201718_Nov_MAIN_OLASS_Particpation_FINALv1.xlsx
This data is published using total numbers, not by proportion of the population which
would be disproportionate costs for us to calculate. We do not hold data centrally for
unaccredited learning.
Rape: British Nationals Abroad
Mr Jim Cunningham: [249836]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, if he will make an assessment of the potential
merits of bringing forward legislative proposals to enable allegations of rape committed
abroad by UK citizens to be investigated and prosecuted in the UK.
Lucy Frazer:
Existing law already provides for a UK national or a UK resident accused of raping a
person under the age of 18 abroad to be brought to trial in the UK.
The draft Domestic Abuse Bill includes provision to extend the jurisdiction of our
courts to offences of rape committed abroad against a victim aged 18 or over as
required by the Istanbul Convention.
Segregation of Prisoners
Richard Burgon: [248730]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many prisoners serving Imprisonment for
Public Protection sentences are currently held in segregation units.
Lucy Frazer:
The information requested is not held centrally and could not be collated without
incurring disproportionate cost.
The welfare of those in our care is our priority: prison governors have authority to
arrange that a prisoner is to be segregated where it appears desirable for the
maintenance of good order or discipline or it is in his or her own interest. Segregation
is used only as a last resort, however.
Her Majesty’s Prison & Probation Service and the Parole Board have a joint action
plan to provide opportunities for prisoners serving sentences of Imprisonment for
Public Protection to progress to safe release.
Stalking
Jo Stevens: [249992]
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many people have been cautioned for
stalking in each of the last five years.
Edward Argar:
The number of people cautioned for stalking in each of the last five years can be
found in the Outcomes by Offence data tool available here:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachm
ent_data/file/733981/outcomes-by-offence-tool-2017-update.xlsx
Select 8.Q Stalking from the Offence drop down list
Court proceedings and convictions data for 2018 are planned for publication on 16
May 2019
NORTHERN IRELAND
Historical Institutional Abuse Inquiry
Lady Hermon: [249883]
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, what assurances she can provide that
the resumption of the talks process between political parties in Northern Ireland will not
further delay the implementation of the recommendations of the Hart Report in relation to
historical institutional abuse in Northern Ireland; and if she will make a statement.
Lady Hermon: [249889]
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, what steps she is taking to ensure the
appointment by the Head of the Northern Ireland Civil Service of an Interim Advocate for
victims and survivors of historical institutional abuse; and if she will make a statement.
John Penrose:
The Secretary of State for Northern Ireland welcomes the resumption of the talks
process between the political parties of Northern Ireland, and will continue to work to
restore a functioning Executive. A locally elected, democratically accountable
devolved government will mean that decisions affecting the people of Northern
Ireland can be taken by locally elected ministers as soon as possible. The Secretary
of State also recognises the importance of providing clarity on this issue, and is
currently considering the recent judgment and the next steps.
The Northern Ireland Civil Service is in the midst of the appointment process for an
Interim Advocate and expects the post to be filled shortly.
Northern Ireland Government
Lady Hermon: [249876]
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, what her response is to the call by the
Leader of Sinn Fein on Easter Sunday 2019 for a joint authority over Northern Ireland
between the Irish and British Governments; and if she will make a statement.
Karen Bradley:
This Government remains steadfast in its commitment to the Belfast Agreement
including the principle of consent governing Northern Ireland’s constitutional position.
It is on that basis that Northern Ireland is and remains a full and integral part of the
United Kingdom.
As the Conservative and Unionist Party Northern Ireland General Election Manifesto
2017 clearly stated, “we will not countenance any constitutional arrangements - such
as joint authority over Northern Ireland between the United Kingdom and Ireland -
that are inconsistent with the consent principle”.
Northern Ireland Office: Secondment
Chris Ruane: [249908]
To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, how many civil servants in her
Department have been seconded to (a) the Department for Exiting the European Union
and (b) the Department for International Trade in each of the last three years.
John Penrose:
There have been no civil servants seconded from the Northern Ireland Office to either
the Department for Exiting the European Union or the Department for International
Trade, in each of the last three years.
SPEAKER'S COMMITTEE ON THE ELECTORAL COMMISSION
Electoral Register
Nick Smith: [250031]
To ask the hon. Member for Houghton and Sunderland South, representing the Speaker's
Committee on the Electoral Commission, what assessment the Commission has made of
the effect on trends in the level of voter registration of information sharing between
Government and local authorities.
Bridget Phillipson:
In 2011 and 2012, the Electoral Commission carried out an evaluation of the
Government’s pilots to test the extent to which data held on national public databases
could assist Electoral Registration Officers in maintaining their electoral registers. Its
evaluations found that the principle of sharing data had potential but that the
approach, as piloted, was not effective.
The Commission has recently undertaken feasibility studies examining how publicly-
held data could be used to improve registration. The findings will be published in the
summer.
TRANSPORT
Airports: Unmanned Air Vehicles
Lady Hermon: [249885]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment he has made of the effect
of the recent introduction by the Civil Aviation Authority of Flight Restriction Zones around
protected aerodromes on the interests of members of the British Model Flying Association
in Northern Ireland; and if he will make a statement.
Jesse Norman:
The flight restriction zone around aerodromes was developed in response to
submissions gathered through our consultation on the safe and effective regulation of
drones, ‘Taking Flight: The Future of Drones in the UK’. There was significant interest
in the consultation, which closed in September 2018 and received around 5,000
responses. A range of options were considered when developing the extended
restriction zone and factors including impacts on all airspace users, safety, security
and the communication and enforceability of the zone were all evaluated.
The new legislation takes the same approach as the former restriction zone by
allowing any small unmanned aircraft, including model aircraft, to fly within the
restriction zone where the relevant permission has been received. When an Air
Traffic Control Unit (ATCU) is operational, permission needs to be sought from this
unit.
The CAA will be assessing the permissions process as part of a wider review of
airport restriction zones later this year.
Bus Services: Per Capita Costs
Chris Ruane: [249895]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what recent estimate he has made of the
average price-per-mile for bus travel in (a) each region of the UK and (b) each bus
franchise operating in the UK.
Ms Nusrat Ghani:
The Department has not made a recent assessment of the average price per mile for
bus travel. The bus market outside London is deregulated and decisions regarding
setting the level of fares, is primarily a commercial matter for bus operators.
Bus Open Data powers in the Bus Services Act 2017 will require bus operators in
England to open up route and timetable, fares and tickets and real time information
for passengers from 2020. These improvements aim to remove uncertainty in bus
journeys, improve journey planning and help passengers secure best value tickets.
