1
E L E C T R O C H E M I S T R Y L A B O R A T O R Y B A T T E R I E S 1 μm Correlation of electrode expansion and cyclability in graphite-based negative electrodes Christa Bünzli 1 , Dario Cericola 2 , Thomas Hucke 2 , Michael E. Spahr 2 , Petr Novák 1 , and Juan Luis Gómez-Cámer 1 1 Paul Scherrer Institute, Electrochemistry Laboratory, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland 2 IMERYS Graphite & Carbon, CH-6743 Bodio TI, Switzerland [email protected] Electrochemical in situ dilatometry Motivation / Targets Conclusions Develop carbon based anode material with specific charge > 450 mAh/g by addition of small amounts of silicon Investigate the influence of graphite / binder combination on cycling Understand the relationship between expansion and electrode failure Experimental 4.75 wt% Si, 90.25 wt% intercalating carbon, 1 wt% SuperC65, 4 wt% binder Baseline: 95 wt% intercalating carbon, 1 wt% SuperC65, 4 wt% binder Electrochemistry: 20 mA/g 1 st cycle, then 50 mA/g, 5 mV 1.5 V vs Li + /Li Electrolyte: 1M LiPF 6 in EC/DMC 1:1 (w:w) Graphite / Binder influence Binder has strong influence on accommodation of volume changes Failure mechanism is influenced by the binder type: CMC-PAA holds larger expansion avoiding loss of active Si in situ dilatometry provides new insights into binder performance graphite SLP30 + Si Graphite only: stable cycling regardless of the binder Graphite with silicon: improved cycling stability for both KS6 and SLP30 based electrodes with CMC-PAA crosslinked binder 2 μm 2 μm 1 μm cross-sectional view top view Scan me! Both KS6 and SLP30 electrodes show stable cycling regardless of the binder Different failure mechanism with PVDF KS6-Si keeps the graphite charge, SLP30-Si fails even below graphite’s capacity Larger particles & higher aspect ratio for SLP30 than KS6 → preferred orientation of SLP30 parallel to substrate graphite KS6 + Si PVDF is a stiff binder KS6 and SLP30 electrodes expand irreversibly ca. 2% in 1 st cycle Capacity fading linked to ‘’loss’’ of active Si lower expansion in subseq. cycles CMC-PAA is an elastic binder Irreversible expansion of ca. 1% recovered every cycle Holds expansion of up to 9% with low irreversibility Capacity fade is not due to ‘’loss’’ of active Si → different failure mechanism KS6-Si/PVDF KS6-Si/CMC-PAA SLP30-Si/PVDF SLP30-Si/CMC-PAA

Correlation of electrode expansion and cyclability in

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

E L E C T R O C H E M I S T R Y L A B O R A T O R Y B A

T T

E R

I E

S

1 µm

Correlation of electrode expansion and cyclability in

graphite-based negative electrodes Christa Bünzli1, Dario Cericola2, Thomas Hucke2, Michael E. Spahr2, Petr Novák1, and Juan Luis Gómez-Cámer1

1Paul Scherrer Institute, Electrochemistry Laboratory, CH-5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland 2IMERYS Graphite & Carbon, CH-6743 Bodio TI, Switzerland

[email protected]

Electrochemical in situ dilatometry

Motivation / Targets

Conclusions

• Develop carbon based anode material with specific charge > 450 mAh/g by

addition of small amounts of silicon

• Investigate the influence of graphite / binder combination on cycling

• Understand the relationship between expansion and electrode failure

Experimental

•4.75 wt% Si, 90.25 wt% intercalating carbon, 1 wt% SuperC65, 4 wt% binder

•Baseline: 95 wt% intercalating carbon, 1 wt% SuperC65, 4 wt% binder

•Electrochemistry: 20 mA/g 1st cycle, then 50 mA/g, 5 mV – 1.5 V vs Li+/Li

•Electrolyte: 1M LiPF6 in EC/DMC 1:1 (w:w)

Graphite / Binder influence

Binder has strong influence on accommodation of volume changes

Failure mechanism is influenced by the binder type:

− CMC-PAA holds larger expansion avoiding loss of active Si

− in situ dilatometry provides new insights into binder performance

graphite SLP30 + Si

Graphite only: stable cycling regardless of the binder

Graphite with silicon: improved cycling stability for both KS6 and SLP30

based electrodes with CMC-PAA crosslinked binder

2 µm 2 µm

1 µm

cro

ss-s

ectio

na

l vie

w

top v

iew

Scan me! Both KS6 and SLP30 electrodes show stable cycling regardless of the binder

Different failure mechanism with PVDF

− KS6-Si keeps the graphite charge, SLP30-Si fails even below graphite’s capacity

Larger particles & higher aspect ratio for SLP30 than KS6

→ preferred orientation of SLP30 parallel to substrate

graphite KS6 + Si

PVDF is a stiff binder

− KS6 and SLP30 electrodes expand irreversibly ca. 2% in 1st cycle

− Capacity fading linked to ‘’loss’’ of active Si → lower expansion in subseq. cycles

CMC-PAA is an elastic binder

− Irreversible expansion of ca. 1% → recovered every cycle

− Holds expansion of up to 9% with low irreversibility

− Capacity fade is not due to ‘’loss’’ of active Si → different failure mechanism

KS

6-S

i/P

VD

F

KS

6-S

i/C

MC

-PA

A

SL

P3

0-S

i/P

VD

F

SL

P3

0-S

i/C

MC

-PA

A