Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
www.misurinasma.it
Con l’ossido nitrico gestisco l’asma dei miei bambini molto meglio!
Usare i markers della flogosi atopica migliora la terapia dell’asma. E’ vero?
A. Kantar
Mito?A patient with a diagnosis of asthma tells her physician, “I'm really concerned about side effects and expense. Will thesemedications be safe and effective for me?”. The physician orders an asthmapharmacogenomic profile and a week later prescribesmedications according to the results of the profile.
Wechsler Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005
One drug, many genomes
Many drugs, one genome
Phenotype:The visibile properties of an organism that are produced by the interaction of genotype and the environment
Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary
In asthma “environmental stimuli” (allergens, viruses and just as importantly, various pharmacologic agents) differentially interact with this genetic makeup of the individual to produce the clinical, immunologic, and /or pathophysiologicphenotype that we observe.
How to deal with Management ?Utilize characteristics, biomarkers, and genetics to “profile” asthma ‘severity’ and controlSelect medications based on “driving factors” of disease presentation and predictors of responseMonitor response, assess reasons for treatment failure, and adjust therapy accordingly
Stratifying Phenotypes in the Heterogeneity of Airway Inflammation
Mucosal biopsyBAL
SputumBlood/urine
Markers in exhaled air
NO: in practice
EBC: promising
FENO Interpretation and Application
response to ICSin titrating/reducing ICSto monitor adherenceto predict relapseto guide managementto predict EIBto evaluate allergen exposure
Response/Reproducibility of FENO after ICS
Reproducibility of response
12 adult asthmatics*
FENO >80 ppb2 wks of 200ug/d BDP1> wk No therapy periods
*3 withdrawn failed to to return to baseline value
1 wk 1< wk <6
FEV1 No changes
Silkoff Chest 2001
FENO & Asthma Outcomes
Bates JACI 2003
Dose-Response of FENO after ICS
020406080
100120140160
FENO PC20 FEV1 Diff
basalplaceboBDP 100ugBDP 400ugBDP 800ug
Dose-response15 adult asthmaticsFENO >60 ppb4 wks follow-up1 wk therapy regimea) Placebob) BDP 100µgc) BDP 400µgd) BDP 800µg
Silkoff Chest 2001
Dose-Response of FENO after ICS
Silkoff Chest 2001
Therapy-Resistant FENO Elevation
42 Children 6-18 yrsStable for 3 moFENO>20ppb (Aerocrione)
Inhalation technique
ICS response
Pijnenburg Clin Exp Allergy 2005
Therapy-Resistant FENO Elevation
FENO before and 2 wks after increasing ICS in 36 atopic children
All were able to demonstrate optimalinhalation technique
Median ICS 400µg 1200µgBUD-equivalent (100-800)
Pijnenburg Clin Exp Allergy 2005
12-75 yrs46 pts (FeNO) groupFENO 15 ppb (cut-off)48 pts (GINA 2002) groupPhase 1: 3-13 moPhase 2: 12 moCSI (Fluticasone)
Mean daily dose:370 µg/day (FeNO)641 µg/day (GINA)
No significant differenceRate of exaerbationPulmoary functionUse of oral CSSputum Eos
Smith N Engl J Med 2005
FENO to Guide Management103 adults >18 yrs52 FENO group (atopy 62%, nasal polyps 11)51 BTS Gidelines (atopy 70%, nasal polyps 8)
Asthma Juniper score: 0-6 Score >1.57 double therapy Score<1.57 on 2 consecutive occasions therapy halved
FENO >26 ppb Increase ICSFENO<26 ppb on 2 consecutive occasions decrease ICSFENO<16 ppb decrease ICS
Shaw Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007
FENO to Guide Management
FENO
Score
Total ICS 11% more in FENO
Shaw Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007
FENO to Guide ManagementExaceb.freq/pat/yr0.09/0 FENO/Score
Exaceb.freq/pat/yr0.39/0.67FENO/Score
Score
FENO
FENO Score
Shaw Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007
FENO + Symptoms in Titrating ICSsymptoms
46
39
n = 85Atopic asthma
6-18 yrs FENO & symptoms
1 yearVisit 0 Visit 1 Visit 2 Visit 3 Visit 4 Visit 5FENO FENO FENO FENO FENO FENO
randomisation
FEV1 FEV1
PD20 PD20
diary card diary card diary card diary card diary card
Pijnenburg Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005
FENO + Symptoms in Titrating ICSSymptoms
dyspnea, wheezing, cough; each day-night time, β2FENO & Symptoms
symptoms > 14FENO > 30 ppb
symptoms ≤ 14, first time
FENO ≤ 30 ppb &symptoms>14 =
symptoms ≤ 14, second timeFENO ≤ 30 ppb &
symptoms ≤ 14
Pijnenburg Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005
FENO + Symptoms in Titrating ICSB
UD
or e
quiv
alen
tdos
e
FENO
Symptoms FENO
Symptoms
FENO every 3 monthsSymptoms group: decrease dose after 6 months of a stable conditionFENO group: decrease dose after a single low symptom score (more ICS?)
