Upload
others
View
8
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
UA
COUNTRYPROFILE UKRAINE
IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook 2020, Digital 2020, Talent 2019: summaries
WORLD COMPETITIVENESSRANKING 2020
All data are available from theWorld Competitiveness Online.
Visit our eShop
BASIC FACTSCapital
Land area (square km '000) 6042019
Exchange Rate (per $) 25.8462019
Population - market size (millions) 41.862019 21
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) (US$ billions) 153.82019 50
GDP (PPP) per capita (US$) 9,7912019 59
Real GDP growth (%) 3.22019 18
Consumer price inflation (%) 7.892019 60
Unemployment rate (%) 8.202019 52
Labor force (millions) 18.162019 22
Current account balance (% of GDP) -0.862019 43
Direct investment stocks inward ($bn) 43.82018 52
Direct investment flows inward (% of GDP) 1.982019 37
PEER GROUPS RANKINGSEUROPE - MIDDLE EAST - AFRICA (40 countries) POPULATIONS > 20 MILLION (29 countries)
COMPETITIVENESS TRENDS - OVERALL
UKRAINEOVERALL PERFORMANCE (63 countries) Rank
Kiev
CHALLENGES IN 2020Reinforce the rule of law, reform legal system, and restore trust in
the judicial system.
International Management Institute (MIM-Kyiv)
COMPETITIVENESS LANDSCAPE
59 60 5954 55
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
52
21
5951 50
56
23
6153
6053
38
60
42 41
57 5652
62
43
Dom
estic
Eco
nom
y
Inte
rnat
iona
l Tra
de
Inte
rnat
iona
l Inv
estm
ent
Empl
oym
ent
Pric
es
Publ
ic F
inan
ce
Tax
Polic
y
Inst
itutio
nal F
ram
ewor
k
Busi
ness
Leg
isla
tion
Soci
etal
Fra
mew
ork
Prod
uctiv
ity &
Effi
cien
cy
Labo
r M
arke
t
Fina
nce
Man
agem
ent
Prac
tices
Att
itude
s an
d V
alue
s
Basi
c In
fras
truc
ture
Tech
nolo
gica
l Inf
rast
ruct
ure
Scie
ntifi
c In
fras
truc
ture
Hea
lth a
nd E
nvir
onm
ent
Educ
atio
n
Economic Performance Government Efficiency Business Efficiency Infrastructure
38 40 3936 36
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
27 27 27
24 25
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
• Reinforce the rule of law, reform legal system, and restore trust in the judicial system.
• Secure economic advancement and improve capital investment efficiency.
• Service the external and internal debt on schedule, secure economic development.
• Manage work migration to stabilize country balance of payment.• Freeze the conflict in Donbas.
Provided by:International Management Institute (MIM-Kyiv)
IMPROVEMENTSWCY 2019
WCY 2020 DECLINES
WCY 2019
1.4.04 Employment - long-term growth -7.69 3.76 4.4.04 Health infrastructure 2.73
3.2.14 Labor force long-term growth -8.17 2.68 2.1.11 Pension funding 2.03
1.2.02 Current account balance -3.56 -0.86 4.4.23 Environment-related technologies 0.08
2.3.04 Country credit rating 10.0 16.3 4.4.19 Forest area growth 1.7
2.3.08 Exchange rate stability 0.084 0.032 3.2.01 Compensation levels 2.03
1.5.01 Consumer price inflation 10.95 7.89 2.1.09 Public finances 3.39
2.3.13 Bribery and corruption 1.52 1.92 1.1.19 Resilience of the economy 3.12
3.3.16 Credit 2.49 3.11 3.3.10 Stock market capitalization (%) 3.91
3.1.09 Small and medium-size enterprises 4.58 5.70 4.2.14 Funding for technological development 4.55
1.4.08 Long-term unemployment 2.49 1.90 4.3.22 Knowledge transfer 3.67
1.2.12 Exports of commercial services ($bn) 13.78 17.02 2.5.01 Justice 2.58
2.3.07 Foreign currency reserves per capita 495 604 4.3.21 Intellectual property rights 4.24
4.4.12 Energy intensity 553 445 4.4.28 Quality of life 3.12
2.4.09 State ownership of enterprises 3.94 4.68 4.5.17 Management education 5.91
3.4.04 Credibility of managers 4.42 5.24 2.4.06 Investment incentives 3.18
COMPETITIVENESS EVOLUTION & ATTRACTIVENESS INDICATORS
UKRAINECOMPETITIVENESS EVOLUTION
1.59
2.63
2.49
2.30
2.92
3.59
2.95
5.03
The criteria below highlight the 15 biggest Improvements and the 15 biggest Declines in the overall performance of the economy. They are
determined by the largest percentage changes in the value of each criterion from one yearbook to the next.
