Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Oct 2012
Control Strategies Affected by Changes in
IECC-2012
Siemens Building Technologies, Inc. is a Registered Provider with The American Institute of Architects Continuing Education Systems. Credit earned on completion of this program will be reported to CES Records for AIA members.
Certificates of Completion for non-AIA members are available on request.
This program is registered with the AIA/CES for continuing professional education. As such, it does not include content that may be deemed or constructed to be an approval or endorsement by the AIA of any material of construction or any method or manner of handling, using, distributing, or dealing in any material or product.
Questions related to specific materials, methods, and services will be addressed at the conclusion of this presentation.
AIA/CES
Learning Objectives
Oct 2012 page 3
After attending the
“Control Strategies Affected by Changes in IECC-2012"
seminar, the participant will:
Learn about the history leading up to the current standard
Identify how equipment changes effect the controls
Prepare for changes in controls specifications and sequences
Understand suggestions for reaching new efficiency goals
Agenda
Oct 2012 page 4
Equipment Changes and Controls
Controls for HVAC
Non-HVAC Controls
Best Practices
Codes and Standards Background
History of Commercial Building Energy Codes
Oct 2012 page 5
Year 90.1 Revision
Year
Energy Efficiency Description
1978 1975 65,000 BTU/ft2/Year National Energy Conservation Policy Act (NECPA)
1992 1989 1992 Energy Policy Act mandates all states must review/consider adopting the national model energy standard (ASHRAE 90.1-1989).
2004 1999-2001 53,300 BTU/ft2/Year 1992 Energy Policy Act requires States energy codes to meet/exceed ASHRAE 90.1-1999 by July 15, 2004.
2005 2004 47,000 BTU/ft2/Year Energy Policy Act of 2005 mandated all states must review/consider adopting national model energy standard (ASHRAE 90.1 -2004).
2009 2004 47,000 BTU/ft2/Year American Clean Energy & Security Act of 2009 (ACES) DOE adopts National Energy Code based on ASHRAE 90.1
2009 2007 42,300 BTU/ft2/Year American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) Requires IECC as code based on 90.1-2007; 11% below ASHRAE 90.1-2004
2013 2010 36,000 BTU/ft2/Year IECC-2012 update; 30% energy savings over 90.1-2004. States adopt no later than December 2013
2015 2013+ 23,500 BTU/ft2/Year 50% energy savings below 90.1-2004 (Goal)
Oct 2012 page 6
ASHRAE 90.1 Recent Milestones
1999 – Major Revision
2001 – Minor revisions
2004 – Verbiage changed to Code language - SSPC 90.1 adopts continuous maintenance Addenda “on the go”; compiled every 3 years
2007 – 15 Addenda adopted – VAV Zone controls limit reheat and recool - Single Zone VAV DX requires fan
modulation above 9 tons – Exterior lighting densities defined and
incentives for lighting controls – Heat pump Pool heater require COP of 4
2010 – 52 Addenda adopted about mechanical Information is drawn from ASHRAE Journal 2008, Schwedler, Mick “The Future of 90.1”
Oct 2012 page 7
Building Codes
ICC is largest standards management body for construction in US - Combined BOCA, ICBO, and SBCCI
International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) for Commercial Buildings created in 2000 - Similar to 90.1-1999
IECC 2006 adopts 90.1-2004 as reference energy standard
Latest IECC update 2012 - References ASHRAE 90.1-2010 - Supplemental language above and beyond 90.1
Most states have adopted automatic update of codes based no update to IECC or 90.1
Information is drawn from the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Building Energy Codes Program and the Building Codes Assistance Project (BCAP)
