COMPREHENSIVE REPORT ON THE SPRING 2016 NON … · Fall 2015 Graduate Report: Holds Report. Spring 2016 SAP Status (Beginning of term) from Financial Aid: February 1, 2016. January

February 2016

COMPREHENSIVE REPORT ON THE SPRING 2016 NON-RETURNERS

Statewide Data

Fall 2015 End of Term (EOT) Compared to Spring 2016 Census

Prepared by:

Sonia Ninon

Main Take-Away Points and Next Steps

Count PercentSpring 2013 Non-Returners 27,093 25%Spring 2014 Non-Returners 25,466 24%Spring 2015 Non-Returners 22,668 22%Spring 2016 Non-Returners 19,843 21%

Count PercentFall 2012 Non-Returners 38,475 30%Fall 2013 Non-Returners 33,740 25%Fall 2014 Non-Returners 30,952 24%Fall 2015 Non-Returners 26,210 21%

IVY TECH COMMUNITY COLLEGE

SPRING 2016 NON-RETURNERS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. The number of fall and spring non-returners and the proportion of fall and spring non-returners compared to the overall student body have been declining for a few semesters. The number of non-returners was at its peak when more than 38,000 who were enrolled at the end of the spring 2012 term did not return in the fall 2012 term. They represented about 30 percent of all students enrolled at the end of the spring 2012 term. The spring 2016 semester boasts the lowest number of non-returners at 19,843 coupled with one of the lowest proportions of non-returners at

about 21 percent. This is the first time since we started analyzing attrition patterns that the number of non-returners is below 20,000. This is an indication that statewide retention efforts are bearing fruits.

Of the 19,843 students who did not return in the spring 2016 term:● 73 percent were part-time students.● 72 percent were age 29 and under, which is more than twice the rate of non-returners age 30 and over (28 percent).● 72 percent were continuing students.● Nearly 59 percent of them did not have any holds. Of the 41 percent who had a hold, 34 percent (6,823 students) were in "academic termination," "accounts receivable," and "multiple holds."● 57 percent were pell eligible.● More than half (55 percent) were female students.● 45 percent of them had a cumulative GPA below 2.0.● About 43 percent (8,594) of them were enrolled in coursework in both spring 2015 (Census) and fall 2015 (End of Term).● Nearly a quarter of them (24 percent) were students of color (African American, Latino and other minority groups).

27,09325,466

22,66819,84325% 24%

22%21%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

Spring 2013 Non-Returners




Spring Non-Returners Trend Line

Count Percent

38,475

33,74030,952

26,21030%

25% 24%

21%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

Fall 2012 Non-Returners




Fall Non-Returners Trend Line

Count Percent

IR #16022 Spring 2016 Non-Returners Prepared by Sonia Ninon

1 2/18/2016


SPRING 2016 NON-RETURNERS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Data Sources:

Reports

21st Century Scholar Report

Fall 2015 Academic Standing Report

Fall 2015 Graduate ReportHolds Report

Spring 2016 SAP Status (Beginning of term) from Financial Aid February 1, 2016

January 27, 2016January 27, 2016

Additional Financial Aid Data January 27, 2016

Spring 2016 Unit Records Report (Census) January 28, 2016

January 28, 2016

4. The spring 2016 non-returners continue to be concentrated in a few programs within certain divisions and schools.● Nearly two-thirds of the spring 2016 non-returners were in the University Transfer division (41 percent) and the Business and Public Service division (21 percent). ● The three schools with the highest rates of non-returning students were Health Sciences (23 percent), Liberal Arts and Sciences (21 percent) and Business (15 percent). o In the School of Health Sciences, 51 percent of the non-returning students majored in Health Care Specialist RN Interest. o In the School of Liberal Arts and Sciences, students majoring in General Studies (85 percent) were the largest group of non-returners. o In the School of Business, the most affected were those majoring in Business Administration with 53 percent.Please note that the last two programs have similar proportions when looking at the entire student body.

5. A statistical analysis of factors affecting enrollment in the spring 2016 semester shows that a few academic and demographic variables matter the most. Nine variables were found to have a statistically significant impact on re-enrolling in the spring 2016 term in all three models (e.g., having a full-time course load, technology division, having a higher cumulative GPA, having

higher cumulative hours attempted, having higher credit hours earned, being on probation, pursuing a certificate, proportion of all courses completed successfully, and participanting in more

interventions).Please see Appendix B, B-1, B-2 and B-3 for more details.

6. Results from the survey of the spring 2016 non-returners will be available in late March.

Pull Dates

Fall 2015 Unit Records Report (End of Term) December 21, 2015Fall 2015 SAP Status (End of Term) from Financial Aid December 30, 2015

January 27, 2016

3. Only 28 percent of the spring 2016 non-returners were in good standing. Nearly two-thirds of these non-returners had a SAP status in one of the warning (36 percent) and termination (28 percent) categories. ● African American non-returners were more likely to be in SAP trouble. Only 22 percent of African American females and 21 percent of African American males were in good standing. It was above 22 percent for most other groups (some were even above 30 percent). Latino and Caucasian females had one of the highest proportions of students in good standing with 32 percent.

2. Not surprisingly, course success is a huge indicator for the spring 2016 non-returners:● Students who passed no courses account for 43 percent of all spring 2016 non-returners.● A total of 10,660 spring 2016 non-returners attempted a gateway course. Of these students, 62 percent passed none of the gateway courses they attempted.● It is even more pronounced with remedial students. There were 1,030 spring 2016 non-returners who attempted a remedial course – 74 percent of them didn’t pass any of those courses (a majority were only enrolled in one remedial course). This helps to underscore the importance of our success with the co-req model.


2 2/18/2016

96,580

73,183

66,743

46,900

19,843

Student Campus Desc (All)EnrolledSpring2016Census 0GradFall2015 0Deceased Status NDegree (Multiple Items)

Count Percent

Continuing Students 14,204 72%Enrolled at Spring 2015 Census 8,594

Enrolled at Fall 2015 Census 13,590

First-Time Freshmen 4,343 22%Transfer 1,296 7%Grand Total 19,843 100%

Count Percent

Female 10,881 55%Male 8,786 44%Not Reported 176 1%Grand Total 19,843 100%

Spring 2016 Non-Returners by Gender

Spring 2016 Non-Returners by Registration Type

* Of the 3,440 graduates at the end of the fall 2015 term, 1,279 were still enrolled at Ivy Tech as of the spring 2016 semester

census day.

** The count of continuing students does not include fall 2015 graduates, and high school, guest, courses only and Indiana

College Network students. Deceased students are also excluded from this report.

IVY TECH COMMUNITY COLLEGEPROFILE OF SPRING 2016 NON-RETURNERS

Fall 2015 End of Term (EOT) to Spring 2016 Census

Spring 2016 First-Time, Transfer and Continuing Students excluding high school and guest students

Fall 2015 EOT Total Student Body

Spring 2016 First-Time, Transfer and Continuing Students excluding high school and guest, courses only,

Indiana College Network, deceased and graduate students*

Continuing Students from Fall 2015 EOT**

Non-Returning Students from Fall 2015 EOT to Spring 2016 Census


3 2/18/2016



Count Percent

African American 2,774 14%Caucasian 11,064 56%Latino 1,082 5%Other Minorities 1,067 5%Race/Ethnicity Unknown 30 0%Not Reported 3,826 19%Grand Total 19,843 100%

Count Percent

15 -19 3,429 17%20 - 24 7,506 38%25 - 29 3,378 17%30 - 34 1,913 10%35 - 39 1,304 7%40 - 49 1,524 8%50 - 59 637 3%60 & Older 147 1%N/A 5 0%Grand Total 19,843 100%

Count Percent

Full Time 5,267 27%Part Time 14,576 73%Grand Total 19,843 100%

Count Percent

Pell Eligible 11,384 57%Not Pell Eligible 8,459 43%Grand Total 19,843 100%

Spring 2016 Non-Returners by Pell Eligible

Spring 2016 Non-Returners by Age Range

Spring 2016 Non-Returners by Race/Ethnicity

Spring 2016 Non-Returners by Course Load


4 2/18/2016



Count Percent

Business and Public Service 4,235 21%Health Science 4,547 23%Technology 2,649 13%University and Transfer 8,091 41%Other (Undeclared) 321 2%Grand Total 19,843 100%

Count Percent

School of Applied Sciences and Engineering 682 3%

Agriculture 71 10%Biotechnology 49 7%Chemical Technology 5 1%Computer Science 22 3%Computer Science TSAP via DE 54 8%Computer Science via DE 83 12%Electrical Engineering Technol 45 7%Electrical Enginrng Tech TSAP 30 4%Engineering Technology 102 15%Manufacturing Operations 3 0%Mechanical Engineering Tech 52 8%Mechanical Enginrng Tech TSAP 37 5%Nanotechnology 3 0%PreEngineering 126 18%

School of Business 3,046 15%

Accounting 369 12%Accounting Distance 37 1%Bookkeeper 11 0%Business Admin Distance 108 4%Business Admin TSAP via DE 9 0%Business Administration 1,624 53%Business Administration TSAP 312 10%Computer Info Systems 2 0%Computer Info Systems Distance 23 1%Computer Information Systems 104 3%Computer Information Tech 121 4%Enrolled Agent 4 0%Entrepreneurship 19 1%Entrepreneurship via DE 2 0%Human Resources Management 18 1%Information Security 6 0%Information Security Dist Ed 4 0%Microsoft Office Specialist 6 0%

Spring 2016 Non-Returners by Division

Spring 2016 Non-Returners by School and Major


5 2/18/2016



Network Administration 1 0%Office Administration 130 4%Office Administration Distance 77 3%Supply Chain Management Logist 27 1%Supply Chain Mgmt Log Distance 22 1%Supply Chain Mgmt/Logistics 7 0%Systems Security 1 0%Visual Programming 1 0%Web Management 1 0%

