Upload
katherine-hudson
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
County Delivery Review School Survey ResultsReport to Steering CommitteeAugust 16, 2010Prepared by Judy AshleyExtension Coordinator for School Relations
MethodsTarget audience: school superintendents
and elementary school principalsOnline survey via Survey Monkey218 responded73 counties represented in results (46%)78 school systems represented (43%)Survey divided into:
◦ Introductory questions ◦Funding◦Value of programming areas◦Value of delivery methods◦Demographics
Introductory/Funding questions
Does UGA CE/4-H provide programming in any school in your school system?
Does your school system provide funding?
If yes, return on investment?Willingness to collaborate?Would you allow
paraprofessionals?
Value of Programming AreasHealthy Lifestyles and Nutrition
EducationPublic SpeakingCitizenship and Youth LeadershipScience Engineering and
TechnologyYouth in Agriculture
Ranking of Programming AreasCitizenship/Leadership (121)Science Engineering and
Technology (105)Healthy Lifestyles and Nutrition
(99)Public Speaking (98)Youth in Agriculture (82)
Value of Delivery Methods
Camps and conferencesIn-school programming (club
meetings)Competitive eventsEnvironmental Education
Ranking of Delivery Methods
In-school programming (95)Competitive Events (83)Environmental Education and
Camps and Conferences (69 each)
Funding Strategies
Increase funding 20-30%Maintain current funding but
collaborateSupport property tax levyIncrease user fees to students
Demographics
Name of the school systemPositionSchool System enrollment
Summary87% received programming from
CE/4-H75% willing to collaborate59% disagreed with using
paraprosHighest ranked programming
area – Citizenship/LeadershipHighest ranked delivery method –
In-school programming