9
Czech cohesion policy in the period 2007-2013: some critical remarks Pavel Ptáček, Department of Geography, Palacký University in Olomouc, Czech republic [email protected] 11th session Central and South East Europe and the EU New Cohesion Policy 1

Czech cohesion policy in the period 2007-2013: some critical remarks Pavel Ptáček, Department of Geography, Palacký University in Olomouc, Czech republic

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Czech cohesion policy in the period 2007-2013: some critical remarks Pavel Ptáček, Department of Geography, Palacký University in Olomouc, Czech republic

11th session Central and South East Europe and the EU New Cohesion Policy

1

Czech cohesion policy in the period 2007-2013: some critical remarks

Pavel Ptáček, Department of Geography, Palacký University in Olomouc, Czech

[email protected]

Page 2: Czech cohesion policy in the period 2007-2013: some critical remarks Pavel Ptáček, Department of Geography, Palacký University in Olomouc, Czech republic

11th session Central and South East Europe and the EU New Cohesion Policy

2

NUTS 2 regions

Praha 172Střední Čechy 70Jihozápad 69Severozápad 63Severovýchod 65Jihovýchod 72Střední Morava 64Moravskoslezsko 67

Praha EU27= 100% 172

Střední Čechy 70

Jihozápad 69

Severozápad 63

Severovýchod 65

Jihovýchod 72

Střední Morava 64

Moravskoslezsko 67

Page 3: Czech cohesion policy in the period 2007-2013: some critical remarks Pavel Ptáček, Department of Geography, Palacký University in Olomouc, Czech republic

11th session Central and South East Europe and the EU New Cohesion Policy

3

GDP in PPP after NUTS 2 regions

Page 4: Czech cohesion policy in the period 2007-2013: some critical remarks Pavel Ptáček, Department of Geography, Palacký University in Olomouc, Czech republic

11th session Central and South East Europe and the EU New Cohesion Policy

4

Structure of EU funds

• Period 2007-13 available 800 bil. CZK (26bil. €)• 26 operational programmes: • 7 regional (NUTS 2, 18 % of the budget)• 8 thematic (Transport, Environment,

Enterpreneurship and Innovations, R&D for Innovations, Human resources and employment, Education for competetiveness, Integrated OP, OP Technical help)

Page 5: Czech cohesion policy in the period 2007-2013: some critical remarks Pavel Ptáček, Department of Geography, Palacký University in Olomouc, Czech republic

11th session Central and South East Europe and the EU New Cohesion Policy

5

Structure of EU funds

• OP Prague competetiveness, • OP Prague adaptability (both just 1%)• European territorial collaboration:• 5 cross-border programs• OP Interregional collaboration (EU+N+CH)• Central Europe• ESPON 2013• INTERACT II

Page 6: Czech cohesion policy in the period 2007-2013: some critical remarks Pavel Ptáček, Department of Geography, Palacký University in Olomouc, Czech republic

11th session Central and South East Europe and the EU New Cohesion Policy

6

Current stage of progress:

• In October 2013 from total budget:• 35 % payed from Brussels• 60 % payed from Czech state budget• 90 % signed contract for realisation• Cca 50-60 bil. CZK (2-2,5 bil. €) will not be

spent• Some expenses will not be certified (4-6 bil. €)

Page 7: Czech cohesion policy in the period 2007-2013: some critical remarks Pavel Ptáček, Department of Geography, Palacký University in Olomouc, Czech republic

11th session Central and South East Europe and the EU New Cohesion Policy

7

Criticism:

• Too many OP (splitting of focus of reg. policy)• Too low absorbtion capacity (subjects unable to

spend money)• Under estimation of revision mechanisms• Inefficiency in money spending• „Soft“ project do not work properly (but CZ has

one of the lowest share of soft projects + expected higher share for 2014-20)

• Unfair competition for subjects without subsidies

Page 8: Czech cohesion policy in the period 2007-2013: some critical remarks Pavel Ptáček, Department of Geography, Palacký University in Olomouc, Czech republic

11th session Central and South East Europe and the EU New Cohesion Policy

8

Reasons for inefficiency

• Missing Low on Civil Service (unprofessional, fluctuating and politicaly manipulated staff)

• Crucial condition for 2014-2020 from the EU to accept this law (only EU country without it)!

• 2014-20 period: • Questionable is to cancel ROP (Northwest vs. sest of

NUTS2)• Regional autonomy in decession making is important• Absorbtion capacity for soft programmes

Page 9: Czech cohesion policy in the period 2007-2013: some critical remarks Pavel Ptáček, Department of Geography, Palacký University in Olomouc, Czech republic

11th session Central and South East Europe and the EU New Cohesion Policy

9

THANK YOU! [email protected]