Upload
s-mukherjee
View
220
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
1/37
Consumer Theory
Motivation: The key limitation of Solow growth theory is thatit abstracts from optimizing consumers. Economists widely be-
lieve that consumers and firms respond to incentives. Absent
optimizing consumers, the theory offers little in the way of
(1) an understanding of how the economy will react to shocks
due to war, immigration, technological booms or important changes
in tax policy
(2) a welfare analysis of different policies
1
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
2/37
Review of Static Consumer Theory:
Assume:
1. Preferences over goods: U(c1, c2)
2. Budget set: p1c1+p2c2 I
Prices: (p1, p2)
Income: I2
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
3/37
Consumer maximization implies:
(1) M RS(c1, c2) = p1p2
(2) p1
c1
+p2
c2
=I
Notation: M RS(c1, c2) denotes the marginal rate of
substitution between good 1 and good 2 at the allo-
cation (c1, c2). Basic Micro: M RS(c1, c2) = U1(c1,c2)U2(c1,c2)
3
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
4/37
4
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
5/37
Cobb-Douglas Preferences:
U(c1, c2) =c1c
12
U(c1, c2) = log c1+ (1 )log c2
M RS(c1, c2) = U1(c1,c2)U2(c1,c2) = c2(1)c1
5
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
6/37
Solve (1)-(2) w/ Cobb-Douglas Preferences:
(1) M RS(c1
, c2
) = c2(1)c1
= p1p2
(2) p1c1+p2c2=I
Result (Marshallian Demand Functions) :
c1= Ip1
c2= (1)I
p2
6
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
7/37
Q: Is the consumer theory we have just reviewed ap-
plicable to decision making over time which is key in
Macro?
A: With some reinterpretation of income and priceconcepts, standard vanilla consumer theory is a theory
of optimal decision making over time.
Key Assumptions: perfect foresight and lifetime plans
7
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
8/37
History of Economic Thought:
Irving Fisher - early 1900s he applies stardard con-
sumer theory to decision making over time
Modigliani and Brumberg - 1950s pursue this idea
over the life cycle
Friedman - 1950s pursues this idea but adds risky
labor income
8
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
9/37
Dynamic Consumer Theory:
Maximize U(c1, c2) subject to
(1) c1+ a2 w1
(2) c2 w2+ a2(1 + r)
(w1, w2) - wages in period 1 and 2
9
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
10/37
r - real interest rate
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
11/37
10
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
12/37
Algebra:
1) c1+ a2 w1
(2) c2 w
2+ a
2(1 + r)
imply the present value budget constraint:
c1+ c21+r w1+
w21+r
11
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
13/37
Equivalence of present value and standard
budget constraint:
c1+ c21+r w1+
w21+r
p1c1 +p2c2 I
Equivalent when
p1= 1, p2= 1/(1 + r) and I=w1 + w21+r
12
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
14/37
Cobb-Douglas Preferences - Again!:
[Use: p1= 1, p2= 1/(1 + r) and I=w1+ w21+r ]
c1=
I
p1 =[w1 +
w2
1+r]
c2= (1)I
p2=
(1)[w1+ w21+r ]
1
1+r
a2=w1 c1
13
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
15/37
Multi-Period Models:
Many applications require many time periods to inter-pret data
Utility - Generalized Cobb Douglas:
U(c1, c2,...,cJ) =1 log c1 + 2 log c2+ ... + Jlog cJ
Assume: weights add up to 1 (i.e.
jj = 1)
14
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
16/37
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
17/37
c1+ c2
(1 + r)+
c3(1 + r)2
+ ... + cJ
(1 + r)J1
P V w1+ w2
(1 + r)+
w3(1 + r)2
+ ... + wJ
(1 + r)J1
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
18/37
Solution:
Consumption: cj = jP V
( 11+r)j1,j
Asset Holding: aj+1=wj+ aj(1 + r) cj
Asset holding is determined as a residual
16
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
19/37
Stylized Numerical Example:
0. Lifetime - J= 60
1. Utility - as specified and j = 1/J at all ages
2. Interest rate: r = 0
3. Labor Income: constant (wj = 10 j=1 -40) then
zero for j >40
17
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
20/37
18
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
21/37
Empirically Motivated Questions:
1. Why is (mean) consumption profile hump shapedover the life cycle?
2. Why do high income households save a higher
fraction of income than low income households?
3. Why are consumption responses to permanent and
temporary income changes quite different?
19
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
22/37
20
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
23/37
Why is Consumption Hump Shaped?
Possible Story: Income is hump shaped ... and some-
how this implies the same for consumption.
Use Dynamic Consumer Theory: cj = jP V
( 11+r )j1
,j
Does this work??????
21
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
24/37
Two Famous Savings Rate Facts:
1. The aggregate savings rate in the US is withouttrend
2. In any year, high income households in the US
save a greater fraction of income than low income
households.
What type of theory explains these facts?
22
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
25/37
g1410161048021009204836448125957727.gif (GIF Image, 545 290 pixels)
23
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
26/37
24
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
27/37
Keynesian Story:
Households follow a simple rule of thumb:
The fundamental psychological law, upon which we
are entitled to depend with great confidence both a
priori from our knowledge of human nature and from
the detailed facts of experience, is that men are dis-
posed, as a rule and on average, to increase theirconsumption as their income increases, but not by as
much as the increase in their income. - JM Keynes
25
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
28/37
26
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
29/37
Modigliani-Brumberg Story:
1. Labor Income is Hump Shaped
2. Preferences lead to consumption smoothing mo-tivated by retirement
3. Low income are largely young + old, whereas high
income are largely middle age
27
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
30/37
28
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
31/37
Responses to Permanent and Temporary Income
Changes
1. Keynesian Story: response should be the same!
2. Modigliani-Brumberg Story: response should de-
pend on how it impacts the present value of lifetime
labor income
[numerical example ... connection to tax cuts and
stimulus debate]
29
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
32/37
Theory: cj = jP V
( 11+r)j1
,j and J= 60
Temporary Shock: compare two situations
1. wj = 10 in all periods
2. w1= 70 and wj = 10 in all other periods
Consumption change: cj = jP V
( 11+r)j1
,j
30
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
33/37
Theory: cj = jP V
( 11+r)j1
,j and J= 60
Permanent Shock: compare two situations
1. wj = 10 in all periods
2. wj = 70 in all periods
Consumption change: cj = jP V
( 11+r)j1
,j
31
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
34/37
Overview:
1. Dynamic Consumer Theory highlights rational de-
cision making over the lifetime and a forward looking
view of individuals. The main reason for saving is to
smooth consumption over the lifetime.
2. Theory Omits: Savings for (1) precautionary rea-
sons, (2) for purchases of a house and (3) bequests
among other possibilities.
32
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
35/37
3. Precautionary motives are easy to add to our
model. Precautionary motives are a popular response
in consumer surveys. Connection to Expected Utility
Theory.
4. The evidence on the differential savings response
to temporary vs permanent shocks presents difficulties
to theories that do not allow for some foresight on the
part of consumers.
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
36/37
33
7/25/2019 Consumer Lecture
37/37
34