Upload
abel-robles
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/29/2019 Converged Tv
1/5
Telecom operators commonly
provide TV as a part of their
multiservice offerings. The
market is segmented into xed
IPTV and mobile TV offerings,
which are based on techni-
cally different solutions. Todays
operators, especially on the
xed side, have started to show
strong interest in extending
their TV service over multiple
kinds of access and devices
in order to retain and expand
their market position, grow new
sources of income, and lower
operating costs. Ericssons con-
verged TV vision supports those
goals by providing TV services
anywhere, to any device, and atany time.
Telecom operators commonly pro-vide TV as a part of their multi-service offerings. The market iscurrently segmented into xedIPTV and mobile TV offerings thatare deployed as separate solutionsin the network and service layer(Figure 1). This means there isduplication of user and content
management functions, and verti-cal integration of the TV servicewith specic accesses and devices.
The systems are based on differ-ent sets of standards and are main-
ly proprietary implementations notintended for interoperability. This sit-uation creates lock-in effects betweendevices and networks, vendors, andoperators, and limits service evo-lution and mass-market adoption.
Todays operators, especially on thexed side, want to extend their TV ser-vice over multiple kinds of access and
devices, and are thus looking for three-screen or converged TV solutions inorder to retain and expand their market
position, grow new sources of income,and lower operating costs.
Tends and dives
The ambition to leave proprietarysolutions behind is shown by theindustry-wide engagement in stan-dardization initiatives for next-
generation networks. These include theETSI TISPAN and IPTV solutions in theOpen IPTV Forum (OIPF), wherein net-work operators, the consumer electron-ics (CE) industry, and network equip-ment vendors are jointly dening tech-
nical specications for multi-access,multidevice IPTV solutions.
There has been a sharp rise in recentyears in the consumption of video con-tent on numerous kinds of devices. In
mature markets, the average house-hold now owns about six video-enableddevices, and user demand for xed andmobile broadband subscriptions contin-
ues to grow. A recent consumer surveyindicated that 6 out of 10 participantswant to bring their TV subscriptions totheir vacation place, and many of themappreciate the ability to control their TV
service remotely, such as by program-ming a personal video recorder. Thesetrends point to growing user demand toaccess services from any location, by any
device, and on the users terms.
By 2014, it is anticipated that morethan 100 million households will havetelevision services based on IPTV tech-nology. DSL technology will be wide-spread in xed access for the foreseeable
future, but ber is increasingly beingdeployed in key IPTV markets. Withinve years, it is anticipated that a largemajority of TV sessions will be delivered
via dedicated user streams rather thanvia broadcast. This is important to con-sider for future xed network dimen-sioning. During the same period, mobile
broadband subscriptions are expected
to outnumber xed subscriptions, andnearly 60 percent of the mobile trafc
will carry video content. The mobilebroadband networks in use today are
widely based on WCDMA and will becomplemented by 3GPP Long TermEvolution (LTE).
Operators are increasingly bundlingvoice, broadband data, and TV servic-es into triple- and quadruple-play pack-ages to create attractive offerings. TVdrives service in this competition, andby adding mobility, operators can dif-
ferentiate themselves from compet-
Conveged TVEricsson has developed a prototype that showcases TV services delivered overfxed and mobile access. The company has also demonstrated advanced use-cases,such as transferring video sessions and blending TV with communication services.
daliBor turina, ola andersson, Berndt Wallin,
miguel BlocKstrand and torBJrn cagenius
BOX A Tems and abbeviations
AS application server
CE consumer electronics
CMS content management system
CTV converged TV
EPC evolved packet core
EPG electronic program guide
ETSI European Telecommunications
Standards Institute
FSAN Full Service Access Network
GGSN gateway GPRS support node
GPON gigabit passive optical network
GPRS general packet radio service
HSPA high-speed packet access
IMS IP Multimedia Subsystem
IPTV Internet Protocol TV
LTE 3GPP Long Term Evolution
MAE multi-access edge
OIPF Open IPTV Forum
OTT over the top
PGM presence and group data management
PON passive optical network
SGSN serving GPRS support node
VoD video on demand
WCDMA wideband code-division multiple access
17
TV services anywhere, to any device, at any time
7/29/2019 Converged Tv
2/5
markets, and at an early stage it recog-nized the drivers, trends, and emerg-ing need for a combined xed IPTV and
mobile TV solution.1Figure 2 showsEricssons converged TV strategy andtarget architecture.
