COLLECTIVE BARGAINING IN CHINA - apirnet.ilo.org
-
Upload
others
-
View
0
-
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CB-China-FV_190Report on the Survey on Industrial Relations in East
Asia
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING IN CHINA
2
Report on the Survey on Industrial Relations in East Asia
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING IN CHINA
Prepared by QIAO Jian, ZHENG Qiao, JIANG Ying Written by ZHENG
Qiao
Translated by WANG Jia-qiang
ILO-Japan Multi-Lateral Project, 2006
3
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING IN CHINA Research Team: QIAO Jian, ZHENG
Qiao, JIANG Ying Written by: ZHENG Qiao Translated by: WANG
Jia-qiang © ILO- Japan Multi-Lateral Project, 2006 International
Labour Organization Subregional Office for East Asia United Nations
Building Rajdamnern Nok Avenue P.O. Box 2-349 Rajdamnern Bangkok
10200, Thailand
4
B. Freedom of Association
C. Employees
Definition of a Trade Union Trade Union Organizational Structure
Legal personality of trade unions Trade Union Funds Trade Union
Membership Trade Unions and Collective Bargaining
Part 3: Legal and Institutional Framework and Practice of
Collective Bargaining A. Rights of Bargaining
Legal Sources and Relevant Legislative Provisions B. Duty to
bargain C. Procedure of Collective Bargaining D. Bargaining
Agents/Parties to Collective Contracts
Employees Employers Role of Organizations at Higher Levels
E. Contents of a Collective Contract F. Levels of Collective
Bargaining G. Procedural Requirement for Concluding H. Deadlocks in
Collective Bargaining and the Amendment and Suspension of a
Collective Contract I. Implementation of Collective Contract J.
Collective Bargaining in State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs)
5
K. Workers’ Congress and Collective Bargaining
Part 4: Trends, Issues and Debates: Social partners’ and Political
Actors’ Views and Proposals for Future development of national
Bargaining Systems A. Major Issues and Trends in Collective
Bargaining
Appendix 1: Basic Economic Statistics
6
Introduction Collective bargaining in China has undergone a series
of changes and ups-and-downs since the early part of the 20th
century, reflecting the historical upheavals of the last century.
After the foundation of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, a
collective bargaining system was put into practice for a short
period of time. However, after the socialist transformation had
been completed in the mid 1950s, the system had virtually
disappeared. Afterwards, China’s economy was transformed into a
socialist planned economic system up until Deng Xiaoping’s reforms
and the open door policy in the late 1970s. Industrial relations
under the planned economy were basically incorporated into the
overall labour administration system under the direct supervision
of the government. Since there was supposed to be no separation of
interests between the employer (in the form of ‘employing work
units’) and employees, both sides had no need to bargain
collectively and conclude collective contracts. When there were
occasional conflicts, the conflicts were adjusted and resolved
through administrative intervention. It was only since the open
door policy and economic reforms in the late 1970s that a need for
modern industrial relations resurfaced. In particular, the
restructuring of state-owned enterprises (hereafter SOEs) resulted
in mass lay-offs and significant changes to employment relations in
that sector. Additionally, the rapid growth of the non-state or
private sector has changed the nature of employment relations in a
new market environment. While collective bargaining practices were
introduced on an experimental basis in the 1980s, it was only after
the adoption of the new Labour Law in 1995 when collective
bargaining began to spread across workplaces in China. Particularly
since 2000, collective bargaining appears to have become an
important channel for the regulation of industrial relations. It
has also emerged in a variety of innovative forms, though there are
still shortcomings in terms of the quality of collective contracts
and process of bargaining.