Civil Aviation Authority
Mr Clive Betts: [249823]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what the last date was on which the Civil
Aviation Authority conducted a campaign to (a) raise awareness of the dangers of illegal
public transport operations and (b) guide consumers on what to look for when chartering
an aircraft to ensure the flight is legal; how many illegal operators were identified; how
many successful prosecutions there were of illegal operators arising from that campaign;
what the outcomes were; how many airfields were revealed to be hosting illegal activity;
and what steps (i) he and (ii) the CAA has taken to place an obligation on airfield
operators to report suspicions of illegal public transport operations to the (A) CAA and (B)
police.
Jesse Norman:
The CAA last conducted a campaign to raise awareness of the dangers of illegal
public transport operations, and to guide consumers on what to look for when
chartering an aircraft to ensure the flight is legal, in 2013. The CAA is planning further
work to educate consumers about the rules, and the potential risks of illegal charter
flights.
It is not possible to link work aimed at raising awareness directly to specific
enforcement actions. The CAA will prosecute people where there is sufficient
evidence, and where it is in the public interest to do so, but enforcement action will
vary depending on the circumstances of the incident. It includes educating individuals
or organisations on the regulations to avoid breaches, a formal warning, the
revocation of licences, approvals or certificates, or criminal investigations and
prosecutions.
The CAA publishes the detail and outcome of all successful prosecutions since 2005
on its website at https://www.caa.co.uk/Our-work/About-us/Enforcement-and-
prosecutions/. These include successful prosecutions for illegal public transport.
Earlier this year, the CAA assisted with the prosecution of an individual in the
Manchester Crown Court for, among other things, illegal public transport.
Both the CAA and the police encourage the reporting of potential illegal activity at
airfields and provide a number of channels, including confidential reporting, for
concerns to be reported.
Department for Transport: Secondment
Chris Ruane: [249909]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how many civil servants in his Department
have been seconded to (a) the Department for Exiting the European Union and (b) the
Department for International Trade in each of the last three years.
Jesse Norman:
The information requested for all three years can only be provided at disproportionate
cost.
However, of the information that is more readily available, the Central Department
and its Executive Agencies does hold information for the previous year which is as
follows:
DEPARTMENT FOR EXITING THE
EUROPEAN UNION (DEXEU)
DEPARTMENT FOR
INTERNATIONAL TRADE (DIT)
1 April 2018 – 31 March 2019 7 5 or fewer
Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency
Stephen Kerr: [249350]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what the arrangements are for the
governance and accountability of the Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency; and what
plans there are to review those arrangements.
Jesse Norman:
The Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) has robust governance and
accountability arrangements in place, which are published at
www.gov.uk/government/organisations/driver-and-vehicle-standards-
agency/about/our-governance.
The Cabinet Office is planning a tailored review of the DVSA’s control and
governance arrangements, later this financial year. The review will ensure that the
DVSA is complying with recognised principles of good corporate governance, and
that it has the capacity to deliver its services effectively and efficiently.
Driving Tests: Rural Areas
Stephen Kerr: [249351]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what policies and guidance there are to
ensure that people living in rural areas have adequate access to driving centres through
the Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency network.
Jesse Norman:
The Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) has policies and guidance in place
to ensure that people living in rural areas where the population is equal to, or fewer
than, 100 persons per square kilometre, should not have to travel more than 30 miles
to take their test. The DVSA takes this travel distance criterion into account when
deciding on locations for new driving test centres.
East Midlands Rail Franchise
Chris Williamson: [248647]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, at what stage in the franchise process the
decision was taken to exclude Stagecoach from bidding for the East Midlands franchise.
Andrew Jones:
The decision was made shortly before Stagecoach was informed of the
disqualification decision on 9 April 2019.
East Midlands Rail Franchise: Pensions
Mr Clive Betts: [249825]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 25 April 2019 to
Question 245609 on Railways: Franchises, whether the recent bidders for the East
Midlands Trains franchise were subject to different requirements from those of previous
bidders in respect of their responsibilities for pension contributions (a) now and (b) at a
later date.
Andrew Jones:
No. Since privatisation, train operators have always been, and will continue to be,
responsible for paying employer pension contributions required under the schedule of
contributions applicable during their franchise term. There are no plans to change this
arrangement.
East Midlands Rail Franchise: Rolling Stock
Mr Clive Betts: [249827]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 23 April 2019 to
Question 244025 on East Midlands Rail Franchise: Rolling Stock, what type of train will
replace existing rolling stock; and which train routes those trains will be transferred from.
Andrew Jones:
The procurement of the trains that replace the current rolling stock is matter for the
new operator.
East Midlands Trains: Pensions
Chris Williamson: [248648]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assurances Abellio have provided his
Department in relation to the pensions of staff employed on the East Midlands line.
Andrew Jones:
The Railways Pension Scheme was established in 1994, replacing the previous
British Rail scheme. Contributions in to the Railways Pension Scheme are split
according to a shared cost arrangement, whereby employers (the Train Operating
Companies) pay 60% and employees pay the remaining 40%. Since franchising
arrangements were first introduced Train Operating Companies have been, and
continue to be, responsible for paying employer pension contributions during a
franchise term.
Under the East Midlands Franchise Agreement Abellio will participate in and become
the Designated Employer for the East Midlands section of the Railways Pension
Scheme. Abellio will be obliged by the Franchise Agreement to pay the employer
contributions required under the schedule of contributions applicable during their
franchise term. All of Abellio’s pensions related obligations are detailed in Schedule
16.1 to the Franchise Agreement which will be published in due course.
Electric Vehicles: Charging Points
Ben Bradley: [249958]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps his Department is taking to
increase the number of electric vehicle charging points in Nottinghamshire.
Jesse Norman:
Nottingham City Council has been awarded £6m under the Government’s Go Ultra
Low Cities Scheme to deliver a range of initiatives in Nottingham and Derby to
increase the uptake of ultra-low emission vehicles, including deploying 35 rapid and
195 fast charging units at key locations across the cities. The Council has also been
awarded £700k under the Ultra-low Emission Taxi Infrastructure Scheme, to deliver
20 rapid chargepoints and 12 fast chargepoints dedicated to taxis and private hire
vehicles.
The Government has various UK-wide support schemes in place to assist with the
cost of installing chargepoints in motorists’ homes, on residential streets, in
workplaces, car parks and the wider public estate. The workplace scheme has
provided funding for 59 chargepoints in the wider Nottingham area.
High Speed 2 Railway Line
Mr David Davis: [248588]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether High Speed Two will be delivered (a)
on time and (b) on budget.
Ms Nusrat Ghani:
The 2015 Spending Review confirmed a funding envelope for the whole of HS2 of
£55.7bn in 2015 prices.
