Upload
tania-bardwell
View
216
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Comparison of Gravimetric Geoid Models Over the Great Lakes Region
Daniel R. Roman and Xiaopeng Li
Surface Gravity ObservationsSaleh et al. (2012) Fig. 11 Biases of all 244 significantly biased surveys
Saleh et al. (2012) Fig. 12 The effect of significant gravity biases on the geoid
Collection in August 2013, very likely to complete
Collection possible in Aug/Sept 2013,
unlikely to complete
Collection in Sept/Oct 2013, likely to complete
Gravity for the Redefinition of the American Vertical Datum (GRAV-D)Great Lakes Airborne Gravity Collection Effort
Aerogravity – GOCE DIR Rel. 4
Great Lakes GPSBM Locations (NAVD 88)
Alternatives:
• SEPT 12
• NOV 07
• Min. Constr. GPSBM’s (WI)
Great Lakes Errors: SatelliteDegree Cutoff vs. GPSBM’s
Two separate nadir points at degrees100 and 180: must try both
Great Lakes Errors: AerogravityDegree Cutoff vs. GPSBM’s
Degree 280 yields lowest overall error as EGM2008 is cut in at higher harmonics
2.E GRAV-D Surface Gravity Error Detection and Cleaning
• Check terrestrial gravity at suspect sites noted by Saleh et al. (2012)
• Determine and remove potential biases trends in 40 km and longer bandwidth
Errors Detected by GOCE DIR Rel. 4
Location is western New York State and the southeastern portion of Lake Ontario
Errors Detected by Aerogravity
Location is western New York State and the southeastern portion of Lake Ontario
Surface Gravity Anomalies (SGA)
Location is western New York State and the southeastern portion of Lake Ontario
SGA – EGM2008 quiet
SGA – EGM2008/GOCE-DIR R. 4noise
SGA – EGM2008/GOCE/Aerogravitynoiser
CGG2013M8 – CGG2010
Model 8:
• GOCE DIR Release 4
• Surface gravity
• Modified Kernel with Cosine filter between 140-200
CGG2013M8 – USGG2012
4. Conclusions
• Aerogravity bridges the gap between satellite and surface gravity data
• Suspect surface gravity data was confirmed• Assessment of cleaning of surface data and
potential impact is ongoing• With adoption of common W0 and use of
aerogravity to constrain middle wavelengths, a common gravity field model is possible
5. Future Work
• Use NOV 07, SEPT 12, & M.C. GPSBM to model• Test all surface gravity data in region• Develop regional model spanning same region
as CGG2013• Compare final CGG2013 against USGG2012,
XGG13D, and any follow-on models• Test against tide gauges/MODT• Water level gauges on Lakes