Upload
matthew-morris
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Core IT Assessment ApproachCommon Solutions Group
IT Governance and Funding Workshop
January, 2006Philip Long
Yale University
Past
• Charge by proxy of usage
– Per jack for network
– Per account for email
– etc.
Cost By FTEWhy FTE??
• Simple to understand, budget and implement
– (But not as simple as you think :-)
• Of three primary network costs (edge, core, Internet), our variable costs
were best explained by edge – roughly approximated by FTE
• Similar reasoning on email
• More complex formula would likely be more precise but at $15/month,
we’re good enough . . .
Core IT Infrastructure ElementsBlended Rates “per FTE”
• Basic 10/100/wireless network: $10.xx per month
• Norton Anti-virus: $.xx per month
• Imap, pop, virus & spam controlled email: $3.50 per month
• Help desk support for above
• Central campus cost: $15 +/- per month per FTE for all faculty, students and staff including anyone with network access
• Some schools have school specific additions, e.g., HIPAA security charge + more within Medicine
– Also, Medicine recharges differentially based on role
• What we need to add asap: institutional IT security
Campus-wide Core IT Assessment
• Effort began in December, 2000, implemented in October, 2004
• Assess every FTE on campus for core IT services
– Includes Service and Maintenance workers, etc. – online benefits, paystub
• Facilitating issues
– Prior charge-back model did provide full funding for included services
– Reduced expense base by 10%, held that expense base constant for 2 years
• Reduced impact on losers and generated real overall savings
– Strong backing by the Provost, willingness from most deans
• Primary complications: all governance
– Substantial winners and losers within restricted fund sources, including, where appropriate, federal grants and contracts
– Three major school losers: three year phase in
Effects
• Increasingly, all jacks are live, no prior ordering of network service
– All new buildings fully wired and activated
– Email is set up on request
• Most schools pay the assessment centrally as a single transaction
– For this group, universal appreciation of dramatic simplification
– Also, most see the cost as a great bargain for the service provided
• Schools with large restricted funds continue to sub-charge
– On a period based on the fund, some annual, some monthly
• Long term risk
– Network and email scale with expanding people
– However, network and email expense growth presumably must fit within normal
budget growth
Next Challenge
• Appropriate distributed IT model
• Created a new integrated IT organization from prior central campus
and Medical campus IT organizations
• Primary political drivers
– Cost
– Cost
– Savings
– Cost
– IT critical mass, technical competence, improved quality and services
– Alignment, future academic prospects
• Working hard at building a next generation IT organization