HS2 Ltd has been set Delivery-In-Service targets by Government under its
Development Agreement, which are to deliver initial Phase One services from 2026
and the whole HS2 network by 2033.
HS2 Ltd is currently working with their contracted suppliers to update and agree the
latest cost and schedule positions for Phase One. Once completed we will make
these details public as part of the Phase One Full Business Case, which is due for
publication later in 2019.
Keir Starmer: [249343]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how many lorry movements would be
required to move Euston approaches excavated material by HGV; and what estimate he
has made of the cost of moving that material by (a) HGV and (b) rail.
Ms Nusrat Ghani:
The volume of lorry movements to move excavated material by HGV is detailed in the
HS2 Phase One Environmental Statement and the cost is included within the HS2
budget. The cost of moving material by rail is more expensive than moving material
by road because it requires investment in rail infrastructure and the cost of operating
and maintaining the freight service. HS2 Ltd and its contractors are committed to
identifying options to reduce the impact of lorry movements and where practicable
maximise the volume of material transported by rail.
Low Emission Zones
Gareth Thomas: [249181]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if he will make it his policy to enable local
authorities to introduce ultra-low emission zones; and if he will make a statement.
Jesse Norman:
Local authorities already have powers under the Transport Act 2000 to implement
Clean Air Zones. The Clean Air Zone (CAZ) Framework sets out the principles for the
operation of Clean Air Zones in England. It provides the expected approach to be
taken by local authorities when implementing and operating a Clean Air Zone. The
full guide provided to local authorities is in the link below.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachm
ent_data/file/612592/clean-air-zone-framework.pdf
Motorways
Sir Mike Penning: [248615]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what information his Department holds on the
timing of the implementation of dynamic all-lane running on smart motorways.
Jesse Norman:
Highways England operational staff are automatically alerted to rising traffic flows
from roadside detectors. At a pre-determined threshold, operators are prompted to
begin the process of opening the hard shoulder. CCTV is used to check for any
stopped vehicles or obstructions in the hard shoulder. Once checked, the hard
shoulder is opened to traffic by the operator implementing a speed limit sign above
the hard shoulder.
The decision to close the hard shoulder is again taken based on location specific,
pre-determined, traffic flow thresholds.
Sir Mike Penning: [248616]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, if he will publish the locations of (a)
permanent and (b) dynamic all-lane running sections of smart motorways.
Jesse Norman:
The locations of smart motorway sections in England are as follows:
(a) All Lane Running
SMART MOTORWAY SCHEME REGION STATUS OF SCHEME
M1 J16-19 Midlands Operational
M1 J23a-25 Midlands Operational
M1 J28-31 Midlands Operational
M5 J4a-6 Midlands Operational
M6 J10a-13 Midlands Operational
M1 J32-35a North East Operational
M1 J39-42 North East Operational
M25 J5-7 South East Operational
M25 J23-27 South East Operational
M3 J2-4a South East Operational
M6 J16-19 North West Operational
M62 J18-20 North West Operational
M1 J13-16 Midlands In Construction
M6 J2-4 Midlands In Construction
M6 J13-15 Midlands In Construction
M20 J3-5 South East In Construction
M23 J8-10 South East In Construction
M27 J4-11 South East In Construction
M4 J3-12 South East In Construction
M62 J10-12 North West In Construction
(b)Dynamic Hard Shoulder Running
SMART MOTORWAY SCHEME REGION STATUS OF SCHEME
M1 J10-13 East Operational
M42 J3a-7 Midlands Operational
M6 J4-10a Midlands Operational
M4 J19-20 South West Operational
M5 J15-17 South West Operational
M62 J25-30 North East Operational
Motorways: Accidents
Sir Mike Penning: [248613]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what estimate he has made of the number of
accidents involving (a) personal injury and (b) death on (i) permanent all-lane running
sections and (ii) dynamic all-lane running sections of smart motorways in each of the last
three years.
Jesse Norman:
England’s motorways are among the safest roads in the world and each smart
motorway scheme’s safety objective is to be at least as safe as the traditional
motorway it replaces.
All Highways England schemes are evaluated after opening. In addition, Highways
England have carried out a more detailed review of the first two permanent all lane
running schemes, on the M25, after one, two and three years of operation. From
review of personal injury data (including fatal incidents) it has been demonstrated that
the safety objective set for these all lane running smart motorways has been met.
The three-year evaluation reports for both M25 schemes are publicly available here:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/m25-junction-5-to-7-third-year-
evaluation-report
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/m25-junction-23-to-27-third-year-
evaluation-report
This assessment approach of evaluating the first three years of operation was also
taken for the first dynamic hard shoulder running scheme on the M42.
The three-year evaluation report for the M42 is publicly available here:
http://highwaysengland.co.uk/knowledge-compendium/knowledge/publications/m42-
mm-monitoring-and-evaluation-three-year-safety-review/index.html
Motorways: Laybys
Sir Mike Penning: [248614]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what criteria his Department uses for the
spacing of emergency refuge lay-bys on (a) permanent and (b) dynamic all-lane running
sections of smart motorways.
Jesse Norman:
The criterion for the spacing of emergency areas for the initial dynamic hard shoulder
running pilot scheme on the M42 was set at approximately 500 metres. Based on
more operational insight and further performance data, the spacing was progressively
increased to a maximum of 1000 metres on all other dynamic hard shoulder running
schemes and then to 2500 metres on existing All Lane Running schemes.
Highways England undertook a comprehensive review of smart motorways and found
no consistent correlation between the number of live lane stops and the spacing of
emergency areas. Nevertheless, Highways England understand motorists want to
feel safe and therefore are making a number of changes to the design of emergency
areas.
On new schemes, starting construction from 2020 onwards, the maximum spacing of
emergency areas will be reduced to 1600 metres (1 mile). Highways England are
also enhancing the visibility of emergency areas on all new and existing smart
motorways by installing orange surfacing and improved, more frequent signs. These
changes are designed to help drivers feel more confident that they can find a safe
place to stop in an emergency.
Offshore Industry: Helicopters
Alex Cunningham: [249278]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what recent representations he has received
from representatives from oil and gas companies on (a) safety and (b) regulatory
standards in the offshore helicopter transport industry.
Jesse Norman:
The Department for Transport officials met twice with representatives from Oil and
Gas UK to discuss safety in 2018/2019. Regulatory Standards were not raised in
these meetings.
Alex Cunningham: [249279]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 1 April 2019 to
Question 237684 on Offshore Industry: Helicopters, what the timeframe is for the
publication of the Civil Aviation Authority review of CAP1145.
Jesse Norman:
The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) seeks to ensure that North Sea helicopter flight is
as safe as possible. It is carefully reviewing the Recommendations and Actions in
CAP 1145 to check that they achieve the objective of making further improvements to
offshore helicopter safety standards.