Oct 2012 page 8
Design Standards
LEED 2009 (v3) - EAp2 Min Energy Performance - EAc1 Optimize Energy Performance - Reference 90.1-2007 without addenda
LEED lags in adoption - 3 years behind IECC-2012
- 5 years behind 90.1-2010 with addenda
Customer Driven - ex. Federal Government
- ex. University President’s Commitment
IECC-2009 coincides with LEED EA minimum: NC → Code = EAp2 EB → Code = EAp2
States’ Adoption of Building Codes
Oct 2012 page 9
Source: US Dept of Energy Building Energy Codes Program Website http://www.energycodes.gov/adoption/states
Source: US Dept of Energy Building Energy Codes Program Website http://www.energycodes.gov/adoption/states
States’ Adoption of Building Codes
Oct 2012 page 10
Source: US Dept of Energy Building Energy Codes Program Website http://www.energycodes.gov/adoption/states
IECC-2012 design model is approximately 18% more efficient than LEED minimum:
NC → Code = EAc1 4 points EB → Code = EAc1 6 points
California Title 24 Comparison
Oct 2012 page 11
Source: “Rethinking Percent Savings: The Problem with Percent Savings and the New Scale for a Zero Net-Energy Future”, prepared by Architectural Energy Corporation and Southern California Edison; FIGURE 2 – CURRENT ENERGY METRIC
Oct 2012 page 12
Progress Toward Sustainability
189.1-2010
90.1-2007
90.1-2010
189.1-2013
90.1-2004 90.1-2001
90.1-2013
100-2011
Oct 2012 page 13
IECC Energy Efficient Design of Commercial Buildings
Target: New Buildings
2006 Edition, (baseline set by 90.1-2004)
2009 Edition, (90.1-2007) 18% more energy efficient than 2006 edition
2012 Edition, (90.1-2010) 30% more energy efficient than 2006 edition Over 100 Approved Addendums Controls mentioned 67 times
ASHRAE 90.1-2013, the Challenge 50% more energy efficient than 2006 edition.
Oct 2012 page 14/23
SSPC 100 Energy Efficient Existing Buildings
Target: Existing Buildings [Under Development]
Purpose: Energy efficient exiting buildings Provide procedures and programs towards energy efficient
operation, maintenance, management and monitoring; Increase energy efficiency of energy-using systems and
components; and Upgrading thermal performance of the building envelope.
US Climates
Oct 2012 page 15
9 Climate Zones + 3 moisture zones = 17 climates
Agenda
Oct 2012 page 16
Equipment Changes and Controls
Controls for HVAC
Non-HVAC Controls
Best Practices
Codes and Standards Background
Standard Says Equipment Efficiency Ratings changed from SEER to IEER - Recognizes part load performance
- Covers a variety of terminal units Heat pumps
Fan Coils
VRF
Rooftops
Effect on Controls -Decoupled cooling components
- Packaged cooling terminal units
VRF and HPs - More points to monitor
- More smart terminal units =
more integration and
less single source controls - Less pure VAV box systems
- AHUs driven by Vent loads not design cooling loads
Oct 2012 page 17
Equipment Changes and Effects on Controls Design
“Part load efficiency means part load sensing + part load outputs which means smarter controls.”
Standard Says
All AC equipment with water cooled condensers must have a control valve that can stop the flow when cooling is not needed (C403.4.3.3.3)
Effect on C
ontrols
More Control Valves Coordinate pumps with 0% call for cooling Promotes variable pumping systems with controls
Oct 2012 page 18
Equipment Changes and Effects on Controls Design
Standard Says Added VRF Systems
Added Water-to-Water HPs
Recognizes condenser heat recovery methods
Machine efficiency requirement determined by heat rejection method
Effect on Controls - More options to move away from pure VAV systems
- More options for using water source heat rejection
- More options for synergy between heating and cooling
-More options for engineers to reject heat
Oct 2012 page 19
