Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
D-CPV ZONING SUMMARYCentral Platte Valley – Auraria Implementation
Planning Board Information Item #2 – August 15, 2018
Overview
• Plan Guidance and Community Input
• Promoting an Active Urban Neighborhood in Downtown• Human Scale and Street-Level Experience
• Variety and Character (especially residential uses)
• Appropriate Intensity for new D-CPV Zone Districts
• Floor Area Ratio as Zoning Tool
• D-CPV Zoning/DSG Summary
• Next Steps
2007 Downtown Area Plan
• Central Platte Valley – Auraria is included as part of Downtown
• Different character areas within Downtown are described (e.g., Ballpark, Golden Triangle, etc.)
• Lacking specific guidance for CPV-Auraria
“Future opportunities to densify these areas are beginning to emerge as transit use increases and parking demand decreases.”
Plan Amendment Process – What the Public Told Us
• Strengths – “proximity to the high density of office and commercial uses downtown …”
• Weaknesses – “area is not built on a human-scale”
• Opportunities – “create a new downtown neighborhood with active streets and new parks” and “create an extension of the existing downtown”
• Threats – “failing to realize the vision and the potential of the plan area to become a new downtown neighborhood of dense, high-quality, mixed-use development”
Plan Amendment Process – What the Public Told Us
Downtown Area Plan Amendment
• “This significant land resource allows the city to continue to evolve and prosper with new businesses, jobs, and residents in its core.”
• “Enable a deliberate mix of uses to create a prosperous neighborhood that is vibrant throughout the day and night.”
• “Promote new development that creates diverse places and activities through a variety of building densities and intensities within a mixture of building forms that reinforce a comfortable, human-scale pedestrian experience.”
Blueprint Denver (2020 DRAFT)
Denver’s preferred growth strategy • Guide most growth to regional
centers, community centers and corridors, select districts and high intensity residential areas near downtown
• Ensure high growth areas are linked to existing or planned quality, high-frequency transit, specifically the medium- and high-capacity transit corridors from Denver Moves: Transit
Community Open House – July 31
• 32 attendees including Auraria
residents, downtown residents, and
representatives from Auraria campus,
RiverMile, Water Street, and DDP
• “Use design guidelines to encourage
diversity in architecture”
• “Don’t encourage height maximums
on towers”
• “Need a Transition zone along Speer
across from existing buildings”
How can we promote an active urban neighborhood in Downtown?
How can we promote an active urban neighborhood in Downtown?
FLEXIBILITY FORDEVELOPMENT INTENSITY
How can we promote an active urban neighborhood in Downtown?
Flexibility for Development Intensity
ACCESS TO LIGHT AND AIR
How can we promote an active urban neighborhood in Downtown?
Flexibility for Development Intensity
Access toLight and Air
DIVERSE AND CONTEXT-SENSITIVE DESIGN
How can we promote an active urban neighborhood in Downtown?
Diverse and Context-Sensitive Design
HUMAN SCALE AND ACTIVE ENGAGING STREETS
Flexibility for Development Intensity
Access toLight and Air
Human Scale and Street-Level Experience
• Activate the street with a mix of residential and commercial uses, minimize vehicular impacts, and create richness in architectural massing, detailing, and materials• Incremental Mass Reduction
• Residential entries and setbacks
• Street level and upper story setbacks
• Non-Residential Use standards on Key Streets
• Limit visible parking (wrap with Active Use)
• Design Standards and Guidelines (DSG) and Design Review
Human Scale and Street-Level Experience
• Zoning
• Upper Story Setback
• 15’ for 65% of Zone Lot Width
• DSG and Design Review
• Street Enclosure
• Streetwall Height
Human Scale and Street-Level Experience
• Zoning
• Incremental Mass Reduction
• Stories 1-5 = 15%
• Stories 6-8 = 25%
• Stories 8-12 = 35%
• DSG and Design Review
• Coordinated Massing
• Façade Articulation
• Upper Story Setbacks
Variety and Character of Buildings
GENERAL STANDARD TOWER POINT TOWER
Variety and Character of Buildings
GENERAL
ZONING DSG + DESIGN REVIEW
Variety and Character of Buildings
POINT TOWER
ZONING DSG + DESIGN REVIEW
Variety and Character of Buildings
POINT TOWER
ZONING DSG + DESIGN REVIEW
BUILDING FORMTRANSITION RIVER CENTER
General
Standard Tower
Point Tower
Variety and Character of Buildings
Appropriate Intensity of New D-CPV Zone Districts
Downtown Area Plan Amendment
Lower overall building intensity is appropriate
near the river and around existing lower-scale
buildings.