In this solution, the service layerparts, such as the application serversand management systems, support con-tent delivery to all devices and accesses.This approach enables unied subscriber
handling and advanced offerings whilelowering operating costs. The convergedcore network is based on IP transport con-
trolled by the IP Multimedia Subsystem(IMS), which provides several featuresrequired by the converged TV solution;
for instance, common user identity han-dling across accesses and the ability toblend the TV service with communica-tion services. The common core networkcomponents further reduce both OPEXand CAPEX. The solution reuses the
media-delivery protocols for IPTV andmobile TV in order to accommodate thedifferent characteristics of their accessnetworks. Therefore, any portable device
that uses both types of accesses will needto support both transport methods.
Operators who deploy a converged TV
solution can provide TV services across
multiple accesses and devices, introduceinnovative blended services, and bundle
them into attractive offerings. The com-
mon content management system andmultiple delivery channels also enableoperators to extend their distributioncapabilities while protecting contentand offering QoS to broadcasters andproviders of over-the-top content. Thissatises the need to defend and expandtheir market position while reducingoperating costs. Compliance to a stan-dard solution also allows operators toselect and combine products from mul-
tiple vendors as well as to drive mass-market availability.
From the end-user perspective, con-verged TV provides one TV service for all
devices regardless of location. Further,the subscription and the service can bemanaged from any device. End users can
thus program video recording equip-ment from one device and watch thecontent on another.
realization o conveged TV
a pototype
Market players have discussed the vision
itors. Therefore, as the transforma-tion from single-service to multiservicebroadband networks gains momentum,
operators are emphasizing the need fornew, suitable network architectures.
The value chain for TV content deliv-ery is also changing as the content and
CE industries extend their businesses by
establishing a direct relationship withend users. They often bypass networkowners by delivering internet servic-
es over the top of access networks. Togain a share of this value chain, somenetwork operators have begun offeringproper added value, such as quality-of-service (QoS) mechanisms for content
distribution, to providers of over-the-top (OTT) content.
Conveged TV vision sevice
defnition and value poposition
Ericsson is well positioned in the TV
Mobileaccess network
Mobilecore network
Mobile TVservice layer
IPTVservice layer
Fixedcore network
Fixedaccess network
Homenetwork
AN
BS
FIGUrE 1 Cuent fxed IPTV and mobile TV achitectue.
BOX B Standadization
Ericssons choice to base the CTV prototype on rele-
vant existing and emerging standards underscores
the importance of open-standards-based solutions
for interoperability and future-proong operator
investments. The following standards were refer-
enced for the CTV prototype:
Open IPTV Forum 1.0, Functional architecture
Open IPTV Forum 2.0, Service requirements
3GPP SA4, IMS-based PSS and MBMS User
Service
3GPP R8 SAE/LTE, Evolved Packet System
including xed mobile convergence
Mobileaccess network
Convergedcore and
IMS network
Converged TVservice layer
Fixedaccessnetwork
Homenetwork
AN
BS
MAE
FIGUrE 2 Conveged TV taget achitectue.
18
Eric ss on rEviEw 2 200 9
TV services anywhere, to any device, at any time
7/29/2019 Converged Tv
3/5
of converged TV services and supporting
architectures for some time. To move the
discussion forward, Ericsson has devel-
oped a converged TV (CTV) prototype toshowcase how the services can be real-ized and to establish a platform for eval-uating use cases, network implications,and solutions to technical challenges.The CTV prototype is based, as much aspossible, on existing and emerging stan-
dards and commercial products.The architecture for the prototype
(Figure 3) is based on the OIPF R1 archi-tecture and extended to cover the pro-totypes mobile accesses.2 The devicesused are a mobile phone connected viaWCDMA, a laptop computer connected
via WCDMA or LTE, and a TV set con-nected via 10Gbps GPON access.3 Thekey enablers for converging servicebetween different access and devicetypes are the common IMS core and theconverged application server.
