Upload
jodie
View
23
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Customization of Educational Resources for Harris-Hillman Special Education School. Robert Connor. Proposed Problem. An adjustable tray with side pieces (wings) (to keep arms inside). The tray needs to adjust height and angle--to fit feeder seat. Background. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Customization of Educational Resources for Harris-Hillman
Special Education School
Robert Connor
Proposed Problem
• An adjustable tray with side pieces (wings) (to keep arms inside). The tray needs to adjust height and angle--to fit feeder seat.
Background
• Special Education students are Special
• Harris-Hillman contains the students that are too handicapped for inclusion
• Irene Lowe’s class contains the most handicapped of all Harris-Hillman students
References: Duran, Elva. Teaching the Moderately and Severely Handicapped Student and Autistic Adolescent. Charles C. Thomas:1988
Berdine, W; Blackhurst. An Introduction to Special Education. New York: 1985.
Project Breakdown
P ro jec t # 1 aB u ild res tra in t d evice
P ro jec t # 1 bB u ild ed u ca tion a l tray
C u s tom iza tion o f E d u ca tion a l R esou rces
Subject Anthropometrics
• Sitting height 60 cm• Weight 26.3kg(58lb)• vertical CG at 30%
sitting height (~18cm) from base
• horizontal CG 20cm from seat back
• Muscle Force exerted in Frontal plane: 20lb
• Reference– Roche, Alex and Robert
Malina. Manual of Physical Status and Performance in Childhood. Vol. 1A. Plenum Press. New York: 1983.
• Muscle Force exerted in the Sagital Plane: 25 lb.
Frontal Plane
Sagital Plane
Calculations and Testing
• Restraint Device– Device withstands
calculated extremes in the changes in the CG and the estimated Muscle Force Exertions
– Tested initially by weight placement until failure
– Tested in classroom with success
• Tray table – Calculations show that
a working load of 45lb.
– Tested by weight placement
Design Specifications
• Strength Considerations– 125 cm^2 of touch
fastener minimum
– 187 cm^2 Incorporated in Design
• Safety Factor – 1.5
Threshold (Normal) Strength v. Area
y = 2000x - 50
50
0 0.01 0.02 0.03
Area Touch Fasterners (m^2)
Th
res
ho
ld
Str
en
gth
(lb
)
Sheer Strength v. Area
y = 2000x - 50
20
40
60
0 0.01 0.02 0.03
Area Touch Fasterners (m^2)
Th
res
ho
ld
Str
en
gth
(lb
)
Safety Considerations
Economic Analysis
• Market Analysis– Customers
• tall, severely-handicapped individuals with little muscle control
• 10,000 students nationwide
– Life cycle• lasts about two years
depending of frequency of use
• Cost/Benefit– Development Costs
• 1 student@$10/hour for 60 hours
• Materials $20
– Benefit Analysis• Safer experience• 15 minutes of Instructor’s
time per day (Correcting a child for one minute every fifteen minutes that the chair is in use. )
Questions and Suggestions