9
Common crystal structures •Simple close packed structures atoms hard spheres problem of structure most efficient packing Donuts * *Proposition made by Goldschmidt 1926. Useful approach for metals, where the chemical bond does not provide geometrical constrains like in diamond for instance

Common crystal structures Simple close packed structures atoms hard spheres problem of structure most efficient packing Donuts * *Proposition made by Goldschmidt

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Common crystal structures Simple close packed structures atoms hard spheres problem of structure most efficient packing Donuts * *Proposition made by Goldschmidt

Common crystal structures

•Simple close packed structures

atoms hard spheres problem of structure most efficient packing

Donuts

*

*Proposition made by Goldschmidt 1926. Useful approach for metals, where the chemical bond does not provide geometrical constrains like in diamond for instance

Page 2: Common crystal structures Simple close packed structures atoms hard spheres problem of structure most efficient packing Donuts * *Proposition made by Goldschmidt

hexagonal layers packed in 2 different ways

Hexagonal Close-Packed Structure

hexagonal close-packed cubic close packed

layers stack according to ABAB

Page 3: Common crystal structures Simple close packed structures atoms hard spheres problem of structure most efficient packing Donuts * *Proposition made by Goldschmidt

hexagonal layers are stacked ABCCubic Close-Packed Structure

FCC

(close packed

structures

- unit cells )

Page 4: Common crystal structures Simple close packed structures atoms hard spheres problem of structure most efficient packing Donuts * *Proposition made by Goldschmidt

* more complicated packing sequence such as ABAC, ABCB, etc

*

= FCC

Page 5: Common crystal structures Simple close packed structures atoms hard spheres problem of structure most efficient packing Donuts * *Proposition made by Goldschmidt

Computer proof:

hcp and fcc have both 74% packing ratio :=Volume of the spheres in the unit cell

Volume the unit cell 100%

all others including bcc have less packing ratio

Johannes Kepler asserted in the early 1600's that

no packing can improve the Face-Centered Cubic packing

Proof took nearly 400 years

1998 Thomas Hales (presently University of Pittsburgh) announced to have a proof of the Kepler conjecture

250 pages of notes and 3 gigabytes of computer programs, data and results

minimizing a function with 150 variables

!

(click to see an e-mail of T.Hales

announcing the proof)

Page 6: Common crystal structures Simple close packed structures atoms hard spheres problem of structure most efficient packing Donuts * *Proposition made by Goldschmidt

Lattices which can be considered as 2 interpenetrating fcc lattices

diamond lattice: fcc lattice with basis

diamond lattice: not packing but symmetrically placed valence bonds

),,(4

1

4

1

4

1= two identical atoms at (0,0,0) and

(0,0,0)),,(4

1

4

1

4

1

determine the structure

Page 7: Common crystal structures Simple close packed structures atoms hard spheres problem of structure most efficient packing Donuts * *Proposition made by Goldschmidt

What happens if atoms of the basis are different ?

ZnS (zincblende), or GaAs

Four neighbors

all of opposite chemical species

(click here for animations)

Page 8: Common crystal structures Simple close packed structures atoms hard spheres problem of structure most efficient packing Donuts * *Proposition made by Goldschmidt

NaCl: fcc translational symmetry with basis

(0,0,0))

21

,21

,21

(

CsCl: Simple cubic space lattice with basis

(0,0,0)

)21

,21

,21

(

Page 9: Common crystal structures Simple close packed structures atoms hard spheres problem of structure most efficient packing Donuts * *Proposition made by Goldschmidt

The most advantageous crystal structure for ionic solids*

NaCl versus CsCl structure

Competition between packing and avoiding of e.g. anion-anion contact

r0

20r

R+

R-

Radius Ratio Coordination no. Binary (AB) Structure-type

r+/r- = 1 12 none known

1 > r+/r- > 0.732 8 CsCl

0.732 > r+/r- > 0.414 6 NaCl

0.414 > r+/r- > 0.225 4 ZnS

To avoid - contact in NaCl structure

0 2 2r R

2R R R 2 1R

R

(*the explanation in Blakemore page 15 is misleading )