The bit rates of the media streams are200Kbps to the mobile phone, 800Kbpsto the laptop, and 2.5Mbps to the TV.
Moderate bit rates were used because themain idea is to prove the feasibility of thearchitecture and use cases rather than todemonstrate high media quality.
The CTV prototype realizes a select
set of use cases from the OIPF R2requirements. These are demonstratedon all three devices. The use cases fallinto three different categories: single-
device features, multidevice-dependent
features, and blended services.
Single-device features
In a converged solution, the single-device features use case implies newtechnical challenges for content man-agement and may create new usage pat-terns.
Live TV users access traditional broad-
casted content via an electronic pro-
gram guide (EPG). The same channels
are available and have the same look and
feel on all devices.
Video on demand (VoD) users can
order and view movies on demand. All
titles are available on all devices.
Bookmarks users can bookmark a
position while watching TV; for example,
setting a bookmark while watching a
VoD title on a mobile device and later
viewing the rest of the video on a TV set.
Network personal video recorder users
may choose to record a program in the
network; for example, while watching a
TV channel on the PC, a user might
decide to record a program and watch it
later on a TV set.
Multidevice-dependent features
The multidevice-dependent features usecase relies on multiple devices to adduser value.
Session push a user transfers an ongo-
ing broadcasted program or VoD title to
another device. The user lists all avail-
able devices (on the original device) and
pushes the ongoing session to one of
them. When the target device receives
the pushed information, it automatically
plays the content without any user inter-
action. Depending on the users prefer-
ence, the original session either contin-
ues or is terminated.
Session pull when a user turns on the
TV application, the device in use displays
a notication if a session is already ongo-
ing on another device. The user may then
choose to access that same session on
the current device.
Blended services
The blended services use case runs TVservice simultaneously with anothercommunication service, possibly inter-connected, on the same device.
TV and presence while watching TV, a
user displays a buddy list to see who is
available to communicate with.
TV and messaging a user chats with
friends while watching a TV program or
movie.
These services are integrated on the cli-ent side to give a good user experience
but are otherwise separate.
Detailed CTV
pototype achitectue
Figure 4 shows a detailed view of theCTV prototype architecture, with com-ponents grouped into architectureareas. As can be seen, the CTV prototype
realizes the envisioned architecture.1
Service layer nodes
The CTV application server (AS) isbased on the application server foundin Ericssons commercial IPTV offer-
ing. The mobile TV and IPTV media-delivery and ingestion components arealso reused from commercial solutions.With respect to interfaces and the func-tionality of an IMS AS, the CTV AS com-plies with the general IMS architec-ture. One function of the CTV AS is toensure that all content and service alter-
natives are presented with the samelook and feel and can be selected on allclient devices. The devices announcetheir capabilities during the service-discovery procedure to enable necessary
adaptations. Further, when a user
CTV application server
Common IMS core
Multi-access edge
WCDMA LTE 10 Gbps GPON
Content streams
live TV and VoD
TV with set-top boxPC laptopMobile phone
Signaling Media + signaling
FIGUrE 3 Oveview o the conveged TV pototype.
19
Eric ss on rEviEw 2 20 09
7/29/2019 Converged Tv
4/5
IP edge and associated network attach-ment functions, such as IP address con-trol and distribution, as well as policy
control and resource management. TheMAE area also manages mobility within
and among different accesses.In the CTV prototype, the MAE area is
realized with the gateway GPRS support
node (GGSN) products and related nodes
for the WCDMA access. An evolved pack-
et core (EPC) prototype was incorporat-ed for the GPON and LTE accesses. Itcontains
LTE-specic core network elements (the
serving gateway and mobile mobility
entity node);
a gateway element for xed access (the
IP edge node);
a common anchor point for session con-
tinuity for mobility (the packet data net-
work gateway); and
a common policy control node.