Equipment Changes and Effects on Controls Design
Standard Says
Fan speed reduction required on small packaged AHUs - Tons >9.2 at loads less than 50% - 2 speed or variable fan speed
Effect on C
ontrols
More complex packaged units More smart rooftops – integration
to BAS is good practice Vent volume should be maintained If serving a DCV zone, then more
control loops and variable vent
Oct 2012 page 20
Equipment Changes and Effects on Controls Design
Standard Says
Fan speed reduction required on CHW AHUs - fan motor > 5 hp - 2 speed or variable fan speed
Effect on Controls
Fan speed controls Variable ventilation positions Compensation for building pressure balancing Discharge temperature sensors If DCV zones, then OAI monitoring required More controls points on smaller systems Was 15 hp in IECC-2006 (90.1-2004)
Oct 2012 page 21
Equipment Changes and Effects on Controls Design
Oct 2012 page 22
Equipment Changes and Effects on Controls Design
Table 6.5.6.1 Exhaust Air Energy recovery Requirements
Climate Zone
% Outdoor Air at Full Design Airflow Rate
30-40% 40-50% 50-60% 60-70% 70-80% > 80%
Design Supply Fan Airflow Rate (cfm)
3bc,4bc,5b NR NR NR NR ≥5000 ≥5000
1b,2b,5c NR NR ≥26000 ≥12000 ≥5000 ≥4000
6b ≥11000 ≥5500 ≥4500 ≥3500 ≥2500 ≥1500
1a-6a ≥5500 ≥4500 ≥3500 ≥2000 ≥1000 >0
7,8 ≥2500 ≥1000 >0 >0 >0 >0
Standard Says
Zone 5a and 6a Energy Recovery Ventilation Requirements
Oct 2012 page 23
Equipment Changes and Effects on Controls Design
Energy Recovery Effect on Controls
More control points Coordinate with Economizer Bypass for economizer means motorized isolation dampers Exceptions for labs, warehouses, solar heat, distributed exhaust
Standard Says VFDs on unitary water pumps > 5 hp VFDs on all other system water pumps > 10hp (Down from 50hp)
Effect on Controls -VFDs on almost all pumps
- More points to monitor
- Sensor to control pump - More control loops
- More communication points
Oct 2012 page 24
Equipment Changes and Effects on Controls Design
Standard Says Chiller Part Load Efficiency metric to meet (Addendum M)
Effect on Controls - “80% of chiller operation spent at less than 50% load”
- Sequencing chiller more complex - Whole system optimization should take into account system loads, pump speeds, tower approach, etc.
- Chiller efficiency taken before compressor VFD means less attractive to put VFD on compressor
Oct 2012 page 25
Equipment Changes and Effects on Controls Design
Standard Says Chiller Part Loads Part II
Effect on Controls Water distribution improvements:
Flatten system flow curve for better turn down
Better matching of control valves to coils to raise coil ∆T More modulating control valves to reduce spikes
Temperature reset strategies to keep coils in sweet spots
Flow modulation to keep ∆T high
More variable primary flow systems
Oct 2012 page 26
Equipment Changes and Effects on Controls Design
Data Center Additions Adds CRAC units to scope of standard (Addendum Aq)
Adds efficiency requirements for computer rooms (Addendum Bu)
New requirements when using water and air side economizers
Data Center Exceptions Lists exceptions for economizers
Data Center modeling is not available in 90.1
Alternative to modeling is power usage effectiveness (PUE)
Oct 2012 page 27
Equipment Changes and Effects on Controls Design
Significant additions to come in future additions to the standard.
Controls for HVAC
Oct 2012 page 28
Standard Says Requires service water booster pumps to be controls by VFDs
Effect on Controls -Eliminates PRVs on domestic water
- Adds VFDs, sensors, control loops
- More points to monitor - More critical alarms
Oct 2012 page 29
Controls for HVAC Water side
Packaged racks of pumps with controls are common solution. Opportunity for integration to BAS for single source operation.
