23
COVID-19 Impact – RBI and IBBI Webinar April, 2020

COVID-19 Impact RBI and IBBI - ECPL Live -IBC PPT for Webcast... · 2020. 4. 18. · COVID-19 Impact –RBI and IBBI Webinar April, 2020. Page 2 x 1. Impact of COVID-19 on the economy

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • COVID-19 Impact – RBI and IBBI

    Webinar

    April, 2020

  • Page 2

    Ind

    ex 1. Impact of COVID-19 on the economy

    2. RBI’s circular /IBBI response

    3. New IBC Amendments

    4. Prepacks

    5. Questions

  • Impact of COVID-19

  • Page 4

    COVID-19 – ‘A Global Pandemic’Current situation

    ► Impact of COVID-19 has been profound and deleterious on the global economy

    ► It has forced policymakers to look for novel ways to respond to the growing humanitarian & economic crisis

    ► Innovative policies implemented at the right time have the potential to limit the economic damage

    Global Impact to date

    > 75 Countries with

    > 100 cases

    > 2 millionConfirmed cases

    > 200%Increase in cases

    in Europe/America

    > 200 Countries with

    local transmission

    >120,000Deaths

    194 Countries

    35New countries

    with cases

    >10,000total cases

    ₹ 1.7 trillionGoI stimulus

    plan

    Stage 2 of the

    pandemic

    >400deaths

    Lockdown extended to 3 May 2020

    27Infected states

    Story in India so far…..

    Situation can worsen quickly if tough measures are not taken

  • Page 5

    COVID-19 – ‘A Global Pandemic’Globalised Impact

    100+ countries under lockdown globally

    >30%

    Financial stress in emerging markets

    Chinese growth

    expectation

    Likely recession

    in the US & the Eurozone

    Growth outlook down

    significantly

    4.8%

    2.9%

    Big decline in global stock markets

    The economic impact of COVID-19 is still unfolding and longer the global lockdown continues, greater the economic loss and time to recovery

    Firms cut costs,default

    on loans

    Bank’s unwilling to

    lend

    Consumers not

    spending

    Short-run trade-off between flattening the epidemic curve and the depth of the recession

    World’s recovery period to pre-crisis levels>4 Qtr

    $2Tn Global income loss (estimated), Recovery to start post Q2 FY20

    Addition to unemployed individuals from Mar7 to Mar21 just in the US

    3 Mn

    China’s Industrial output fell ~14% in Jan-Feb’20Exports fell ~20%Auto sector fell ~90%

    Economic stimulus announced by all major world economies

  • Page 6

    COVID-19 – ‘A Global Pandemic’Destruction of income and wealth

    Moody’s investor service cut India’s growth forecast for Calendar year 2020

    40 days of countrywide lockdown, aimed at reducing the spread of the disease… Led to

    5.3%

    2.5%

    Disruption in mfg. supply chain

    Poor cash recoveryto farmer despite bumper harvest

    Significant loss to

    unorganized sector

    Daily loss @ ₹ 35-40K Cr

    Loss for 21 days

    >₹7Lac Cr

    GDP Loss

    Q4 FY20 1.5%-2% growthdown from 4.7%amplified impact expected in Q1 FY21

    Widespread job losses leading to labor migration

    Loss of Govt. revenues

    From 52wk High

    Top 100 stock by Mkt Cap₹ 46.5

    Lac Cr

    Credit rating downgrade fearsFitch has downgraded UK [AA to AA-]Any such action against India could have profound impact on investment flows

    Declining market capitalization

    Significant decline in Rupee value

    FIIs - >₹ 100K Cr Net outflow during Feb-Mar’20

    Gold loosing its safe haven title

    Increasing external debt₹ 28 Lac Cr (Sep’19)

    Revised fiscal deficit targetFY 20, could be higher (>6.0%) for FY21 along with recalibration of budget

    3.8%

    3.3%

    Large Caps – Nifty 50P/E : Declined from historic high of 22x to 17x29% correction since Jan 14th, 39% at lowest

    ► Tata Motors 70%► Vedanta 67%

    ► ONGC 64%► Gail 62%

    Some of the biggest losers

  • Page 7

    Covid-19: Impact on various industry sectorsPotential survivors and thrivers in the short term

