Customer Feedback f

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    1/35

    Slide 2004 by Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz Services Marketing 5/E 13 - 1

    Customer Feedback andService Recovery

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    2/35

    Slide 2004 by Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz Services Marketing 5/E 13 - 2

    American Customer Satisfaction Index:Selected Industry Scores, 2002

    Industry:

    8579 80 79

    7471 71

    6670

    76

    6562

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    5060

    70

    80

    90

    100

    3.7% 1.3% 0.0% 1.3% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 8.2% 2.9% -2.6% 4.8% 3.3%% Change2002 vs 2001

    Score

    (Max = 100)

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    3/35

    Slide 2004 by Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz Services Marketing 5/E 13 - 3

    Key Questions for Managers to Ask aboutCustomer Complaining Behavior

    Why do customers complain?

    What proportion of unhappy customers complain?

    Why dont unhappy customers complain?

    Who is most likely to complain?

    Where do customers complain?

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    4/35

    Slide 2004 by Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz Services Marketing 5/E 13 - 4

    Customer Response categories to service failures

    Service Encounteris Dissatisfactory

    Take some formof public action

    Take some formof private action

    Take no action

    Complain to theservice firm

    Complain to athird party

    Take legal actionto seek redress

    Defect (switchprovider)

    Negative word-of-mouth

    Any one or a combination ofthese responses is possible

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    5/35

    Slide 2004 by Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz Services Marketing 5/E 13 - 5

    Understanding customer responses to servicefailures

    To be able to deal effectively with dissatisfied & complaining customers,managers need to understand key aspects of complaining behavior, startingwith several questions:

    1. Why do customers complain?

    a. Obtain restitution or compensation: Often consumers complain torecover some economic loss by seeking a refund, compensation, &/orhave the service performed again.

    b. Vent their anger: Some customers complain to rebuild self-esteem &/orto vent their anger & frustration. When service processes arebureaucratic & unreasonable or when employees are rude, deliberatelyintimidating, or apparently uncaring, the customers self-esteem, self-worth, or the sense of fairness can be negatively affected. They maybecome angry & emotional.

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    6/35

    Slide 2004 by Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz Services Marketing 5/E 13 - 6

    Cont..

    c. Help to improve the service: When customers are highly involved with aservice, they give feedback to try & contribute toward service improvements.These customers are motivated by the prospect of getting better service inthe future.

    d. For altruistic reasons: These customers want to spare other customers

    from experiencing the same problems, & they might feel bad if a problem isnot highlighted.

    2. What proportion of unhappy customers complain?

    Research shows that an average, only 5-10% of customers who have beenunhappy with a service actually complain.

    However, although generally only a minority of dissatisfied customerscomplain, there is evidence that consumers across the world are becomingbetter informed, more self- confident, & more assertive about seekingsatisfactory outcomes for their complaints.

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    7/35

    Slide 2004 by Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz Services Marketing 5/E 13 - 7

    Cont..

    3. Why dont unhappy customers complain?

    TARP, a customer satisfaction & measurement firm, has identified anumber of reasons why customers dont complain.

    Some dont wish to take the time to write a letter, fill out a form, or make aphone call, especially if they dont see the service sufficiently important tomerit the effort.

    Many customers see the payoff as uncertain & believe that no one wouldbe concerned about their problem or willing to resolve it.

    In some situations, people simply do not know where to go or what to do

    Additionally, many people may feel that complaining is unpleasant.

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    8/35

    Slide 2004 by Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz Services Marketing 5/E 13 - 8

    Cont

    4. Who is most likely to complain?

    Research findings consistently show that people in higher socioeconomiclevels are more likely to complain than those in lower levels.

    There better education, higher income, & greater social involvement givethem the confidence, knowledge & motivation to speak up when theyencounter problems.

    5. Where do customers complain?

    Studies show that majority of complaints are made at the place where theservice was received.

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    9/35

    Slide 2004 by Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz Services Marketing 5/E 13 - 9

    Customer expectations about their complaints

    When a service failure occurs, people expect to be adequatelycompensated in a fair manner.

    However, recent studies have shown that many customers feel that theywere not treated fairly & did not receive adequate justice. When thishappens, customer reactions tend to be immediate, emotional & enduring.

    It was found in a research, that as much as 85% of the variation in thesatisfaction with a service recovery was determined by the 3 dimensions offairness:

    1. Procedural justice: It deals with the policies & rules that any customerwill have to go through in order to seek fairness. Here, customers expect thefirm to assume responsibility, which is the key to the start of a fair procedure,followed by a convenient & responsive recovery process.

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    10/35

    Slide 2004 by Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz Services Marketing 5/E 13 - 10

    Cont..

    2. Interactional justice:

    It involves the firms employees who provide the service recovery & theirbehavior towards the customer.

    Giving an explanation for the failure & making an effort to resolve theproblem are very important.