The CAA currently intends to publish the review in the autumn of 2019.
Alex Cunningham: [249280]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, pursuant to the Answer of 1 April 2019 to
Question 237686 on Offshore Industry: Helicopters, what changes have been made to
the Civil Aviation Authority's safety assurance policy since 2014.
Jesse Norman:
The Civil Aviation Authority’s safety assurance policy was established in 2017. Since
2017, one minor revision to the policy has been made.
Alex Cunningham: [249281]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what recent estimate he has made of the
level of (a) current and (b) future demand for pilots in the offshore helicopter transport
sector.
Jesse Norman:
The Government has not made an assessment of the current and future demand for
offshore helicopter pilots. However, understanding the current and future demand
and equipping the aviation sector with the skills it needs to succeed, including pilot
training, is an important part of the Government’s strategy for aviation. The Aviation
2050 consultation now under way considers proposals to overcome financial, social
mobility and diversity barriers that may prevent people from entering the aviation
sector now and in the future.
Public Transport
Alan Brown: [249943]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how many full-time equivalent (a) civil
servants and (b) contractors in his Department are working on matters in relation to
accessibility (i) on buses and the bus network; and (ii) railway stations and on rolling
stock.
Jesse Norman:
The Government is committed to developing a transport network which disabled
individuals can use easily, confidently and without additional cost.
Consistent with this commitment, and with its Public Sector Equality Duty, the
Department routinely considers the impact of its policies on people with protected
characteristics, including those who are disabled.
Matters concerning accessibility are therefore considered by officials working across
a range of bus and rail related workstreams in addition to the central accessible travel
team, and it is not possible to disaggregate the amount of Full Time Equivalent
resource dedicated to accessibility.
Railways: Disability
Lloyd Russell-Moyle: [249924]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps he has taken to ensure that
disabled people are able to access rail travel (a) in the absence of second safety critical
member of staff and (b) at unstaffed stations.
Ms Nusrat Ghani:
The Inclusive Transport Strategy, which was published in July 2018, sets out the
action the Department is taking to improve access to transport for disabled people,
including to the rail network. This includes working with industry partners to improve
the Passenger Assist scheme through which disabled passengers can book the
assistance they need, and the provision of information about accessibility to enable
better journey planning.
All operators are required as a licence condition to have a Disabled People’s
Protection Policy in place, which sets out how disabled people can seek assistance
on board and at stations.
Lloyd Russell-Moyle: [249925]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment his Department has made
of the effect on disabled passenger access to the rail network of (a) driver-only operations
and (b) unstaffed stations.
Lloyd Russell-Moyle: [249928]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment he has made of the
potential effect on disabled people's access to the rail network of (a) ensuring that trains
are run with a second member of staff and (b) increasing the number of stations that are
staffed on a full-time basis.
Ms Nusrat Ghani:
With growing passenger numbers, the Department has been clear that it wants to see
more customer-facing staff on the railways, not fewer. For example, there are now
more on-train staff on Southern and South Western Railways and their modernisation
plans will mean more staff to assist passengers on trains. Regarding off-train staff,
the number of staff employed at stations in Hampshire has increased by nearly 10%
since 2010.
In addition, train and station operators are required as a condition of their licence to
take part in the Passenger Assist scheme through which disabled passengers can
book the assistance they need.
We believe that train operators themselves are best placed to determine how staff
are deployed to best meet the needs of their passengers.
Lloyd Russell-Moyle: [249927]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what representations his Department has
received from (a) organisations representing disabled people and (b) disabled people on
the accessibility of the rail network.
Ms Nusrat Ghani:
The Department is committed to ensuring that disabled people have equal access to
the rail network. As such, officials and Ministers regularly engage with disabled
people and organisations representing disabled people to discuss making the
railways more accessible.
This includes, for example, the Disabled Persons Transport Advisory Committee, who
are statutory independent advisors to the Government; extensive engagement with
disabled people and disability organisations in the development and delivery of the
Inclusive Transport Strategy; and the Inclusive Transport Stakeholder Group, which
brings together the expertise of representative bodies to act as a sounding board for
the Department on inclusive travel policy.
Railways: Franchises
Lisa Nandy: [248670]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, with reference to the disqualification of
Stagecoach from three rail franchise bids, what recent assessment he has made of the
viability of the rail franchise system.
Andrew Jones:
The Williams Review is currently considering potential rail industry structures and will
summarise its recommendations as part of a white paper in Autumn 2019.
Railways: Operating Costs
James Morris: [248651]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what the net cost to the public purse was of
subsidising the running of services not including enhancements or repairs on the railways
in (a) the year before privatisation and (b) the last financial year in (i) cash terms and (ii)
real terms at prices in the last financial year.
Ms Nusrat Ghani:
In 2017-18, train operating companies provided a net premium of £0.2 billion to
central government. In 1993-94, train operating companies received a net subsidy of
£0.9 billion in nominal terms (£1.5 billion in real terms) from central government.
For additional information on train operating companies net premiums and subsidies
please refer to the Office of Rail and Road data at the link below:
http://dataportal.orr.gov.uk/displayreport/report/html/a830de20-83bf-408d-9c22-
7f3ec23999f9
Railways: Sheffield
Mr Clive Betts: [249824]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what proportion of trains between (a)
Sheffield and London and (b) London and Sheffield arrived on time between (i) April 2017
and March 2018 and (ii) April 2018 and March 2019.
Andrew Jones:
The Department does not hold data on what proportion of trains between London and
Sheffield and Sheffield and London arrived on time between April 2017 and March
2018 and April 2018 and March 2019 as it does not have a requirement for
information on the performance of specific journeys.
Railways: Standards
James Morris: [248649]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how many direct train services there were
per day between (a) Edinburgh, (b) Glasgow, (c) Newcastle, (d) Birmingham, (e)
Nottingham, (f) Derby, (g) Peterborough, (h) Norwich, (i) Portsmouth, (j) Southampton, (k)
Preston, (l) Stoke-on-Trent, (m) Leeds, (n) Sheffield, (o) Liverpool and London in (A) the
year before privatisation of the railways and (B) the last financial year.
James Morris: [248650]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how many seats on direct train services there
were per day between (a) Edinburgh, (b) Glasgow, (c) Newcastle, (d) Birmingham, (e)
Nottingham, (f) Derby, (g) Peterborough, (h) Norwich, (i) Portsmouth, (j) Southampton, (k)
Preston, (l) Stoke-on-Trent, (m) Leeds, (n) Sheffield, (o) Liverpool and London in (A) the
year before privatisation of the railways and (B) the last financial year.