increase if FENO >30 even when symptoms were lowMore Inflammation in symptoms group
Pijnenburg Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005
FENO + Symptoms in Titrating ICS
start 12 mo start 12 mo
Mea
n P
D20
Mch
(ug)
2.5 DD
1.1 DD
- similar cumulative ICS doses- similar clinical control- prendisone courses
8 in 7 pts FeNO+ symptoms (39)18 in 10 pts symptom (46)
- less bronchial hyperresponsive-ness in FENO +symptoms (58 pts)- more benefit in patients with low FENO 27* 31*
Pijnenburg Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005
FENO to Reduce ICS40 children 10-14 yrsStable for 2 mo on ICS; Median ICS 400 (200-500 ug/day)Reduction 2 mo (dose halved)BHR, sputum Eos, FENO
Zacharasiewicz Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005
FENO to Reduce ICS
PREDICTING LOSS OF CONTROL = EXACERBATION
Zacharasiewicz Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005
FENO to Reduce ICSClinical Symptoms complete ICS withdrawal 30%
If used as indicator to prevent exacerbationExcluding children with FENO> 22would have prevented exacerbation in 11/14 (78%)
Excluding children with Sputum Eos > 3would have prevented exacerbation in 8/11 (72%)
If used as indicator not to reduce treatmentFENO > 22 could have prevented attempt to reduce ICS in 19/39 (39%)
Sputum Eos > 3 could have prevented attempt to reduce in 6/28 (21%)
Zacharasiewicz Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005
31 children (6.2-14.8yrs)mild-moderate asthmaDesign:4 wks run-in (400µg x2 BUD) β2 on demand4 wks washout (no therapy)8 wks randomized treatment:
a) Low dose 200µg x2 BUD (n=15) b) No ICS (n=16)
β2 on demand all over the study
*
FENO to Monitor Adherence to ICS
Beck-Ripp Eur Respir J 2002
FENO to Predict Relapse37 asthmatic children; 29 atopic (RAST class>2)At discontinuation of ICS (100-400ug BUD/day)6 months stable because lack of symptomsNo leukotrienes antagonists
weeks
PEF
T-2 T0 T2 T4 T12 T24
FENO
Diary Card
SpirometryRelapsemore than one exacerbation/mo and/or exacerbations requiring oralor ICS use and/or need for rescue bonchodilators on 4 or more days/wk for at least 2 consecutive wks and/ormean diurnal PEF varaiability of >20%.