School of Computing and Informatics 767 4%

Computer Science TSAP 4 1%Cyber Sec Info Assurnce via DE 38 5%Cyber Sec/Info Assurnce via DE 2 0%Cyber Security Info Assurance 75 10%Dabase Mgmt Admin via DE 15 2%Data Analytics 2 0%Database Administration 1 0%Database Administration via DE 1 0%Database Development via DE 1 0%Database Mgmt and Admin 25 3%Digital Forensics via DE 1 0%Info Tech Help Desk via DE 4 1%Informatics 18 2%Informatics - TSAP 5 1%Informatics TSAP via DE 12 2%Informatics via DE 20 3%Information Tech Help Desk 4 1%Information Technology Support 125 16%Informatn Tech Support via DE 57 7%Java Applic Developmnt via DE 1 0%Java Application Development 1 0%Microsoft Administration 1 0%Network Infrastructure 50 7%Network Penetration via DE 2 0%Network Security 4 1%Network Security via DE 2 0%Routing and Switching 1 0%Server Administration 38 5%Software Development 199 26%Software Development via DE 56 7%Web Application Development 2 0%


6 2/18/2016



School of Education 980 5%

Child Development Associate 5 1%Early Childhood Administration 4 0%Early Childhood Educ Distance 84 9%Early Childhood Education 414 42%Early Childhood Education TSAP 43 4%Early Chld Ed CDA Process 42 4%Education 257 26%Elementary Education TSAP 109 11%Indiana Youth Development Prof 1 0%Special Education TSAP 21 2%

School of Fine Arts and Design 338 2%

Environmental Design 1 0%Environmental Interior Design 17 5%Fine Arts 48 14%Interior Design 1 0%Landscape Technician 1 0%Visual Communication 270 80%

School of Health Sciences 4,472 23%

ACSM Certified Personal Trainr 2 0%Basic Emerg Medical Studies 18 0%Dental Assisting 20 0%Dental Hygiene 3 0%Electrocardiography Technician 5 0%Exploratory Healthcare Careers 50 1%Health Care Support 541 12%Health Information Technology 6 0%Healthcare Spec Dental Asstg 62 1%Healthcare Spec Dental Hygien 51 1%Healthcare Spec Health Info T 41 1%Healthcare Spec Imaging Sci 157 4%Healthcare Spec Med Lab Tech 17 0%Healthcare Spec Medical As 157 4%Healthcare Spec Paramedic Sci 92 2%Healthcare Spec Phys Ther Int 145 3%Healthcare Spec Radiation The 10 0%Healthcare Spec Resp Care Int 106 2%Healthcare Spec RN Interest 2,279 51%Healthcare Spec Surg Tech Int 124 3%Healthcare Spec Therap Mass I 8 0%Healthcare Specialist 141 3%Healthcare Specialist TC 14 0%Healthcare Spec-Prac Nrsg Int 2 0%Imaging Sciences 10 0%Kinesiology 13 0%Medical Assisting 152 3%Medical Laboratory Technology 6 0%Medical Office Administration 30 1%


7 2/18/2016



Nursing TSAP 16 0%Outpatient Insurance Coding 20 0%Paramedic Science 42 1%Patient Care 5 0%Pharmacy Technician 19 0%Phlebotomy Technician 42 1%Physical Therapist Assistant 21 0%Radiation Therapy 1 0%Respiratory Care 17 0%Surgical Technology 7 0%Therapeutic Massage 20 0%

School of Liberal Arts and Sciences 4,222 21%

General Ed Transfer Cert Distc 3 0%General Education Transfer Cor 44 1%General Studies 3,589 85%General Studies Distance 46 1%Liberal Arts 534 13%Professional Communication 6 0%

School of Nursing 90 0%

Nursing 52 58%Practical Nursing 38 42%

School of Public and Social Services 2,328 12%

Addiction Studies 5 0%Certified Pastry Culinarian 6 0%Criminal Justice 593 25%Criminal Justice Distance 68 3%Criminal Justice TSAP 120 5%Criminal Justice TSAP via DE 36 2%Culinarian 29 1%Dietary Management 4 0%Elder Care Professional 1 0%Fire Prevention Investigation 1 0%Fire Service Administration 3 0%Homeland Security Emergency Mg 3 0%Homeland Security Public Safet 44 2%Hospitality Administration 379 16%Hospitality Management 12 1%Human Serv Soc Wrk TSAP via DE 9 0%Human Services 542 23%Human Services Distance 96 4%Human Serv-Social Work TSAP 91 4%Library Technical Asst Distanc 39 2%Mortuary Sciences 15 1%Paralegal 118 5%Paralegal Studies Distance 89 4%Public Safety 23 1%Substance Abuse 2 0%


8 2/18/2016



School of Technology 2,589 13%

Advanced Automation Robotics 46 2%Advanced Manufacturing 8 0%Appr Tech Heat/Frost Insultr 2 0%Apprentice Tech Boilermaker 20 1%Apprentice Tech Bricklayer 23 1%Apprentice Tech Carpenter 379 15%Apprentice Tech Electrician 227 9%Apprentice Tech Floorlayer 16 1%Apprentice Tech Glaziers 28 1%Apprentice Tech Ironworker 7 0%Apprentice Tech Millwright 171 7%Apprentice Tech Operat Engnr 31 1%Apprentice Tech Painter 27 1%Apprentice Tech Plumb Pipe 52 2%Apprentice Tech Plumb Steam 2 0%Apprentice Tech REMC Tech 5 0%Apprentice Tech Sheet Mtl Wrk 71 3%Apprentice Tech Telecom Tech 8 0%Auto Body Technology 6 0%Automation Controls 1 0%Automation Robotics Tech 12 0%Automotive Electrical Electron 2 0%Automotive Technology 265 10%Aviation Maintenance Tech 18 1%Aviation Manufacturing 2 0%Aviation Mfg Electrical Assemb 1 0%Aviation Operations 1 0%Building Construction Mgmt 32 1%CNC Production Machinist 2 0%Construction Technician 3 0%Construction Technology 59 2%Design Technology 126 5%Design Technology Distance 12 0%Electrical Technician 6 0%Electrician Apprenticeship 6 0%Electronics and Computer Tech 41 2%Energy Technology 35 1%Engine Performance 1 0%Heating Ventilation Air Condit 185 7%Industrial Electrician 19 1%Industrial Machining 3 0%Industrial Mechanical 2 0%Industrial Technology 411 16%Machine Repair Apprenticeship 8 0%Machine Tool Technology 91 4%Maintenance and Light Repair 1 0%Manufactng Prod Oper Distance 42 2%


9 2/18/2016



Manufacturing Industrial Tech 3 0%Mechatronics 2 0%Millwright Apprenticeship 2 0%Mold Die Maker Apprenticeship 3 0%Motorsports Technology 1 0%Plumber Pipefitter Apprentice 1 0%Structural Welding 59 2%Toolmaker Apprenticeship 2 0%

Ivy Institute 8 0%

Advanced Manufacturing 1 13%Automotive Technology 4 50%Industrial Technology 2 25%Machine Tool Technology 1 13%

Other 321 2%

Exploratory/Undeclared 308 96%Undeclared 13 4%

Grand Total 19,843 100%

Count Percent

Academic Termination Hold 2,661 13%Accounts Receivable Hold 2,169 11%Multiple Holds 1,993 10%Admissions Hold 14 0%Collections 160 1%Dean's Hold 2 0%Deceased Student 2 0%Financial Hold 313 2%Library Fine 25 0%Must see academic advisor 253 1%Nelnet Payment Plan 89 0%Nelnet Pending Aid 34 0%New Student Orientation Hold 1 0%Refund Awaiting Verification 289 1%Registration Hold 122 1%Return of Title IV Hold 34 0%Transcript Hold 12 0%Write Off-Bad Debt 2 0%No Holds Reported 11,668 59%Grand Total 19,843 100%

* Multiple holds is a mix of financial aid, academic and other holds.

Spring 2016 Non-Returners by Hold Type


10 2/18/2016



Cumulative Hours

Attempted

Cumulative Hours

Earned

Continuing Students 663,788 473,040First-Time Freshmen 49,951 22,785Transfer 25,196 17,717Grand Total 738,936 513,542

Count Percent

0 - 1.99 8,881 45%2 - 2.99 5,408 27%3 - 3.99 4,496 23%4.00 880 4%Not Reported 178 1%Grand Total 19,843 100%

Count Percent

Enrolled in 0 Remedial Course 18,813 95%

Enrolled in 1 Remedial Course 1,000 5%

Successful in 0 Remedial Course 740 74%Successful in 1 Remedial Course 260 26%

Enrolled in 2 Remedial Courses 30 0%

Successful in 0 Remedial Course 22 73%Successful in 1 Remedial Course 3 10%Successful in 2 Remedial Courses 5 17%


Count Percent

Enrolled in 0 Gateway Course 9,183 46%

Enrolled in 1 Gateway Course 6,501 33%

Successful in 0 Gateway Course 4,164 64%Successful in 1 Gateway Course 2,337 36%

Enrolled in 2 Gateway Courses 2,972 15%

Successful in 0 Gateway Course 1,783 60%Successful in 1 Gateway Course 559 19%Successful in 2 Gateway Courses 630 21%

Spring 2016 Non-Returners by Cumulative GPA Range

Spring 2016 Non-Returners by Success in Remedial Courses in Fall 2015

Spring 2016 Non-Returners by Success in Gateway Courses in Fall 2015

Spring 2016 Non-Returners by Hours Attempted and Earned


11 2/18/2016



Enrolled in 3 Gateway Courses 942 5%

Successful in 0 Gateway Course 544 58%Successful in 1 Gateway Course 135 14%Successful in 2 Gateway Courses 104 11%Successful in 3 Gateway Courses 159 17%


Successful in 0 Gateway Course 132 58%Successful in 1 Gateway Course 25 11%Successful in 2 Gateway Courses 20 9%Successful in 3 Gateway Courses 19 8%Successful in 4 Gateway Courses 33 14%


Successful in 0 Gateway Course 7 44%Successful in 1 Gateway Course 6 38%Successful in 4 Gateway Courses 2 13%Successful in 5 Gateway Courses 1 6%