    However, the recovery effort must be perceived as genuine, honest &polite.

    3. Outcome justice:

    It pertains to the compensation that a customer receives as a result of thelosses & inconvenience incurred because of the service failure.

    It includes compensation for time, effort, spent during service process

    recovery.

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    11/35

    Slide 2004 by Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz Services Marketing 5/E 13 - 11

    Dimensions of Perceived Fairness in ServiceRecovery Process

    Procedural

    Justice

    Interactive

    Justice

    Outcome

    Justice

    Complaint Handling & Service

    Recovery Process

    Justice Dimensions of the Service Recovery Process

    Customer Satisfaction with the

    Service RecoverySource: Tax and Brown

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    12/35

    Slide 2004 by Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz Services Marketing 5/E 13 - 12

    Customer responses to effective service recovery

    Service recovery is an umbrella term for systematic efforts by a firm tocorrect a problem following a service failure & retain a customers goodwill.

    Service recovery efforts play a crucial role in achieving customer satisfaction.

    The true test of a firms commitment to satisfaction & service quality is notin the advertising promises but in the way it responds when things go wrongfor the customer.

    Effective service recovery requires thoughtful procedures for resolvingproblems & handling dissatisfied customers.

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    13/35

    Slide 2004 by Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz Services Marketing 5/E 13 - 13

    Impact of Effective Service Recoveryon Retention

    No

    Problem

    Problem

    Unresolved

    Customer Retention

    0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

    84%

    92%

    46%

    Source: IBM-Rochester study

    Problem,but effectively

    resolved

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    14/35

    Slide 2004 by Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz Services Marketing 5/E 13 - 14

    Principles of effective service recovery systems

    1. Make it easy for customers to give feedback:

    Many companies have improved their complaint- collection procedures byadding special toll-free phone lines, links on the Web sites, prominentlydisplayed customer comment cards in their branches.

    In the customer newsletter, some companies feature service improvementsthat were the direct result of customer feedback under the motto you toldus, & we responded

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    15/35

    Slide 2004 by Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz Services Marketing 5/E 13 - 15

    Strategies to Reduce Customer ComplaintBarriers

    Complaint Barriers for

    Dissatisfied Customers

    Strategies to Reduce These Barriers

    Inconvenience

    Difficult to find the right complaint

    procedure.

    Effort, e.g., writing a letter.

    Make feedback easy and convenient by:

    Printing Customer Service Hotline

    numbers, e-mail and postal addresses on

    all customer communications materials.

    Doubtful Pay Off

    Uncertain whether any action, and

    what action will be taken by the

    firm to address the issue the

    customer is unhappy with.

    Reassure customers that their feedback will

    be taken seriously and will pay off by:

    Having service recovery procedures in

    place, and communicating this to

    customers.

    Featuring service improvements that

    resulted from customer feedback.Unpleasantness

    Complaining customers fear that

    they may be treated rudely,

    may have to hassle, or

    may feel embarrassed to complain.

    Make providing feedback a positive

    experience:

    Thank customers for their feedback.

    Train the frontline not to hassle and make

    customers feel comfortable.

    Allow for anonymous feedback.

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    16/35

    Slide 2004 by Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz Services Marketing 5/E 13 - 16

    Cont..

    2. Enable effective service recovery:

    Recovering from service failures take more than pious expressions ofdetermination to resolve any problems that may occur.

    It requires commitment, planning & clear guidance.

    Specifically, effective service recovery procedure should be:

    a. Proactive: Service recovery needs to be initiated on the spot, ideallybefore customers have a chance to complain. Service personnel should

    be sensitized to signs of dissatisfaction & ask whether customers mightbe experiencing a problem.

    b. Planned: Contingency plans have to be developed for service failures,especially for those that can occur regularly.

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    17/35

    Slide 2004 by Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz Services Marketing 5/E 13 - 17

    Cont.

    c. Recovery skills must be taught: Customers easily feel insecure at the pointof service failure because things are not turning out as anticipated. Effectivetraining arms frontline staff with the confidence & competence to turn distressinto delight.

    d. Recovery requires empowered employees: Service recovery efforts

    should be flexible & employees should be empowered to use their judgment& communication skills to develop solutions that will satisfy complainingcustomers. Employees need to have the authority to make decisions &spend money in order to resolve service problems promptly & recover customer goodwill.

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    18/35

    Slide 2004 by Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz Services Marketing 5/E 13 - 18

    Cont

    3. How generous should compensation be?

    How much compensation should a firm offer when there has been aservice failure? Or would an apology be sufficient instead?

    The following rules of thumb can help to answer these questions:

    a. What is the firms market positioning?

    b. How severe was the service failure?

    c. Who is the affected customer? Overly generous compensation is not only expensive but may be

    negatively interpreted by customers.

