27
Convergence and difference between campus based and distance education: trends in a digital age Jennifer Glennie April 2013

Convergence and difference between campus based and distance education: trends in a digital age Jennifer Glennie April 2013

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Convergence and difference between campus based and distance education: trends in a digital age Jennifer Glennie April 2013

Convergence and difference between campus based and

distance education: trends in a digital age

Jennifer GlennieApril 2013

Page 2: Convergence and difference between campus based and distance education: trends in a digital age Jennifer Glennie April 2013

Continuum of Educational Provision

From purely face-to-face (contact) tuition through to education purely at a distance

Face-to-faceDistance

As for face-to-face education, there are many variations of distance provision

Page 3: Convergence and difference between campus based and distance education: trends in a digital age Jennifer Glennie April 2013

Convergence?

• No doubt that any ‘toenadering’’ will be accelerated by the growing use of technology which offers opportunities, or affordances, to facilitate and enrich learning in all modes

Page 4: Convergence and difference between campus based and distance education: trends in a digital age Jennifer Glennie April 2013

Technology has always had a dramatic impact on Distance

EducationSo-called ‘Generations’ which privilege technology as the differentiatore.g. Moore and Kearsley (2005)1st Correspondence – single medium (print) – mass production –correspondence2nd Radio and TV broadcasting in the ascendency3rd Combined approach – correspondence assisted by broadcasting 4th Tele-learning: interactive audio/video conferencing5th Online delivery – multimedia interactive content with online communication and support

Page 5: Convergence and difference between campus based and distance education: trends in a digital age Jennifer Glennie April 2013

Affordances of New Technologies for Distance Education: Some

examples • Communication • Learning materials

– More cost effective, quicker access to a wider range of learning materials for online and offline use

– Ease of adaptation of course materials– Availability of open educational resources

Page 6: Convergence and difference between campus based and distance education: trends in a digital age Jennifer Glennie April 2013

Affordances of New Technologies for Distance Education: Some

examples • Possibility of real time and/or asynchronous

engagement with and support of students – also among students

• Assessment– More frequent and interactive formative

assessment – peer and educator– Rapid turnaround in assignment submission,

marking and return• Tracking students’ progress

Page 7: Convergence and difference between campus based and distance education: trends in a digital age Jennifer Glennie April 2013

Changing context

• Increased bandwidth• Increased connectivity• Affordable devices• Unisa set to take advantage of these affordances

Page 8: Convergence and difference between campus based and distance education: trends in a digital age Jennifer Glennie April 2013

Changing nature of face-to-face education

© Bates, A. and Poole, G., 2003: Creative Commons license (non-commercial use; acknowledgement)

Page 9: Convergence and difference between campus based and distance education: trends in a digital age Jennifer Glennie April 2013

Changing nature of face-to-face

Bates prediction: Hybrid learning: one year 20-40%; three years: 40-60%; five years: 70-90%Questions? • What can the university or college offer that will

make the morning commute for students worthwhile (not to mention faculty)?

• How can institutions leverage more fully the benefits of the campus when students can do much of their learning more conveniently, and often more effectively, online or remotely?

Page 10: Convergence and difference between campus based and distance education: trends in a digital age Jennifer Glennie April 2013

The emerging Networked School environment

Page 11: Convergence and difference between campus based and distance education: trends in a digital age Jennifer Glennie April 2013

Moving to two dimensions

Campus-based

Remote/off campus 

No digital support Digitally supported Internet-supported

Internet-dependant

Fully online

Page 12: Convergence and difference between campus based and distance education: trends in a digital age Jennifer Glennie April 2013

A

D

C

B

Fully Offline

Internet Supported

Internet Dependent

Fully Online

Campus-based Remote

E

Digitally Supported

O

ff-l

ine -

-><

----

----

---

On

lin

e --

----

----

->

Page 13: Convergence and difference between campus based and distance education: trends in a digital age Jennifer Glennie April 2013

Third dimension: level of interaction

Laurillard (2002) • meaningful learning requires active student

engagement including interactions between students and content, students and other students, students and faculty and, when appropriate, students and workplaces and/or communities

• Made more difficult by large class size

Page 14: Convergence and difference between campus based and distance education: trends in a digital age Jennifer Glennie April 2013

‘Good teaching may overcome a poor choice of technology but technology will never save bad

teaching’

Page 15: Convergence and difference between campus based and distance education: trends in a digital age Jennifer Glennie April 2013