Count Percent

Enrolled in 1 Course 3,947 20%

Successful in 0 Course 1,860 47%Successful in 1 Course 2,087 53%

Enrolled in 2 Courses 5,447 27%

Successful in 0 Course 2,445 45%Successful in 1 Course 1,110 20%Successful in 2 Courses 1,892 35%


Successful in 0 Course 1,738 42%Successful in 1 Course 646 16%Successful in 2 Courses 570 14%Successful in 3 Courses 1,172 28%


Successful in 0 Course 1,754 43%Successful in 1 Course 511 13%Successful in 2 Courses 419 10%Successful in 3 Courses 495 12%Successful in 4 Courses 878 22%


Successful in 0 Course 691 38%Successful in 1 Course 292 16%Successful in 2 Courses 156 8%Successful in 3 Courses 155 8%Successful in 4 Courses 210 11%Successful in 5 Courses 336 18%

Spring 2016 Non-Returners by Success in Courses of All Types in Fall 2015


12 2/18/2016



Enrolled in 6 Courses 344 2%

Successful in 0 Course 101 29%Successful in 1 Course 41 12%Successful in 2 Courses 26 8%Successful in 3 Courses 17 5%Successful in 4 Courses 16 5%Successful in 5 Courses 26 8%Successful in 6 Courses 117 34%


Successful in 0 Course 2 5%Successful in 1 Course 2 5%Successful in 2 Courses 3 7%Successful in 3 Courses 4 10%Successful in 4 Courses 2 5%Successful in 5 Courses 4 10%Successful in 6 Courses 4 10%Successful in 7 Courses 20 49%


Successful in 0 Course 2 11%Successful in 1 Course 2 11%Successful in 2 Courses 1 5%Successful in 3 Courses 2 11%Successful in 4 Courses 3 16%Successful in 7 Courses 1 5%Successful in 8 Courses 8 42%


Successful in 2 Courses 2 20%Successful in 4 Courses 1 10%Successful in 7 Courses 3 30%Successful in 8 Courses 2 20%Successful in 9 Courses 2 20%


Successful in 9 Courses 2 29%Successful in 10 Courses 5 71%


Successful in 8 Courses 1 50%Successful in 12 Courses 1 50%


Successful in 13 Courses 1 100%Enrolled in 18 Courses 1 0%

Successful in 0 Course 1 100%Enrolled in 29 Courses 1 0%

Successful in 28 Courses 1 100%Grand Total 19,843 100%


13 2/18/2016



Count Percent

Good Standing 5,583 28%

Good Standing 5,330 95%Good Standing, formerly on Warning, Termination or Probation 253 5%

Probation 6 0%

Review 1,041 5%

Acad ACP Review Pending 419 40%Dual Degree Review 1 0%Fin Aid ACP Review Pending 129 12%Missing Grade, See Instructor 413 40%Not Yet Reviewed 4 0%Subsequent Degree Review 75 7%

Warning 7,098 36%

Maximum Timeframe Alert 16 0%Warning, Completion Rate 1,445 20%Warning, GPA 619 9%Warning, GPA and Completion 3,292 46%Warning, Maximum Timeframe 1,726 24%

Termination 5,566 28%

Acad Restriction, No FA Appeal 15 0%Termination Max, Inst FA Only 2 0%Termination, Acad Dismissal 1,050 19%Termination, All Criteria 35 1%Termination, Appeal Denied 5 0%Termination, Comp and Max 88 2%Termination, Completion Rate 683 12%Termination, FA Appeal Denied 3 0%Termination, GPA 386 7%Termination, GPA and Comp 2,465 44%Termination, GPA and Max 19 0%Termination, Maximum Timeframe 460 8%Termination, Maximum Timeframe (terminated by the region) 14 0%Termination, No Fin Aid Appeal 341 6%

No SAP Calculated 549 3%


SAP status as of December 2015 and February 1, 2016

Count Percent

First Generation 6,293 32%Not First Generation 8,304 42%Not Reported 5,246 26%Grand Total 19,843 100%

Spring 2016 Non-Returners by First Generation Status

Spring 2016 Non-Returners by SAP Status


14 2/18/2016

Fem

ale

Ma

le

No

t R

ep

ort

ed

Gra

nd

To

tal

Good Standing 3,232 2,295 56 5,583

Good Standing 3,085 2,191 54 5,330Good Standing, formerly on Warning, Termination or Probation 147 104 2 253Probation 3 3 6

Review 530 504 7 1,041

Acad ACP Review Pending 224 194 1 419Dual Degree Review 1 1Fin Aid ACP Review Pending 89 39 1 129Missing Grade, See Instructor 155 253 5 413Not Yet Reviewed 1 3 4Subsequent Degree Review 61 14 75

Warning 3,853 3,179 66 7,098

Maximum Timeframe Alert 16 16Warning, Completion Rate 852 578 15 1,445Warning, GPA 337 277 5 619Warning, GPA and Completion 1,671 1,584 37 3,292Warning, Maximum Timeframe 993 724 9 1,726

Termination 3,198 2,331 37 5,566

Acad Restriction, No FA Appeal 9 6 15Termination Max, Inst FA Only 1 1 2Termination, Acad Dismissal 586 458 6 1,050Termination, All Criteria 14 20 1 35Termination, Appeal Denied 1 4 5Termination, Comp and Max 50 38 88Termination, Completion Rate 423 256 4 683Termination, FA Appeal Denied 3 3Termination, GPA 224 161 1 386Termination, GPA and Comp 1,400 1,045 20 2,465Termination, GPA and Max 15 4 19Termination, Maximum Timeframe 235 223 2 460Termination, Maximum Timeframe (terminated by the region) 11 3 14Termination, No Fin Aid Appeal 226 112 3 341

No SAP Calculated 65 474 10 549

Grand Total 10,881 8,786 176 19,843

Spring 2016 Non-Returners by SAP Status and Gender



PROFILE OF SPRING 2016 NON-RETURNERS



15 2/18/2016




Full

Tim

e

Par

t Ti

me

Gra

nd

To

tal

Good Standing 1,152 4,431 5,583

Good Standing 1,104 4,226 5,330

Good Standing, formerly on Warning, Termination or Probation48 205 253

Probation 1 5 6

Review 259 782 1,041

Acad ACP Review Pending 58 361 419Dual Degree Review 1 1Fin Aid ACP Review Pending 27 102 129Missing Grade, See Instructor 153 260 413Not Yet Reviewed 4 4Subsequent Degree Review 20 55 75

Warning 2,233 4,865 7,098

Maximum Timeframe Alert 16 16Warning, Completion Rate 426 1,019 1,445Warning, GPA 176 443 619Warning, GPA and Completion 1,226 2,066 3,292Warning, Maximum Timeframe 405 1,321 1,726

Termination 1,607 3,959 5,566

Acad Restriction, No FA Appeal 7 8 15Termination Max, Inst FA Only 2 2Termination, Acad Dismissal 250 800 1,050Termination, All Criteria 11 24 35Termination, Appeal Denied 5 5Termination, Comp and Max 22 66 88Termination, Completion Rate 153 530 683Termination, FA Appeal Denied 3 3Termination, GPA 101 285 386Termination, GPA and Comp 890 1,575 2,465Termination, GPA and Max 3 16 19Termination, Maximum Timeframe 97 363 460Termination, Maximum Timeframe (terminated by the region) 5 9 14Termination, No Fin Aid Appeal 68 273 341

No SAP Calculated 15 534 549

Grand Total 5,267 14,576 19,843

Spring 2016 Non-Returners by SAP Status and Course Load



16 2/18/2016




Pel

l

Elig

ible

No

t P

ell

Elig

ible

Gra

nd

Tota

l

Good Standing 2,643 2,940 5,583

Good Standing 2,504 2,826 5,330Good Standing, formerly on Warning, Termination or Probation 139 114 253Probation 5 1 6

Review 527 514 1,041

Acad ACP Review Pending 178 241 419Dual Degree Review 1 1Fin Aid ACP Review Pending 97 32 129Missing Grade, See Instructor 192 221 413Not Yet Reviewed 1 3 4Subsequent Degree Review 58 17 75

Warning 4,589 2,509 7,098

Maximum Timeframe Alert 16 16Warning, Completion Rate 972 473 1,445Warning, GPA 370 249 619Warning, GPA and Completion 2,285 1,007 3,292Warning, Maximum Timeframe 962 764 1,726

Termination 3,566 2,000 5,566

Acad Restriction, No FA Appeal 9 6 15Termination Max, Inst FA Only 2 2Termination, Acad Dismissal 612 438 1,050Termination, All Criteria 18 17 35Termination, Appeal Denied 2 3 5Termination, Comp and Max 45 43 88Termination, Completion Rate 413 270 683Termination, FA Appeal Denied 1 2 3Termination, GPA 253 133 386Termination, GPA and Comp 1,772 693 2,465Termination, GPA and Max 9 10 19Termination, Maximum Timeframe 187 273 460Termination, Maximum Timeframe (terminated by the region) 9 5 14Termination, No Fin Aid Appeal 234 107 341

No SAP Calculated 54 495 549

Grand Total 11,384 8,459 19,843

Spring 2016 Non-Returners by SAP Status and Pell Eligibility



17 2/18/2016




Firs

t G

en

era

tio

n

No

t Fi

rst

Gen

era

tio

n

No

t R

ep

ort

ed

Gra

nd

To

tal

Good Standing 1,622 2,129 1,832 5,583

Good Standing 1,560 2,011 1,759 5,330Good Standing, formerly on Warning, Termination or Probation 62 118 73 253Probation 2 3 1 6

Review 281 394 366 1,041

Acad ACP Review Pending 98 145 176 419Dual Degree Review 1 1Fin Aid ACP Review Pending 38 73 18 129Missing Grade, See Instructor 108 144 161 413Not Yet Reviewed 1 1 2 4Subsequent Degree Review 36 30 9 75

Warning 2,552 3,268 1,278 7,098

Maximum Timeframe Alert 16 16Warning, Completion Rate 529 694 222 1,445Warning, GPA 211 300 108 619Warning, GPA and Completion 1,231 1,617 444 3,292Warning, Maximum Timeframe 581 657 488 1,726

