24
Congenital Hip Dislocation

Congenital Hip Dislocation

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Congenital Hip Dislocation. Introduction. THA in the DDH patient presents a difficult challenge to the reconstructive hip surgeon. Introduction. Mild dysplastic hips (Crowe I and II) usually have adequate bone stock and can accept standard components. Crowe II. Crowe I. Introduction. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Congenital Hip Dislocation

Congenital Hip

Dislocation

Page 2: Congenital Hip Dislocation

Introduction• THA in the DDH

patient presents a difficult challenge to the reconstructive hip surgeon

Page 3: Congenital Hip Dislocation

Introduction• Mild dysplastic

hips (Crowe I and II) usually have adequate bone stock and can accept standard components

Crowe I Crowe II

Page 4: Congenital Hip Dislocation

Introduction

Crowe III Crowe IV

Page 5: Congenital Hip Dislocation

Introduction• Crowe III and IV

dysplastic hips can be difficult to reconstruct and have the potential for more intra-operative and postoperative complications

Page 6: Congenital Hip Dislocation

Introduction• Surgical Options are Numerous:

? High Hip Center? Controlled Protusio? Structural Grafting? Specialized Components (e.g. Custom)? Oblong Cups? Cementation and/or Cemented Cups

Each has potential problems

Page 7: Congenital Hip Dislocation

Study Aim

• The aim of the current study is to present our midterm results after primary THA in DDH (Crowe III and IV) patients

Page 8: Congenital Hip Dislocation

Study Design• Between 1990 to 2000 twenty -nine (29)

cementless primary THA were performed in 24 patients(Crowe III and IV DDH patients)

• 17 Female and 7 Male

• Five pts had staged bilateral THA

Page 9: Congenital Hip Dislocation

Study Design• Average pt age = 49.5 yrs

• 48% were Crowe III

• 52% were Crowe IV

• Average Follow-up was 5.5 years

Page 10: Congenital Hip Dislocation

Technique• All surgeries were

performed through a posterior approach

• Acetabular Reaming routinely resulted in medial and superior placement of a standard cup.

Page 11: Congenital Hip Dislocation

Results• No

structural allografts were utilized during acetabular preparation

Page 12: Congenital Hip Dislocation

• Average Cup Size = 51 mm Range (42mm to 66 mm)

• Average Stem Size = 12.0 mm

Range (9.0mm to 16.5 mm)

• Average Head Size = 28 mm Range (22mm to 32 mm)

Results

****Note that these are standard implant sizes

Page 13: Congenital Hip Dislocation

Results• 21% (6 pts)

required a shortening osteotomy

• All were type IV

Page 14: Congenital Hip Dislocation

Complications• Dislocations - 6.8% (2 pts)

• (both eventually required conversion to a captured liner)

• Aseptic Poly Wear - 13.8% (4 pts) • one required revision

Page 15: Congenital Hip Dislocation

Complications• Symptomatic H.O. - 3.4% (1 pt)

(Booker III, no surgery was required)

• No Sciatic or Femoral Nerve complications

Page 16: Congenital Hip Dislocation

PMPre

Page 17: Congenital Hip Dislocation

PMOR

PM14 days

Page 18: Congenital Hip Dislocation

PMPost 2

PM18 mths

Page 19: Congenital Hip Dislocation

MCPre

MCPost

MC3yr

Page 20: Congenital Hip Dislocation

JG5yrs.

JGPre

Page 21: Congenital Hip Dislocation

Conclusions• Crowe III and IV dysplastic hips can be

routinely done without the use of structural allograft

• Total Hip Arthroplasty (Crowe III/IVpts) can be routinely performed without the need for specialized components

Page 22: Congenital Hip Dislocation

Conclusions• Complications were low in

this series

No Femoral or Sciatic Nerve Complications were observed

Dislocation rate of 6.8%Only one poly exchange at

5.5 yrs

Page 23: Congenital Hip Dislocation

Conclusions• A Femoral Osteotomy is rarely required

in Crowe III pts and only occasionally in Crowe IV pts

• A Femoral Osteotomy was required in 6 Crowe IV pts (21%) No Crowe III pts required a femoral osteotomy (in this series)

Page 24: Congenital Hip Dislocation

Conclusions• Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty can be

safely perfomed without the use of structural acetabular allograft in Crowe III/IV pts

• Standard components can be utilized in a majority of cases and lesson the need for smaller “specialized” implants