Andrew Jones:
The Department does not hold the specific information requested. However, industry
figures from the Rail Delivery Group suggest that the number of planned train
services per year has increased from 5.69 million in 1997-98 to 7.30 million in
2016/17. The industry also cites some specific examples of increased services on
routes to London, such as Manchester to London increasing from 17 trains per day in
1994 to 47 in 2016, and the number of trains from London to Sheffield increasing
from 15 per day in 1994 to 31 in 2016.
In relation to the number of seats, According to the Rail Delivery Group, there were
10,400 vehicles in passenger use in 1996/97 compared to 14,025 as at March 2018,
an increase of over 3,500 vehicles or nearly 35%. This additional fleet capacity is
helping to lengthen trains and contribute towards the thousands of extra rail services
each week.
Roads: Standards
Mr Ranil Jayawardena: [248733]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps he will take to support improving
key roads that are official diversion routes for motorways that are not in the major road
network.
Jesse Norman:
Highways England and the relevant local authority work together to identify local
roads that are official diversionary routes. As part of this, a risk assessment is
undertaken to determine a route’s suitability. That assessment includes taking
account of suitability and physical characteristics.
Diversion route planning is conducted in close liaison with the local highway authority
traffic manager, and includes liaison with other key local stakeholders as deemed
necessary by the authority.
The Government is providing over £6.6 billion funding for local highways
maintenance between 2015 and 2021. It is for local highway authorities to decide
how this funding is utilised, including on improvement of key diversionary roads,
based on local needs and priorities.
Stagecoach Group
Lisa Nandy: [248681]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what discussions officials in his Department
have had with the Pensions Regulator on the decision to disqualify Stagecoach from
bidding on three rail franchises.
Andrew Jones:
Department for Transport officials had no discussions with The Pensions Regulator in
respect of the Department’s intention to disqualify Stagecoach from the three
franchise competitions before making that decision. All bidders were given the same
opportunity to bid compliantly and they were warned not to submit bids which were
not compliant. Stagecoach breached established rules and, in doing so, they are
responsible for their own disqualification.
Stagecoach Group and Virgin Trains: Pensions
Lisa Nandy: [248682]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps the Government is taking to help
safeguard the pensions of rail workers employed by (a) Stagecoach and (b) Virgin Trains.
Andrew Jones:
Responsibility for providing pensions for employees in the rail franchising system
resides with train operators. Under current franchising arrangements when contracts
are awarded train operators are required, under the terms of Schedule 16 of the
Franchise Agreement, to provide pensions. This requirement will continue to apply
when the new train operator takes over responsibility for pensions in which the
current rail workers employed by Stagecoach and Virgin Trains participate.
Transport: Infrastructure
Craig Tracey: [249341]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what progress the Government has made on
improving transport infrastructure in areas with a high number of new build homes.
Jesse Norman:
The Government has invested £1.2bn through the Housing Infrastructure Fund to
support housing and further announcements through this £5.5bn fund are expected
later this year. A significant number of HIF bids include transport infrastructure.
The Government is also investing in transport supporting new home construction
through the Transforming Cities Fund, Major Road Network, and projects in the
Oxford-Cambridge Arc, and it is promoting integrated housing and transport planning,
for example through the revised National Planning Policy Framework.
Virgin Trains: Staff
Lisa Nandy: [248671]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, with reference to the disqualification of
Stagecoach from three rail franchise bids, what steps is he taking to help protect the (a)
jobs and (b) terms and conditions of all staff employed by Virgin Trains West Coast.
Lisa Nandy: [248672]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, with reference to the disqualification of
Stagecoach from three rail franchise bids, what steps he is taking to help ensure that the
jobs and terms and conditions of all staff employed by sub-contractors for Virgin Trains
West Coast are protected.
Lisa Nandy: [248679]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what recent assessment he has made of the
potential effect on job (a) numbers and (b) roles of staff employed by Virgin Trains West
Coast of the disqualification of Stagecoach from three rail franchise bids.
Lisa Nandy: [248680]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what recent assessment he has made of the
potential effect on job (a) numbers and (b) roles of staff employed via subcontractors on
the Virgin Trains West Coast line of the disqualification of Stagecoach from three rail
franchise bids.
Andrew Jones:
The Invitation to Tender for the West Coast Partnership does not specify a reduction
in any staff, and is explicit in its requirement for a franchisee who will provide a high-
quality experience for all customers, including through excellent customer service.
Overall, since 2010/11 we have seen an increase in the total number of people
employed by Train Operating Companies of nearly 20%.
Volkswagen
Dr David Drew: [249193]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what penalties have been imposed on
Volkswagen in the UK since the scandal on excessive emissions levels.
Jesse Norman:
It is for the German Government in the first place to take action given that the vast
majority, if not all, of the potential wrongdoing is thought to have occurred at
Volkswagen AG in Germany. The Department will assess the prospects of taking
action in the UK once the German investigation is complete, based on evidence
available at the time.
West Coast Partnership Rail Franchise
Lisa Nandy: [248673]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether a train guard will be retained on
every train in the next West Coast Main Line franchise contract.
Andrew Jones:
The Invitation to Tender for the West Coast Partnership does not specify a reduction
in any staff, and is explicit in its requirement for a franchisee who will provide a high-
quality experience for all customers, including through excellent customer service.
Lisa Nandy: [248674]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether the current catering provision will be
(a) maintained and (b) expanded in the next West Coast Main Line franchise contract.
Andrew Jones:
The West Coast Partnership Invitation to Tender incentivizes a future franchise
operator to develop proposals to significantly improve the overall catering offer for
passengers, such as improving passenger choice, quality, complimentary first class
catering and offering advance ordering or at seat services.
Lisa Nandy: [248675]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether the current ticket office provision will
be (a) maintained and (b) expanded in the next West Coast Main Line franchise contract.
Andrew Jones:
The West Coast Partnership Invitation to Tender requires any future franchise
operator to deliver a high-quality standard of ticket retailing service to all customers
which will provide them with widespread and easy access to the full range of fares
and a range of ticket retail opportunities that meet their needs.
Lisa Nandy: [248676]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether the current level of provision of
station staff will be (a) maintained and (b) expanded in the next West Coast Main Line
Franchise contract.
Andrew Jones:
The Invitation to Tender for the West Coast Partnership does not specify a reduction
in any staff (including on train), and is explicit in its requirement for a franchisee who
will provide a high-quality experience for all customers, including through excellent
customer service.
Lisa Nandy: [248677]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, with reference to the disqualification of
Stagecoach from three rail franchise bids, whether Virgin Trains will retain the West
Coast Main Line franchise until March 2020.