Termination 1,810 2,468 1,288 5,566

Acad Restriction, No FA Appeal 2 10 3 15Termination Max, Inst FA Only 1 1 2Termination, Acad Dismissal 297 466 287 1,050Termination, All Criteria 8 13 14 35Termination, Appeal Denied 3 2 5Termination, Comp and Max 27 27 34 88Termination, Completion Rate 222 268 193 683Termination, FA Appeal Denied 2 1 3Termination, GPA 140 177 69 386Termination, GPA and Comp 873 1,198 394 2,465Termination, GPA and Max 8 6 5 19Termination, Maximum Timeframe 104 144 212 460Termination, Maximum Timeframe (terminated by the region) 3 9 2 14Termination, No Fin Aid Appeal 123 145 73 341

No SAP Calculated 26 42 481 549

Grand Total 6,293 8,304 5,246 19,843


Spring 2016 Non-Returners by SAP Status and First Generation Status


18 2/18/2016




Afr

ican

Am

eri

can

Ca

uca

sian

Lati

no

No

t R

ep

ort

ed

Oth

er M

ino

riti

es

Rac

e/Et

hn

icit

y U

nkn

ow

n

Gra

nd

To

tal

Good Standing 595 3,349 322 1,021 290 6 5,583

Good Standing 547 3,199 306 1,000 272 6 5,330Good Standing, formerly on Warning, Termination or Probation 48 150 16 21 18 253Probation 3 2 1 6

Review 154 640 77 102 66 2 1,041

Acad ACP Review Pending 82 264 36 4 33 419Dual Degree Review 1 1Fin Aid ACP Review Pending 23 83 10 4 9 129Missing Grade, See Instructor 36 240 24 92 20 1 413Not Yet Reviewed 3 1 4Subsequent Degree Review 13 49 7 1 4 1 75

Warning 840 3,366 332 2,241 310 9 7,098

Maximum Timeframe Alert 2 12 2 16Warning, Completion Rate 162 748 75 402 57 1 1,445Warning, GPA 87 266 29 213 23 1 619Warning, GPA and Completion 351 1,091 130 1,591 125 4 3,292Warning, Maximum Timeframe 238 1,249 96 35 105 3 1,726

Termination 1,150 3,316 338 363 386 13 5,566

Acad Restriction, No FA Appeal 6 7 2 15Termination Max, Inst FA Only 2 2Termination, Acad Dismissal 255 606 71 26 90 2 1,050Termination, All Criteria 2 29 1 1 2 35Termination, Appeal Denied 5 5Termination, Comp and Max 12 66 1 9 88Termination, Completion Rate 118 463 40 23 37 2 683Termination, FA Appeal Denied 1 1 1 3Termination, GPA 83 218 31 32 21 1 386Termination, GPA and Comp 513 1,357 151 263 176 5 2,465Termination, GPA and Max 2 13 4 19Termination, Maximum Timeframe 63 338 18 15 25 1 460Termination, Maximum Timeframe (terminated by the region) 1 12 1 14Termination, No Fin Aid Appeal 95 199 20 2 23 2 341

No SAP Calculated 35 390 13 97 14 549

Grand Total 2,774 11,064 1,082 3,826 1,067 30 19,843


Spring 2016 Non-Returners by SAP Status and Race/Ethnicity


19 2/18/2016




15 -

19

20 -

24

25 -

29

30 -

34

35 -

39

40 -

49

50 -

59

60 &

Old

er

N/A

Gra

nd

To

tal

Good Standing 774 2,019 958 576 422 534 240 57 3 5,583

Good Standing 753 1,897 911 549 410 517 235 55 3 5,330Good Standing, formerly on Warning, Termination or Probation 21 122 47 27 12 17 5 2 253Probation 2 2 1 1 6

Review 95 398 251 114 76 81 22 4 1,041

Acad ACP Review Pending 17 210 98 36 25 26 7 419Dual Degree Review 1 1Fin Aid ACP Review Pending 2 29 41 23 11 15 7 1 129Missing Grade, See Instructor 75 149 97 39 28 20 2 3 413Not Yet Reviewed 1 2 1 4Subsequent Degree Review 8 14 16 12 19 6 75

Warning 1,986 2,445 998 590 369 469 197 44 7,098

Maximum Timeframe Alert 5 6 4 1 16Warning, Completion Rate 383 489 223 127 74 96 42 11 1,445Warning, GPA 158 258 93 44 23 32 10 1 619Warning, GPA and Completion 1,427 1,128 320 165 93 109 39 11 3,292Warning, Maximum Timeframe 18 565 356 250 179 231 106 21 1,726

Termination 540 2,476 1,031 546 372 395 166 40 5,566

Acad Restriction, No FA Appeal 1 6 5 1 2 15Termination Max, Inst FA Only 2 2Termination, Acad Dismissal 82 579 174 90 47 49 26 3 1,050Termination, All Criteria 8 12 7 4 3 1 35Termination, Appeal Denied 5 5Termination, Comp and Max 11 23 17 9 21 6 1 88Termination, Completion Rate 34 249 165 70 65 63 29 8 683Termination, FA Appeal Denied 2 1 3Termination, GPA 55 206 47 24 26 18 8 2 386Termination, GPA and Comp 363 1,219 416 188 118 117 39 5 2,465Termination, GPA and Max 9 3 1 3 1 2 19Termination, Maximum Timeframe 2 88 105 91 58 69 32 15 460Termination, Maximum Timeframe (terminated by the region) 2 2 4 3 2 1 14Termination, No Fin Aid Appeal 3 92 78 57 34 51 21 5 341

No SAP Calculated 32 166 139 87 65 45 12 1 2 549

Grand Total 3,429 7,506 3,378 1,913 1,304 1,524 637 147 5 19,843


Spring 2016 Non-Returners by SAP Status and Age Range


20 2/18/2016




Aca

de

mic

Term

inat

ion

Ho

ld

Acc

ou

nts

Re

ceiv

able

Ho

ld

Ad

mis

sio

ns

Ho

ld

Co

llect

ion

s

De

an's

Ho

ld

De

ceas

ed

Stu

den

t

Fin

anci

al H

old

Lib

rary

Fin

e

Mu

ltip

le H

old

s

Mu

st s

ee

acad

emic

ad

viso

r

Nel

net

Pay

men

t

Pla

n

Nel

net

Pen

din

g

Aid

New

Stu

den

t

Ori

enta

tio

n H

old

Re

fun

d A

wai

tin

g

Ve

rifi

cati

on

Re

gist

rati

on

Ho

ld

Re

turn

of

Titl

e IV

Ho

ld

Tran

scri

pt

Ho

ld

Wri

te O

ff-B

ad

De

bt

No

Ho

lds

Re

po

rte

d

Gra

nd

To

tal

Good Standing 538 6 43 1 133 3 177 37 49 10 115 29 4 5 4,433 5,583

Good Standing 507 6 42 1 131 3 170 34 46 9 106 28 4 5 4,238 5,330Good Standing, formerly on Warning, Termination or Probation 31 1 2 7 3 3 1 9 1 195 253Probation 1 5 6

Review 61 104 1 15 25 1 97 9 8 2 21 8 2 687 1,041

Acad ACP Review Pending 25 63 1 9 8 1 43 6 8 7 248 419Dual Degree Review 1 1Fin Aid ACP Review Pending 8 3 3 1 1 3 5 105 129Missing Grade, See Instructor 36 23 6 5 45 1 11 3 2 281 413Not Yet Reviewed 4 4Subsequent Degree Review 10 8 6 1 1 49 75

Warning 3 1,294 6 74 2 1 97 13 441 186 23 7 112 64 28 3 4,744 7,098

Maximum Timeframe Alert 2 14 16Warning, Completion Rate 395 1 17 13 3 127 31 4 14 9 4 1 826 1,445Warning, GPA 1 84 7 11 48 25 1 2 10 3 2 1 424 619Warning, GPA and Completion 2 660 2 38 2 1 28 9 213 98 8 1 43 50 20 1 2,116 3,292Warning, Maximum Timeframe 153 3 12 45 1 53 32 10 4 45 2 2 1,364 1,726

Termination 2,592 214 1 27 54 7 1,260 19 9 15 40 14 4 1 1,309 5,566

Acad Restriction, No FA Appeal 4 2 1 8 15Termination Max, Inst FA Only 2 2Termination, Acad Dismissal 694 3 342 1 1 9 1,050Termination, All Criteria 28 7 35Termination, Appeal Denied 2 3 5Termination, Comp and Max 1 8 2 2 7 1 1 66 88Termination, Completion Rate 102 1 16 14 1 34 7 6 7 16 1 3 1 474 683Termination, FA Appeal Denied 1 1 1 3Termination, GPA 246 2 2 2 71 1 62 386Termination, GPA and Comp 1,611 12 1 1 734 5 1 1 99 2,465Termination, GPA and Max 9 8 2 19Termination, Maximum Timeframe 34 2 23 2 21 3 1 17 2 1 354 460Termination, Maximum Timeframe (terminated by the region) 1 4 1 1 7 14Termination, No Fin Aid Appeal 1 47 5 9 1 30 7 2 1 5 8 225 341

No SAP Calculated 5 19 1 4 1 17 2 1 1 7 1 490 549

Grand Total 2,661 2,169 14 160 2 2 313 25 1,993 253 89 34 1 289 122 34 12 2 11,668 19,843

Spring 2016 Non-Returners by SAP Status and Holds



21 2/18/2016

Fall 2015 EOT

(n=96,580)

Fall 2015 EOT

excluding High School,

Guest, Courses Only,

ICN and Deceased

Students

(n=70,170)

Spring 2016 Non-

Returners

(n=19,843)

Gender

Female 54% 57% 55%Male 43% 42% 44%Gender Not Reported 3% 1% 1%

Race/Ethnicity

Caucasian 50% 60% 56%African American 8% 11% 14%Latino 4% 5% 5%Other Ethnicity/Ethnicity Unknown 38% 24% 25%

Age Range

24 and Younger 62% 52% 55%25 and Older 37% 48% 45%Age Not Reported 1% 0% 0%

Course Load

Full-Time 27% 36% 27%Part-Time 73% 64% 73%

Pell EligibilityPell Eligible 41% 56% 57%Not Pell Eligible/Did Not Apply for Aid 59% 44% 43%

First Generation Status

First Generation 24% 33% 32%Not First Generation 31% 42% 42%Not Reported 45% 25% 26%

Cumulative GPA

0 - 1.99 17% 21% 45%

2 - 2.99 28% 32% 27%3 - 3.99 37% 38% 23%4 12% 7% 4%Not Reported 7% 1% 1%

SAP Status

Good Standing 54% 51% 28%FA Probation, Acad Restriction 1% 1% 0%All Review Categories 3% 4% 5%All Warning Categories 22% 29% 36%

All Termination Categories 11% 14% 28%

No SAP Status Calculated 9% 2% 3%


DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE

Items in bold red are at least 4 percentage points higher than the fall 2015 EOT students who were not high school, guest, ICN,

courses only or deceased students.