• Limits on building mass.
• Significant spacing between towers
and/or a specific limit on building height.
Appropriate Intensity of New D-CPV Zone Districts
TRANSITION DISTRICT(S)
RIVER DISTRICT(S)
CENTER DISTRICT(S)
Overall Lower Intensity Overall Highest Intensity
Appropriate Intensity of New D-CPV Zone Districts
112 3
Appropriate Intensity of New D-CPV Zone Districts
• Downtown Core zoning not
addressed in 2010, but there is
building momentum to address in
the future
• D-CPV districts represent first
iteration that may apply to future
Downtown Core
• Plan guidance recommends
flexibility on height in exchange for
better control over building mass,
scale, and design quality
D-C D-CPV
Greater Height Does Not Equal Greater Intensity
• Bulky buildings can have a greater impact on the public realm, and views than taller slender towers with equivalent floor area
• D-CPV has no height limit in certain building forms, but has much stronger design limitations than Downtown Core (both zoning and DSG)
Floor Area Ratio (FAR) as Zoning Tool
• FAR directs building intensity by calculating allowed building • Like height limit, FAR is a basic intensity tool that does not control architectural
style or design details• Cities use FAR to promote a variety of objectives
• In suburban areas, FAR is often used to limit development (particularly vehicular) impacts• In urban/downtown areas FAR is often used to promote height/design variety while ensuring that
structures are not overly massive• FAR is most effective when combined with other tools that promote more specific design outcomes, such
as an active pedestrian frontage
Floor Area Ratio (FAR) as Zoning Tool
City Context Includes Parking?
Base and Incentive System?
Packaged w/ Design Tools
Denver Downtown Core No Yes No*
Seattle Core/Lake Union Yes Yes Yes
Portland South Waterfront Yes Yes Yes
San Diego Core/East Village Yes Yes Yes
New York CityManhattan/outer boroughs
Yes Yes
Floor Area Ratio (FAR) as Zoning Tool
Portland – South Waterfront San Diego – East Village
Seattle – South
Lake Union
NYC
Relationship of FAR and Height Limits
• Zoning and DSG include various
design requirements that affect
location of building mass• Incremental Mass Reduction
• Street-level and upper story
setbacks
• Coordinated Massing
• Façade Articulation
• FAR works with Zoning/DSG to
enable relocation of mass to
better utilize allowed entitlement
• Height limits result in loss of floor
area even if outcome is desired
D-CPV Zone District SummaryTRANSITION DISTRICT(S)
• General
• 12-16 story maximum height
• Water St and Speer/Auraria
RIVER DISTRICT(S)• General and Point Tower
• 5-story maximum streetwall
• 1-1.5 blocks from River
CENTER DISTRICT(S) • General, Standard Tower, and
Point Tower
• 8-12 story maximum streetwall
• 2-3 blocks from CML and
I-25/Speer
Design Standards and Guidelines Structure and Approach
• Currently in progress with goal of
being completed by adoption date
• Based on Arapahoe Square with
revisions/additions from other cities
(Toronto, Vancouver, Portland, etc.)
• Eventually intended to serve as a
framework for future Downtown DSG
• Streamlined, user-friendly, and
organized around the design process
Will Include:
• Site Design
• Building Scale and Massing
• Architecture and Details
• Public Realm/Open Space
• Streetscapes
• Sign Design
D-CPV Regulatory Package Summary
ZONING
Allowed Entitlement
Quantitative Design &
Use Standards
Parking Maximum
Affordable Housing
PRESCRIPTIVE
DSG/DESIGN
REVIEW
Qualitative Design &
Use Standards
Design Review Process
PERFORMANCE
BASED
INFRASTRUCTURE
MASTER PLAN
Roads and Connections
Parks / Open Space
Utilities
River Enhancements
DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT(S)
Contractual
Obligations Required
Prior to or Part of
Development
Binds the
Infrastructure
Master Plan
Entire CPV-Auraria District Project by Project
Next Steps