31
1 Computation of Open Access Surcharge

computation_of_surcharge

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: computation_of_surcharge

1

Computation of Open Access Surcharge

Page 2: computation_of_surcharge

Cross-subsidy surcharge and additional surcharge for open access

2

National Electricity Policy lays down that the amount of cross-subsidy surcharge and the additional surcharge to be levied from consumers who are permitted open access should not be so onerous that it eliminates competition which is intended to be fostered in generation and supply of power directly to the consumers through open access.

Page 3: computation_of_surcharge

3

A consumer who is permitted open access will have to make payment to the generator, the transmission licensee whose transmission systems are used, distribution utility for the wheeling charges and, in addition, the cross subsidy surcharge. The computation of cross subsidy surcharge, therefore, needs to be done in a manner that while it compensates the distribution licensee, it does not constrain introduction of competition through open access. A consumer would avail of open access only if the payment of all the charges leads to a benefit to him. While the interest of distribution licensee needs to be protected it would be essential that this provision of the Act, which requires the open access to be introduced in a time-bound manner, is used to bring about competition in the larger interest of consumers.

Page 4: computation_of_surcharge

4

Accordingly, when open access is allowed the surcharge for the purpose of sections 38,39,40 and sub-section 2 of section 42 would be computed as the difference between (i) the tariff applicable to the relevant category of consumers and (ii) the cost of the distribution licensee to supply electricity to the consumers of the applicable class.

Page 5: computation_of_surcharge

5

Surcharge formula: S = T – [ C (1+ L / 100) + D ] Where S is the surcharge T is the Tariff payable by the relevant category of consumers; C is the Weighted average cost of power purchase of top 5% at the margin excluding liquid fuel based generation and renewable power D is the Wheeling charge L is the system Losses for the applicable voltage level, expressed as a percentage 19

Page 6: computation_of_surcharge

6

The surcharge may be collected either by the distribution licensee, the transmission licensee, the STU or the CTU, depending on whose facilities are used by the consumer for availing electricity supplies. In all cases the amounts collected from a particular consumer should be given to the distribution licensee in whose area the consumer is located. In case of two licensees supplying in the same area the licensee from whom the consumer was availing supply shall be paid the amounts collected.

Page 7: computation_of_surcharge

Open acess-Govt .Initiatives

Electricity Policy,2005-Cross subsidy surcharge should not eliminate competition.Tariff policy 2006 lays down the formula for calculation of cross-subsidy charges .Cross –subsidy surcharge to be brought down progressively .

7

Page 8: computation_of_surcharge

8

Methods of computation of Open Access Surcharge

15 states have finalised methods to be adopted for computation of Open Access surcharge. Tamil Nadu, Madhya Pradesh, Karnataka,

Rajasthan, Gujarat, Haryana, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Andhra Pradesh, Uttaranchal, Maharashtra, Kerala, Punjab, Assam, Orissa

Page 9: computation_of_surcharge

9

State wise details of Open Access

Page 10: computation_of_surcharge

10

Tamil Nadu

Embedded Cost Method

- The surcharge would take into account the tariff applicable to the relevant category of consumers and cost of the distribution Licensee to supply electricity to the consumers of the applicable class.

Page 11: computation_of_surcharge

11

Madhya Pradesh

Avoided Cost Method

Based on 5% power purchased at margin.

This method adopted since it is recommended by the group of regulators and also in the draft tariff policy.

Page 12: computation_of_surcharge

12

Karnataka Methodology for determination of

Surcharge:

Average cost of supply method

The Commission feels that since average cost of supply has been considered for tariff determination, the same methodology shall be adopted for determination of surcharge also and it would be inappropriate to adopt different methodologies.

Page 13: computation_of_surcharge

13

Rajasthan

Method adopted for Determination of Surcharge

Embedded Cost Method

The basis of calculating the extent of cross subsidy provided by such consumer shall be

(1) The cost of supply to the category of consumers (2) The voltage at which he is connected (3) The realization from that category of consumers.

Page 14: computation_of_surcharge

14

Rajasthan Cross subsidy to be phased out over a period of

10 years

Hence, surcharge for various category of consumers is determined at 90% of the current level of cross subsidy

Illustration : The cross subsidy surcharge for EHT consumers (15 MVA & above) works out to Rs.1.72p/unit. However, with a view to phasing out cross subsidy surcharge for EHT consumers is determined at 90% of the current level of cross subsidy i.e. Rs. 1.55/unit.

Page 15: computation_of_surcharge

15

Andhra Pradesh

Embedded Cost Method

- The Commission is of the opinion that the embedded accounting costs are actually used to allocate costs to various consumer categories and to determine the current level of cross-subsidy. Therefore, the embedded cost model used for determining the tariffs is undoubtedly the best methodology for determining the current level of cross-subsidy and accordingly the cross-subsidy surcharge.