    Potential Survivors

    Potential Thrivers

    Construction & Real Estate

    ICT

    E-Commerce

    Agriculture

    Education

    Financial ServiceManufacturing

    (non essential)

    Automotive

    Aviation & Maritime

    Tourism & leisure

    Oil & Gas

    Medical supply & Services

    Food Processing

    Healthcare

    Expenditure being limited to non-luxury goods

    • Deferred Capex• Preference for

    renting• Essential

    commodities• Preference to

    generic brands

  • Page 8

    RBI and IBBI response

  • Page 9

    Developmental and regulatory packageRBI’s comprehensive package to mitigate negative effects of COVID-19, revive growth and preserve financial stability

    Expanding liquidity in the system to restore normalcy

    ► CRR

    ► Policy rate

    ► LTLRO

    ► MSF

    01

    Improving the functioning of financial markets

    ► Long term Repo operation

    ► Offshore Rupee NDF

    03Liquidity to Banking Sector for investment Borrower

    Easing financial stress caused by COVID-19

    ► Moratorium on debt repayment

    ► Asset Classification norms

    04

    Reinforcing monetary transmission for smooth credit flow

    ► Reverse repo rate

    ► Extension in Basel III framework

    02

  • Page 10

    COVID-19 Regulatory packageAttempts in mitigating the burden of debt servicing brought about by disruptions on account of COVID-19 pandemic and to ensure the continuity of viable businesses

    Lending institutions (LIs)• Commercial banks (including

    regional rural, small finance & local area banks)

    • Co-operative banks, • All-India Financial Institutions, • NBFCs (including housing

    finance companies)

    Supervisory review

    • Accounts provided relief subject to supervisory review with regard to their justifiability on account of the economic fallout from COVID-19

    Other conditions

    • Reliefs provided not to constitute as default

    • MIS on reliefs provided to borrowers with o/s in excess of ₹ 5 Cr

    Term loans

    ► 3 month moratorium in payment of installments

    ► Includes Agricultural, retail and crop loans

    ► Residual tenor to be shifted across the board

    Interest on CC/OD

    ► Recovery of interest on CC/OD facilities to be deferred by 3 months

    ► Interest shall continue to accrue and to be recovered immediately after May 31, 2020

    Drawing Power

    ► Recalculation of DP allowed on case to case basis

    ► LI may reduce margins or reassess WC cycle

    ► Relief to be available up to May31, 2020

    Moratorium

    Deferment

    Recalculation

    Relevant period for COVID-19 regulatory package being 3 month starting March 1, 2020 to May 31, 2020

  • Page 11

    Industry ImpactFinancial services & NBFC industry section

    ► LTLRO of ₹ 1 lakh crores unlikely to be used for NBFCs (of investment grade securities of ₹ 53.2 lac crores, NBFC debentures contribute ₹ 9.6 lakh crores, while total non bank borrowings of NBFCs stand at ₹ 15.6 lakh crores. All other liquidity measures mainly SLR or CRR based, no direct liquidity support to NBFCs

    ► If ₹ 15.6 lakh crores of non-bank liabilities do not offer moratorium (assuming banks do) this sector would have high liquidity mismatches as it has no option but to offer moratorium to its borrowers

    ► High level of NPAs expected given a ₹ 3.0 lakh crore of the outstanding's are to the commercial real estate sector, a substantial portion of its non-housing loan portfolio

    ► Accounting anomalies may result in covenant breaches. Issues around Staging under IFRS not addressed by RBI, DPD calculation related interpretations

    ► Issues around securitisation and Debentures held by banks remain unresolved creating uncertainties.