Standard Says
Isolation valves on systems with multiple chillers or boilers Reduces bypass mixing inefficiencies Improves coil efficiencies Reduces pumping energy
Effect on C
ontrols
Isolation valves added to water loops Need to interlock to equipment Need safety to make sure equipment is not run with no flow Need safety to pumps to make sure not deadheaded Valve sizing more critical Pressure independent valves less attractive
Oct 2012 Steven McCloskey page 30
Controls for HVAC Water side
Standard Says
Pump pressure optimization
Effect on C
ontrols
Variable speed pumping over 10hp Pressure sensors to maintain pressure at extreme locations Poll valves to adjust pressure setpoint such that 1 valve is near 100% open Requires a BAS system
Oct 2012 page 31
Controls for HVAC Water side
Effect on Controls
Hot water systems traditional resets
Oct 2012 page 32
Controls for HVAC Water side
Effect on Controls
Chiller systems look at zone or return loads
Require BAS control Tight constraints Move slow
Temperature Control Reset above 300,000 BTU/h (C403.4.3.4)
Standard Says
Standard Says
IECC-2012 is more strict than 90.1 > 33,000 BTU/h (3 tons) (C403.3.1)
(90.1-2012 is > 54,000 BTU/h, 4.5 tons, 6.5.1)
Effect on Controls
May be needed for zone heat pumps – “bolt on strategy” Must be sized to match max design supply airflow Must be sequenced with the mechanical cooling, not mixed air Water coil economizers can be substituted
Exceptions including heat recovery and cooling efficiency increase (See Table 6.3.2 on next slide)
Oct 2012 page 33
Controls for HVAC Air side
Standard Says
Economizers
Effect on Controls
Exceptions including heat recovery and cooling efficiency increase (Table 6.3.2)
Oct 2012 page 34
Controls for HVAC Air side
Standard Says
Motorized and Low Leakage Dampers at outdoor barriers > 2 story buildings > 300cfm (6.4.3.4.2)
Effect on C
ontrols
Must operate with ventilation schedules Includes stairways and shafts (fail open) 4 cfm/ft2 at 1.0 in.wg
Exception for 1 and 2 story buildings and less than 300 cfm
Oct 2012 page 35
Controls for HVAC Air side
Standard Says VAV required on more special applications: Hospital applications Labs Requires more heat recovery Removed blanket exception for labs and pressurization
Effects on Controls Significantly increases complexity of lab controls Requires VAV hoods Requires pressurization controls Requires VAV MUA units
Oct 2012 page 36
Controls for HVAC Air side
Many conditions and exceptions to requirements. Many details covered by other standards.
Standard Says
Supply Air Temperature Reset Multizone shall automatically raise the supply air temperature when the spaces served are not at peak loads
Effect on C
ontrols
Infers BAS that can monitor zone statuses as input to the setpoint control Goal is to decrease cooling load, reduce reheat, increase economizer usage Tight constraints - setpoints between 50 and 60F Suspended for dehumidify control
Oct 2012 page 37
Controls for HVAC Air side
Standard Says Demand Control Ventilation IECC more strict at 25 people per 1000 ft2 (90.1 above 40 people per 1000 ft2) Ventilation optimization required on Variable Volume systems Exemptions: Heat Recovery, no DDC, OAI<1,200 cfm
Oct 2012 page 38
Controls for HVAC Air side
CO 2 space
OA SA
RA EA
If DCV is chosen…
Oct 2012 page 39
Controls for HVAC Air side
CO 2
space
OA SA
RA EA
Single Zone AHU Demand Control can be at AHU Population count Ventilation Reset Formulas reset OAI cfm CO2 can reset directly
If DCV is chosen… Example of single zone OA Intake reset based on CO2
Oct 2012 page 40
Controls for HVAC Air side
If DCV is chosen…
Oct 2012 page 41
Controls for HVAC Air side
Zone Level Demand Control Population count Box position reset CO2 can be used with formulas
space
space
CO 2
CO 2
S A
If DCV is chosen…
Oct 2012 page 42
Controls for HVAC Air side
Multi Zone Mixed Air VAV DCV at box Population count all zones Ventilation Optimization based on population count Ventilation reset because of VAV fan speed Formulas to take credit for some zones over-ventilated
If DCV is chosen…
Oct 2012 page 43
Controls for HVAC Air side
