Upload
rio
View
124
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP). New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story. 47.5%. Indicator 1 Graduation Rate. Percent of youth with IEPs graduating from high school with a regular diploma. State Target: 80%; State Average: 56.3%. 05-06. 06-07. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Continuous Improvement
Performance Plan (CIPP)
New Hanover County Schools
Students with Disabilities
Data Story
Indicator 1Graduation Rate
State Target: 80%; State Average: 56.3%
47.5%
37.8%
Percent of youth with IEPs graduating
from high school with a regular diploma.
05-06
06-07 07-0845.8
%
08-09
43.9%
09-10
44.3%
10-11
42.0%
Indicator 2Drop Out
State Target: 6.0%; State Average: 8.0%
8.3% 9.7%
Percent of youth with IEPs dropping out
of high school.
05-06 06-07 07-08
6.8%
08-09
8.4%
09-10
11.7%
Indicator 3Assessment Participation & Performance/Reading
07-08
08-09
09-10
10-11
99 100 100 100
96 73 73 92
Grade
State Targe
t
3-8 95
10 95
0809 & 0910 – SWD made AYP in grades 3-8 (Safe Harbor)
Grade
State Targe
t
3-8 43.2
10 38.5
07-08
08-09
09-10
10-11
24.1 39.8 45.6 42.0
22.2 23.3 25.7 20.3
Participation
Performance
Indicator 3Assessment Participation & Performance/Math
Grade
State Target
3-8 77.2
10 68.4
07-08
08-09 09-10
10-11
39.8 56.0 61.4
61.0
27.8 39.3 51.9
51.6
0809 & 0910 – SWD made AYP in grades 3-8 (Safe Harbor)
Grade
State Target
3-8 95
10 95
07-08
08-09 09-10
11-12
99 100 100 100
84 73 76 94
Performance
Participation
Indicator 4Suspension/Expulsion
Rates of suspension and expulsion of students with disabilities greater than 10 days in a school year that is twice the state average or greater.
State Target: 7%; State Average: 2.3%06-07
0.3% 0%
07-08 08-09
1.0%
09-10
n/a
Indicator 5Least Restrictive Environment
Percent of children with IEPs aged 6through 21 served in regular,
separate, or public, private, home or hospitalsettings.
Indicator 5Least Restrictive Environment
Amount of
Removal
State Target
Regular 64.6%
Separate 15.7%
05-06
06-07
55.4 52.3
24.1 22.6
07-08
08-09
09-10
10-11
50.1 61.8 59.6 58.6
20.0 18.5 17.5 15.9
Indicator 6Preschool LRE
No data or targets set at this time
Indicator 7Early Childhood Outcomes
Percent of preschool children with IEPs who demonstrate improvement in positive social-emotional skills, acquisition and use of knowledge and skills, and use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs.
A. % Substantially improvement byage 6
B. % Functioningat age 6
Skills State Target
State Averag
e
NHCS 08-09
NHCS 09-10
A. Social/Emotional
TBD 88.9% 86.0% 90%
B. Social/Emotional
TBD 57.0% 41.0% 47%
A. Com/Literacy TBD 89.0% 82.0% 77%
B. Com/Literacy TBD 54.1% 52.0% 56%
A. Approp. Behavior
TBD 88.3% 87.0% 86%
B. Approp. Behavior
TBD 67.9% 58.0% 60%
Indicator 8Parent Involvement
Percent of parents with a school age child receiving special education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving service and results for children with disabilities.
State Target: 40%.
08-09
43.0%
Indicator 9Disproportionality Spec Ed
Percent of districts with disproportionaterepresentation of racial and ethnic groupsin special education and related servicesthat is the result of inappropriate identification.
State Target 0%
NHCS 0%
Indicator 10Disproportionality by Category
NHCS data indicate disproportionaterepresentation of racial and ethnic groupsin specific disability categories that is theresult of inappropriate identification.
State target: 0%
NHCS – 0%
Indicator 1190 Day Timeline
Percent of children referred for whom areferral was received and placementdetermined within 90 days.
State Target: 100%
45%
77%
05-06 06-07 07-08
08-09
90%67%
09-10
95%
Indicator 12Part C to Part B
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3 and who are found eligible for Part B who receive
special education and related services by their third birthday.
State Target: 100%
74%
78%
05-06 06-07 07-08
08-09
96%88%
09-10
100%
Indicator 13IEPs and Postsecondary Goals
Percent of youth aged 16 and above with
an IEP that includes coordinated,measurable, annual IEP goals andtransition services that will reasonablyenable the child to meet the postsecondary goals.
Indicator 13IEPs and Postsecondary Goals
6% 24%
05-06 06-07 07-08
35%
100%Corrected within a year
State Target: 100%
08-09
64%
100% 100%
09-10
71%
100%
Indicator 14Post-School Outcomes
Percent of youth who had IEP’s, are nolonger in secondary school and who havebeen competitively employed, enrolled insome type of postsecondary school, or,both, within one year of leaving highschool.
State Baseline Data: 75%NHCS Baseline: 70%
Indicator 15General Supervision Part 1Percent of noncompliance
identified and corrected within one year.
State Target: 100%
100%
05-06 06-07
100%
07-08
100%
08-09
100%
09-10
100%
Indicator 15General Supervision Part 2Percent of compliance rate of
InternalRecord Review.State Target: 100%
25%
05-06 06-07
66%
07-08
91%
08-09
81%
09-10
90%
What’s the Plan (PreK-12)? Training in Intensive Scientific, Research-
based Reading and Math instruction (Language!, Corrective Reading, Number Worlds)
KU Content Literacy Continuum (Secondary Pilot)
Superintendent’s Graduation-Dropout Task Force
Response to Instruction (RTI) K-8 & Preschool Play Based Assessment
Add School-wide Positive Behavior Support Sites
Intensified training, tools and monitoring practices in implementation and compliance
IDEA 2004 – 34 CFR 300.604 Meets Requirements (NHCS status – 08-
09 & 09-10) Needs Assistance – Direct the use of
funds Needs Intervention – Withhold funds Needs Substantial Intervention –
Recover Funds
What are the consequences?
Questions?