Upload
doantuong
View
215
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
0
A BETTER WAY to invest in employee health
County of Sacramento
Review of Population Health through Kaiser Permanente Data
Dr. Diane Dailey, M.D., Chief of Business Health EngagementEileen Peterson, MPH, RD, TPMG Business Health Consultant, Public AffairsPatricia Purvis, Executive Account Manager, Strategic Accounts
1/18/2017
1
A BETTER WAY to invest in employee health
Meeting Topic Guide
• The people enrolled
• The health status
• How health status influences chronic conditions
• The overall impact of population health on claims
2
A BETTER WAY to invest in employee health
Explore the Ionic History of Kaiser Permanente…….
Patient at Contractors General Hospital, circa 1934
A talented young surgeon and a Vision
Dr. Garfield in front of his hospital, Mojave
Desert, 1935
Tunnel rescue squad serving the Colorado River Aqueduct Project workers, circa 1933
KP’s Oakland Medical Center started with rebuilding of the burned out shell of a former
hospital, Dr. Garfield on right, 1942
Sidney R. Garfield, MD1906 - 1984
2
3
A BETTER WAY to invest in employee health
Your group at a glance
* The Kaiser Permanente regionally adjusted benchmark values are based on the weighted average of the purchaser’s distribution of members across the Kaiser Permanente regions for the time period being measured.
Member demographics County of SacramentoKaiser Permanente adjusted regional
average*Comparison
Subscribers 7,727 - -
Members 18,750 - -
Average age 33.2 33.9 .7 yrs younger
Gender (% female) 52.7% 50.6% 2.1% pts higher
Average family size 2.4 1.8 0.6 higher
Enrollment Stability Index 95.1% - -
County of Sacramento | Measurement period: OCT-01-2015 through SEP-30-2016
4
A BETTER WAY to invest in employee health
Your results: lifestyle risks overview
^ ISS (Insufficient Sample Size) will be displayed if eligible member population for the prevention measure is less than 30. + As a newly reported measure, data is available beginning Q2 2013. For prediabetes and diabetes, not all members with an elevated fasting glucose test result > 126 or hemoglobin A1c > 6.5 will develop a diabetes diagnosis based on a single test result. An actual diabetic diagnosis is based on a number of clinical criteria. * Trust for America’s Health and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, 2013. ** CDC, 2014. *** American Heart Association, accessed September 9, 2013. **** CDC, accessed September 6, 2013.
Measure DescriptionYour
results, 2014 Q3^
Your results,
2016 Q3^
Kaiser Permanente adjusted regional
average
National comparative
data
Adult weight (BMI) % of adult members who are overweight or obese 74.2% 75.1% 68.2% 68.7%*
Childhood weight % of child members who are overweight or obese 31.4% 31.0% 31.5% 31.7%*
Exercise+% of adult members who are not meeting the minimum exercise recommendation
67.2% 66.4% 65.9% N/A
Prediabetes+ % of adult members who had a prediabetic test result 27.0% 29.2% 31.1% 37.0%**
Diabetes+ % of adult members who had a diabetic test result 12.7% 13.1% 11.8% 12.3%**
Cholesterol% of adult members with borderline high or high total cholesterol
35.0% 35.9% 35.9% N/A
Blood pressure % of adult members with blood pressure >=140/90 8.6% 9.7% 7.9% 33.3%***
Smoking rates % of adult members who smoke 10.6% 9.7% 10.0% 19.0%****
County of Sacramento | Measurement period: OCT-01-2015 through SEP-30-2016
5
A BETTER WAY to invest in employee health
Your results: preventive services overview
The data measurement period for preventive services lags a quarter behind lifestyle risks. It takes more time to collect and validate the data because each measure has a different eligible population.
* Continuously enrolled members during measurement period. ^ ISS (Insufficient Sample Size) will be displayed if eligible member population for the prevention measure is less than 30. + 2014 HEDIS® scores (90th percentile). ** CIS Combo 3.
