8
Copyright © 2012 SCK•CEN ALFRED Control Rod and Safety Rod

Copyright © 2012 SCKCEN ALFRED Control Rod and Safety Rod

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Copyright © 2012 SCKCEN ALFRED Control Rod and Safety Rod

Copyright © 2012 SCK•CEN

ALFRED Control Rod and Safety Rod

Page 2: Copyright © 2012 SCKCEN ALFRED Control Rod and Safety Rod

Copyright © 2012 SCK•CEN

ALFRED Control Rod and Safety Rod

 Damien LAMBERTS

SCK•CEN ANS/NSDPrimary system design

E-mail

LEADER WP meetingThe 20th of Novembre 2012, Karlsruhe

Page 3: Copyright © 2012 SCKCEN ALFRED Control Rod and Safety Rod

Copyright © 2012 SCK•CEN

Scope & introduction

These rod were developed in framework of CDT (Central Design Team : FASTEF)See Pervious Presentation (The 25th of October 2011,

Bologna )The rod design has been change to fit into ALFRED

The position for the rods are dedicated with special interface

The rod pressed down onto lower grid (like the grid)The absorber bundle is kept in place

while removing the FA cover and upper grid for refuelling.

Rods are locked into the lowergrid to prevented inadvertentextraction

Page 4: Copyright © 2012 SCKCEN ALFRED Control Rod and Safety Rod

Copyright © 2012 SCK•CEN

Rod interface with lower grid

The rod may not be mistakenly remove (CR & SR)Rods are locked in lower gridUnlocked by 30° rotation

The totation is only possible when the 6 neighbouringFA are removed

during normal operation the male the male toothed ring is pressed against the centring cone

If If pull up the male toothed ring is retained by female toothed ring

small (1 mm) upward motion Small reactivy effect (≈-0.02$).

Page 5: Copyright © 2012 SCKCEN ALFRED Control Rod and Safety Rod

Copyright © 2012 SCK•CEN

Control Rod upper interface

The guide tube is push down by upper grid (via springs)actuation link is divided in 2 parts connected by a

spherical joint Socket is part lower half that stays in the reactor during

refuelling the socket is lowered to avoid inadvertent actuation

during handlingBall is part of the upper half that is removed prior

FA cover removal.Differential expansion (FA cover vs upper grid)

is taken by the spherical joint the armature hinge

The casing is extendDucting the flushing Argon to the high speed

section

Page 6: Copyright © 2012 SCKCEN ALFRED Control Rod and Safety Rod

Copyright © 2012 SCK•CEN

Safety Rod upper interface

Only the feeding lines (& instrument connection) downstream the electro valve needs to be disconnected before the removal of the FA coverFast connection system (pneumatic and electric )

Flexible beam carries the connection lines form rod to the connection interfaceAllowing differential displacement of FA cover (≈5mm)

SR is located and spring loaded by the upper grid

Page 7: Copyright © 2012 SCKCEN ALFRED Control Rod and Safety Rod

Copyright © 2012 SCK•CEN

Conclusion

It seems possible to adapt the FASTEF design to ALFRED Interface with lower grid an upper grid are still to be

detailedPenetrations across FA cover show b deffined (sealing

system, cover temperature field..)

Detailed geometrical adaptation need to done in order toPerform curate insertion time calculation End accurate neutronic modelling

Page 8: Copyright © 2012 SCKCEN ALFRED Control Rod and Safety Rod

Copyright © 2012 SCK•CEN

Copyright © 2012 - SCKCEN

PLEASE NOTE!This presentation contains data, information and formats for dedicated use ONLY and may not be

copied, distributed or cited without the explicit permission of the SCK•CEN. If this has been obtained, please reference it as a “personal communication. By courtesy of SCK•CEN”.

SCK•CENStudiecentrum voor Kernenergie

Centre d'Etude de l'Energie NucléaireBelgian Nuclear Research Centre

Stichting van Openbaar Nut Fondation d'Utilité Publique Foundation of Public Utility

Registered Office: Avenue Herrmann-Debrouxlaan 40 – BE-1160 BRUSSELSOperational Office: Boeretang 200 – BE-2400 MOL