Dedicated Outdoor Air -Simple Constant flow to all zones 2 position hi-lo ventilation for high occupancy zones
If DCV is chosen…
Oct 2012 page 44
Controls for HVAC Air side
Dedicated Outdoor Air -Advanced Population count from all zones Pressure independent boxes serving all zones
If terminal units are variable fan speed, then PI boxes are needed
Standard Says No simultaneous heating and cooling 20F max reheat above zone setpoint
Effect on Controls Reduce VAV minimums as low as possible
SA Reset will help DCV can reduce minimums in some spaces
DDC boxes can control to 10:1 turndown compared to 5:1 Encourages separate htg source
Oct 2012 page 45
Controls for HVAC Air side
Dual max DDC controls is new standard
Standard Says
Requires 2-stage ventilation for enclosed garages
Effect on C
ontrols
CO sensors and control panels 2-speed or VFD fans for 50% reduction
Suggestion: Adding to BAS for monitoring is cheap adder
Oct 2012 page 46
Controls for HVAC Air side
Oct 2012 page 47
ASHRAE 90.1-2010 Lighting Changes
Revised/Interior LPDs (efficiency, geometry)
Exterior LPD requirements expansion
Detailed daylighting control and skylight requirements
Occupancy Sensor Control (more spaces, vacancy)
Exterior Lighting Control (after-hours requirements)
Parking Garage Lighting Control (daylighting & afterhours)
Emergency (night light) shut-off and Stairwell control
Control incentives for advanced controls
Guest bathroom lighting control
Receptacle shut-off control (50% auto-off)
Functional Testing (Commissioning)
Lighting Controls
page 48
Requires 50% of receptacles (wall plugs) in a space to have automatic shutoff control.
Applies to 125 volt (15-20 amp) receptacles in Private Offices, Open Offices and Computer Classrooms.
Requires automatic control using Time of Day Scheduling Occupancy Sensor or, Other automatic control based on occupancy
ASHRAE 90.1-2010 Receptacle Shutoff (50% Auto-off)
Oct 2012
How Do We Get to Goal? Interoperability
Oct 2012 page 49 Steven McCloskey
RS485
BACnet MS/TP
page 50
How Do We Get to Goal? ASHRAE Advanced Energy Design Guides
Small Office Buildings building with total floor area of 20,000 ft2
Daylight harvesting with Interior Lighting Controls Packaged rooftop or split system heat pumps serving each zone. Ventilation provided by Dedicated Outside Air System (DOAS). DOAS system with Energy Recovery Ventilation (ERV)
Medium Office Buildings Three-story building with total floor area of 53,600 ft2 Daylight harvesting and occupancy based controls. DOAS with Heat Recovery Radiant Systems (Heating & Cooling)
Light Commercial Building Market Fastest growing building market segment Oct 2012
Synergies • Heat Reclaim • Coordinating lights with HVAC • Plant equipment reset from zone
control • Load Matching Systems
New Technologies • Mixed-Mode Ventilation • Automated Operable Windows • Blind Controls • Building Façades • Load Matching Systems • Renewable Energy
page 51
How Do We Get To Goal? Just Do It
Migrate to more energy efficient HVAC and Lighting tech
Designing for Part Load Efficiency
Oct 2012
Sources 1. US Dept of Energy Building
Energy Codes Program Website h
ttp://www.energycodes.gov/adoption/states
2. International Code Council http://www.iccsafe.org
3. Illinois Dept of Commerce http://www.ildceo.net/dceo/Bureaus/
Energy_Recycling/IECC.htm
IECC Seminars WILBUR WRIGHT COLLEGE Chicago, IL March 22, 2013
HARPER COLLEGE (WOJCIK CONF. ) Palatine, IL March 27, 2013
URBANA CIVIC CENTER Urbana, IL April 5, 2013
SOUTH SUBURBAN COLLEGE Oak Forest, IL April 9, 2013
WAUBONSEE COMMUNITY COLLEGE Sugar Grove, IL April 16, 2013
CHICAGO DEPT. OF BUILDINGS DePaul Center—Loop Campus May 15, 2013
To Register, Click on a Location!
References and More Information
Oct 2012 page 52
Best Practices
Oct 2012 page 53
3. Automate system reactions to leave operators to handle only exceptions or problems.
1. For every decision, ask “What is long term impact on energy.”
4. Use Energy Management Software for info – use Automation for control.
2. Embrace resetting strategies like population counting and setpoint optimizations
Thank you Questions
page 54 Oct 2012