Upload
hoangthien
View
216
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CONFLATION OF A GAS UTILITY’S DATA: THE
CHALLENGE & REWARD
Clark Tenney, GIS Project Coordinator
John Ziakas, GIS Manager
Questar Gas Company – SLC, Utah
About Questar Gas
• Retail natural gas distribution company
• 968,500 customers • 28,735 miles of mains and
services
What is Conf lation?
Conflate (Merriam-Webster)a: to bring together : fuseb: confuse http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conflate
Conflation (ESRI)a: [data editing] A set of procedures that aligns the features of two geographic data layers and then transfers the attributes of one to the other http://support.esri.com/en/knowledgebase/GISDictionary/term/conflation
The goal of ConflationTo combine the best-quality elements of both datasets to create a composite dataset that is better than either of them. The consolidated dataset can then provide more information than can be gathered from any single dataset (Chen, Knoblock, 2008)
THE REAL STORY…
What would cause this to happen?
Why in the world wouldn’t you put the data in right, the first time?
1983 – VAX BASEDINTERGRAPH AM/FM SYSTEM
Early GIS Development
No entity in the state had incorporated a GIS
system
No available external digital data or aid to help Questar develop its GIS
County, state, and city control data (i.e. section corners, survey data) was
difficult to acquire
Early GIS Development
Large format plotters weren’t available yet, therefore, we
couldn’t distribute our maps
Large flatbed digital scanners had not been developed, so we didn’t have a way to scan existing maps
Early GIS Development
GPS had not yet been invented, so traditional survey methods
were all that could be used
Digital aerial imagery was yet to be developed
Aerial photography could be purchased but the software wouldn’t
support its use
Early GIS Development
So, how do you get your system’s mapping data into a new GIS system when none of it is electronic?
Manual Convers ion FromPaper to Electronic
Manual Convers ion FromPaper to Electronic
Prec i se (Prec i se+Accura te ) Accura te
The ChallengeOnce complete, Questar’s GIS data
became a ‘precise’ representation of
its gas system
As compared to the positional
accuracy of today’s GPS and imagery,
the data was considered to have less
accuracy and more precision
The Challenge
Survey data (i.e. section corners)
was either not available, or it was
only approximate in location
The Challenge
As the positional accuracy of
aerial photography greatly
increased, it could now be used
as a solid control for landbase
and gas facility data.
The Challenge
The length of time it took to redraw the
system = 10 years
Users made large unnoticed changes to
the GIS data
DIMP results didn’t always provide
accurate & confident results needed
when analyzing against outside data
sources
We b e g a n c o l l e c t i n g a s - b u i l t d a t a v i a h i g h a c c u r a c y G P S w h i c h d i d n ’ t l i n e u p w i t h o u r d a t a
The Business Decis ion to Conf late :
THE JUSTIFICATION
All these factors convinced Questar that it was time to initiate a conflation project which would spatially align all of our data to
aerial photography at a high enough accuracy as to correct inconsistencies and provide us with a higher level of confidence
in our GIS data & assure accurate DIMP program results
Conf lation Aftermath
The data will not be perfect post conflation
This assumption is a must when deciding to conflate your data Communicate this to others to temper their expectations
Follow-up adjustments & clean-up projects will be necessary
Have the resources and follow-up strategy well established
• Able to use GPS data to quickly and efficiently place GIS features
• Use aerial photography with confidence
• Better alignment with external data• Able to share data with external
entities• Improved substantiation of our
DIMP program results• More accurate modeling of our gas
network (gas network analysis)
The Rewards
QUESTIONS?