    It may raise questions about the soundness of the business & lead

    customers to become suspicious.

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    19/35

    Slide 2004 by Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz Services Marketing 5/E 13 - 19

    Cont.

    4. Dealing with complaining customers;

    Both managers & frontline employees must be prepared to deal with angrycustomers who are confrontational & sometimes behave in insulting waystoward service personnel.

    The following guidelines provide specific guidelines for effective problemresolution, designed to calm upset customers & deliver a resolution.

    Act quickly

    Admit mistakes, but dont be defensive

    Show that you understand the problem from each customers point ofview

    Dont argue with customers

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    20/35

    Slide 2004 by Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz Services Marketing 5/E 13 - 20

    Cont..

    Acknowledge the customers feelings

    Give customers the benefit of the doubt

    Clarify the steps needed to solve the problem

    Keep customers informed of progress

    Consider compensation

    Persevere to regain customer goodwill

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    21/35

    Slide 2004 by Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz Services Marketing 5/E 13 - 21

    Components of an Effective Service RecoverySystem

    Lea rn fr om t e

    R ec ov er y E p e rie n ce

    Lear n fr om t e

    R ec ov er y E p e rie n ce

    R es o v e C om p ain ts

    E f fe c tiv e y

    R eso v e C o mp a in ts

    E f fe c tiv e y

    enti fy S ervice

    C o m p a in ts

    enti fy S erviceC o m p a in ts

    E f fe c tiv e C o m p a in t

    a n in

    E f fe c tiv e C o m p a in t

    a n in

    Conduct Root Cause

    Analysis

    Conduct Root Cause

    Analysis

    Develop Effective

    System and Training in

    Complaints Handling

    Develop Effective

    System and Training in

    Complaints Handling

    Conduct Research

    Monitor Complaints

    Develop Complaints

    as pportunity

    Culture

    Conduct Research

    Monitor Complaints

    Develop Complaints

    as pportunity

    Culture

    =+

    Close the Loop via Feedback

    Increased Satisfaction

    and Loyalty

    Increased Satisfaction

    and LoyaltyDo the Job Right the

    First Time

    Do the Job Right the

    First Time

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    22/35

    Slide 2004 by Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz Services Marketing 5/E 13 - 22

    Service Guarantees

    A growing number of companies offer customers a satisfaction guarantee,promising that if service delivery fails to meet predefined standards, thecustomer is entitled to one or more forms of compensation, such as easy-to-claim replacement, refund or credit.

    From the customers perspective, the primary function of service guaranteesis to lower the perceived risks associated with purchase.

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    23/35

    Slide 2004 by Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz Services Marketing 5/E 13 - 23

    The power of service guarantees

    Guarantees are powerful tools for both promoting & achieving service qualityfor the following reasons:

    1. Guarantees force firms to focus on what their customers want & expect ineach element of the service.

    2. Guarantees set clear standards, telling customers & employees alike whatthe company stands for.

    3. Guarantees require the development of systems for generating meaningfulcustomer feedback & acting on it.

    4. Guarantees force service organization to understand why they fail &encourage them to identify & overcome potential fail points.

    5. Guarantees help in reducing the risk of the purchase decision & buildinglong-term loyalty.

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    24/35

    Slide 2004 by Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz Services Marketing 5/E 13 - 24

    How to design service guarantees

    Some guarantees are simple & unconditional. Others appear to have beenwritten by lawyers & contain many restrictions.

    Service guarantees should be designed to meet the following criteria:

    1. Unconditional

    2. Easy to understand & communicate

    3. Meaningful to customers

    4. Easy to invoke

    5. Easy to collect

    6. Credible

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    25/35

    Slide 2004 by Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz Services Marketing 5/E 13 - 25

    Types of Service Guarantees

    Single attribute-specific guarantee one key serviceattribute is covered

    Multiattribute-specific guarantee a few important serviceattributes are covered

    Full-satisfaction guarantee all service aspects coveredwith no exceptions

    Combined guarantee like the full-satisfaction, addingexplicit minimum performance standards on important

    attributes

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    26/35

    Slide 2004 by Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz Services Marketing 5/E 13 - 26

    Is it always appropriate to introduce a serviceguarantee?

    Managers should think carefully about their firms strength & weaknessesbefore deciding to introduce a service guarantee.

    Companies that have a strong reputation for high-quality service may notneed a guarantee.

    In contrast, a firm whose service is currently poor must first work to improvequality to level above that at which the guarantee might be invoked on a regularbasis by most of its customers.

    In a market where consumers se little financial, personal or physiological riskassociated with purchasing & using a service, a guarantee adds little value butstill costs money to design, implement & manage.

    Where little perceived difference in service quality among competing firmsexists, the first company to institute a guarantee may be able to obtain a first-mover advantage & create a valued differentiation for its services.