The EPC prototype was designed in linewith 3GPP R8, which includes supportfor xed mobile convergence.6
Access technologies
The WCDMA access is HSPA-capable and
was realized using commercially avail-able products.
The LTE access uses a precommercial
has selected a service, the CTV ASestablishes the viewing session between
the client and the media-delivery serv-
er. It also keeps track of all ongoing ses-sions and plays a key role when sessionsare transferred between devices. The AS
stores user bookmarks and recording
requests and enables them to be appliedon all devices.
The CTV AS contains the metadata cat-alog of VoD titles, and the EPG server holds
the metadata of broadcasted channels.
Both types of metadata are adapted to for-mats suited to the different devices.
Different transport protocols are used
for mobile and xed access. Therefore,there are two node pairs for the inges-
tion and media-delivery functions.For live TV content, the same originalstream is provided to both the IPTV andmobile TV node pairs. However, themobile TV ingestion component musttranscode the stream in order to meetthe lower bit rate requirements set bythe mobile accesses. Also, depending onnetwork characteristics, the mobile TVmedia-delivery function might perform
adaptation, called adaptive streaming.
Live IPTV multicast streams are directly
fed into the network.Because the resolution of mobile TV
and IPTV content is different, the con-tent management system (CMS) mustgenerate multiple versions of the VoDcontent les. These are stored on theirrespective media-delivery componentsand streamed to devices on dedicatedunicast channels.
Devices and clients
All three clients conform to the generalIMS requirements for registration andservice discovery.
The IPTV device is a commerciallyavailable set-top box (STB) and TV setup
with a browser-based client executingin the STB environment. The client com-
plies with the signaling sequences stipu-
lated by OIPF R1 for IMS-based IPTV.The client for the STB/TV is also used
on the laptop. In this case, it executesin the laptops browser environment.Support has been added for the mobileTV transport protocols.
The mobile TV client is Java-basedand deployed on a commercial mobilefeature phone. Since mobile devices arenot included in the OIPF R1, the client isaligned with the new 3GPP SA4 speci-
cation, IMS-based PSS and MBMS UserService.5
Standard services and IMSAll three accesses in the CTV proto-type use a common IMS core based oncommercial products. Users of the CTVprototype must have a service prolecongured in IMS, which handles userauthentication, authorization, IMS reg-istration, and session management.
Consumers are registered in IMS with
the same identity regardless of deviceand service. This is what makes the CTV
use cases possible.The prototype uses two different
edge nodes. Therefore, two different
policy-control interfaces are used from the
IMS core to the multi-access edge (MAE).However, policy control was only imple-mented in the converged evolved packetcore (EPC) gateway for GPON and LTE.
A presence and group data manage-ment (PGM) node supports presence and
chat services. Again, the IMS user identi-
ty, which is employed both for presenceand TV services, enables the serviceblending use case as described above.
Multi-access edge
The MAE functional area contains the
ManagementService layer
Standard Service and IMS
Transport and aggregation
Devices and premises NW
WCDMAaccess
LTE access
GPON access
Multi access Edge
Laptopclient
Subscriber
management
Content
management
QoSmonitoring
andcontrol
IPTVclient
MobileTVclient
Converged TVapplication server
EPGserver
MobileTV mediadelivery
IPTV mediadelivery
IPTVingestion
liveTV & VoD
Mobile TVingestion
liveTV & VoD
PGM
IMS core
Accessnode
Policycontrol
eNodeB
GGSN/SGSN
ConvergedEPC GW
RAN
FIGUrE 4 Illustation o the main components o the CTV pototype.
20
Eric ss on rEviEw 2 200 9
TV services anywhere, to any device, at any time
7/29/2019 Converged Tv
5/5
prototype of LTE that delivers a peak bitrate of 160Mbps.