22 2/18/2016

Fall 2015 EOT

(n=96,580)

Fall 2015 EOT



ICN and Deceased

Students

(n=70,170)

Spring 2016 Non-

Returners

(n=19,843)


DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE



Holds

Academic Termination Hold 3% 4% 13%

Accounts Receivable Hold 3% 4% 11%

Admissions Hold 0% 0% 0%Application for Admission 0% 0% N/ABad ID Pending Delete 0% N/A N/ACollections 0% 0% 1%Dean's Hold 0% 0% 0%Deceased Student 0% 0% 0%F-1 Visa Hold 0% 0% N/AFinancial Hold 2% 2% 2%Hold Web ACH Payments 0% 0% N/AHold Web Payments 0% 0% N/ALibrary Fine 0% 0% 0%Missing HS or GED info 0% N/A N/AMultiple Holds 3% 4% 10%Must see academic advisor 1% 1% 1%Nelnet Payment Plan 5% 6% 0%Nelnet Pending Aid 1% 2% 0%New Student Orientation Hold 0% 0% 0%Probation Hold 0% 0% N/ARefund Awaiting Verification 2% 2% 1%Registration Hold 1% 0% 1%Return of Title IV Hold 0% 0% 0%Transcript Hold 0% 0% 0%Write Off-Bad Debt 0% 0% 0%No Holds Reported 78% 74% 59%

Division

Business and Public Service 15% 21% 21%Health Science 18% 25% 23%Technology 11% 16% 13%University and Transfer 27% 37% 41%

Other 28% 1% 2%School of Applied Sciences and Engineering 3% 3% 3%

Agriculture 19% 19% 10%Biotechnology 7% 7% 7%Chemical Technology 1% 1% 1%Computer Science 2% 2% 3%


23 2/18/2016

Fall 2015 EOT

(n=96,580)

Fall 2015 EOT



ICN and Deceased

Students

(n=70,170)

Spring 2016 Non-

Returners

(n=19,843)


DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE



Computer Science TSAP via DE 8% 8% 8%Computer Science via DE 9% 9% 12%Electrical Engineering Technol 7% 7% 7%Electrical Enginrng Tech TSAP 4% 4% 4%Engineering Technology 14% 14% 15%Manufacturing Operations 0% 0% 0%Mechanical Engineering Tech 8% 8% 8%Mechanical Enginrng Tech TSAP 3% 3% 5%Nanotechnology 0% 0% 0%Pre-Engineering 17% 17% 18%

School of Business 11% 15% 15%

Accounting 13% 13% 12%Accounting Distance 1% 1% 1%Advanced Forensics 0% 0% N/ABookkeeper 0% 0% 0%Business Admin Distance 3% 3% 4%Business Admin TSAP via DE 0% 0% 0%Business Administration 54% 54% 53%Business Administration AS 0% 0% N/ABusiness Administration TSAP 9% 9% 10%Computer Info Systems 0% 0% 0%Computer Info Systems Distance 1% 1% 1%Computer Information Systems 3% 3% 3%Computer Information Tech 4% 4% 4%Database 0% 0% N/AEnrolled Agent 0% 0% 0%Entrepreneurship 0% 0% 1%Entrepreneurship via DE 0% 0% 0%Fundamental Payroll 0% 0% N/AHuman Resources Management 0% 0% 1%Information Data Management 0% 0% N/AInformation Security 0% 0% 0%Information Security Dist Ed 0% 0% 0%Java Programming 0% 0% N/AMicrosoft Office Specialist 0% 0% 0%Network Administration 0% 0% 0%Office Administration 5% 5% 4%Office Administration Distance 2% 2% 3%Supply Chain Management Logist 1% 1% 1%


24 2/18/2016

Fall 2015 EOT

(n=96,580)

Fall 2015 EOT



ICN and Deceased

Students

(n=70,170)

Spring 2016 Non-

Returners

(n=19,843)


DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE



Supply Chain Mgmt Log Distance 1% 1% 1%Supply Chain Mgmt/Logistics 0% 0% 0%Systems Security 0% 0% 0%Visual Programming 0% 0% 0%Web Management 0% 0% 0%

School of Computing and Informatics 2% 3% 4%

Computer Science TSAP 0% 0% 1%Cyber Sec Info Assurnce via DE 6% 6% 5%Cyber Sec/Info Assurnce via DE 0% 0% 0%Cyber Security Info Assurance 11% 11% 10%Dabase Mgmt Admin via DE 2% 2% 2%Data Analytics 0% 0% 0%Database Administration 0% 0% 0%Database Administration via DE 0% 0% 0%Database Development 0% 0% N/ADatabase Development via DE 0% 0% 0%Database Mgmt Admin via DE 0% 0% N/ADatabase Mgmt and Admin 3% 3% 3%Digital Forensics via DE 0% 0% 0%Info Tech Help Desk via DE 0% 0% 1%Informatics 2% 2% 2%Informatics - TSAP 1% 1% 1%Informatics TSAP via DE 2% 2% 2%Informatics via DE 3% 3% 3%Information Tech Help Desk 0% 0% 1%Information Technology Support 15% 15% 16%Informatn Tech Support via DE 7% 7% 7%Java Applic Developmnt via DE 0% 0% 0%Java Application Development 0% 0% 0%Linux Administration 0% 0% N/AMicrosoft Administration 0% 0% 0%Network Infrastructure 7% 7% 7%Network Penetration 0% 0% N/ANetwork Penetration via DE 0% 0% 0%


25 2/18/2016

Fall 2015 EOT

(n=96,580)

Fall 2015 EOT



ICN and Deceased

Students

(n=70,170)

Spring 2016 Non-

Returners

(n=19,843)


DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE



Network Security 0% 0% 1%Network Security via DE 0% 0% 0%Routing and Switching 0% 0% 0%Server Administration 5% 5% 5%Software Development 24% 24% 26%Software Development via DE 8% 8% 7%Web Applic Developmnt via DE 0% 0% N/AWeb Application Development 0% 0% 0%

School of Education 4% 5% 5%Child Development Associate 0% 0% 1%Early Childhood Administration 0% 0% 0%Early Childhood Educ Distance 9% 9% 9%Early Childhood Education 41% 41% 42%Early Childhood Education TSAP 5% 5% 4%Early Chld Ed CDA Process 3% 3% 4%Education 28% 27% 26%Elementary Education TSAP 12% 12% 11%Indiana Youth Development Prof 0% 0% 0%Special Education TSAP 2% 1% 2%

School of Fine Arts and Design 1% 2% 2%Environmental Design 0% 0% 0%Environmental Interior Design 6% 6% 5%Fine Arts 16% 16% 14%Interior Design 0% 0% 0%Landscape Technician 0% 0% 0%Visual Communication 77% 77% 80%

School of Health Sciences 16% 22% 23%

ACSM Certified Personal Trainr 0% 0% 0%Basic Emerg Medical Studies 0% 0% 0%Dental Assisting 1% 1% 0%Dental Hygiene 0% 0% 0%Electrocardiography Technician 0% 0% 0%Exploratory Healthcare Careers 1% 1% 1%Health Care Support 12% 12% 12%Health Information Technology 0% 0% 0%Healthcare Spec Dental Asstg 1% 1% 1%


26 2/18/2016

Fall 2015 EOT

(n=96,580)

Fall 2015 EOT



ICN and Deceased

Students

(n=70,170)

Spring 2016 Non-

Returners

(n=19,843)


DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE



Healthcare Spec Dental Hygien 1% 1% 1%Healthcare Spec Health Info T 1% 1% 1%Healthcare Spec Imaging Sci 3% 3% 4%Healthcare Spec Med Lab Tech 0% 0% 0%Healthcare Spec Medical As 3% 3% 4%Healthcare Spec Paramedic Sci 1% 1% 2%Healthcare Spec Phys Ther Int 3% 3% 3%Healthcare Spec Radiation The 0% 0% 0%Healthcare Spec Resp Care Int 2% 2% 2%Healthcare Spec RN Interest 45% 45% 51%

Healthcare Spec Surg Tech Int 3% 3% 3%Healthcare Spec Therap Mass I 0% 0% 0%Healthcare Specialist 3% 3% 3%Healthcare Specialist TC 0% 0% 0%Healthcare Spec-Prac Nrsg Int 0% 0% 0%Imaging Sciences 1% 1% 0%Kinesiology 0% 0% 0%Medical Assisting 6% 6% 3%Medical Laboratory Technology 1% 1% 0%Medical Office Administration 1% 1% 1%Nursing Program Interest 0% N/A N/ANursing TSAP 3% 3% 0%Outpatient Insurance Coding 0% 0% 0%Paramedic Science 1% 1% 1%Paramedic Science Program Inte 0% N/A N/APatient Care 0% 0% 0%Pharmacy Technician 0% 0% 0%Phlebotomy Technician 1% 1% 1%Physical Therapist Assistant 1% 1% 0%Physical Therapist Asst Progra 0% N/A N/ARadiation Therapy 0% 0% 0%Respiratory Care 2% 2% 0%Respiratory Care Program Inter 0% N/A N/ASurgical Technology 1% 1% 0%Therapeutic Massage 1% 1% 0%