Measure* DescriptionYour
results, 2014 Q2^
Your results,
2016 Q2^
Kaiser Permanente adjusted regional
average
National comparative
data+
Breast cancer screenings
% of eligible population screened 86.4% 82.1% 86.9% 82.4%
Cervical cancer screenings
% of eligible population screened 92.9% 90.8% 91.6% 83.6%
Colorectal cancer screenings
% of eligible population screened 72.1% 76.5% 77.5% 75.7%
Childhood immunization rates**
% of eligible population screened 88.4% 91.7% 90.4% 87.1%
County of Sacramento | Measurement period: OCT-01-2015 through SEP-30-2016
6
A BETTER WAY to invest in employee health
UnderweightBMI < 18.5
NormalBMI 18.5–24.9
OverweightBMI 25.0–29.9
ObeseBMI 30.0 or higher
Your results: adult weight
Ages 21 to 74. Excludes members who utilized maternity services.The customer values will be displayed as 0% if the eligible member population for the metric is less than 30.
of your member population was measured in the last 12 months
75.1% of your 2016 Q3 adult member population is overweight or obese
County of Sacramento | Measurement period: OCT-01-2015 through SEP-30-2016
7
A BETTER WAY to invest in employee health
Your results: adult weight
* Van Nuys et al., American Journal of Health Promotion, May/June 2014.
On average, an overweight or obese employee costs an employer $2,295 more a year in direct and indirect medical expenses than an employee at a healthy weight.*
Your results in Direct and indirect costs related to weight
x
estimated additional annual direct and indirect costs
Overweight or obese adult members
6,440 members are overweight or obese
$2,295 additional medical costs
County of Sacramento | Measurement period: OCT-01-2015 through SEP-30-2016
$14,779,800ISS
2016 Q3
8
A BETTER WAY to invest in employee health
Normal test resultFasting glucose < 100
or hemoglobin A1c < 5.7
Prediabetic test resultFasting glucose 100–125
or hemoglobin A1c 5.7–6.4
Diabetic test result*
Fasting glucose > 126 or hemoglobin A1c > 6.5
Your results: glucose
* Not all members with an elevated fasting glucose test result > 126 or hemoglobin A1c > 6.5 will develop a diabetes diagnosis based on a single test result. An actual diabetic diagnosis is based on a number of clinical criteria.Total percentage of members ages 18 and older. The customer values will be displayed as 0% if the eligible member population for the metric is less than 30.Data isn’t available for any region prior to Q2 2013.
of your member population wasmeasured for glucose in the last 3 years
42.3% of your 2016 Q3 member population had a prediabetic or diabetic test result
County of Sacramento | Measurement period: OCT-01-2015 through SEP-30-2016
9
A BETTER WAY to invest in employee health
Your results in Medical costs related to diabetes
x
estimated additional annual medical costs
Your results: glucose
Employees with diabetes can cost their employers $4,413 more a year on average than nondiabetic employees.*
* National Business Coalition on Health, February 2012.† Not all members with an elevated fasting glucose test result > 126 or hemoglobin A1c > 6.5 will develop a diabetes diagnosis based on a single test result.An actual diabetic diagnosis is based on a number of clinical criteria.
Adult members with diabetic test results†
905 members have diabetes$4,413 additional medical costs
$3,993,765
County of Sacramento | Measurement period: OCT-01-2015 through SEP-30-2016
†
2016 Q3
ISS
10
A BETTER WAY to invest in employee health
DesirableTotal cholesterol < 200
BorderlineTotal cholesterol 200–239
HighTotal cholesterol > 240
Your results: cholesterol
Total percentage of members ages 18 to 75. Components of total cholesterol include LDL, HDL, and triglycerides.The customer values will be displayed as 0% if the eligible member population for the metric is less than 30.
of your member population wasmeasured for cholesterol in the last 5 years
35.9% of your 2013 Q3 member population has borderline to high total cholesterol
County of Sacramento | Measurement period: OCT-01-2015 through SEP-30-2016
11
A BETTER WAY to invest in employee health
Your results in Medical costs related to high cholesterol
x
estimated additional annual medical costs
Your results: cholesterol
* Goetzel et al., Health Affairs, 2012.
Employees with high cholesterol
Annual medical expenses for employees with high total cholesterol are about $92 more than expenses for employees with lower cholesterol.*
701 members have high cholesterol
$92 additional medical costs
$64,492
County of Sacramento | Measurement period: OCT-01-2015 through SEP-30-2016
2016 Q3
ISS
12
A BETTER WAY to invest in employee health
DesirableBP systolic/diastolic <140/90
UndesirableBP systolic/diastolic ≥ 140/90
Your results: blood pressure
The percentage of members ages 18 to 85 who came to a doctor during the measurement period and had a blood pressure reading. The customer values will be displayed as 0% if the eligible member population for the metric is less than 30.
of your member population was measured in the last 12 months
County of Sacramento | Measurement period: OCT-01-2015 through SEP-30-2016
13
A BETTER WAY to invest in employee health
Your results in Medical costs related to high blood pressure
x
estimated additional annual medical costs
Your results: blood pressure
Medical expenses for an employee with high blood pressure are $1,378 more than for an employee without high blood pressure.*
* Goetzel et al., Health Affairs, November 2012.