    Debentures30%

    Borrowing from Banks19%

    Borrowing from FIs

    1%

    CPs4%

    Other Borrowing14%

    Current Liabilities & Provisions

    8%

    Shareholder Funds24%

    NBFCs- Liabilities breakup

    Loans and Advances72%

    Investment in G-Sec2%

    Other Investments17%

    Cash and Deposits3%

    Other assets6%

    NBFCs- Assets breakup

    Balance sheet - ₹ 32,57,641 Crores (as of Sept. 2019) NBFCs comprise 21% of total lending by financial institutions at ₹ 23.4 lakh crores

  • Page 12

    Impact of current situation on IBC cases

    Regulatory/legal pronouncements IBC cases in pipeline

    ► Finance Minister announced the raising of minimum limit for IBC cases from ₹ 1 lac to ₹ 1 crore

    ► IBBI vide a notification regarding has declared a blackout period for all accounts in IBC for the lockdown period

    ► Courts are closed during the Lockdown

    ► Finance minister has announced a possible temporary suspension of section 7,9 and 10 of the IBC

    ► Suo moto order from the NCLAT for extension of CIRP by the moratorium period.

    ► Considered view that the 1 crore limit applies only for prospective filings and all filings done prior to the announcement would be at the old limits

    ► Seeing many situations where factories are either locked down or operating at minimal staff and going through a business continuing planning. Value preservation

    ► There has been a lack of interest in bidders mainly as they are involved in business continuity planning of their own.

  • Page 13

    Emergency Credit LineAn initiative taken by banks to meet temporary liquidity mismatch arising out of impact of COVID-19 pandemic

    Various banks have rolled out COVID Emergency Credit Line (CECL) to provide emergency credit to existing MSME and Corporate borrowers affected by the impact of COVID-19.

    Particulars Bank 1 Bank 2 Bank 3

    Eligible BorrowersAll standard accounts, not

    classified as SMA-1 or SMA-2Not available in public domain

    All standard accounts, not classified as SMA-1 or SMA-2

    Nature of Facility Demand Loan Demand Loan / Overdraft Short Term Loan / Demand Loan

    Validity of Scheme June 30, 2020 June 30, 2020 Not available in public domain

    Quantum of FinanceMax. 10% of the existing FBWC

    Limits, up to ₹ 200 CrMax. 10% of the existing FBWC

    Limits, up to ₹ 100 CrMax. 10% of the existing FBWC Limits, up

    to ₹ 200 Cr

    Repayment Tenor12 Months (including 6 months

    moratorium)24 Months (including 6 months

    moratorium)15% in first 6 months,

    Balance 85% in next 12 months

    Rate of Interest 7.25% p.a.1 Year MCLR / RLLR

    (1-yr MCLR as on Apr 1, 2020 is 7.75%)

    Corporate Borrowers : 8.15% (1-yr MCLR)

    MSMEs : 8% (RLLR)

    Margin / SecurityNIL

    Extension of charges on securityNot available in public domain

    Nil80% of proposed limits should be backed

    by value of stocks & receivables.

  • Page 14

    New IBC Amendments

  • Page 15

    Admission of the insolvency application by class of creditors

    ► Specific criteria set for class and real estate allottees.

    ► Initiation of CIRP on another corporate debtor (CD) by a CD now allowed

    Commencement date

    ► Removed the provision for initiating a CIRP from the appointment of IRP.

    ► IRP to be appointed on the date of order instead of within 14 days from the order date.

    ► RP to manage affairs of CD till a liquidator gets appointed.

    Commencement MoratoriumRing-fencing or whitewashing

    of corporate debtor

    Enhanced scope of moratorium► A grant or right given by the

    central government, state government, local authority, etc. shall not be suspended or terminated on the grounds of insolvency*

    Enhanced scope of essential goods and services

    ► Shall not be terminated, suspended or interrupted if considered to be critical for survival by IRP/RP*.

    *provided payments are made during moratorium

    For prior offences,► Liability of CD to cease► CD shall not be prosecuted

    after approval of a resolution plan

    ► No action (attachment, seizure, etc.) after approval of a resolution plan

    ► Actions against promoters and designated partners still allowed

    ► Assistance and cooperation shall be provided to authorities

    Others

    ► The definition of interim finance is changed and may be used to include rescue finance

    The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Second Amendment) Bill, 2019, effective 28 December 2019, aims to further amend the code and accord clarity on some contentious and litigious issues of the Code while expanding the scope of some provisions. The amendments address concerns expressed by major resolution applicants and creditors. The legislative changes, coupled with Supreme Court orders in 2019, may lead to higher investor interest in resolving distress in insolvent companies.