Andrew Jones:
The current franchise agreement with West Coast Trains Limited is due to expire on 1
April 2020. There is a contractual option to terminate the franchise agreement at the
Secretary of State’s discretion no earlier than 11 November 2019 upon the provision
of three months’ notice to West Coast Trains Limited.
Lisa Nandy: [248678]
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, with reference to the disqualification of
Stagecoach from three rail franchise bids, what steps his Department has taken to ensure
the compliance of the remaining bidders for the West Coast Main Line franchise.
Andrew Jones:
The Department does not comment on a live competition. All bids received for any
franchise competition are evaluated against the requirements and instructions set out
in the relevant Invitation to Tender.
TREASURY
101 Calls: VAT
Tim Loughton: [249791]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what the contribution has been to the public
purse from levying VAT on the 101 non-emergency police phone line.
Mel Stride:
The details that HMRC collects from taxpayers on their VAT returns are not specific
enough to provide an estimate of VAT on 101 phone calls.
To minimise the administrative burden on businesses, they are only required to report
the total VAT on all their taxable supplies of goods and services in the relevant
period. It is therefore not possible to identify the types of supplies on which the VAT
was charged.
Cash Dispensing: Fees and Charges
Chi Onwurah: [249934]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what steps he is taking to ensure that reductions
in the interchange rate do not result in free ATMs becoming pay ATMs.
Chi Onwurah: [249935]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether he has made an assessment of the
effect on poorer households of recent increases in the number of free ATMs becoming
pay ATMs; and if he will make a statement.
Chi Onwurah: [249936]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what discussions he has had with the Payment
Services Regulator on the effect of changes to LINK rates; and whether he plans to re-
impose interchange rates at LINK cost study levels.
Chi Onwurah: [249937]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment his Department has made of
the proportion of household income spent as cash in the last 12 months; and what
projection his Department has made of changes in the level of income and spending with
cash in the next 10 years.
John Glen:
Last year, Government launched a Call for Evidence on Cash and Digital Payments
in the New Economy. One part of the wide range of evidence collected detailed the
changing levels of cash usage. Responses showed that, although the proportion of
cash transactions is expected to fall over the next 10 years, cash remains important
in the lives of many people and businesses across the UK. That’s why the
Government is committed to supporting digital payments, whilst safeguarding access
to cash for those who need it. The Government is engaging, and will continue to
engage, with the regulators and industry on this important topic.
The Government has not made an assessment of the effect on poor households of
free-to-use ATMs becoming pay-to-use. However, the Government-established
Payment Systems Regulator (PSR) is closely monitoring developments in ATM
provision, including those that are free-to-use. The PSR regulates LINK, the scheme
which runs the UK’s ATM network, and has used its powers to hold LINK to account
over LINK’s commitments to preserve the broad geographic spread of the ATM
network.
The PSR has set out requirements of LINK, including that any cuts to interchange
fees (the fees which fund free-to-use ATMs) must be incremental, with action taken
by LINK where the impact is not as expected. Having implemented two of the four
planned incremental reductions to the interchange fee, LINK has cancelled the third
reduction and put on hold the fourth. The PSR welcomed these adjustments, having
stated that LINK must carefully review its decisions on interchange fees to reflect
changing market conditions. These adjustments gave the PSR further assurances
that LINK is committed to making sure communities do not lose their free-to-use
ATMs.
LINK has put in place specific arrangements to protect free-to-use ATMs more than 1
kilometre away from the next nearest free-to-use ATM. LINK has also enhanced its
Financial Inclusion Programme by tripling the funding available to ATMs in the most
deprived areas of the UK and undertaken new financial support for ATMs in remote
and deprived areas.
General Anti-abuse Rule Advisory Panel
Peter Dowd: [249975]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many cases have been referred to the
GAAR Advisory Panel since 2015.
Mel Stride:
Since 2015, 13 cases have been referred to the General Anti-Abuse Rule (GAAR)
Advisory Panel. GAAR Advisory Panel opinions are published on GOV.UK.
Social Security Benefits
Stephen Timms: [249808]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate he has made of the amount of (a)
tax credits and (b) child benefit to which claimants were entitled but did not claim in each
year since 2010.
Elizabeth Truss:
Estimates of the amounts of tax credit which have not been claimed by eligible
households are published annually in “Child Benefit, Child Tax Credit and Working
Tax Credit Take-up rates” on the gov.uk website. The latest publication relating to
2016-17 is here:
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachm
ent_data/file/763597/Child_Benefit__Child_Tax_Credit_and_Working_Tax_Credit_ta
ke-up_rates_2016_to_2017.pdf
The table below show estimates of the total amount of tax credit expenditure
unclaimed since 2010-11.
YEAR
CENTRAL ESTIMATE OF EXPENDITURE UNCLAIMED
(£BN)
2010-11 4.6
2011-12 4.1
2012-13 4.0
2013-14 3.7
2014-15 4.1
2015-16 5.1
2016-17 4.4
Variations in the amounts unclaimed are related to changes in the rates and
thresholds in the tax credit system. The proportion of Child Tax Credit expenditure
which is claimed has remained at 90 per cent or above since 2010-11, and the
proportion of Working Tax Credit expenditure which is claimed has remained at
between 83 and 86 per cent over the same period.
The proportion of eligible children who have Child Benefit claimed on their behalf is
included in the publication referenced above and remains high at 93 per cent in 2016-
17. Information relating to the amounts of Child Benefit unclaimed can only be
provided at disproportionate cost.
Tax Avoidance
Peter Dowd: [249976]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many penalties related to off-shore
activities HMRC collected in the last 12 months.
Mel Stride:
HMRC does not record data on penalties related to offshore activities in a single
system, as cases can be complex and involve a combination of offshore and onshore
elements. The information requested is not available.
Taxation: Multinational Companies
Anneliese Dodds: [250037]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate he has made of the number of
companies which claimed the group financing exemption to the controlled foreign
company rules in each of the last three years.
Mel Stride:
Data from corporate tax returns submitted to HMRC indicates that between 170 and
190 UK companies have claimed the group financing exemption to the controlled
foreign company rules in each of the years 2015-2017.
Taxation: Self-assessment
Peter Dowd: [249978]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many late filing penalties HMRC collected
in 2018 from small and medium-sized businesses.
Mel Stride:
HMRC does not record data on penalties paid by size of business so the information
requested is not readily available and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Welfare Tax Credits: Overpayments
Ruth George: [249939]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate he has made of the number of
people claiming tax credits who have an overpayment in the latest period for which
figures are available.
Elizabeth Truss:
I refer the hon. Member to the reply that I gave her on 11 January 2019, UIN:
206456. Updated estimates will be published in Summer 2019.
Ruth George: [249940]
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what proportion of the £6.9 billion of tax credit
debt has been held by HMRC (a) for more than seven years, (b) between two and seven
years and (c) less than two years.