Pijnenburg Thorax 2005
FENO to Predict Relapse
Who relapsed ?
wide variations in FENO
initial FENO (in therapy) not predictive
no correlations with symptoms for no-relapse Pijnenburg Thorax 2005
FENO to Predict Relapse
0,00
10,00
20,00
30,00
40,00
50,00
Basal 2 wks 4 wks
FENO in the relapse/no relapse group ROC curve for FENO 4 wks after discontinuation
Pijnenburg Thorax 2005
111 children 7-16 yrsMild-moderate asthma stable well controlledAllergy 71%ICS 56.8 %EIB treadmillFENO (Aerocrine No system)
FENO to Predict EIB
∆ FEV1> 15% < 15%
Reactive Nonreactive
Patients 30 81
Allergy / Steroid therapy 80% / 57% 68% / 57%
Median FENO 29.5* (21-55) 10.2 (8-15)
Mean Basaline FEV1 89.1*(84-94) 101.1 (99-104)
Buchvald Chest 2005
FENO to Predict EIB+ ive prediticve value 44% 53%- ive prediticve value 96% 88%
9371
59 76
on 100-1600ug BUD steroid naïve
Buchvald Chest 2005
FENO after Allergen Exposure21 children, 6-16 yrsseasonal allergic asthma8 on ICS during seasonFENO (CLD 700 Al-MED)Spirometry
Baraldi Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999
FENO after Allergen Exposure
6 wks study11 asthmatic childrenAge (5-13 yrs)Allergy: Brich pollen + OtherSeasonal asthma
Therapy:2 on ICS2 on MontelukastAll β2-agonists on demand
*During study + 2 on ICS
FENO NIOX MINO (Aerocrine) daily at home
Vahlkvist J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006
FENO after Allergen Avoidance
Misurina Home
20 asthmatic children
Age 6-15 yrs
T0 admission
T1 15 days
T2 3 mo
13 on ICS between T0-T1
FENO (Logan LR 2149)
FEN
O p
pb
FEV1 2.006 2.007 2.112 ECPµg/L 16.2 16.01 16.02
Piacentini J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999
FENO after Allergen Avoidance/Exposure
Misurina Home M
22 Children6-15 yrs, allergy HDM12 in FLUT < 200µg/d19 days exposure to HDMβ -2 on demand
6 pts reported symptomsfor at least 3 days at home
<0.05 µg/gdust
30.9 µg/gdust
FENO NIOX MINO (Aerocrine) daily at homeBodini Chest 2007
FENO PHENOTYPE
Patients with asthma are clinically quite diverse, have variable levels of FENO, and are often difficult to distinguish phenotypically from one another
Nitrite Game
Shin J Appl Physiol 2007
FENO and pH Dysregulation
Decrease in H+ decreases peripheral but not alveolar NO
Nitrous acid
FENO Sources & Handling
2-compartment modelthe sum of 2 contributions, the alveolar region and the airwayregion, which depends on 3 flow-independent parameters:
George J Appl Physiol 2004
FENO and NOS1 Genotypes
Genotypes with a high trinucleotide identify a cohort of patients who have lower and less variable levels of exhaled NO, In an asthmatic cohort harboring two alleles with > 12 AAT repeats, the contribution of NOS1 to the total FENO level may be diminished
Wechsler Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000
FENO TODAY
Kharitonov Chest 2006
Taylor Thorax 2006FENO Range Eos Infla Action
If asymptomatic and taking ICSGood complianceReduce /withdraw dose
If asymptomaticIf asymptomatic No change in ICS if patient is stable
intermediate Present but mild
If asymptomatic No change in ICS if patient is stable
significant
low unlikely If symptomaticReview diagnosis: Wheezy bronchitis; CF; Congential abnormalities (malacia); PCD; GER; Neutrophilic asthma, Rhinosinusitis; Hyperventation; Vocal cord dysfunction
If symptomatic considerInfection (worsening)Allergen exposureCheck compliancePoor inhalation technique (shift to PMDI + spacer if on powder device)Inadequate ICS doseAdd therapy or Increase ICS
High or rise of 60% more since previous visit
If symptomatic considerHigh allergen exposureCheck compliancePoor inhalation technique (shift to PMDI + spacer if on powder device)Inadequate ICS doseImminent exacerbation or relapse Monitor/Therapy – Review
45-h
ighe
r
30-4
0
5-25
Diagnostic Accuracy of Canine Scent Detection in Early- and Late-Stage Lung and Breast Cancer
Biological Breathmeterin standby
McCulloch Integrated Cancer Therapies 2005