    The amendments seek to address the practical issues in the insolvency framework and respond to the emerging trends in an adequate manner

    1 2 3 4

  • Page 16

    Insolvency for Financial Service Providers (FSP) – a prelude to FRDI?

    Rules of the game..

    MCA has notified rules providing a ‘framework‘ for insovlency resolution of systemically important FSPs, excluding banks. This comes on the back of a liquidity crisis in the NBFC sector and recent cases of default by Financial Institutions (Fis)

    Sec. 227 of the Code

    Insolvency and Liquidation

    Proceedings for FSPs Rules 2019

    MCA notification S.O. 4139(E) dated 18th

    November 19

    Gives power to Central Govt., in consultation with financial regulators, to

    notify FSPs to whom provisions of Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code would

    apply

    Provides a framework for initiation of insolvency process against a FSP on an

    application by a notified Regulator

    Notifies the rules will be applicable to NBFCs (including Housing Finance

    Companies) with asset size of INR 500 crs. or more as per last audited balance sheet and RBI will be the FSP regulator

    allowed to file an application

    Backdrop..

    infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services (IL&FS) Group, one of India’s biggest non-bank finance company’s (NBFC) defaulted on its debt obligation and Govt. stepped-in and took control of the Group by reconstituting its board.Further, large FSPs (DHFL, Altico) missed debt payments sparking a default fear in the financial sector. The problem seemed to be more systemic than transactional and necessitated a need for a framework to deal with such situations

    2017

    2018

    2019 RBI initiated regulatory actions and investigations over alleged irregularities in certain loan accounts by Punjab & Maharashtra Co-operative Bank.In absence of insolvency framework for FSPs, in a unique case NCLT admitted an application by an Operational Creditor against Aviva Life Insurance for a default of an operational debt.

    Financial Resolution and Deposit Insurance (FRDI) Bill was introduced to provide a framework for resolution of distress/failures of FIs. The ‘bail-in’ provisions grabbed media attention and raised concerns amongst the general public, making it politically unwelcome and was subsequently shelved

  • Page 17

    The process...how it differs from a vanilla CIRP?

    Particulars Sec. 7, 8, 9 Sec. 227 Further comments

    Who will it apply to?

    Companies other than FSPs

    Notified FSPs (with asset size > INR 500 crs) have been notified

    Central Government's power to notify any other FSP (bank/insurance/AMC) for purpose of their insolvency (in consultation with regulator) continues as it were earlier

    Who can apply?Any creditor with default above amount specified

    Only notified regulators can apply – only RBI has been notified so far

    The power given only to regulators and not any other creditor to file an application for insolvency seems to be in line with leading global practices including the UK

    When does the moratorium start?

    Starts from the date of the admission order

    Interim-moratorium from the date of filing application

    Interim moratorium is to provide breathing space to the FSP from independent creditor actions on the news of filing of application

    Who runs the process?

    An Insolvency Professional registered under the IBBI regulations

    An ‘Administrator’ proposed by the appropriate Regulator and appointed by NCLT

    In addition to the Administrator, the Regulator may, where deemed necessary constitute an Advisory Committee (AC) within 45 days of admission with three of more members

    Approval on resolution plan

    CoC + NCLTCoC + NCLT + No objection from the appropriate regulator

    Upon CoC approval the Administrator shall seek ‘no objection’ from the appropriate regulator on the ‘buyer’ who would be in control or management of the FSP after plan approval

    Except for the key differences highlighted below, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process for FSPs would be like any other Company with claims in 14 days from admission, first CoC in 30 days and process to be completed in 180 [+90] days

  • Page 18

    Prepacks

  • The Government of India’s outlook for resolving Stressed Assets beyond the IBC: Pre-packaged Bankruptcy

    This information contained in summary is not intended to be a substitute for detailed research or the exercise of professional judgment. Neither Ernst & Young LP nor any other member of the global Ernst & Young organization can accept any responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any material in this publication.