Elizabeth Truss:
The £6.9 billion of tax credit debt in 2017/18 is net £0.3billion of debt that was
transferred to DWP. A breakdown of the age of tax credits debt is only readily
available on the gross debt estimate of £7.2 billion. This shows that (a) 16 per cent
relates to the 2010-11 award year or older, (b) 52 per cent relates to award years
between 2011/12 to 2015/16, and (c) 29 per cent relates to the 2016/17 award year
or after.
WORK AND PENSIONS
Construction: Silicosis
Jim Shannon: [249297]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what information her Department
holds on trends in the number of people with Silicosis in the construction industry.
Justin Tomlinson:
Silicosis, along with coal workers pneumoconiosis and asbestosis are the most
common forms of pneumoconiosis which is a prescribed disease within the Industrial
Injuries Disablement Benefit (IIDB) scheme. Pneumoconiosis cases not specifically
identified as asbestosis or coal workers’ pneumoconiosis are mainly silicosis and the
annual numbers of such cases newly assessed for IIDB over the last ten years are
shown in the table below. Of these annual cases, those associated with the
construction industry are also shown.
The number of silicosis cases within the IIDB scheme is likely to be lower than the
true incidence of this disease. This is because IIDB does not compensate anyone
who is self-employed, and not all affected individuals apply to the scheme.
Annual new cases of pneumoconiosis not recorded as asbestosis or coal
workers’ pneumoconiosis assessed for IIDB, 2008-2017
- 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 TOTAL
All cases 85 80 60 50 40 45 55 25 30 30 500
Cases
associated
with
construction
20 20 15 10 5 10 20 10 10 10 130
Note: values have been rounded to the nearest 5 to meet disclosure rules.
Food Poverty: Disability
Mr Jim Cunningham: [249834]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what steps his Department is
taking to reduce the number of disabled people in food poverty.
Justin Tomlinson:
We will spend over £55 billion this year (2019/20) on benefits to support disabled
people and people with health conditions. This is around 2.5% of GDP, and over 6%
of government spending, and as a share of GDP, the UK’s public spending is second
highest in the G7, bar Germany [OECD 2015 data]. This year spending on the main
disability benefits (PIP, DLA and Attendance Allowance) will be over £6bn higher in
real terms than it was in 2010.
Alongside this, we want to build a better understanding of household food needs so
that future support reaches those who need it most. The new questions that we are
including on the Family Resources Survey starting from April 2019 will enable us to
better understand the drivers of food insecurity and identify which groups are most at
risk.
We are committed to helping people with health conditions and disabilities move
nearer to the labour market and, when ready, into work, by building more
personalised tailored employment and health support, such as:
• The Work and Health programme, which was rolled out between November 2017
and March 2018, and will provide innovative support for around 275,000 people.
The majority of people of starting on the programme (around 220,000) will be
disabled people who can volunteer for the programme at any time.
• Access to Work, which is a demand-led, discretionary grant scheme that offers
advice and in-work support above the level of statutory reasonable adjustments to
disabled people who are in work or about to start work, up to an annual limit of
£59,200 per person.
• We also are promoting the skills and talents of disabled people and those with long
term health conditions to employers through the Disability Confident Scheme. The
Scheme focuses on the crucial role that employers play in ensuring disabled
people are recruited, retained and developed in their careers. Over 11,500
employers have already signed up to the campaign, and this number continues to
grow.
Social Security Benefits
Stephen Timms: [249806]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what steps she is taking to promote
the use of benefits calculators to help ensure that people claim the benefits to which they
are entitled.
Will Quince:
The independent benefits calculators we endorse are intended to provide useful
estimations of what people can get in certain circumstances, based on what
information is entered on the calculators themselves. This is to allow people to safely
explore what help they may receive from Universal Credit before they apply, or based
on potential changes of circumstances.
Information on accessing independent benefit calculators is readily available via the
gov.uk website. This includes links to three independent calculators and advice on
the type of information required to complete a calculation.
https://www.gov.uk/benefits-calculators
In addition, DWP staff will signpost post people to independent benefit calculators
and websites which provide additional advice and guidance.
State Retirement Pensions: British Nationals Abroad
Sir Roger Gale: [249790]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, for what reasons not all UK
pensioners living overseas receive annual pension uprating.
Andrew Rosindell: [249963]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, for what reasons the Government
has not agreed to uprate the pensions of UK nationals resident outside the EU; and if will
she make a statement.
Guy Opperman:
Since WW2 successive Governments, Labour, the Coalition and Conservatives have
had the same policy. The policy on up-rating the UK State Pension abroad is long-
standing and unchanged. UK State Pensions are payable worldwide and they are up-
rated for overseas residents where there is a legal requirement to do so.
The cost of up-rating State Pensions would increase by more than £3 billion over five
years if payments to recipients in countries where they are not currently up-rated
were increased to the rates payable had the recipients never left the UK. It is not
proposed to change this policy.
Universal Credit: Disability
Ruth George: [249942]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what estimate he has made of the
number of people in receipt of severe disability premium (SDP) who claimed universal
credit before 16 January 2019 and who will be repaid their entitlement to SDP when the
Universal Credit (Managed Migration) Regulations 2018 come into force.
Justin Tomlinson:
I refer the hon. Member to the answer to Question 215614, from 6 February 2019.
Since the introduction of The Universal Credit (Transitional Provisions) (SDP
Gateway) Amendment Regulations 2019, which came into force on 16th January
2019, claimants who are entitled, or have been within the last month, to an award of
an existing benefit that includes SDP have not been required to move to Universal
Credit; even if they have experienced a relevant change in their circumstances. The
draft Universal Credit (Managed Migration Pilot and Miscellaneous Amendments)
Regulations 2019, which are currently before Parliament, make provision for SDP
transitional payments for those eligible claimants who have already moved to UC and
for moving existing legacy claimants onto Universal Credit and implementing
transitional protection.
We are currently considering the court judgment handed down on 3 May 2019.
Marsha De Cordova: [250028]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many (a) seriously ill and (b)
disabled people are no longer eligible for severe disability premium as a result of (i)
natural and (ii) managed migration to universal credit since 16 January 2019.
Justin Tomlinson:
Since the introduction of The Universal Credit (Transitional Provisions) (SDP
Gateway) Amendment Regulations 2019, which came into force on 16th January
2019, claimants entitled to the SDP are not required to move to Universal Credit,
even if they experience a change in circumstance.
Universal Credit: Private Rented Housing
Steve McCabe: [249850]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, pursuant to the Answer of 15 April
2019 to Question 243334 on Universal Credit: Private Rented Housing, whether she has
plans to classify being in receipt of benefits as a protected characteristic in order to
eliminate discrimination against benefit recipients in the rental housing market.
