View
217
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Colonial Period
Self-governing, Merge ?
Split with MalayaIndependence (1965)
The Context
From colonial: free-market &
administrative system Ideological: Confucianism (Orientalism)
PAP’s leftism Societal: Multi-racial
& potential tension Political: conflict
with Malaysia &
Indonesia
A multi-cultural society
Nation Building Project
A Long-term strategy to build the nation and to react to its fundamental nature.
Our community lacks in-built reflexes… our society and its education system was never designed to produce a people capable of cohesive action, identifyingtheir collective interests and then actingin furtherance of them ….The reflexes of group thinking must bebuilt to ensure the survival of the community, not the individual …. Lee Kuan-yew, 1966
In a similar manner….
We are a complex, multi-racialcommunity with little sense ofcommon history, with a group purpose which is yet to be properly articulated. We are in the process of rapid transition towards a destiny which we do not yet know….
Goh Keng SweeFinance Minister Minister of Interior and Defence1967,
Emphasis of the Project
Economic: free market-based capitalism Political: central planning, authoritarianism Ideology: national unity and collectivism
Welfare policy serving all three emphasis
Characteristics of Welfare Structure
High level of service provision regulated by state
Central planning Private Insurance Model
(you get what you contribute…..) Pro-family ideologies Promote national unity, social
stability, sense of belonging
Liberal Welfare State
Central Provident Fund
Contributory Scheme by Employer & Employees
From 1955 Funded for retirement initi
ally, but gradually extended to housing, medical, investment etc.
Accounts: Ordinary, Special, Medisave (MediShield)
Guarantee Interest Rate
Housing Development Board
Private ownership of public provided housing
Dominant control of housing supply
Established in 1960 Home ownership from
1964 Down payment &
mortgage paid by CPF saving
Social Welfare Services
Personal pathology approach Pro-family approach Minimal Public Assistance
Scheme Small Family Improvement
Improvement Scheme Community Development
Achievements
High home ownership rates High standard of services without too much
state investment Personal contributory retirement payment Social stability Created national solidarity
Current problems
the loopholes in CPF potential risks of home ownership weakening family ties political discontent potential social conflicts (ethnic, class)