27 2/18/2016

Fall 2015 EOT

(n=96,580)

Fall 2015 EOT



ICN and Deceased

Students

(n=70,170)

Spring 2016 Non-

Returners

(n=19,843)


DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE



School of Liberal Arts and Sciences 13% 17% 21%

General Ed Transfer Cert Distc 0% 0% 0%General Education Transfer Cor 1% 1% 1%General Studies 83% 83% 85%General Studies Distance 1% 1% 1%General Technical Studies 0% N/A N/ALiberal Arts 15% 15% 13%Liberal Arts with Honors 0% 0% N/AProfessional Communication 0% 0% 0%

School of Nursing 2% 3% 0%Nursing 75% 75% 58%Practical Nursing 25% 25% 42%

School of Public and Social Services 9% 12% 12%Addiction Studies 0% 0% 0%Beverage Management Career 0% 0% N/ACertified Pastry Culinarian 0% 0% 0%Criminal Justice 23% 23% 25%Criminal Justice Distance 3% 3% 3%Criminal Justice TSAP 4% 4% 5%Criminal Justice TSAP via DE 1% 1% 2%Culinarian 1% 1% 1%Dietary Management 0% 0% 0%Elder Care Professional 0% 0% 0%Fire Prevention Investigation 0% 0% 0%Fire Service Administration 0% 0% 0%Homeland Security Emergency Mg 0% 0% 0%Homeland Security Public Safet 2% 2% 2%Hospitality Administration 17% 17% 16%Hospitality Management 0% 0% 1%Human Serv Soc Wrk TSAP via DE 0% 0% 0%Human Services 26% 26% 23%Human Services Distance 4% 4% 4%Human Serv-Social Work TSAP 4% 4% 4%Indiana Public Librarian 0% 0% N/ALibrary Technical Asst Distanc 2% 2% 2%Mortuary Sciences 1% 1% 1%Paralegal 6% 6% 5%Paralegal Studies Distance 3% 3% 4%Public Safety 1% 1% 1%


28 2/18/2016

Fall 2015 EOT

(n=96,580)

Fall 2015 EOT



ICN and Deceased

Students

(n=70,170)

Spring 2016 Non-

Returners

(n=19,843)


DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE



Substance Abuse 0% 0% 0%School of Technology 11% 15% 13%

Advanced Automation Robotics 2% 2% 2%Advanced Manufacturing 0% 0% 0%Appr Tech Heat/Frost Insultr 1% 1% 0%Apprentice Tech Boilermaker 1% 1% 1%Apprentice Tech Bricklayer 1% 1% 1%Apprentice Tech Carpenter 9% 8% 15%

Apprentice Tech Electrician 11% 11% 9%Apprentice Tech Elevator Cons 0% 0% N/AApprentice Tech Floorlayer 0% 0% 1%Apprentice Tech Glaziers 0% 0% 1%Apprentice Tech Ironworker 3% 3% 0%Apprentice Tech Millwright 3% 3% 7%Apprentice Tech Operat Engnr 2% 2% 1%Apprentice Tech Painter 1% 1% 1%Apprentice Tech Plumb Pipe 7% 7% 2%Apprentice Tech Plumb Steam 2% 2% 0%Apprentice Tech Refrigeration 0% 0% N/AApprentice Tech REMC Tech 1% 1% 0%Apprentice Tech Sheet Mtl Wrk 3% 3% 3%Apprentice Tech Telecom Tech 0% 0% 0%Auto Body Technology 0% 0% 0%Automation Controls 0% 0% 0%Automation Robotics Tech 0% 0% 0%Automotive Electrical Electron 0% 0% 0%Automotive Technology 9% 9% 10%Aviation Maintenance General 0% 0% N/AAviation Maintenance Tech 1% 1% 1%Aviation Maintenance Tech Gene 0% 0% N/AAviation Manufacturing 0% 0% 0%Aviation Mfg Electrical Assemb 0% 0% 0%Aviation Operations 0% 0% 0%Aviation Technology 0% 0% N/ABrakes and Suspension 0% 0% N/ABuilding Construction Mgmt 1% 1% 1%CNC Production Machinist 0% 0% 0%Construction Technician 0% 0% 0%Construction Technology 2% 2% 2%


29 2/18/2016

Fall 2015 EOT

(n=96,580)

Fall 2015 EOT



ICN and Deceased

Students

(n=70,170)

Spring 2016 Non-

Returners

(n=19,843)


DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE



Design Technology 5% 5% 5%Design Technology Distance 0% 0% 0%Diesel Electronic Controls 0% 0% N/AElectrical Technician 0% 0% 0%Electrician Apprenticeship 0% 0% 0%Electronics and Computer Tech 1% 1% 2%Energy Technology 2% 2% 1%Engine Performance 0% 0% 0%Facilities Mgmt Apprenticeship 0% 0% N/AFluid Power 0% 0% N/AHeating Ventilation AC Apprent 0% 0% N/AHeating Ventilation Air Condit 6% 6% 7%Industrial Electrician 0% 0% 1%Industrial Machining 0% 0% 0%Industrial Mechanical 0% 0% 0%Industrial Technology 15% 15% 16%Machine Repair Apprenticeship 0% 0% 0%Machine Tool 0% 0% N/AMachine Tool Technology 3% 3% 4%Maintenance and Light Repair 0% 0% 0%Manufactng Prod Oper Distance 1% 1% 2%Manufacturing Industrial Tech 0% 0% 0%Mechatronics 0% 0% 0%Millwright Apprenticeship 0% 0% 0%Mold Die Maker Apprenticeship 0% 0% 0%Motorsports Technology 0% 0% 0%Plumber Pipefitter Apprentice 0% 0% 0%Stationary Power Plant Apprent 0% 0% N/AStructural Welding 1% 1% 2%Toolmaker Apprenticeship 0% 0% 0%Ivy Institute 0% 0% 0%Advanced Manufacturing 4% 4% 13%Automotive Technology 58% 58% 50%Industrial Technology 31% 31% 25%Machine Tool Technology 8% 8% 13%


30 2/18/2016

Fall 2015 EOT

(n=96,580)

Fall 2015 EOT



ICN and Deceased

Students

(n=70,170)

Spring 2016 Non-

Returners

(n=19,843)


DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE



Other 1% 1% 2%

Exploratory/Undeclared 98% 98% 96%Undeclared 2% 2% 4%

Courses Only 27% N/A N/A

Indiana College Network 0% N/A N/A


31 2/18/2016

Stat

ew

ide

No

rth

we

st

No

rth

Ce

ntr

al

No

rth

eas

t

Lafa

yett

e

Ko

kom

o

East

Ce

ntr

al

Terr

e H

aute

Ce

ntr

al

Ind

ian

a

Ric

hm

on

d

Co

lum

bu

s

Sou

the

ast

Sou

thw

est

Selle

rsb

urg

Blo

om

ingt

on

Dis

tan

ce

Ap

pr.

1. Fall 2015 overall student body 96,580 8,987 8,032 8,786 5,628 3,488 7,699 4,528 20,177 2,680 4,142 3,073 6,249 6,614 6,463 342. Fall 2015 first-time, transfer, and continuing students excluding high school and guest students

73,183 7,929 5,056 7,146 4,505 2,657 5,371 3,381 17,735 2,011 2,511 1,956 4,506 4,180 4,205 34

3. Fall 2015 first-time, transfer, and continuing students excluding high school, guest, courses only, Indiana College Network, and deceased students*

70,170 7,739 4,920 6,961 4,105 2,549 5,260 3,239 16,951 1,973 2,256 1,849 4,287 4,064 3,983 34

4. Fall 2015 first-time, transfer, and continuing students excluding high school, guest, courses only, Indiana College Network, deceased and graduate students*

66,743 7,243 4,535 6,717 3,918 2,338 5,124 2,994 16,605 1,872 2,017 1,619 4,059 3,851 3,822 29

5. Continuing students from fall 2015** 46,900 4,673 3,113 4,897 2,707 1,701 3,672 2,337 11,202 1,266 1,477 1,206 3,113 2,854 2,664 186. Non-returning students from fall 2015 EOT to spring 2016 Census

19,843 2,570 1,422 1,820 1,211 637 1,452 657 5,403 606 540 413 946 997 1,158 11

APPENDIX A: STATEWIDE AND NON-RETURNERS DATA BY REGION


32 2/18/2016

Positive Association Negative Association

African AmericanOther minority groups

• The odds of re-enrolling for Caucasian students were 8.7 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for African American students.• The odds of re-enrolling for Caucasian students were 11.8 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for other minority students.• The odds of re-enrolling for in-bound transfers were 21.4 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for continuing students.• The odds of re-enrolling for full-time students were 90.1 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for part-time students.

Higher cumulative GPAHigher cumulative credit hours earned (credit accumulation)SAP status in good StandingSAP status on probationHigher proportion of all courses successfully completedHigher number of interventions

Enrolled fall 2015 censusEnrolled spring 2015 censusTransfer Higher cumulative credit hours attempted

• The odds of re-enrolling for students who were registered for classes during the fall 2015 semester (Census) were 107.6 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for those who weren't.• The odds of re-enrolling for students who were registered for classes during the spring 2015 semester (Census) were 33.1 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for those who weren't.

• The odds of re-enrolling for students in the Health Science division were 9.4 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for students in the University and Transfer division.• The odds of re-enrolling for students in the Technology division were 115.1 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for students in the University and Transfer division.

• The odds of re-enrolling for students in the Business and Public Service division were 10.7 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for students in the University and Transfer division.

APPENDIX B: SUMMARY RESULTS OF THE LOGISTIC REGRESSION MODELS

The Central Office IR staff wanted to examine the factors that could affect enrollment in fall 2015. Since “fall 2015 enrollment” is a dichotomous variable, taking the value of “0” for not enrolled or “1” for enrolled, we chose the logistic regression method. Three logistic regression models were run using multiple demographic, financial and academic variables to test which ones could affect changes in the spring 2016 enrollment.

The data set excluded graduates in the fall 2015 term, high school/courses only students, guest, Indiana College Network and deceased students.