Will Quince:
The Government has no current plans to classify receipt of benefits as a protected
characteristic (under Equalities Legislation).
Ministers are working with stakeholders from across the private rental sector to
discuss how it can work with them to eliminate practices which prevent benefit
recipients from renting property.
Universal Credit: Wales
Chris Elmore: [249986]
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what recent assessment her
Department has made of a potential link between the rollout of universal credit and use of
foodbanks in (a) Wales and (b) Ogmore.
Will Quince:
There are many reasons people use foodbanks and agreement that growth in the use
of foodbanks cannot be attributed solely to Universal Credit.
Under Universal Credit no claimant has to wait for their money: advances of up to
100 per cent of their award are available to all claimants from day one of their claim.
Advances are paid back over a period of 12 months and in the Autumn Budget 2018,
we announced that from October 2021, the payback period for these advances will be
extended further, up to 16 months. This is just one of a number of measures the
Department has put in place to support claimants, such as paying those claimants
moving from Housing Benefit onto Universal Credit a two week ‘transitional housing
payment’. We are also introducing a two-week run on for eligible claimants of Income
Support, Jobseeker’s Allowance and Employment and Support Allowance from July
2020.
WRITTEN STATEMENTS
HOME OFFICE
Home Office funding for local authorities supporting Unaccompanied Asylum-
Seeking Children
The Minister of State for Immigration (Caroline Nokes): [HCWS1543]
Following a review of the existing funding arrangements, I have decided to make more
funding available to local authorities supporting Unaccompanied Asylum-Seeking
Children (UASC).
The review involved gathering detailed information and feedback from across the local
government sector, and I am grateful to all those who contributed to producing a robust
evidence base. This included over 50 Upper Tier or Unitary Local Authorities, NGOs, the
Local Government Association (LGA), Convention of Scottish Local Authorities (COSLA),
the Association of Directors of Children’s Services (ADCS) and regional Strategic
Migration Partnerships (SMPs).
After considering the evidence, I have decided that the rates currently paid at £71, £91
and £95 should be uplifted to £114 per UASC per night. This will apply to care provided
from 1 April 2019 onwards.
Home Office funding for local authorities supporting UASC provides a contribution to their
costs. The decision to increase these rates reflects the incredibly valuable work local
authorities undertake with vulnerable UASC, and the Home Office commitment to
supporting this.
INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Contingent Liability arising from the Loan Guarantee Agreement with the World
Bank Group Covering an IBRD Loan to the Government of Jordan
Secretary of State for International Development (Rory Stewart): [HCWS1542]
I have today laid a departmental Minute setting out DFID’s intention to guarantee a
portion of a forthcoming Development Policy Loan from the International Bank for
Reconstruction and Development (IBRD)-arm of the World Bank to Jordan.
This would create a contingent liability of the US Dollar equivalent of £332 million (based
on current interest and exchange rates), in respect of the World Bank Group. There
remain strong incentives for Jordan to avoid entering into arrears as doing so would lead
to the IBRD not agreeing any new lending, and not providing any lending agreed under
existing loans.
In the event that a default did occur, and the guarantee is called, the UK would still
provide compensation to the World Bank, in proportion to the UK’s guaranteed share of
the overall IBRD loan. If this liability is called, provision for any DFID payment would be
sought through the normal procedure.
LEADER OF THE HOUSE
Parliamentary Buildings (Restoration and Renewal) Bill
Lord President of the Council and Leader of the House of Commons (Andrea
Leadsom): [HCWS1544]
Today, the Government publishes the Parliamentary Buildings (Restoration and
Renewal) Bill, which seeks to establish the statutory bodies that will be responsible
for the restoration and renewal works within the Parliamentary estate, giving effect to
the resolutions passed by Parliament earlier last year. In addition to Parliament
having expressed its view in those resolutions, it will also be given an opportunity to
vote on the proposed design, cost and timing of the substantive building works
relating to the Palace of Westminster. In developing the Bill, the Government has
worked closely with the House Authorities.
The tragic fire at Notre Dame has served as a reminder of the risks to this historic
and iconic building. The recent incidents in the Palace of Westminster, including
falling masonry, have further highlighted the urgency of the works to restore and
renew the Palace of Westminster.
The Restoration and Renewal Bill was published in draft in October 2018 and has
been subject to pre-legislative scrutiny by a Joint Committee. Their report was
published in March 2019 and we have carefully considered the responses of the Joint
Committee. The Government welcomed the Committee’s report and the considered,
evidence-based approach the Chair and Members of the Committee have taken in
scrutinising the Bill, and accepted many of its recommendations in full. The support of
the Committee and its endorsement of the overarching aim of the Bill is integral in
progressing this important and pressing work.
The Bill will establish the governance structure within which those bodies will operate.
The bodies will have the capacity and capability to make strategic decisions on the
Restoration and Renewal Programme, so that the Palace of Westminster can be
secured as the UK Parliament for future generations.
The Bill establishes a Parliamentary Works Sponsor Body which will have overall
responsibility for the Programme and act as a single client on behalf of both Houses.
It will also form a Delivery Authority as a company limited by guarantee. The Delivery
Authority will formulate proposals in relation to the restoration works, and ensure their
operational delivery. The bodies will be independent and able to operate effectively in
the commercial sphere, bringing the expertise and capability needed for a project of
this scale. This two-tier approach was used to successfully deliver the London
Olympics.
The Bill also establishes a Parliamentary Works Estimates Commission which will lay
the Sponsor Body’s estimates before Parliament, and play a role in reviewing the
Sponsor Body’s expenditure.
The Government’s role is to ensure we deliver the best possible value for taxpayers’
money, and the measures in the Bill reflect our determination to ensure Parliament
keeps the total bill down, and the restoration runs to time and on budget. The Bill
provides that the Sponsor Body and the Delivery Authority must have regard to value
for money when exercising their functions throughout the Programme. The Treasury
will be able to review and comment on the annual estimates for the funding of the
Programme, and the National Audit Office will be able to undertake audits and value-
for-money reviews. Furthermore, the Estimates Commission will have the power to
review, comment on, and in certain circumstances reject those annual estimates.
It is important that the views of Parliamentarians on the Programme are taken into
account. The Sponsor Body will have a majority of Parliamentarians on its Board,
alongside external expertise. Parliamentarians will be fully consulted on the strategic
direction of the Programme. The Sponsor Body will be required to return to
Parliament for approval to make any significant changes to the approved proposals in
respect of the Palace. Parliament will also be given an opportunity to vote on the
annual expenditure of the Sponsor Body and the Delivery Authority through the
estimates process.