Employees with undesirable blood pressure
917 members have undesirable blood pressure
$1,378 additional medical costs
County of Sacramento | Measurement period: OCT-01-2015 through SEP-30-2016
$1,263,626
2016 Q3
ISS
14
A BETTER WAY to invest in employee health
Percentage that smokes
Your results: smoking
The customer values will be displayed as 0% if the eligible member population for the metric is less than 30.
of your member population age 18+ with a recorded result for smoking status
County of Sacramento | Measurement period: OCT-01-2015 through SEP-30-2016
15
A BETTER WAY to invest in employee health
Your results in Direct and indirect costs related to smoking
x
estimated additional annual direct and indirect costs
Your results: smoking
* Berman et al., tobaccocontrol.bmj.com, June 2, 2013.
Just one smoking employee can cost an employer $5,816 more per year compared to nonsmoking workers.*
Percentage that smokes
1,254 members smoke$5,816 additional medical costs
County of Sacramento | Measurement period: OCT-01-2015 through SEP-30-2016
$7,293,264
2016 Q3
ISS
16
A BETTER WAY to invest in employee health
The impact of chronic conditionsChronic conditions can have a significant impact on your employees’ quality of life. They’re also a primary driver of health care costs. Our integrated system of care and focus on member engagement help you improve your employees’ health and well-being while combating those costs.
People with chronic conditions account for up to 80% of health care costs. They also account for:*
* California Department of Public Health, 2013.
Hospital admissions
Prescriptions
Doctor’s office visits
Workers’ compensation claims cost about twice as much for employees with chronic conditions.** And these claims also result in more time away from work.
** Laws and Colon, NCCI Research Brief, October 2012.
Diabetes increased the average price of a claim by
$3,169Hypertension increased the average price of a claim by
$2,687Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease increased the average price of a claim by
$2,501
County of Sacramento | Measurement period: Jul-1-2015 through Jun-30-2016
17
A BETTER WAY to invest in employee health
The importance of engagement
* Hibbard and Greene, Health Affairs, February 2013.
When people with chronic conditions are more engaged in their health, they are more likely to:
adhere to treatment
monitor their condition at home
get regular chronic care
Higher engagement is also linked to better health outcomes and lower costs.*
At Kaiser Permanente, our integrated care delivery makes it easier for members to actively participate in and manage their care, wherever they are:
At home At work At our facilities Online and on the go
County of Sacramento | Measurement period: Jul-1-2015 through Jun-30-2016
18
A BETTER WAY to invest in employee health
The calculations for this graph use DxCG methodology.
Percentage of costs from members with chronic conditions
of your costs are driven by of your members1
1 Continuously enrolled members during measurement period.
Percentage of your costs driven by chronic conditions
Percentage of U.S. employees who have at least one chronic condition or are overweight — and many of them have multiple chronic conditions.2
2 Witters and Agrawal, Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index, January 2–October 2, 2011, gallup.com. 3 Brownlee, Center for Advancing Health, April 18, 2012.
People with multiple chronic conditions are more likely to end up in the hospital.3
86%
County of Sacramento | Measurement period: Jul-1-2015 through Jun-30-2016
Percentage of members with
chronic conditions
22%63%
22.3%
77.9%
63.0%
37.0%
19
A BETTER WAY to invest in employee health
* Continuously enrolled members during measurement period.Note: Major chronic conditions = diabetes, asthma, coronary artery disease, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, and depression. Calculations for this graph use DxCG methodology.
Percentage of members compared to percentage of cost by condition*
of your costs are driven by of your members*
Percentage of your costs driven by conditions — segmented
10%
0%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
County of Sacramento | Measurement period: Jul-1-2015 through Jun-30-2016
Members Costs
2 or more major chronic conditions 3.4% 21.3%
1 major chronic condition 14.6% 28.7%
Additional chronic conditions 4.3% 13.0%
Cancer 0.7% 1.9%
Back pain 7.1% 7.0%
Arthritis 1.4% 2.1%
Injuries (other than back pain) 7.7% 4.4%
Maternity without other conditions 1.5% 5.0%
All other 59.5% 16.6%
22%63%
24
A BETTER WAY to invest in employee health
Pharmacy Detail: Drug Category by Dollars in Claims, Drug Category by Medication Type
Generic37%
Brand34%
Specialty29%
2015 - % of Total Rx $
Generic36%
Brand34%
Specialty30%
2016 - % of Total Rx $
25
A BETTER WAY to invest in employee health
Top 25 Drugs by Total Scripts sorted by Therapeutic Class