Compare Historic Drug Testing With Contemporary Drug Testing

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 Compare Historic Drug Testing With Contemporary Drug Testing

    1/14

  • 7/28/2019 Compare Historic Drug Testing With Contemporary Drug Testing

    2/14

    The extract from the foxglove plant which is used totreat patients with heart disease is known as digitalis

    which was found by William Withering.

    He bought the recipe for a herbal cure for oedema

    from a patient.

    This medicine was a mixture of several herbs and

    that include Digitalis.

  • 7/28/2019 Compare Historic Drug Testing With Contemporary Drug Testing

    3/14

    He began with a low dose of his owndigitalis soup and increased it until thepatient suffered side effects. He used low levels of this soup where noside effects develop. This was considered as the ideal dosage. This extract is digitalin and is used to treatheart disease.It is ethically wrong as the over dose is fatal

  • 7/28/2019 Compare Historic Drug Testing With Contemporary Drug Testing

    4/14

    In double blind trial neither the participants northe researchers know which participants belong tothe control group and who is being treated.

    This method can be applied to any experimentalsituation where there is a possibility that theresult will be affected by bias.

    If the treated group shows significantly betterresults than the placebo control group, then thetreatment has passed the trial.

  • 7/28/2019 Compare Historic Drug Testing With Contemporary Drug Testing

    5/14

    Medically ineffectual treatment for adisease intended to deceive the patient.

    In a common placebo procedure a patient isgiven an inert pill told that it may improve

    his/her condition.

    But not told that it is in fact inert.

  • 7/28/2019 Compare Historic Drug Testing With Contemporary Drug Testing

    6/14

    This may cause the patient to believe that thetreatment will change his/ her condition.

    They may feel that their condition has improved

    or there is an actual improvement .

    This phenomenon is called placebo effect

    Loss of trust between the patient and the doctor

  • 7/28/2019 Compare Historic Drug Testing With Contemporary Drug Testing

    7/14

    Every medicine that comes into themarket today is the result of years ofresearch and development. It takes around 10 years to develop anew drug.

  • 7/28/2019 Compare Historic Drug Testing With Contemporary Drug Testing

    8/14

    A new medicine has to be: Effective-it cures or prevents the disease itis designed for. Safe- non toxic and without unacceptableside effects. Stable-able to be stored under normalconditions Easily taken into and removed from thebody- able to get into the target. Capable of being made on a large scale-

    able to be manufactured in large quantities.

  • 7/28/2019 Compare Historic Drug Testing With Contemporary Drug Testing

    9/14

    Pre-clinical testing-the proposed drug is firsttested on cell cultures, tissue cultures and wholeorgans in the lab.

    To see if the compound does what the scientist

    thought it would. Phase 1-A small group of healthy volunteers (20-100)is

    given the drug to see1. if it is safe2. how quickly it is absorbed, metabolized and

    excreted from the body

  • 7/28/2019 Compare Historic Drug Testing With Contemporary Drug Testing

    10/14

    Phase 2-A group of volunteers with disease are giventhe drug to see1.how effective it is against the signs andsymptoms of the disease.2. what doses are the best.3. what are the side effects.

    A control group is given dummy dose(placebo)

  • 7/28/2019 Compare Historic Drug Testing With Contemporary Drug Testing

    11/14

    Phase 3-Hundreds to thousands of patients are giventhe drug to get more reliable data on its1. effectiveness2.safety3. best dose4. rare side effects

    If all goes well it is put forward to licensingauthority

  • 7/28/2019 Compare Historic Drug Testing With Contemporary Drug Testing

    12/14

    Safer: Use of specific active ingredient should allow a more

    precise dose to be given. Any serious ill effects may be detected in the animal

    trials first More reliable: Uses larger samples reduces effects of chance/random

    variation Double blind testing avoids patient/researcher bias in

    observing, recording and interpreting effects Statistical analysis of data improves accuracy of

    conclusions as to whether or not drug actually doeshave an effect or not.

  • 7/28/2019 Compare Historic Drug Testing With Contemporary Drug Testing

    13/14

    Similarity

    Groups of patients undergoing treatmentvary from small to large group.

    A potentially useful medicine is identified.

  • 7/28/2019 Compare Historic Drug Testing With Contemporary Drug Testing

    14/14

    William Withering Contemporary threephase trial

    No trials on healthy people Trial first carry out on healthy

    people

    No test on laboratory animals Test on laboratory animals

    Approval and licensing notrequired

    Approval and licensing required