Upload
hien
View
59
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Comparing Clinician Evaluation of mild TBI history with ACRM Criteria. Terri Krangel Pogoda, PhD 1 Ann Hendricks, PhD 1 Errol Baker, PhD 1 John A. Gardner, PhD 1 Katherine M. Iverson, PhD 1 Maxine H. Krengel, PhD 1 Mark Meterko, PhD 1 Kelly L. Stolzmann, MS 1 Henry L. Lew, MD, PhD 2. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Terri Krangel Pogoda, PhD1
Ann Hendricks, PhD1
Errol Baker, PhD1
John A. Gardner, PhD1
Katherine M. Iverson, PhD 1
Maxine H. Krengel, PhD1
Mark Meterko, PhD1
Kelly L. Stolzmann, MS1
Henry L. Lew, MD, PhD2
This work is supported by VA HSR&D Grant: SDR 08-405
1VA Boston Healthcare System2Defense and Veterans Brain Injury
Center
The views expressed in this presentation are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States government.
High risk of TBI during OEF/OIF deploymentsBlow to the head that disrupts brain functioningPrevalence: 12-20%1-4 Most cases are mild in severity5
Postconcussive symptoms6
In OEF/OIF Veterans…7
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) (58.2%)Anxiety (28.3%)Depression (42.3%)
A traumatically induced physiological disruption of brain function, as manifested by at least one of the following: Loss of consciousness (LOC) Alteration of consciousness (AOC) Posttraumatic amnesia (PTA)
Focal neurologic deficit(s) that may or may not be transient (e.g., weakness, loss of balance, change in vision)
Intracranial lesion
5
Mild Moderate SevereLOC 0–30 min >30 min
and < 24 hrs
> 24 hrs
PTA 0–1 day > 1 and < 7 days
> 7 days
AOC a moment up to 24 hrs
> 24 hours. Severity based on other criteria
Structural Imaging Normal Normal or Abnormal
Normal or Abnormal
Glascow Coma Scale (best available score in first 24 hours)
13-15 9-12 < 9
1) To identify concordance rates of VA clinician judgment of deployment-related mTBI history with ACRM criteria
2) To identify variables associated with clinician errors (misses, false positives) in evaluating mTBI history
Protocol to assist in making a clinical judgment about whether a TBI occurred (mostly self-report)
Etiology of injuryBlast Non-blast (i.e. vehicular accidents, bullet wound,
falls, other blunt trauma)
Post-injury sequelae (LOC, AOC, PTA) and their duration
Presence of probable psychiatric comorbidity
22-item Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory(NSI-22)10
Subscale Symptoms
Affective• Low frustration tolerance• Irritability• Anxiety/tension
Somatosensory
• Noise sensitivity• Vision problems• Headaches
Cognitive
• Difficulties getting organized/can’t finish things
• Forgetfulness • Difficulties making decisions
Vestibular• Loss of balance• Feeling dizzy• Poor coordination/clumsy
Veterans who… Completed a CTE between FY 2008 and FY 2009
Been judged to have or not have deployment-related mTBI
Did not report TBI prior to or following deployment
Sample of 19,669 Veterans for analysis who had data from both ACRM criteria and clinician judgment of mTBI history
Retrospective database review Outcome variables
Concordance rates of clinician judgment of mTBI history with ACRM criteria Misses vs. True Positives False Positives vs. True Negatives
Independent Variables Demographics Deployment-related events Mental health judgments NSI-22 symptoms
Descriptive statistics and logistic regressions
Characteristic %Age 31.5 ± 8.7 yearsMale 93.8Blast Injury* 77.7Non-Blast Injury* 58.3PTSD* 67.5Depression* 39.4Anxiety Disorder (other than PTSD)*
24.4
*Based on CTE data
Clinician Judgment of mTBI History
ACRM Criteria Met? Yes No
Yes True Positive
52.7%
False Negative (Miss)
26.1%No False
Positive
2.0%
True Negative
19.2%
Severe
None
*
*
*
*
*True Positive > (False Negative = False Positive) > True Negative
Patient Characteristics and Deployment-related Experiences
Misses vs. True Positives
False positives vs. True Negatives
β OR β ORAge .02 1.02***
*-.01 .99
Gender (Female vs. Male)
.13 1.14 .18 1.20
Blast Injury -.37 .69**** .81 2.26****
Non-Blast Injury .05 1.05 .60 1.82****
LOC -1.27 .28***AOC -.35 .70****PTA -.68 .51***PTSD -.28 .76**** .63 1.87***
*Depression -.09 .91** .40 1.49***Anxiety -.13 .88*** .24 1.27‡
NSI-22 Symptoms Affective .21 1.24***
*-.36 .70****
Somatosensory -.21 .81**** .21 1.23‡
Cognitive -.25 .78**** .20 1.23** Vestibular -.15 .86**** -.01 .99
‡p < .10, *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001, ****p < .0001
1. The majority of mTBI history evaluations reviewed agreed with ACRM criteria: 71.9% either true positives or true negatives.