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    27/35

    Slide 2004 by Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz Services Marketing 5/E 13 - 27

    Key objectives of effective customer feedbacksystems

    Many strategists have concluded that in increasingly competitive markets, theultimate competitive advantage for a firm is to learn & change more rapidly thancompetition.

    Specific objectives of effective customer feedback systems typically fall intothree main categories:

    1. Assessment & benchmarking of service quality & performance:

    The objective is to answer the question, How satisfied are the customers?

    This objective includes learning about how well a firm performed incomparison to its main competitors?

    How it performed in comparison to the previous year?

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    28/35

    Slide 2004 by Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz Services Marketing 5/E 13 - 28

    Cont..

    Whether investments in certain service aspects have paid off in terms ofcustomer satisfaction?

    Often, a key objective of comparison against other units (branches, teams,competitors) is to motivate managers & service staff to improve performance,especially when the results are linked to compensation.

    2. Customer-driven learning & improvements: The objective is to answer:

    Why our customers are unhappy?

    Where & how can we improve?

    This objective is about gaining an understanding of the things that othersuppliers do well & those that make customers happy.

    3. Creating a customer-oriented service culture

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    29/35

    Slide 2004 by Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz Services Marketing 5/E 13 - 29

    Customer feedback collection tools

    Recognizing that different tools have different strengths & weaknesses,service marketers should select a mix of customer feedback collection toolsthat jointly deliver the needed information.

    1. Total market surveys, annual surveys & transactional surveys:

    Total market surveys & annual surveys measure satisfaction with allmajor customer service processes & products.

    The level of measurement is usually at high level, with the objective ofobtaining a global index or indicator of overall service satisfaction for theentire firm.

    Overall indices tell how satisfied customers are but not why they arehappy or unhappy.

    There is a limit to the number of questions that can be asked about eachindividual process or product.

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    30/35

    Slide 2004 by Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz Services Marketing 5/E 13 - 30

    Cont

    In contrast, transactional surveys are typically conducted after customershave completed a specific transaction & query them about this process insome depth.

    All three types are representative & reliable when designed properly.Representativeness & reliability are required for:

    1. Accurate assessment of where the company, a process, branch orindividual stands relative to quality goals.

    2. Evaluation of individuals, staff, teams, branches &/or processesespecially when incentive schemes are linked to such measures.

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    31/35

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    32/35

    Slide 2004 by Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz Services Marketing 5/E 13 - 32

    Strengths and Weakness ofKey Customer FeedbackCollection Tools

    Potentialfor ServiceRecovery

    Collection Tools

    Multi-level MeasurementAction-

    able

    Represen

    -tative,

    Reliable

    First

    Hand

    earning

    Cost

    EffectiveServiceSatisfaction

    Process

    Satisfaction

    Specific

    Feedback

    Total Market Survey (inclu.

    competitors)

    Annual Survey on overallsatisfaction

    Transactional Survey(process specific)

    Service Feedback Cards(process specific)

    Mystery Shopping(service testers)

    Unsolicited Feedback Recd(Online feedback system)

    Focus Group Discussions

    Service Reviews

    Meets Requirements: Fully Moderate Little/Not at all

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    33/35

    Slide 2004 by Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz Services Marketing 5/E 13 - 33

    Entry Points forUnsolicited Feedback

    Employees serving customers face-to-face or by phone

    Intermediaries acting for original supplier

    Managers contacted by customers at head/regional office

    Complaint cards mailed or placed in special box

    Complaints passed to company by third-party recipients

    consumer advocates

    trade organizations legislative agencies

    other customers

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    34/35

    Slide 2004 by Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz Services Marketing 5/E 13 - 34

    Analysis, reporting & dissemination of customerfeedback

    Choosing the relevant feedback tools & collecting customer feedback ismeaningless if company is unable to disseminate the information to therelevant parties to take action.

    Hence, to drive continuous improvement & learning, a reporting systemneeds to deliver feedback & analysis to frontline staff, process owners, branch

    or department managers & top management.

    The feedback loop to the frontline should be immediate for complaints &complements as is practiced in a number of service businesses wherecomplaints, compliments & suggestions are discussed with the staff.

    There are 3 types of service performance reports to provide informationnecessary for service management :

    1. A monthly Service Performance update provides process owners withtimely feedback on customer comments. Here the feedback is provided to theprocess manager who can discuss it with service staff.

  • 8/6/2019 Customer Feedback f

    35/35

    Slide 2004 by Christopher Lovelock and Jochen Wirtz Services Marketing 5/E 13 - 35

    Cont.

    2. A quarterly service performance review provides process owners &branch or department managers with trends in process performance &service quality.

    3. An annual service performance report gives top management arepresentative assessment of the status & long-term trends relating to

    customer satisfaction with the firms services.

    The reports should be short & reader friendly, focusing on key indicators.