20
Convocation 2007 Survey Results

Convocation 2007 Survey Results. Please rate the following aspect of convocation: Quality of Content

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Convocation 2007 Survey Results. Please rate the following aspect of convocation: Quality of Content

Convocation 2007

Survey Results

Page 2: Convocation 2007 Survey Results. Please rate the following aspect of convocation: Quality of Content

Please rate the following aspect of convocation:Please rate the following aspect of convocation: Quality of ContentQuality of Content

Fair27.5%

Good43.3%

Poor8.3%

No Opinion3.3%

No Answer5.0%

Excellent12.5%

Page 3: Convocation 2007 Survey Results. Please rate the following aspect of convocation: Quality of Content

Good, 40%

Fair, 27.5%

Poor, 12.5%Excellent, 12.5%

No Answer, 6.67%

No Opinion, 0.83%

Please rate the following aspect of convocation:Please rate the following aspect of convocation: Relevance of Content to Your Role at WilkesRelevance of Content to Your Role at Wilkes

Page 4: Convocation 2007 Survey Results. Please rate the following aspect of convocation: Quality of Content

Fair, 27.5%

Good, 25.8%

Excellent, 25%

No Answer, 9.17%

Poor, 5.83%

No Opinion, 6.67%

Please rate the following aspect of convocation:Please rate the following aspect of convocation: VideoVideo

Page 5: Convocation 2007 Survey Results. Please rate the following aspect of convocation: Quality of Content

No Opinion, 1.27%

Poor, 3.33%

Fair, 10%

No Answer, 6.67%

Good, 41.6%

Excellent, 36.6%

Please rate the following aspect of convocation:Please rate the following aspect of convocation: Introduction of New AdministratorsIntroduction of New Administrators

Page 6: Convocation 2007 Survey Results. Please rate the following aspect of convocation: Quality of Content

35%

19.1%

6.67%

27.50%

7.50%

4.17%

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

NoOpinion

Poor Fair Good Excellent NoAnswer

Perc

en

tag

e

Please rate the following aspect of convocation:Please rate the following aspect of convocation: Duration of EventDuration of Event

Page 7: Convocation 2007 Survey Results. Please rate the following aspect of convocation: Quality of Content

Excellent 8.33%

No Answer 5.83%

Not Clear At All, 2.50%

Moderately 30%

Very Well45%

Slightly8.83%

How well do you understand the university’s strategic initiatives for How well do you understand the university’s strategic initiatives for

the year?the year?

Page 8: Convocation 2007 Survey Results. Please rate the following aspect of convocation: Quality of Content

No Answer 8%

I don't know 18%

No 20%

Yes 54%

Has convocation helped clarify your role in ensuring the success of Has convocation helped clarify your role in ensuring the success of

Wilkes’ strategic initiatives?Wilkes’ strategic initiatives?

Page 9: Convocation 2007 Survey Results. Please rate the following aspect of convocation: Quality of Content

Fair, 26.60%

Positive, 40.80%

Very Positive, 21.60%

No Answer, 5%

Negative, 4.17%

Very Negative, 1.67%

What is your overall impression of the direction Wilkes University?What is your overall impression of the direction Wilkes University?

Page 10: Convocation 2007 Survey Results. Please rate the following aspect of convocation: Quality of Content

Somewhat Important

Rate 316.60%

ImportantRate 4 38.30%

Very Important Rate 530.80%

No Answer 5%

Slightly Important

Rate 2 7.50%

Not Important Rate 1 1.67%

Rank each of the following purposes of a university convocation:Rank each of the following purposes of a university convocation: Review of Past YearReview of Past Year

Page 11: Convocation 2007 Survey Results. Please rate the following aspect of convocation: Quality of Content

Somewhat Important

Rate 3 10.80%

ImportantRate 4 39.10%

Very Important Rate 5

40.00%

No Answer 5%

Slightly Important

Rate 23.33%

Not Important - Rate 11.67%

Rank each of the following purposes of a university convocation:Rank each of the following purposes of a university convocation: Profile of New and Ongoing InitiativesProfile of New and Ongoing Initiatives

Page 12: Convocation 2007 Survey Results. Please rate the following aspect of convocation: Quality of Content

