32
Yuri Maistrenko E-mail: [email protected] Complex Network Dynamics: Theory & Application Lecture 3

Complex Network Dynamics - Welcome BCS...SYNC: How Order Emerges From Chaos In the Universe, Nature, and Daily Life by S.Strogatz (2004) ===== A book for reading (no Nonlinear Dynamics

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Yuri Maistrenko

E-mail: [email protected]

Complex Network Dynamics:

Theory & Application

Lecture 3

Watch S. Strogatz’s lecture (2004):

The science of sync at page http://www.ted.com/talks/steven_strogatz_on_sync#t-12468

SYNC: How Order Emerges From Chaos In the Universe, Nature, and Daily Life by S.Strogatz (2004)

===================================================================

A book for reading (no formulas! ) :

Nonlinear Dynamics of Networks

- regular (stationary, periodic ,or quasiperiodic)

- chaotic (strange attractors, chimera states)

Neuronal Networks

Human brain: ~ 100 000 000 000 neurons

5

- how complex are neuronal networks in the brain?

- are they locally or globally coupled?

- strength of coupling between individual neurons?

- excitatory and inhibitory neurons, why so?

How to get modelling?

Parkinson’s disease is characterized by pathological

synchronization of neuronal activity in subthalamic

nucleus (STN) and external segment of globus pallidus

(GPe):

Namely, some part of the STN-GPe neurons

starts to fires synchronously

at some frequency in the beta-band 10-30Hz

By contrast, under healthy conditions

these neurons fire in an uncorrelated and

desynchronized manner.

Pathological synchronization in Parkinson’s disease

HOW TO DESYNCHRONIZE?

7

Deep Brain Stimulation (Benabid, 1986)

electrode

target point

generator

permanent high-frequency stimulation >90 Hz

Tremor amplitude as

a function of DBS frequency

From :

Experimental data: beta-band synchronization (~10-30 Hz)

9

Normal monkey

Parkinsonian monkey

Recording individual GPE cells

10 “Parkinsonian” spectrum “Healthy” spectrum

How to desynchronize

pathologic neuronal synchrony in the brain?

Co-workers:

R.Levchenko (Kyiv)

B.Lysyansky (Juelich-Kyiv)

Yu.Maistrenko (Juelich-Kyiv)

J.Rubin (Pittsburg)

O.Sudakov (Kyiv)

P.Tass (Juelich)

National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine Research Center Jülich, Germany Pittsburg University, US

How to switch from pathologic synchronouse

to healthy desynchronized state?

Intuitively: phenomenon of multistability could help for desirable transitions between the characteristic states If so: one should apply deep brain stimulation (DBS) with a hope to turn from synchronization to desynchronization by resetting initial conditions But first: we need to study the phenomenon, to build a model for individual neurons and for connectivity in the network .

13

Network of excitatory (STN) and inhibitory(GPe)

neurons

STN GPe

15

Parameters of STN and GPe neurons

17

Strong connectivity Weak connectivity

Network topology

STN GPe

18

2000 coupled neurons

“Parkinsonian” bursting: space-time dynamics

Gpe

cells

STN

cells

time

20

2000 coupled neurons

“Healthy” irregular spiking: space-time dynamics

Four different system parameters to vary

Coupling coefficient SG

Coupling coefficient GG

Coupling coefficient GS

External current

1.5 – 4.0

0.06 – 0.14

2.0 – 10.0

-0.3 – -1.0

What can we conclude from the modelling study?

• Network connectivity plays a crucial role for the STN-GPe network dynamics: namely, sparser connectivity provokes synchronous bursting

• Two characteristic regimes, chaotic spiking and regular bursting are confirmed by massive parallel supercomputing (~600 trajectories of ~10000 ms for 2000 neurons)

• But, both regimes can exist only at different coupling configurations

How one can help to parkinsonian patients?

• Unfortunately, there is no another way to switch from regular bursting

(synchronization, “pathologic””) to chaotic spiking (desynchronization, “healthy”) except as modifying neuronal connectivity in the network.

Spontaneous synchronization

of coupled limit-cycle oscillators.

We are interested in the spontaneous synchronization

of populations of biological oscillators. For example:

- the pacemaker region of the heart consists of thousands of cells

that produce a regular, collective rhythm of electrical signals.

- fireflies, males congregate in a tree and flash in synchrony to the

Sending signals to their lady friends.

Winfree model (1967)

NiZdt

dj

N

j

iii ,...,1 ),( )(

1

Book 2000

A population of interacting limit-cycle oscillators: - weak coupling - nearly identical oscillators

The oscillators relax to their limit cycles and so, can be characterized solely by their phases

Each oscillator is coupled to the collective rhythm generated by the whole population

i

i - phases of individual oscillators

- frequencies of individual oscillators

“Biological rhythms and the behavior of populations of coupled oscillators” J.Theor. Biol. 1967

Network of N coupled phase oscillators:

ii

- coupling function )( ijijij

- phases of individual oscillators

- frequencies of individual oscillators are distributed according to some

probabilistic density 𝑔(𝜔), like Gaussian distribution.

Nidt

dij

N

j

ijii ,...,1 ),(

1

ii

Kuramoto model (1975)

Book 1984

One-dimensional complex Ginzburg-Landau equation, periodic boundary conditions

Introduce non-local coupling

Integral coupling term

How one can obtain Kuramoto model?

)sin(1

1

ij

N

j

iji GN

Kuramoto model Parameter 𝛼

28

“Standard” Kuramoto model

cKK

cKK : synchronization (phase-locking)

: desynchronization (clustering and chaos)

There exists critical bifurcation value such that: 0cK

.,...,1 ),(sin1

NiN

Kij

N

j

ii

All-to-all sinusoidal coupling function sin)(N

Kij

When the coupling is small compared to the spread of natural frequencies, the system behaves incoherently, with each oscillator running at its natural frequency. As the coupling is increased, the incoherence persists until a certain threshold is crossed — then a small cluster of oscillators suddenly ‘freezes’ into synchrony. For still greater coupling, all the oscillators become locked in phase and amplitude.

cKK

global coupling

Synchronization transition in Kuramoto model

𝑵 = 𝟑 𝑵 = 𝟕

i - average frequency of individual oscillator (Poincare rotation number)

symmetric frequency distribution asymmetric frequency distribution

T

Ti dttT

0

)(1

lim

Complex order parameter

.,...,1 ),(sin1

NiN

Kij

N

j

ii

N

j

ii jeN

re1

1 Order parameter:

𝑟(𝑡) measures the coherence of the oscillator population

𝜓(𝑡) is the average phase

.,...,1 ),sin( NiKr iii

Each oscillator is coupled to the common average

phase with coupling strength given by 𝐾𝑟 i

)(t

31

Cauchy-Lorentz frequency distribution

Books

Y. Kuramoto (1984) Chemical Oscillations, Waves and Turbulence (Springer-Verlag, Berlin). A. Winfree (2000) The Geometry of Biological Times (Springer, New-York). Review papers S.Strogatz (2000). " From Kuramoto to Crawford: exploring the onset of synchronization in populations of coupled oscillators. Physica D 143, 1 -20. S.Strogatz (2001). "Exploring Complex Networks". Nature 410 (6825): 268–276. Yu. Maistrenko et al (2005). “Desynchronization and chaos in the Kuramoto model“. Lect. Notes Phys. 671, 285-306.

Recommended literature