Upload
computax53
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/6/2019 Comm Law Negotiability - 425[1]
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comm-law-negotiability-4251 1/7
NEGOTIABILITY
Types of negotiable InstrumentsMoney – a bill of exchange, draft from the US TreasuryNote – Written promise to pay money
CD – certificate of deposit – note written by bankDraft – order from one person to another
§3-104(a): An Article is a Negotiable Instrument if it is,-- an unconditional promise to pay a fixed amount-- with or without interest-- (1) is payable to bearer -- (2) is payable at a certain time or on demand. Buyer must
be able to tell the earliest date due-- (3) does not require bearer to do anything
The Negotiability ConceptMust be in Writing (Promise or order)Signed – an X is OK!Unconditional Promise – can’t have conditions on it
– unsafe for future holdersImplied Conditions – by 3-106, referencing other documents does not
make it non-negotiable. Countersigning is not necessary ontraveler’s checks.
Consideration – “Void in 90 days” – usually non-neg, but common lawsays it is negotiable
Fixed amount of money –must be able to tell its value on its face –
Note words “of MONEY”Courier without luggage – no additional promises can be on instrumentPayable on Demand – instrument does not need to be dated, but holder
needs to know when its due. (if there is no date to be paid, it isassumed on demand
Payable to Bearer – Making payable to bearer creates privity. Payable to“order” is payable to the order of named payee
Payable to (blank) is an incomplete instrument. OK if intended to becompleted. Burden is on person claiming lack of authority tocomplete
Ex: Ill give you $1000 upon presentment and car – nonnego, 2 nd promise
Ill give you $1000 with the car as security -- negotiable
COMMERCIAL LAW II OUTLINE Page 1 of 7Walter M. Spader, Jr.
Last Printed on 5/10/2011 at 22:29 A5/P5
8/6/2019 Comm Law Negotiability - 425[1]
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comm-law-negotiability-4251 2/7
NEGOTIATION
Transfer and NegotiationThree Stages of an Instrument’s Life
1) Issuance
2) Transfer 3) Presentment
You can only be holder after a valid negotiation.Must have possession and be identified on the instrument
Special/Blank IndorsementBlank Indorsement -- Signing the back automatically makes it a bearer
instrumentSpecial Indorsement – signing the back “to the order of”
Forgery of Payee’s Name
No one can be a holder unless they are named…after payee indorses,anything is possible, but there can never be a holder after a forgery of payee’s name (no valid negotiations)
COMMERCIAL LAW II OUTLINE Page 2 of 7Walter M. Spader, Jr.
Last Printed on 5/10/2011 at 22:29 A5/P5
8/6/2019 Comm Law Negotiability - 425[1]
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comm-law-negotiability-4251 3/7
HOLDERS IN DUE COURSE
Woodworth p 344: No one can be a holder in due course of a non-negotiableinstruments”
Acquiring Status of HIDC §3-302
Payee is usually not a HIDC (has knowledge of underlying problems and obtainsit from an issuance not a negotiation)
1) No apparent forgery2) holder took instrument
i) for valueii) in good faithiii) without notice of overdue/dishonored/defaultiv) without notice of unauthorized signature/alterations
v) without notice of claim against it by 3-306vi) without notice of a defense
Holder – must get instrument from a valid negotiation
For Value §3-303Gift will never make a holder in due course
Good Faith/NoticeNotice can be “forgotten” if considerable time has passed“Closely Connected Doctrine” can’t get HIDC status in closetransactions (p384)
Overdue Instrument §3-304ON DEMAND:Day after demandChecks – 90 daysInstruments – unreasonably longPAYABLE AT A DEFINITE TIMEDefault of an installmentDay after due date
Shelter Rule – can step in the shoes of the holder in due course
COMMERCIAL LAW II OUTLINE Page 3 of 7Walter M. Spader, Jr.
Last Printed on 5/10/2011 at 22:29 A5/P5
8/6/2019 Comm Law Negotiability - 425[1]
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comm-law-negotiability-4251 4/7
Real & Personal Defenses3-305(a)(1) – real Defenses3-305(a)(2) – personal defenses3-305(a)(3) claim of recoupment
Real Defenses – low transaction costs – HIDC is subject to them!Fraud in factumInfancy – can be reasserted at age 18DuressLack of legal capacityIllegality of the transaction (ie. Statute says no gambling debts)Discharge in insolvency proceeding(Forgery is not a real defense by public policy)
Personal Defenses – high transaction costs – not valid against a HIDCBreach of warranty
Fraud in inducementEstoppelFailure of considerationDischarge by payment – obligor will have to pay new holder and go for
recoupmentPartial Payment – Should be noted on the instrument, debtor’s obligationConditional Issuance is a defense as in non-issuance
Recoupment
By 3-308, holder has the burden of showing they are HIDCMust be a STRONG rebutable presumption that the signature is proper
Signatures are presumed proper Obligor must deny propernessObligor must present evidence that supports argument
Once trier-of-fact is satisfied with evidence, the burden shifts to party assertingThe signature is proper
(a mere denial does not overcome presumption – having handwriting samplesmay!)
