Upload
jesse-larson
View
215
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ConnectivismRethinking learning in a digital age
October 19, 2005University of Manitoba
Every public action which is not customary,
either is wrong, or, if it is right, is a
dangerous precedent. It follows that nothing
should ever be done for the first time.F. M. Cornford Microcosmographia Academica,
Conceptualizing learning…
• Knowledge is “out there”
• Knowledge is interpreted
• Knowledge is constructed
• Our verbs: constructs, framework, underpinnings, schema
• What’s wrong with these views of learning? – concept and reality: not aligned
How is learning different?
• Context is different: Interplay of learner needs, societal needs, and available tools– Information growth
• Process is different: Learning as network creation
• Cognition and knowing is different: distributed cognition (Hutchins) and collaborative meaning-making
• Learning no longer “in advance” of need
Baggage of existing understanding
• Trying to get new technology to do the work of the old
• Trying to meet new knowledge needs with old models
• Failing to see new opportunities and directions
Thinking and cognition
• Thoughts exist in space and time
• I am not the network…I am on my own network
• Pattern recognition (not info processing)
Learning, knowledge, meaning
• Perspective is not a framework (hence our ability to hold contradictory thoughts)
• Perspective is seeing a network from a particular node
• Network reflects back on itself to create a filtering node
• Chaos, systems thinking, self-organization
Internet trends
• Technology: RSS/Atom, Open APIs,
• Functionality: openness, read/write, personalization, relational
• Procedural: tagging, social networks, microcontent
• Key concept: connectivity (which requires openness)
What does this mean?
Interplay: people, society, technology:– Mobility, interoperability, convergence,
divergence, integration, richness of content, collaboration, open source, decentralized
http://www.det.act.gov.au/publicat/pdf/emergingtechnologies.pdf
End-user in control
• Networked individualism (Wellman)
• Participative
• Co-content and meaning creators
• Aggregated perspective (Downes/Surowiecki)
• Data recombination
• Personalize
Types of tools
• Blogs• Wikis• Social networks• Aggregators• Folksonomies• VoIP
• Groupware • Eportfolio (ELGG)• Virtual Classrooms• Combing worlds –
online and F2F
http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html
It’s not all good…
• Shielded
• Amateur
• Vacuum, echo chamber
• Quality
• Vetting (though it happens by a community-filtering process)
• http://www.roughtype.com/archives/2005/10/the_amorality_o.php
Does this align how we currently use learning/technology?
• No
• Content and courses still viewed as starting point of learning
• We are focusing on content tools: LMS (as they exist today), CMS, LCMS
• We should be focusing on connection-forming tools
• All content started as a connection…
Scott Wilson
Connectivism
• Learning is a network forming process• Capacity to know more is more critical
than what is known• Learning rests in aggregating diverse,
often opposing, views• Content is often the by-product of the
learning process, not the starting point• Connections, not content, are the
beginning point of the learning process
Connectivism
• Learning can reside in non-human appliances• Knowledge can rest within our network, not only
internally in ourselves• Ability to see connections (pattern recognition)
between ideas andconcepts critical to learning
• Currency (up to date knowledge) is the intent of properly createdlearning networks
• Decision making is in itself a learning process
George Siemens
www.elearnspace.org
www.connectivism.ca