WCY 2020
2.74
KEY ATTRACTIVENESS INDICATORSFrom a list of 15 indicators, respondents of the Executive Opinion Survey were asked to select 5 that they perceived as the key
attractiveness factors of their economy. The chart shows the percentage of responses per indicator from the highest number of responses
to the lowest.
1.19
0.05
1.1
2.11
3.57
2.63
1.4%2.8%5.6%9.9%11.3%15.5%15.5%21.1%21.1%42.3%46.5%47.9%53.5%57.7%77.5%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%
Competency of governmentPolicy stability & predictability
Effective legal environmentAccess to financing
Business-friendly environmentStrong R&D culture
Reliable infrastructureQuality of corporate governance
Competitive tax regimeEffective labor relations
Open and positive attitudesDynamism of the economy
Cost competitivenessHigh educational level
Skilled workforce
WORLD COMPETITIVENESSDIGITAL RANKING 2020
All data are available from theWorld Competitiveness Online.
Visit our eShop
Alpha AlphaLabelBeta BetaLabel Gamma GammaLabel1 2 2 2 2 2 24 4 4 2 2
6.5 4 4 2 28.5 4 4 2 211 4 4 2 2
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
59 60 58 60 58
44 45 39 40 38
60 62 61 61 59
61 61 61 62 61
OVERALL
Future readiness
PEER GROUPS RANKINGS
EUROPE - MIDDLE EAST - AFRICA (40 countries) POPULATIONS > 20 MILLION (29 countries)
COMPETITIVENESS & DIGITAL RANKINGS
Technology
DIGITAL TRENDS - OVERALL
UKRAINE
OVERALL PERFORMANCE (63 countries)
OVERALL & FACTORS - 5 years
Knowledge
5960
5860
5859
6059
5455
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Digital
Competitiveness
3840 40 40 39
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
2627
25
27
25
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
38 52 19 50
59 54 59 5858
61 56 51 62
Knowledge Talent Training & education Scientific concentration
Technology Regulatory framework Capital Technological framework
Future readiness Adaptive attitudes Business agility IT integrationThe direction of the triangle indicates the performance change from the last year: improved or stabledeclined
Overall Factors Sub-Factors
N.B. This graph provides only a comparison of the country’s performance in the two rankings.
u Overall top strengths
w Overall top weaknesses
Subfactors 2016 2017 2018 2019 202058 57 55 57 52
20 26 22 21 19
45 45 40 49 50
Talent Rank Rank Rank
Educational assessment PISA - Math 40 45 52 International experience 60 u 11 43 Foreign highly-skilled personnel 59 - u 17 Management of cities 56 u 11 u 21 Digital/Technological skills 27 28 48 Net flow of international students 47 - 37 43
Subfactors 2016 2017 2018 2019 202055 56 54 54 54
60 62 61 62 59
58 60 57 60 58
Regulatory framework Rank Rank Rank
Starting a business 32 - 46 Enforcing contracts 43 60 w 63 Immigration laws 40 56 w 62 Development & application of tech. 59 60 50w Scientific research legislation 61 61 44w Intellectual property rights 61 u 7 52
Subfactors 2016 2017 2018 2019 202060 58 53 59 56
59 56 53 45 51
60 60 61 61 62
Adaptive attitudes Rank Rank Rank
E-Participation 39 32 53 Internet retailing 51 51 59 Tablet possession 55 33 w 61 Smartphone possession 49 40 60 Attitudes toward globalization 49 59 -
Training & education Scientific concentration
Talent
Robots in Education and R&D
IT integration
Business agility IT integration
Scientific concentration
Capital Technological framework
FACTORS BREAKDOWN - STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES
UKRAINE
FUTURE READINESS
TECHNOLOGY
Technological framework
Opportunities and threats E-GovernmentWorld robots distribution Public-private partnerships
IT & media stock market capitalization Communications technology
Regulatory framework
Capital
KNOWLEDGE
Entrepreneurial fear of failure
Agility of companies Cyber securityUse of big data and analytics Software piracyKnowledge transfer
Adaptive attitudes
Business agility
Venture capital Internet bandwidth speedInvestment in Telecommunications High-tech exports (%)
Funding for technological development Mobile Broadband subscribersBanking and financial services Wireless broadbandCountry credit rating Internet users
Training & education
Employee training Total expenditure on R&D (%)Total public expenditure on education Total R&D personnel per capitaHigher education achievement Female researchersPupil-teacher ratio (tertiary education) R&D productivity by publicationGraduates in Sciences Scientific and technical employmentWomen with degrees High-tech patent grants
WORLD TALENTRANKING 2019
All data are available from theWorld Competitiveness Online.