The xed access is a prototype of a
10Gbps GPON system. It is designed asa proof-of-concept candidate that tar-gets the next-generation access beingdened in the Full Service AccessNetwork (FSAN).3, 4
Conclusion
The CTV prototype demonstrates liveTV and VoD services provided to multi-ple devices connected to the same appli-cation platform. In addition, it demon-strates multidevice use cases, such asthe bookmarking and transfer of vid-eo sessions as well as presence and chat
capabilities integrated with TV service.The prototype proves the feasibility of
building an open-standards-based con-verged TV solution on existing networkand service layer products.
The key enablers of a converged TVsolution are the OIPF standards, the con-
verged applications server, the common
CMS, and IMS technology. The solutionwill allow operators to provide innova-tive services and to take advantage ofmass-market availability.
The implemented cases also provethat using multiple types of devices in a
TV solution adds user value. This is trueboth in terms of
exibility and freedom to consume ser-
vices regardless of location; and
having additional, personal devices to
complement the traditional living room
TV set.
Dalibo Tuina
joined Ericsson Radio
Systems AB in 1993 towork with the design and
standardization of the
GPRS radio interface. In 1997, he be-
came manager of the Air Interface Ar-
chitecture unit at the Access Networks
department of Ericsson Research. Be-
tween 2000 and 2006, he worked with
strategic system management issues
regarding the radio access network.
Currently Dalibor is Director, Systems
Management at Business Unit Multi-
media and works with TV and media
evolution strategies. He holds an M.Sc.
in telecommunications from the Uni-versity of Zagreb, Croatia.
Personalized and interactive TV enabled by IMS.1.
Ericsson whitepaper 2008. http://www.ericsson.
com/technology/whitepapers/IMS_TV_4.pdf
Open IPTV Forum 1.0, Functional Architecture 2.
v1.2
Trojer, E. Dahlfort, S., Hood, D. and Mickelsson,3.
H.: Current and next-generation PONs: A techni-
cal overview of present and future PON technolo-
gy. Ericsson Review, Vol. 85(2008)2, pp. 64-69
Full Service Access Network (FSAN),4.
www.fsanweb.org
3GPP TS 26.237, IMS-based PSS and MBMS User5.
Service
3GPP R8 SAE/LTE6.
Open IPTV Forum 2.0, Service and Platform7.
Requirements v2.0
reeences
Tobjn Cagenius,
who joined Ericsson in
1990, is an Expert in ap-
plied broadband services.
He holds an M.Sc. in elec-
trical engineering from the Royal Insti-
tute of Technology, Sweden. During the
1990s he worked with the develop-
ment, product management, and mar-
keting of ber optic components and
subsystems. From 1999 through 2006he focused on research in ber optics
in RBS applications, multi-access ar-
chitectures from a xed-broadband
network perspective, and IMS-based
services relating to residential net-
works. Torbjrn currently serves as
Technical Coordinator of IPTV at Busi-
ness Unit Networks.
Bendt Wallin,
who joined Ericsson
1986, holds an Expert po-sition in media-handling
architectures. Apart from
a two-year period of mobile phone de-
velopment at RTP in North Carolina,
USA, he has worked with speech- and
media-processing products, such as
transcoders, echo cancellers, media
gateways, messaging, and streaming
systems. Berndt holds an M.Sc. in elec-
trical engineering from the Royal Insti-
tute of Technology, Sweden.
Ola Andesson,
joined Ericsson in 2008
and is a Senior System
Manager for IPTV. He has
extensive experience of
web technologies, client-side graphics
and application framework technolo-
gies, and authoring tool solutions. He
also has several years experience of
working with different standardization
forums, including W3C, OMA, and
3GPP. Ola holds an M.Sc. in engineer-
ing physics from Uppsala University,
Sweden.
Miguel Blockstand
joined Ericsson in 1989
to work in integration and
verication. He was in-
volved in the rst release
and deployment of GSM, the rst im-
plementation of the PDC system, and
the rst introduction of WCDMA,
where he was responsible for the im-
plementation of a demonstration ser-
vice layer for 3G applications. Since
2007, Miguel has worked with mobile
TV and IPTV technologies. He is cur-
rently Senior Product Manger for IPTV
and mobile TV network technologies
within Business Unit Networks.
21
Eric ss on rEviEw 2 20 09