SomewhatRate 322.50%

ImportantRate 439.10%

Very Important Rate 526.60%

No Answer, 5%

SlightlyRate 25.00%

Not Important - Rate 13.33%

Rank each of the following purposes of a university convocation:Rank each of the following purposes of a university convocation: FellowshipFellowship

Page 13: Convocation 2007 Survey Results. Please rate the following aspect of convocation: Quality of Content

Somewhat Important

Rate 322.50%

ImportantRate 439.10%

Very Important Rate 526.60%

No Answer, 6.67%

Slightly Important

Rate 25.00%

Not Important - Rate 13.33%

Rank each of the following purposes of a university convocation:Rank each of the following purposes of a university convocation: Generate Enthusiasm For Starting the YearGenerate Enthusiasm For Starting the Year

Page 14: Convocation 2007 Survey Results. Please rate the following aspect of convocation: Quality of Content

Top Two Choices for a Convocation Format: Top Two Choices for a Convocation Format:

20

1

83

1

39

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

ProfessionallyFacilitated Workshops

Presentation and Q&A

Keynote Speaker

Interactive GroupWorkshops

Trade-Show Style(Exhibits)

Page 15: Convocation 2007 Survey Results. Please rate the following aspect of convocation: Quality of Content

Comments:Comments:

A bit more staff orientated would be nice. The faculty undoubtedly deserves all the accolades which they receive, however I do feel like the staff is underrepresented and under appreciated. After all it is the staff which makes the day to day operations of this campus feasible and attainable.

Extend the work of the convocation to the unit/department level with appropriate activities to help employees connect their work to the strategy of the University.

Allow for submission of questions prior to the event to allow for more in depth and prepared responses.

Page 16: Convocation 2007 Survey Results. Please rate the following aspect of convocation: Quality of Content

Comments:Comments:

Stop wasting money and time with these dog and pony shows. Put the money into enhancing salaries, programs and infrastructure. The time spent by the facilities people in setting up and attending the event is better spent getting the dorms ready for students. The food is unnecessary and expensive. Just invite everyone to an hour meeting with an informational agenda that is short on rhetoric. Feel good speeches and MTV TYPE PRESENTATIONS WITH HORRIBLE, LOUD MUSIC, are not appreciated. All we want is sincerity, honesty and brevity. If you seriously listen to your faculty and staff this message will come through quite clearly.

I enjoyed hearing from the new cabinet members, and the video was very good, but somehow I felt that energy was lacking this year. I am not sure why, since there was a lot of good news and I am excited about the new administrators.

Page 17: Convocation 2007 Survey Results. Please rate the following aspect of convocation: Quality of Content

Comments:Comments:

Include students so whole community shares the start of the new year.

Foremost, please do not use outdated uncomfortable chairs that may break at a moment's notice then have everyone sit for hours uncomfortably during a drawn out non-interactive presentation. Convocation should be fun and lively. You should leave stimulated and ready to do your part in moving the campus to the next level.Although it's important to meet the new leadership team, the way it was done was extremely boring. Hearing a few new employees have a lengthy speech about themselves is uncreative. It's best to take into account the average attention span. Thanks for listening!

It would also be nice to have a representative from the board of trustees to speakand answer questions.

Page 18: Convocation 2007 Survey Results. Please rate the following aspect of convocation: Quality of Content

Comments:Comments:

Have more comfortable chairs next time.

I really enjoyed the format that we had this year compared to the ones in the past. I would like to have more of these types of convocations in the future.

I like the idea of bringing together the entire Wilkes gang to kick-off the new school year. I prefer this year's format which was not too long, gave everyone a chance to hear from Wilkes leaders, overview of the coming year's goals and a question and answer session.

Page 19: Convocation 2007 Survey Results. Please rate the following aspect of convocation: Quality of Content

Comments:Comments:

I thought that this year’s convocation was well organized and presented information that was necessary for the University community. In other words, many of the components for a good convocation were in place, however, I felt there was a real lack of energy and enthusiasm compared to previous years from both the audience and the cabinet. I think maybe there was a delivery or execution problem. I just wasn't sold on the messages that were being delivered. This was especially important this year as we have a brand new cabinet that no one really knows yet.

Page 20: Convocation 2007 Survey Results. Please rate the following aspect of convocation: Quality of Content

Comments:Comments:

Click here to view all of the comments*.

*Late entries are not shown