Visit our eShop
Alpha AlphaLabel Beta BetaLabel Gamma GammaLabel1 2 2 2 2 2 24 4 4 2 2
Value
u 6.0 % 10u 25.6 % 9 963 US$ 53 12.99 ratio 21u 7.21 ratio 2 4.70 Survey [0..10] 36 5.08 Survey [0..10] 51u 47.64 % 13w 2.73 Survey [0..10] 59
Value
u 62.30 index 5 5.52 Survey [0..10] 59 4.30 Survey [0..10] 58 2.39 Survey [0..10] 58w 3.12 Survey [0..10] 61w 2.55 Survey [0..10] 59w 3,311 US$ 59w 28,071 US$ 60 13.28 % 23 2.58 Survey [0..10] 56 20.68 micrograms 47
Value
0.48 % 46 5.12 Survey [0..10] 42 5.64 Survey [0..10] 49 4.36 Survey [0..10] 57 4.39 Survey [0..10] 54 4.76 Survey [0..10] 46 24.22 % 27 4.48 Survey [0..10] 54 5.91 Survey [0..10] 42 4.36 Survey [0..10] 55 1.25 number 48 - Average -
Investment & Development 2019 Rank
Health infrastructure meets the needs of society
2019 Rank
Total public expenditure on education Percentage of GDP
Pupil-teacher ratio (secondary education)Apprenticeships are sufficiently implemented
Readiness 2019 Rank
Educational assessment - PISA PISA survey of 15-year olds
Appeal
Exposure to particle pollution Mean population exposure to PM2.5, Micrograms per cubic metre
is readily available
Labor force growth Percentage change
Skilled labor
Management education meets the needs of the business community
Language skills are meeting the needs of enterprises
Student mobility inbound Foreign tertiary-level students per 1000 inhabitants
Primary and secondary education meets the needs of a competitive economy
Graduates in Sciences % of graduates in ICT, Engineering, Math & Natural Sciences
University education meets the needs of a competitive economy
Finance skills are readily available
International experience of senior managers is generally significant
Competent senior managers are readily available
Justice is fairly administered
Remuneration in services professions Gross annual income including supplements such as bonuses, US$
Remuneration of management Total base salary plus bonuses and long-term incentives, US$
Effective personal income tax rate Percentage of an income equal to GDP per capita
Brain drain (well-educated and skilled people) does not hinder competitiveness in your economy
Quality of life is high
Foreign highly-skilled personnel are attracted to your country's business environment
Cost-of-living index Index of a basket of goods & services in the main city, including housing (New York City = 100)
Attracting and retaining talents is a priority in companies
Worker motivation in companies is high
Gov. expenditure on education per student Percentage of GDP per capita (secondary education)
Total public exp. on education per student
UKRAINE
Spending per enrolled pupil/student, all levels
Pupil-teacher ratio (primary education) Ratio of students to teaching staff
Ratio of students to teaching staff
Employee training is a high priority in companies
Female labor force Percentage of total labor force
IMD World Talent Ranking 2019
OVERALL PERFORMANCE (63 countries)
4649
59
48
44
16 16
35
22
18
58 5962 61 60
5659 60
56
51
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Overall
Investment &Development
Appeal
Readiness
18
6044
51
Investment & Development
Appeal
Readiness
The direction of the triangle indicates the performance change from the last year: improved or stabledeclined
2020
IMD WORLDCOMPETITIVENESSYEARBOOK
IMD
Wor
ld C
ompe
titive
ness
Year
book
About the Institute for Management Development (IMD)
IMD is an independent academic institution with Swiss roots and global
reach, founded almost 75 years ago by business leaders for business
leaders. Since its creation, IMD has been a pioneering force in developing
leaders who transform organizations and contribute to society.
Based in Lausanne (Switzerland) and Singapore, IMD has been ranked
in the Top 3 of the FT’s annual Executive Education Global Ranking for
the last nine consecutive years and in the top five for 17 consecutive
years. Our MBA and EMBA programs have repeatedly been singled out
among the best in Europe and the world.
We believe that this consistency at the forefront of our industry is
grounded in IMD’s unique approach to creating “Real Learning. Real
Impact”. Led by an expert and diverse faculty, we strive to be the trusted
learning partner of choice for ambitious individuals and organizations
worldwide. Challenging what is and inspiring what could be.
www.imd.org
IMD, IMD INTERNATIONAL, REAL LEARNING. REAL IMPACT, IMD BUSINESS SCHOOL and IMD WORLD COMPETITIVENESS YEARBOOK are trademarks of IMD - International Institute for Management Development