Only claim a non-holder in due course takes free of defense is a perfectedsecurity interest in a secure T/A
Jus Tertii -- ?? p424
COMMERCIAL LAW II OUTLINE Page 4 of 7Walter M. Spader, Jr.
Last Printed on 5/10/2011 at 22:29 A5/P5
8/6/2019 Comm Law Negotiability - 425[1]
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comm-law-negotiability-4251 5/7
LIABILITY
Exam Approach to Liability1) Who are the parties (drawer, payee, maker, indorser, guarantor)2) What are the causes for action
3) What are the defenses4) Can liability be passed?
Underlying ObligationOnce the instrument was accepted, the duty of the underlying obligationwas merged .
Liability on the InstrumentOf Maker – absolutely liable to payOf Indorser – presentment, dishonor, notice of dishonor Of Surety --
Of AgentAccommodation Party – follow rules of agency
If language says guaranteeing collection, only a guarantee if:1) unsatisfied execution of judgment2) insolvent debtor 3) no service possible4) otherwise can’t obtain payment (refusal to pay not enough)
COMMERCIAL LAW II OUTLINE Page 5 of 7Walter M. Spader, Jr.
Last Printed on 5/10/2011 at 22:29 A5/P5
8/6/2019 Comm Law Negotiability - 425[1]
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comm-law-negotiability-4251 6/7
BANKS
Checking AccountTypewritten terms prevail over printed terms, handwritten terms prevail
ver both, words prevail over numbers
A bank that misapplies funds cannot be sued for a conversion! P492
Properly Payable Rule – Banks must follow customer’s orders exactlyIf you sign the check in your checkbook and lose it you are liable
If a bank wrongfully dishonors a check, it is liable for expenses related to it
Death – Bank shouldn’t honor checks once notified of death, until thenthey have to pay. With knowledge they can cash checks for 10days unless they get order of claims against the account. Many
states have statutes that banks must freeze accounts to pay taxes
Stop Payment – expenses borne by bank, if bank mistakenly cashescheck, it can step in shows of customer and sue for recoupment
Bank Statement, 4-406, minimum duty of bank is to provide a statement of item number, amount & date of payment
Banks should only not honor check if it is 100% sure it shouldn’t honor it
COMMERCIAL LAW II OUTLINE Page 6 of 7Walter M. Spader, Jr.
Last Printed on 5/10/2011 at 22:29 A5/P5
8/6/2019 Comm Law Negotiability - 425[1]
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/comm-law-negotiability-4251 7/7
WRONGDOING & ERROR
Forgery of Payee’s NameWithout a valid indorsement by the payee, no future holder can be a HIDC(or even a holder!)
Presentment warranty – You know of nothing to defect presentmentTransfer warranty – you know nothing defective in the transfer The policy of the law is to hold the person with the best chance to catch theforgery liable. Expenses of collection are recoverable – attorneys fees generallynot
Forgery of Drawer’s Name
Prince v Neal – What is the Rule?
Validation of the ForgeryRatification – with knowledge of the forgery, maker can ratify it
Ratification per se…w/knowledge of forgery, kept silent…Estopped from suing for conversion
Imposter Rule – Imposter Rule validate the forgery of the payees namewhen the drawer has been duped…and it is proper to put liability ondrawer
Employee Endorsement Rule – If employees conduct forgery, employer isliable b/c they choose the employee!
Negligence Rule – estopped from complaining, b/c forgery substantiallycontributed to forgery (Young v Grote – shouldn’t let his wife havechecks). Negligence is a defense, not an affirmative cause of action
Bank Statement Rule – customers have a duty to check their bankStatements
Final Payment Rule – Banks have the duty to know their customer’ssignatures
When a check is dishonored, you can either sue on the instrument or the
underlying promise
COMMERCIAL LAW II OUTLINE Page 7 of 7Walter M. Spader, Jr.
Last Printed on 5/10/2011 at 22:29 A5/P5