Criminal Law Crw2601 Assignment 1 Semester 2 2102

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Criminal law assignment

Citation preview

  • NAME OSCAR SIMUKAI JEMWA

    STUDENT NUMBER 4927-397-3

    MODULE CRIMINAL LAW CRW2601

    REGISTRATION PERIOD CODE ASSIGNMENT 1 SECOND SEMESTER 2013

    UNIQUE NUMBER 353495

    DUE DATE 6 SEPTEMBER 2013

    DEGREE PROGRAMME 03492 BACHELOR OF LAWS

    EXAM CENTER HARARE EXHIBITION PARK

    POSTAL ADRESS 12466 UNIT N SEKE CHITUNGWIZA

    ZIMBABWE

    UNISA

    CRIMINAL LAW CRW2601

    ASSIGNMENT 01 SECOND SEMESTER 2013

    6/9/2013

    ASSIGNMENT 01 SECOND SEMESTER 2013 SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULLFILLMENT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE UNISA BACHELOR OF LAWS PROGRAMME

  • OSCAR SIMUKAI JEMWA 4927-397-3 CRIMINAL LAW CRW2601 ASSIGNMENT 1 SEMESTER 2 2013 UNIQUE NUMBER 353495 03492 BACHELOR OF LAWS EXAM CENTER HARARE EXHIBITION PARK

    1 | P a g e

    Question (i)

    The definitional elements of murder read, the intentional killing of another human

    being. Human being, is used in this context to mean a legal subject. A person

    assumes their legal status at birth. The conceived but unborn child is thus not a legal

    subject and cannot have rights, duties and capacities.

    The principle of legality means that there is no crime without a law. A comprehensive

    definition of the principle of legality can be laid out as follows:

    An accused may not be found guilty of crime and sentenced unless the type of conduct

    which he is charged:

    (a) Has been recognized by the law as a crime,

    (b) In clear terms,

    (c) Before the conduct took place,

    (d) Without the court having to stretch the meaning of the words and concepts in

    the definition to bring the particular conduct of the accused within the compass

    of the definition...

    Since the foetus is not a person there is no conduct amounting to murder and X cannot

    be held liable for such.

    Question (ii)

    Conditio sine qua non (factual causation) defines an indispensible condition or simply

    put if the act cannot be thought away without the situation disappearing at the same

    time. Factual causation is without limits.

    An act is a legal cause of a situation if, according to human experience, in the normal

    course of events, the act has a tendency to bring about that kind of a situation. Legal

    causation is applied to achieve the delimitation of factual causation. The authoritative

    case here is S V Tembani 2007 (1) SACR 365 (SCA). In this case it was held that, the

    deliberate infliction of a dangerous wound from which the victim is likely to die without

    medical intervention must generally lead to liability for an ensuing death

    The bombing would not qualify as a novus actus since X previously foresaw that

    shooting Y in the stomach would result in Ys death. Xs shooting is thus the legal cause

    of Ys death.