2. Clinician judgment of mTBI history sensitive to deployment-related injuries, mental health conditions, and cognitive and somatosensory symptoms.
3. For misses, it is possible that clinicians may be misinterpreting NSI-22 affective complaints (e.g., fatigue, irritability, sadness) as being related to readjustment issues, rather than mTBI history.
Nature of clinician-patient conversations that led to clinical decision unknown.
Do not know the basis of evaluator’s judgment about mental health conditions.
Data are from FY2008-09, may not reflect current evaluation practices.
Automating CTE template to populate TBIhistory question based on AOC, LOC, PTA More consistent rates of:
TBI history (Q23) TBI symptom persistence (Q23a) TBI symptom resolution (Q23a)
How do misses (26.1%) and false positives (2.0%)impact referrals, utilization, and outcomes?
Variability in the implementation of the CTE process
My contact information: [email protected]
HSR&D PI’s contact information: [email protected]
Contact Information
1. Hendricks, A., Amara, J., Baker, E., Charns, M., Gardner, J. A., Iverson, K. M., Kimerling, R., Krengel, M., Meterko, M., Pogoda, T. K., Stolzmann, K. L., Wolfsfeld, L., & Lew, H. L. (2010). Screening for mild Traumatic brain injury in OEF-OIF deployed military: An empirical assessment of the VA Experience. Unpublished manuscript.2. Hoge, C. W., McGurk, D., Thomas, J. L., Cox, A. L., Engel, C. C., & Castro, C. A. (2008). Mild traumatic brain injury in U.S. soldiers returning from Iraq. New England Journal of
Medicine, 358, 453-463.3. Schneiderman, A. I., Braver, E. R., & Kang, H. K. (2008). Understanding sequelae of injury mechanisms and mild traumatic brain injury incurred during the conflicts of Iraq and Afghanistan: Persistent postconcussive symptoms and posttraumatic stress disorder.
American Journal of Epidemiology, 167, 1446-1452.4. Tanielian, T., & Jaycox, L. H. (2008). Invisible wounds of war: Psychological and cognitive
injuries, their consequences, and services to assist recovery. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp.5. Hoge, C. W., Goldberg, H. M., & Castro, C. A. (2009). Care of war Veterans with mild traumatic brain injury—Flawed Perspectives. New England Journal of Medicine, 360, 1588-1591.6. Sayer, N. A., Rettmann, N. A., Carlson, K. F., Bernardy, N., Sigford, B. J., Hamblen, J. L., Friedman, M. J. (2009). Veterans with history of mild traumatic brain injury and posttraumatic stress disorder: Challenges from provider perspective. Journal of
Rehabilitation Research & Development, 46, 703-716. 7. Carlson, K. F., Nelson, D., Orazem, R. J., Nugent, S., Cifu, D. X., & Sayer, N. A. (2010). Psychiatric diagnoses among Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans screened for deployment-related traumatic brain injury. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 23, 17-24.8. Kay T, Harrington DE, Adams R. Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Committee,
American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine, Head Injury Interdisciplinary Special Interest Group’s definition of mild traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. September 1993;8:86-87.
9. Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Defense. VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for Management of Concussion/Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Washington, DC April 2009.
10. Cicerone, K. D., & Kalmar, K. (1995). Persistent postconcussion syndrome: The structure of subjective complaints after mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 10, 1–17.
11. Meterko, M., Baker, E., Stolzmann, K. L., Cicerone, K. D., Hendricks, K. M., & Lew, H. L. (2010). Psychometric assessment of the NSI-22. Unpublished manuscript.