Nine variables were found to have a statistically significant impact on re-enrollment in the spring 2016 term in all three models (e.g., having a full-time course

load, technology division, having a higher cumulative GPA, having higher cumulative hours attempted, having higher credit hours earned, being on probation,

pursuing a certificate, having a higher proportion of all courses successfully completed, and participating in a higher number of interventions). Eight variables had a significant positive impact on re-enrollment in the spring 2016 term in two models (e.g., enrolled in fall 2015 census, enrolled in spring 2015 census, being African American, being from another minority group, students in the Business and Public Service division, students in the Health Science division, students with a SAP status in good standing, and being a traditional age African American student).

1. The first logistic regression model examined how demographic, financial, and academic factors affect the dependent variable "re-enrollment in spring

2016" among a subset of students who were enrolled at the end of the fall 2015 term.

Health Science divisionTechnology division

The following variables were found to have a statistically significant impact on the dependent variable. A positive association means that the odds of re-enrolling in spring 2016 increases with any increase "n" in the independent variables. A negative association means that the odds of re-enrolling decreases with any increase "n" in the independent variables.

Full-Time Certificates (i.e., technical certificate and career certificates)Business and Public Service division Traditional age African American (Age Under 25)


33 2/18/2016



Enrolled fall 2015 census African AmericanEnrolled spring 2015 census LatinoFull-Time Other minority groupsBusiness and Public Service division Undeclared majorHealth Science divisionTechnology division

Higher proportion of all courses successfully completedHigher number of Interventions

• The odds of re-enrolling for Caucasian students were 12.1 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for African American students.• The odds of re-enrolling for Caucasian students were 22.7 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for Latino students.• The odds of re-enrolling for Caucasian students were 15.3 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for other minority students.• The odds of re-enrolling for full-time students were 94.5 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for part-time students.

• The odds of re-enrolling for students in the Technology division were 138.2 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for students in the University and Transfer division.

SAP status on probation

• The odds of re-enrolling for students who were registered for classes during the fall 2015 semester (Census) were 161.9 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for those who weren't.• The odds of re-enrolling for students who were registered for classes during the spring 2015 semester (Census) were 59.3 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for those who weren't.

• The odds of re-enrolling for students in the Business and Public Service division were 21.5 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for students in the University and Transfer division.• The odds of re-enrolling for students in the Health Science division were 21.7 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for students in the University and Transfer division.

Higher cumulative credit hours attemptedCertificates (i.e., technical certificate and career certificates)

Higher cumulative GPAHigher cumulative credit hours earned (credit accumulation)SAP status in good Standing

• The odds of re-enrolling for students with a lower number of credit hours attempted were 2.0 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for students with a higher number of credit hours attempted.

The following section provides a summary of these results:

2. The second logistic regression model examined how demographic, financial, and academic factors affected the dependent variable "re-enrollment in spring

2016" among a subset of students who were enrolled at the end of the fall 2015 term and whose cumulative GPA was at least 2.0.

• The odds of re-enrolling for students with a higher cumulative GPA were 25.5 percent than the odds of re-enrolling for students with a lower cumulative GPA.

• The odds of re-enrolling for students who are pursuing an Associate's degree were 51.5 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for students who were pursuing a certificate (i.e., CT or TC).• The odds of re-enrolling for students who completed a higher proportion of their coursework successfully (with a D or higher) were 291.6 percent higher than the odds of students who didn't.

• The odds of re-enrolling for students who participated in a higher number of interventions were 20.8 percent higher than the odds of students who didn't.• The odds of re-enrolling for non-traditional age African American students were 14.6 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for traditional age African American students.

• The odds of re-enrolling for students with a higher number of credit hours earned were 2.6 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for students with a lower number of credit hours earned. • The odds of re-enrolling for students whose SAP status were in good standing and on probation were 71.2 percent and 5813.7 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for students in one of the warning or termination categories, respectively.


34 2/18/2016



Transfer Enrolled spring 2015 censusFull-Time MaleTechnology Health ScienceCum GPACum Hrs EarnedProbationHigher proportion of all courses successfully completedHigher number of interventions

• The odds of re-enrolling for female students were 8.5 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for male students.• The odds of re-enrolling for transfer students were 61.2 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for continuing students.• The odds of re-enrolling for full-time students were 101.8 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for part-time students.

• The odds of re-enrolling for students with a higher number of cumulative credit hours earned were 4.9 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for students with a lower number of cumulative credit hours earned. Credit accumulation matters in this case.• The odds of re-enrolling for students whose SAP status were on probation were 3320.3 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for students in one of the warning or termination categories.

• The odds of re-enrolling for students who weren't registered for classes during the spring 2015 semester (Census) were 37.2 percent higher than the odds of those who were.

• The odds of re-enrolling for students in the University and Transfer division were 16.8 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for students in the Health Science division.• The odds of re-enrolling for students in the Technology division were 56.6 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for students in the University and Transfer division.

• The odds of re-enrolling for students with a higher cumulative GPA were 40.2 percent than the odds of re-enrolling for students with a lower cumulative GPA.• The odds of re-enrolling for students with a lower number of credit hours attempted were 4.0 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for students with a higher number of credit hours attempted.

3. In the third logistic regression model, we looked at how demographic, financial, and academic factors affected the dependent variable "re-enrollment in

spring 2016" among a subset of students who were enrolled at the end of the fall 2015 term and whose cumulative GPA was below 2.0.

The following section provides a summary of these results:

Higher cumulative credit hours attemptedCertificates (i.e., technical certificate and career certificates)Traditional age African American (Age Under 25)

• The odds of re-enrolling for students whose SAP status were in good standing and on probation were 81.1 percent and 8036.4 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for students in one of the warning or termination categories, respectively.• The odds of re-enrolling for students who are pursuing an Associate's degree were 46.0 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for students who were pursuing a certificate (i.e., CT or TC).• The odds of re-enrolling for students who completed a higher proportion of their coursework successfully (with a D or higher) were 247.0 percent higher than the odds of students who didn't.

• The odds of re-enrolling for students who participated in a higher number of interventions were 21.5 percent higher than the odds of students who didn't.

• The odds of re-enrolling for students in the University and Transfer division were 42.6 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for undeclared students.

• The odds of re-enrolling for students with a higher cumulative GPA were 17.0 percent than the odds of re-enrolling for students with a lower cumulative GPA.• The odds of re-enrolling for students with a lower number of credit hours attempted were 1.2 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for students with a higher number of credit hours attempted. • The odds of re-enrolling for students with a higher number of credit hours earned were 1.5 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for students with a lower number of credit hours earned.


35 2/18/2016


• The odds of re-enrolling for non-traditional age African American students were 26.4 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for traditional age African American students.

• The odds of re-enrolling for students who were pursuing an Associate's degree were 51.3 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for students who were pursuing a certificate (i.e., CT or TC).• The odds of re-enrolling for students who completed a higher proportion of their coursework successfully (with a D or higher) were 438.4 percent higher than the odds of students who didn't.

• The odds of re-enrolling for students who participated in a higher number of interventions were 20.7 percent higher than the odds of students who didn't.


36 2/18/2016

Lower Upper

Intercept -2.30 0.08 891.83 1 0.000 0.100Enrolled Fall 2015 Census 0.73 0.06 149.03 1 0.000 2.076 1.85 2.33Enrolled Spring 2015 Census 0.29 0.02 154.44 1 0.000 1.331 1.27 1.39Male -0.04 0.02 3.22 1 0.073 0.960 1.042 0.92 1.00

(Female)African American -0.08 0.04 4.36 1 0.037 0.920 1.087 0.85 0.99Latino -0.10 0.08 1.85 1 0.174 0.902 1.108 0.78 1.05Others -0.11 0.04 6.29 1 0.012 0.894 1.118 0.82 0.98Not Reported -0.21 0.25 0.69 1 0.407 0.810 1.234 0.49 1.33

(Caucasian)Under 25 0.00 0.02 0.03 1 0.854 0.996 1.004 0.95 1.04

(Age 25 and Over)Transfer 0.19 0.04 20.64 1 0.000 1.214 1.12 1.32

(Continuing)Full-Time 0.64 0.02 796.68 1 0.000 1.901 1.82 1.99

(Part-Time)Business and Public Service 0.10 0.03 13.76 1 0.000 1.107 1.05 1.17Health Science 0.09 0.03 11.24 1 0.001 1.094 1.04 1.15Technology 0.77 0.04 392.59 1 0.000 2.151 1.99 2.32Undeclared -0.15 0.09 2.93 1 0.087 0.862 1.160 0.73 1.02

(University and Transfer)Cum GPA 0.23 0.01 279.72 1 0.000 1.255 1.22 1.29Cum Hrs Attempted -0.02 0.00 254.13 1 0.000 0.980 1.020 0.98 0.98Cum Hrs Earned 0.03 0.00 290.14 1 0.000 1.026 1.02 1.03SAP Categories 529.98 3 0.000Good Standing 0.54 0.03 395.64 1 0.000 1.712 1.62 1.80Probation 4.08 0.41 98.35 1 0.000 59.137 26.40 132.45Review -0.09 0.05 3.51 1 0.061 0.914 1.094 0.83 1.00

(Bad SAP: Warning and Termination)Certificates -0.42 0.04 100.04 1 0.000 0.660 1.515 0.61 0.72

(Associates)Proportion of All Courses Successfully Completed

1.37 0.03 1998.83 1 0.000 3.916 3.69 4.16

Number of Interventions 0.19 0.01 191.39 1 0.000 1.208 1.18 1.24African American*Age Under 25 -0.14 0.06 4.94 1 0.026 0.872 1.146 0.77 0.98

(African American*Age 25 and Over)

Latino*Age Under 25 -0.13 0.09 1.95 1 0.163 0.878 1.138 0.73 1.05(Latino*Age 25 and Over) December 30, 2015

APPENDIX B-1: LOGISTIC REGRESSION MODEL #1


FACTORS THAT AFFECT ENROLLMENT IN SPRING 2016

FALL 2015 NON-RETURNERS

Variables B S.E. Wald df Sig.

