Couple  Systems  –  Dry  Scrubber  

Exhaust  Emissions  –  Timbus  

Independent  test  data  –  GL  

Date   Start   Stop   Fuel  (%S)   SO2  (ppm)   CO2  (%m)   SO2/CO2  

Jan  12,  2009   18.20   18.37   0.94   4   6.39   0.63  

Jan  12,  2009   18.41   18.57   0.93   0   6.33   0  

Jan  12,  2009   19.02   19.14   0.94   1   6.31   0.16  

Jan  12,  2009   19.16   19.37   0.93   0   6.28   0  

Jan  12,  2009   19.40   19.56   0.94   7   6.34   1.10  

Accredited measurements by Germanischer Lloyd

Technology  Providers  

Confidential

Mdr   Key  Points   Installa5ons  

EcoSpec   No  verified  system   2  orders  

Norwegian  Co   Unknown  –  under  development   No  installaEons  

OceanNox   Details  presently  unknown     No  installaEons  

Viswa   Under  development     No  installaEons  

STi   No  acEvity  –  previously  undertaken  trials   Trial  installaEons  

Alfa  Laval  Aalborg   Best  example  at  sea   1  current  &  1  order  

Belco/Dupont   Refinery  scrubber  supplier     1  order  

Clean  Marine   Marine  experEse   1  current  &  1  order  

Couple  Systems   Dry  technology   1  current  &  1  order  

Hamworthy     Highest  market  penetraEon   2  current  &  5  orders  

MAN  (2  stroke)   Only  EGR   1  current  &  1  order  

MES   Super  yacht  applicaEons   Several  yachts  

Wartsila   Focus  on  NaOH  –  Acquiring  Hamworthy     1  current  &  6  orders  

EGCS  –Systems  in  Opera5on    

Hamworthy Krystallon Open System mv Zandamm

MES Open System mv Shanaz

MAN Corporation Closed System mv Alexander Maersk

Clean Marine Hybrid System mv Baru

Couple Systems Dry System mv Timbus

Alfa Laval Hybrid System mv Ficarria Seaways

Wartsila Corporation Closed System mv Suula (trial completed)

Shipping  Industry  Concerns  

Technology  Provider  Challenges  

•  Cost  •  Performance  –  Proven  technology  •  Stranded  investment  •  Retrofit  •  InstallaEon  capacity  •  Engineering  •  Physical  parameters  •  InstrumentaEon    •  Compliance  

Retrofit  Installa5on  –  Bulk  Carrier  

Tanker retrofit planned July 2012 10MW system serving- •  2 main engines •  4 auxilliaries •  1 boiler

Layout  for  tanker  

Layout for a 10MW unit serving main engine and three auxy engines •  Pumps 30kW •  Compressor 15kW •  Water flow 450t/hr •  15m x 8m x 4m •  Dry weight 5t

•  SOx emissions <10ppm •  SOx emission <4.3 SO2/

CO2 •  PM emissions TBC - likely

to be less than diesel fuel

Turnkey  cos5ngs  

Capacity   10MW   30MW   50MW  

Installed   $2.6M   $4.7M   $6.2M  

ECA  (1)   4,608t   13,824t   23,040t  

0.1%S  premia  (2)   $1.4M   $4.1M   $6.9M  

0.1%S  premia  (3)   $2.3M   $6.9M   $11.5M  

Payback  (4)   2yrs   >1yr   <1yr  

(1)  Assumes 50% power at 8 days/month & 200g/kWhr in US ECA – Trans Pacific containership (2)  Assumes 0.1%S premia at $300/t (3)  Assumes 2015 0.1%S premia at $500/t (4)  Simple payback. Does not include system monitoring fee

EGCS  Economics  –  Sensi5vity  Analysis  

0.0  

2.0  

4.0  

6.0  

8.0  

10.0  

12.0  

14.0  

16.0  

18.0  

20.0  

0   20   40   60   80   100   120  

Payback  Pe

riod  (years)  

Fuel  Price  Premia    ($/t)  

Scrubber  Payback  Period  

$80/kW  

$120/kW  

$160/kW  

$200/kW  

All  installaEons  payback  within  4  years  with  $50/t  price  premia  

All  installaEons  payback  within  1/2  years  with  $300/t  price  premia  

Overcoming  objec5ons  

Working  with  Interferry    • Developing  a  proposal  to  incenEvise  and  secure  early  investment  • Recognise  &  provide  a  scheme  for  “difficult”  short  sea  shipping  vessels  

 Working  with  ECSA  &  UKCS  • ConsideraEon  of  common  messaging  • Novel  opEons  to  address  key  issues  such  as  shortage  of  capital      EGCS  Training  Course  • Preparing  ship-­‐owners  to  make  sound  investments  

EGCSA  discussions  with  Class  

Working  group  has  been  convened  with  IACs  members  –  Between  1,000  &  5,000  installaEon  will  require  approvals  in  next  48  

months  –  Streamline  approvals  process  and  standardise  requirements  –  If  possible  align  Class  rules  

Class  undertakes  Flag  State  Approvals  (for  some  States)  –  Need  to  agree  scope  of  interest  (eg  safety  but  not  environment)  –  Need  to  agree  the  scope  of  plan  approvals  versus  system  

performance/compliance  

Class  to  form  an  IACs  working  group  to  fast  track  rule  making  

Current  &  Future  Work  

•  UCL  –  Just  completed  a  study  on  discharge  pH  –  Concluded  that  no  discharge  pH  limit  required  –  Provided  a  mathemaEcal  model  to  design  wash  water  discharge  –  Paper  to  IMO  informing  of  the  work  

•  PAH  –  Vendor  project  –  Technology  to  be  assessed  to  a  recognised  performance  standard  –  Sampling  and  maintenance  to  be  standardised  –  VerificaEon  tesEng  to  be  standardised  

•  Wash  water  sampling  programme  –  EGCSA  managed  sampling  programme  (US  EPA  &  IMO)  

Future  Regulated  Emissions  

ParEculate  Marer  •  Currently no prescribed limit •  Diesel only addresses secondary PM •  US EPA already have limits for marine engines

Hydrocarbon  (HC)  •  Currently no international limit

Black  Carbon  (BC)  •  Several papers presented to IMO •  Proposal to limit BC emissions in the Arctic •  BC ill-defined & confused •  Correspondence Group formed to address key issues

Other  PolluEon  Emissions  •  IMO regulations not yet aligned with on-road emissions standards

 

THANK-­‐YOU  Visit  our  website  www.egcsa.com  

 

   

Compliance with Emissions Regulations in 2015 30th April to 2nd May 2012, Brunel University, London – info@egcsa.com Time is not on your side. This essential “stay in business” seminar provides an independent and comprehensive guide through the issues, options, strategies and procurement decisions to avoid vessel detention, fines and potentially bankrupting operating costs.