 

Page 16: computation_of_surcharge

16

Gujarat Cross- Subsidy Surcharge:

Avoided Cost Method Reasons for adopting Avoided Cost Method (1) Recommended by FOIR (2) adopted in the Draft Tariff Policy of MoP (3) Avoided Cost Method takes care of loss to the

existing Licensee on losing the subsidizing consumers and promotes competition.

The Commission has decided to consider Pooled Power Purchase and Generation Cost as Avoided Cost for calculation of Cross-Subsidy Surcharge.

Page 17: computation_of_surcharge

17

Haryana Embedded Cost Method

The Commission has decided that following factors would be used for calculating surcharge:-

(1) The cost of supply to the category of consumers.

(2) The voltage at which he is connected. (3) The realization from that category of

consumers.

Page 18: computation_of_surcharge

18

Chhattisgarh

The Commission has decided to adopt Embedded Cost method for computation of cross-subsidy surcharge.

Page 19: computation_of_surcharge

19

Wide variation in surcharge on application of uniform formula for all

States

Page 20: computation_of_surcharge

20

UTTARANCHAL

Surcharge using avoided cost method based on top 5% of power purchase / own

generation excluding NCE and liquid fuel sources works out to be 25.96 P/Unit for HT

and LT Industry

Page 21: computation_of_surcharge

Traiff:Rs:Rs3 Cost of power Rs1.50(Higher Paying

consumer 5% merit order dispatch) 20% distribution loss 10 paisa wheeling charges Rs 1.50x120/100=1.70+.10=1.80 Surcharge:Rs3-Rs1.80=1.20

21

Page 22: computation_of_surcharge

22

Madhya Pradesh

Surcharge using avoided cost method based on top 5% of power purchase / own

generation excluding NCE and liquid fuel sources works out to be 189.55 P/Unit for Coal

mines

Page 23: computation_of_surcharge

23

Himachal Pradesh

Surcharge using avoided cost method based on top 5% of power purchase / own

generation excluding NCE and liquid fuel sources works out to be (-)6.58 p/unit and

21.41 p/unit for EHT and HT customer respectively.

Page 24: computation_of_surcharge

24

Karnataka Surcharge using avoided cost method

based on top 5% of power purchase / own generation excluding NCE and liquid fuel sources works out to be (-)103.86 p/unit (BESCOM), (-)

74.85p/unt (MESCOM), (-)23.85 p/unit (HESCOM) and (-) 9.87 p/unit ( GESCOM) for HT (ind.) customer.

Page 25: computation_of_surcharge

25

West Bengal

Surcharge using avoided cost method based on top 5% of power purchase / own

generation excluding NCE and liquid fuel sources works out to be 128.8 P/unit for HT

customer

Page 26: computation_of_surcharge

26

Computation of Surcharge by using the method specified in the

concerned SERC Order

Page 27: computation_of_surcharge

27

Madhya Pradesh

Illustration of Surcharge in Open Access (at 132 KV ) (as in MPERC order)

(1) Average tariff applicable from HT consumers at 132 KV = 413 p/unit

(2) Cost of power at margin (5%) =283 p/unit(3) Transmission charge =11 p/unit(4) Cash impact of system losses = 25 p/unit(5) Cross Subsidy Surcharge Difference (5) = (1)-(2)-(3)-(4) = 94 p/unit

Page 28: computation_of_surcharge

28

Gujarat

Sample Surcharge Calculation: (using Avoided Cost Method) Surcharge for Industrial High Voltage (66 KV and above) (1) Average Tariff of the Category (P/ unit) = 421

(2) Pooled Power Purchase and Generation Cost (P/unit) = 213

(3) System Loss = 4.40%

(4) Discounting factor for System loss [(1) – (3)/100)] = 0.9559

(5) Expected Pooled Power Purchase and Generation Cost (P/unit) [(2) ÷ (4) ]= 223

(6) Wheeling Charges P/unit =14

(7) Cross Subsidy Surcharge (1)-(5)-(6) P/unit = 184

Page 29: computation_of_surcharge

29

Karnataka

Illustration of Surcharge in Open Access (for HT consumers)

(1) Average cost of supply as per Tariff (Amendment) Order, 2003: 362 p/ unit

(2) Average billing demand for HT consumers in FY05 as per actuals : 477 p/ unit

Hence, Cross subsidy surcharge applicable shall be (1) –(2) = 115 p/ unit

Page 30: computation_of_surcharge

30

Rajasthan

Illustration of Surcharge in Open Access (for HT consumers AT 33 Kv)

(1) Cost of supply for Large ind. (33 Kv) = 240 p/ unit

(2) Average realization for Large ind. ( 33 Kv) = 410 p/ unit

Hence, Cross subsidy surcharge applicable shall be (2) –(1) = 170 p/ unit

Page 31: computation_of_surcharge

31

Thank You