    Understanding Pre-packaged Bankruptcy

    Defined by Association of Business Recovery Professionalsin the UK

    “an arrangement under which the sale of all or part of acompany’s business or assets is negotiated with apurchaser prior to the appointment of an Administrator,and the Administrator effects the sale immediately on, orshortly after, his Appointment”

    The Pro’s and Con’s of Pre-packaged Bankruptcy

    Advantages of Pre-pack

    process

    Criticism of Pre-pack process

    The Graham Report (2014) in the UK proposed the creation of a ‘pool of independent experts’ which would address problems raised by marketing

    of the business and provide extra checks and balances to the process

    Speed of Resolution

    Continuity of Business

    Low Cost of Trading

    Brand

    ▪ Company undergoes Administration with resolution imminent

    ▪ Minimal disruption to brand, customers, supplied and other stakeholder confidence

    ▪ Cost of trading avoided resulting in maximization of value

    Unsecured Creditors

    Operational Creditors

    ▪ Conclusion probable without creditor or court approval

    ▪ OC can take aggressive stance in collection of dues

    Negotiate terms

    before filing

    Shorten & simplify the

    process

    Proactive approach

    Minimal Brand

    Erosion

  • The proposed mechanism for a pre-packaged insolvency in India

    This information contained in summary is not intended to be a substitute for detailed research or the exercise of professional judgment. Neither Ernst & Young LLP nor any other member of the global Ernst & Young organization can accept any responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of any material in this publication.

    Proposed Pre-Insolvency planning and execution

    Consortium of lending banks

    with the BoD of the CD

    appoint an IP/Advisor

    1IP/Advisor to review financial

    and business position and

    collate financial and operational

    claims

    2

    IP/Advisor to lead process of

    attracting, evaluating and

    negotiating a resolution plan

    3

    BoD to providing data required

    by potential resolution

    applicants for due diligence

    4IP/Advisor to facilitate selection of

    appropriate resolution plan

    completeness of legal compliance

    5

    Valuation and feasibility of the plan is independently determined IP, BoD

    and lenders to have the plan & process reviewed by the Oversight

    Committee especially if the resolution plan is proposed by related party

    6

  • Various options still exist to implement a Pre-packaged Bankruptcy

    Option A (Based on UK Pre-pack model) Filing with NCLT and Approval

    Option B (Based on US Pre-pack model) Filing with NCLT and Approval

    ▪ IP files Resolution Plan in NCLT with application for CIRP,

    with statutory disclosures required under Law

    ▪ Submission of claims collated and details of process

    followed

    1

    ▪ NCLT, if satisfied with the process followed should approve

    the plan within 30 days.

    2

    ▪ If approval is not feasible in view of the NCLT, the corporate

    debtor should be admitted into IBC on Day 30 with the IP as

    the IRP.

    3

    ▪ IP files Resolution Plan in NCLT with application for CIRP,

    with statutory disclosures required under Law

    ▪ Submission of claims collated and details of process

    followed until filing date

    1

    ▪ NCLT, if satisfied with the process followed should approve

    the plan within 14 days.

    ▪ Appoint IP as RP; RP to invite claims and form the CoC as

    prescribed under IBC

    2

    ▪ Pre-pack plan to be put to vote in first CoC and

    subsequently be filed with the NCLT if approved – NCLT to

    approve plan within 14 days of filing

    ▪ If not approved by CoC, CIRP to continue

    3

  • Page 22

    Questions

  • Page 23

    Way Forward

    Successful implementation of RBI directions through quick decision making

    Pass on the liquidity created through RBI directions to the lendees

    Close monitoring of accounts with a cash flow focused approach using predictive analysis & other monitoring tools

    Developing new products to assist the business and the economy to revive

    Further support and robust reforms covering both fiscal & monitory policies

    Long dated rescue package and reforms with a longer horizon / timeline (>12 months)

    Extending the moratorium on downgrade of accounts for 12 months

    Special purpose financing required to address the need of restart financing

    Reforms focused towards middle class to preserve income and revive overall demand

    Economic revival will be staggered, bankers have to reassess the road map for the next 3 years

    Measures taken by the GoI, RBI and banks are in the right direction but a holistic revival plan with a longer timeline must be devised