Upload
dai
View
22
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Compliance Data ISES Small Group Sesson December 2011. Purpose. To review multi-year compliance data from SESR and VR monitoring in order to: Identify additional data questions Discuss preliminary priorities Start thinking about possible improvement activities. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONTom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction
Compliance DataISES Small Group Sesson
December 2011
Tom TorlaksonState Superintendent of Public Instruction
2
Purpose
• To review multi-year compliance data from SESR and VR monitoring in order to:– Identify additional data questions– Discuss preliminary priorities– Start thinking about possible
improvement activities
Tom TorlaksonState Superintendent of Public Instruction
3
All of 1,059 California School Districts Participate Annually
Data Review
Selection CriteriaEvery school districtparticipates everyyear
Activities Local Plan Timeline Compliance CASEMIS Key Performance Indicators (KPI) Compliance and Due Process
Histories
Annual Collection and Analysis of District Information
Activities
Local Plans – Annual Budget and Service Plans (SELPA)
Student Level Data - Compliance testing
Ongoing Compliance History – Triage process
State Performance Plan Indicators – Calculation and review of district data
Compliance Determinations
Disproportionality
Scope
Every school district is reviewed every year.
Tom TorlaksonState Superintendent of Public Instruction
4
Approximately 250 California School Districts
Self-Reviews
Selection CriteriaEvery school districtparticipatesonce everyfour years
Activities Monitoring Plan Record Review Educational Benefit IEP Implementation
Special Education Self Reviews
Scope
Every school district participates every four years
Activities
SELPA/District conducted
Monitoring Plan
Parent Input
SPP Indicators
Compliance History
Record Review
Ed. Benefit
IEP Implementation
Policy and Procedure Review
SELPA Governance
Findings and Corrective Action Plans
CDE Follow up Visits
Tom TorlaksonState Superintendent of Public Instruction
5
20 California School Districts
Verification Reviews
Selection CriteriaSchool districtswith low KeyPerformanceIndicators (KPI)
Activities Monitoring Plan Record Review Educational Benefit IEP Implementation
Verification ReviewsScope
Juvenile Court Schools and other districts per Triage Process
Activities
CDE conducted
Monitoring Plan
Parent Input
SPP Indicators & other Data
Compliance History
Record Review
Ed. Benefit
IEP Implementation
Staff and Parent Interviews
Policy and Procedure Review
SELPA Governance
Findings and Corrective Action Plans
Follow up Visits
Tom TorlaksonState Superintendent of Public Instruction
6
8 California School Districts
Facilitated Districts
Selection CriteriaSchool districtswith the lowest 15% ofKey PerformanceIndicators (KPI)
Activities Three Year Support Grant Process RCAT+ Program Improvement
Facilitated District Reviews
Scope
Districts who have Significant Disproportionality or Disproportionate Representation
Activities
Begins with Review of Policies, Procedures and Practices
2 year support
In depth programmatic and data review
CEIS Plan
Speciality Expert Support
Tom TorlaksonState Superintendent of Public Instruction
7
Training•Statewide SELPA Level Training•Local Training Modules
•Overview•Software Installation•Monitoring Plan Development•Student Record Reviews•Policy and Procedure Reviews•Entering Findings•Systemic Findings, CAs and Reporting•Follow-up and Correction
Monitoring Plan Development
Monitoring Plan Approved
Record Review Activities
IEP Implementation
Monitoring Implementation of Local Plan
Other monitoring activities identified in the Monitoring Plan
Enter and Evaluate Findings
Preparation and Planning
Develop Corrective Actions
Policy and Procedure Review ActivitiesSubmit Findings and Corrective
Actions for Review• Electronic data through secure portal• CDE review files for completeness, accuracy, and coherency
Document/Track Corrections • Submit through secure portal
Prepare Monitoring Plan
Conduct Monitoring Activities
Analyze Results, Submit CAPs, Track
Correction
Parent Input Meeting/Survey
Review District Data
Monitoring Plan Written and Submitted for Approval
Special Education Self Review Process
Educational Benefit Review Activities
Conduct Follow up Reviews• Initiate other enforcement activities, as needed
Close Based on Evidence of Correction
Tom TorlaksonState Superintendent of Public Instruction
8
Total Students and Districts Reviewed through VR and SESR
2006-07 through 2009-10
Tom TorlaksonState Superintendent of Public Instruction
9
Most Frequent Findings from VR and
SESR 2006-07 through 2010-11
Tom TorlaksonState Superintendent of Public Instruction
10
Noncompliance Items by SPP Indicator 2006-07 through 2009-10
Tom TorlaksonState Superintendent of Public Instruction
11
Number of Districts having one or more NC findings by SPP/APR Indicator
2006-07 through 2009-10
Tom TorlaksonState Superintendent of Public Instruction
12
Items Associated with SPP/APR Indicator 5 – Least Restrictive Environment (including total findings by item and total of districts found noncompliant 2006-07 through 2009-10)
Tom TorlaksonState Superintendent of Public Instruction
13
Finding Statements related to Item 3-4-1.2 – General Education Teacher in the IEP meeting.
Tom TorlaksonState Superintendent of Public Instruction
14
Finding statements related to Item 3-4-1.2 – Explanation of the extent to which the student will not participate with general education students in the general education classroom and in extracurricular and nonacademic activities
Tom TorlaksonState Superintendent of Public Instruction
15
National Comparison
Least Restrictive Environment
Tom TorlaksonState Superintendent of Public Instruction
16
National Comparisons – Graduation Rate and
Drop Out Rate