This table summarizes the results of a logistic regression model that examined how demographic, financial and academic factors affect the dependent variable "enrollment in spring 2016" among a subset of students who were enrolled at the end of the fall 2015 term.

The data set excludes graduates in the fall 2015 term, high school/courses only students, guest, Indiana College Network and deceased students.

The variables highlighted in light green were found to be statistically significant. Below is the interpretation for the first 6 variables:* The odds of re-enrolling for students who were registered for classes during the fall 2015 semester (Census) were 107.6 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for those who weren't.* The odds of re-enrolling for students who were registered for classes during the spring 2015 semester (Census) were 33.1 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for those who weren't.* The odds of re-enrolling for Caucasian students were 8.7 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for African American students.* The odds of re-enrolling for Caucasian students of were 11.8 percent higher than the odds of re-re-enrolling for other minority students.* The odds of re-enrolling for transfer students were 21.4 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for continuing students.* The odds of re-enrolling for full-time students were 90.1 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for part-time students.

Odds

Ratios

Inverse

Odds

Ratios

95% C.I.for EXP(B)


37 2/18/2016

Model Fit:

No YesNo 9,281 9,815 48.6Yes 4,089 41,690 91.1

78.6

Enrolled Spring 2016 Census

a. The cut value is .500

Comparison groups are in italics and in parenthesis. Items highlighted in green are statistically significant at the 0.05 level.

Overall Percentage

Cases included in this analysis = 64,875 -2 Log Likelihood = 62951.525 Chi-square = 244.187 Sig. = 0.000

Predicted


Percentage Correct

Observed

Classification Table


38 2/18/2016

Lower Upper

Intercept -2.365 0.115 421.627 1 0.000 0.094Enrolled Fall 2015 Census 0.963 0.068 203.023 1 0.000 2.619 2.294 2.990Enrolled Spring 2015 Census 0.465 0.027 299.440 1 0.000 1.593 1.511 1.679Male -0.039 0.028 1.942 1 0.163 0.962 1.040 0.910 1.016

(Female)African American -0.114 0.038 8.958 1 0.003 0.892 1.121 0.828 0.961Latino -0.205 0.052 15.299 1 0.000 0.815 1.227 0.736 0.903Others -0.142 0.053 7.185 1 0.007 0.868 1.153 0.782 0.963Not Reported -0.217 0.298 0.530 1 0.467 0.805 1.242 0.449 1.444

(Caucasian)Transfer -0.038 0.054 0.500 1 0.480 0.963 1.039 0.866 1.070

(Continuing)Full-Time 0.670 0.028 558.294 1 0.000 1.954 1.848 2.065

(Part-Time)Business and Public Service 0.195 0.033 33.969 1 0.000 1.215 1.138 1.297Health Science 0.196 0.032 38.012 1 0.000 1.217 1.143 1.295Technology 0.868 0.046 360.340 1 0.000 2.382 2.178 2.605Undeclared -0.355 0.110 10.522 1 0.001 0.701 1.426 0.566 0.869

(University and Transfer)Age Under 25 -0.045 0.027 2.795 1 0.095 0.956 1.046 0.907 1.008

(Age 25 and Over)Cum GPA 0.157 0.023 46.678 1 0.000 1.170 1.119 1.224Cum Hrs Attempted -0.012 0.002 58.306 1 0.000 0.988 1.012 0.985 0.991Cum Hrs Earned 0.015 0.002 69.120 1 0.000 1.015 1.011 1.019SAP Categories 460.092 3 0.000Good Standing 0.594 0.031 366.993 1 0.000 1.811 1.704 1.924Probation 4.399 0.580 57.541 1 0.000 81.364 26.110 253.542Review -0.048 0.059 0.661 1 0.416 0.953 1.049 0.849 1.070


(Associates)Proportion of All Courses Successfully Completed

1.244 0.036 1173.049 1 0.000 3.470 3.231 3.726

Number of Interventions 0.195 0.016 143.320 1 0.000 1.215 1.177 1.255

Model Fit:



FALL 2015 NON-RETURNERS WITH CUMULATIVE GPA OF AT LEAST 2.0


Variables B S.E. Wald df Sig.

Comparison groups are in italics and in parenthesis. Items highlighted in green are statistically significant at the 0.05 level.

Cases included in this analysis = 50,023 '-2 Log Likelihood = 45302.865 Chi-square = 87.208 Sig. = 0.000

This table summarizes the results of a logistic regression model that examined how demographic, financial and academic factors affect the dependent variable "enrollment in spring 2016" among a subset of students who were enrolled at the end of the fall 2015 term and whose cumulative GPA was at least 2.0.


The variables highlighted in light blue were found to be statistically significant. Below is the interpretation for the first 6 variables:* The odds of re-enrolling for students who were registered for classes during the fall 2015 semester (Census) were 161.9 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for those who weren't.* The odds of re-enrolling for students who were registered for classes during the spring 2015 semester (Census) were 59.3 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for those who weren't.* The odds of re-enrolling for Caucasian students were 12.1 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for African American students.* The odds of re-enrolling for Caucasian students were 22.7 percent higher than the odds of re-re-enrolling for Latino students.* The odds of re-enrolling for Caucasian students were 15.3 percent lower than the odds of re-re-enrolling for students in other minority groups.* The odds of re-enrolling for full-time students were 95.4 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for part-time students.

Odds

Ratios

Inverse

Odds

Ratios

95% C.I.for EXP(B)


39 2/18/2016

No YesNo 1,849 8,511 17.8Yes 956 38,707 97.6

81.1



Predicted

Enrolled Spring 2016 Census Percentage

Correct

Observed

Overall Percentage



40 2/18/2016

Lower Upper

Intercept -1.454 0.140 108.033 1 0.000 0.234Enrolled Fall 2015 Census 0.011 0.111 0.010 1 0.921 1.011 0.813 1.257Enrolled Spring 2015 Census -0.316 0.048 42.816 1 0.000 0.729 1.372 0.663 0.801Male -0.082 0.041 3.924 1 0.048 0.921 1.085 0.850 0.999

(Female)African American -0.030 0.087 0.118 1 0.732 0.971 1.030 0.818 1.151Latino -0.269 0.205 1.725 1 0.189 0.764 1.309 0.512 1.142Others 0.010 0.085 0.015 1 0.901 1.011 0.856 1.193Not Reported -0.373 0.529 0.496 1 0.481 0.689 1.452 0.244 1.943

(Caucasian)Transfer 0.477 0.065 54.041 1 0.000 1.612 1.419 1.831

(Continuing)Not Pell Eligible 0.070 0.042 2.783 1 0.095 1.073 0.988 1.165

(Pell Eligible)Full-Time 0.702 0.041 294.479 1 0.000 2.018 1.862 2.186

(Part-Time)Business and Public Service -0.072 0.050 2.104 1 0.147 0.930 1.075 0.844 1.026Health Science -0.156 0.052 8.844 1 0.003 0.856 1.168 0.773 0.948Technology 0.449 0.082 30.277 1 0.000 1.566 1.335 1.838Undeclared 0.076 0.130 0.344 1 0.557 1.079 0.837 1.391

(University and Transfer)Age Under 25 0.009 0.051 0.034 1 0.854 1.009 0.914 1.115

(Age 25 and Over)Cum GPA 0.338 0.041 67.814 1 0.000 1.402 1.294 1.520Cum Hrs Attempted -0.039 0.003 189.580 1 0.000 0.962 1.040 0.956 0.967Cum Hrs Earned 0.048 0.004 138.154 1 0.000 1.049 1.041 1.057SAP Categories 42.123 3 0.000Good Standing 0.302 0.180 2.826 1 0.093 1.352 0.951 1.923Probation 3.532 0.594 35.394 1 0.000 34.203 10.683 109.512Review -0.157 0.089 3.110 1 0.078 0.854 1.170 0.717 1.018


(Associates)Proportion of All Courses Successfully Completed 1.683 0.067 629.954 1 0.000 5.384 4.720 6.140Number of Interventions 0.188 0.026 52.297 1 0.000 1.207 1.147 1.270African American * Age Under 25 -0.234 0.113 4.319 1 0.038 0.791 1.264 0.635 0.987

(African American * Age 25 and Over) December 30, 2015Latino by Age Under 25 0.184 0.224 0.671 1 0.413 1.202 0.774 1.865

(Latino * Age 25 and Over)



FALL 2015 NON-RETURNERS WITH CUMULATIVE GPA BELOW 2.0


B S.E. Wald df Sig.

Odds

Ratios

Cases included in this analysis = 14,852 '-2 Log Likelihood = 16863.621 Chi-square = 36.673 Sig. = 0.000

Inverse

Odds

95% C.I.for EXP(B)

Variables

This table summarizes the results of a logistic regression model that examined how demographic, financial and academic factors affect the dependent variable "enrollment in spring 2016" among a subset of students who were enrolled at the end of the fall 2015 term and whose cumulative GPA was at least 2.0.


The variables highlighted in light blue were found to be statistically significant. Below is the interpretation for the first 6 variables:* The odds of re-enrolling for students who weren't registered for classes during the spring 2015 semester (Census) were 37.2 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for those who were.* The odds of re-enrolling for female students were 8.5 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for male students.* The odds of re-enrolling for transfer students were 61.2 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for continuing students.* The odds of re-enrolling for full-time students were 101.8 percent higher than the odds of re-enrolling for part-time students .* The odds of re-enrolling for students in the university and transfer division were 16.8 percent higher than the odds of re-re-enrolling for students in the health science division.* The odds of re-enrolling for students in the technology division were 56.6 percent higher than the odds of re-re-enrolling for students in the university and transfer division.


41 2/18/2016

No YesNo 7,197 1,539 82.4Yes 2,747 3,369 55.1

71.1




Predicted

Enrolled Spring 2016 Census Percentage

Correct

Observed

Overall Percentage


42 2/18/2016

Documents

COMPREHENSIVE REPORT ON THE SPRING 2016 NON … · Fall 2015 Graduate Report: Holds Report. Spring 2016 SAP Status (Beginning of term) from Financial Aid: February 1, 2016. January