Challenges in Remote Provision

Having distance/remote students requires careful upfront planning which consider all dimensions

Robust systems which can accommodate growing numbers are essential

Page 16: Convergence and difference between campus based and distance education: trends in a digital age Jennifer Glennie April 2013

Moving to Distance: NADEOSA Quality Guidelines Policy and planning

Learners Programme development Course design Course materials Assessment Learner support HRD – employing more and more

tutors Management and administration Collaborative arrangements Quality assurance Information dissemination Results

Page 17: Convergence and difference between campus based and distance education: trends in a digital age Jennifer Glennie April 2013

An Example: Learners and Their context

CriterionThere is up-to-date detailed information about past, present and potential learners. This is used to inform policy and planning in programme development, course design and materials development, learner support and other relevant aspects of educational provision

Page 18: Convergence and difference between campus based and distance education: trends in a digital age Jennifer Glennie April 2013

Course Design and DevelopmentCreating an enabling learning environment –

need to investCourse curriculum is well researched with aims appropriate to the level of study. Content, teaching and learning strategies and assessment are carefully structured to facilitate the achievement of learning outcomes

Page 19: Convergence and difference between campus based and distance education: trends in a digital age Jennifer Glennie April 2013

Course Materials

Assessment

Learning support

Course materials

support the aims and learning outcomes; are accessiblypresented; teach in a coherent way that engages the learners. There is an identified process of development and evaluation of course materials.

Page 20: Convergence and difference between campus based and distance education: trends in a digital age Jennifer Glennie April 2013

Assessment

Assessment

Learning support

Course materials

an integral part of the teaching and learning process, is recognised as a key motivator; is properly managed, and meets the requirements of accreditation bodies and employers.

Page 21: Convergence and difference between campus based and distance education: trends in a digital age Jennifer Glennie April 2013

Learning Support

Assessment

Learning support

Course materials

Learners are provided with a range of opportunities for real two-way communication through the use of various forms of technology for tutoring at a distance, contact tutoring, assignment tutoring, mentoring where appropriate, counselling (both remote and face-to-face), and the stimulation of peer support structures. The need of learners for physical facilities and study resources and participation in decision-making is also taken into account.

Page 22: Convergence and difference between campus based and distance education: trends in a digital age Jennifer Glennie April 2013
Page 23: Convergence and difference between campus based and distance education: trends in a digital age Jennifer Glennie April 2013

A Word on MOOCs

The technology hype cycle: Gartner Inc, 2012

• MOOCs are examples of fully online courses for remote students• Lots of hype – need time to discover real worth

Page 24: Convergence and difference between campus based and distance education: trends in a digital age Jennifer Glennie April 2013

Offering MOOCs?

• Unpack your understanding of a MOOC - ?mass

• Explore your purpose

• What do you want to be known for?– Where have your faculty made a name for themselves in

research and in global conversations?– Any UCT MOOC will reflect on UCT’s pedagogical

practices

• Be sure to meet open learning principles

Page 25: Convergence and difference between campus based and distance education: trends in a digital age Jennifer Glennie April 2013

• In Siemens’ words: ‘our cMOOC model emphasises creation, creativity, autonomy and social networking learning. The Coursera model emphasises a more traditional learning approach through video presentations and short quizzes and testing. Put another way, cMOOCs focus on knowledge creation and generation whereas xMOOCs focus on knowledge duplication’

Page 26: Convergence and difference between campus based and distance education: trends in a digital age Jennifer Glennie April 2013

Fulfilling Open Learning Principles?• Learners are provided with opportunities and capacity for

lifelong learning• Learning processes centre on the learners and the

contexts of learning, build on their experience and encourage active engagement leading to independent and critical thinking

• Learning provision is flexible, allowing learners to increasingly determine where, when, what and how they learn, as well as the pace at which they will learn

• Prior learning and experience is recognised wherever possible; arrangements for credit transfer and articulation between qualifications facilitate further learning

• Providers create the conditions for a fair chance of learner success through learner support, contextually appropriate resources and sound pedagogical practices

Page 27: Convergence and difference between campus based and distance education: trends in a digital age Jennifer Glennie April 2013

In conclusion..Embrace the opportunities

whileHolding onto the key principles of quality

pedagogical practicesand

Concentrating on creating an enabling learning environment using these wonderful

technologies but

Attempting to bring down the unit costs of quality education