7
Part 1: Legislative and Institutional Framework for Industrial
Relations
A. Legislations on labour standards Major Legislations Stipulating
Working Conditions and Employment Relations More than any other
countries, China has multiple layers of laws and regulations
governing employment and labour issues. These include the
Constitution of the People’s Republic of China, laws adopted by the
National People’s Congress (hereafter NPC), legal documents adopted
by the standing committee of the People’s Congress, various
statutory regulations by the State Council, local statutory
regulations adopted by the people’s congress and standing committee
of each province, autonomous region and municipality,
administrative regulations and statutory interpretations formulated
by ministries and commissions under the State Council and
provincial governments. Also, as a signatory of various
international labour conventions, China is bound by those
conventions. Among others, the Labour Law of the People’s Republic
of China (“the Labour Law”) is the key legislation governing
employment and industrial relations, which was passed in 1994 and
came into effect in January 1995. Also of significance is the new
Labour Contract Law, which was passed by the NPC in June 2007 with
an effective date of January 2008. The new legislation aims to
strengthen protection measures for employees and introduce new
rules regarding labour contracts and collective contracts. The
Labour Law deals with a range of issues concerning employment,
labour contracts and collective contracts, wages, working hours and
holidays, occupational safety, health and hygiene, special
protection for female and juvenile employees, vocation training,
social welfare, management of labour disputes, labour supervision
and other regulations on labour standards. With 13 chapters and 107
provisions, the Labour Law offers basic principles and rules on
employment relations, which sometimes require more detailed
regulations to be put into practice. This is why the Labour Law is
supplemented by a series of other regulations such as the Temporary
Regulations on Payment of Wages, Regulations on Minimum Wage in
Enterprises, Provisions on Collective Contract and Regulations on
Labour Protection of Female Employees, among others. Adopted by the
Ministry of Labour and Social Security (hereafter MOLSS), these
mandatory regulations support various provisions and principles of
the Labour Law by providing detailed guidelines for its
implementation and interpretation. Due to the vast scale of
regional diversity across China, each local legislature and
government also develop and adopt their own regulatory rules within
the parameter set by national laws and regulations, so that
national legislation can be implemented while considering the local
context. Scope of Application The Labour Law in China applies to
all enterprises, undertakings and their employees who have formal
labour contracts within the territory of the People’s Republic of
China. It is to be noted that state organs, public and social
institutions and their employees with contractual employment
relations are also covered by the Law. However, the Labour Law does
not directly apply to certain categories of employees, such as
civil servants in state ministries, employees of public
institutions and social associations, labourers in rural areas,
employees in township enterprises (‘Xiangzhenqiye’), migrant
workers and peasants running their own business in cities, active
army personnel, family nurses and other similar categories of
employees. At present, the Civil Servant Law is applied to the
civil servants.
B. Freedom of Association At present, China has not ratified ILO
Convention No. 87 on Freedom of Association and Protection of the
Right to Organize Convention or No. 98 on the Right to Organize
and
8
Collective Bargaining Convention. In October 1997, the Chinese
government signed the International Covenant on Economic, Social
and Cultural Rights, which was approved by the Standing Committee
of the NPC in February 2002. While ratifying the Covenant, the
government held a view on Item 1 (A) of Article. 8, which
stipulates, “The right of everyone to form trade unions and join
the trade union of his choice, subject only to the rules of the
organization concerned, for the promotion and protection of his
economic and social interests. No restrictions may be placed on the
exercise of this right other than those prescribed by law and which
are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national
security or public order or for the protection of the rights and
freedoms of others”. The Chinese government stated that China would
deal with this issue pursuant to its own Constitution, the Trade
Union Law, Labour Law and other related regulations: “This item
concerns workers’ right to organize and participate in trade
unions. Our Constitution, Trade Union Law and Labour Law have
effectively protected Chinese workers’ rights to participate in
political, economic, social and cultural activities in a
comprehensive way including organizing and joining a trade union.
Since the foundation of the People’s Republic of China, by
observing these laws, Chinese workers have organized and joined
trade unions.”
1
There are various laws designed to protect workers’ right to form
and join trade unions in China. First of all, the Constitution of
People’s Republic of China stipulates that “Citizens of the
People’s Republic of China enjoy freedom of speech, of publication,
of assembly, of association, of procession and of demonstration”.
Article 7 of the Labour Law also states that “Workers enjoy right
to join and form trade union pursuant to laws. The trade union
represents and protects workers’ legal interests and operates
independently pursuant to laws”. Article 3 of the Trade Union Law
provides that “All workers engaged in physical or mental work in
enterprises, public institutions and government organs within the
Chinese territory who earn their living primarily from wages shall
have the right to participate in and form trade union organizations
pursuant to the law, regardless of their nationalities, races,
sexes, occupations, religious beliefs or educations. No
organization or individual may hinder them from doing so or
restrict them”. Accordingly, civil servants also have the right to
join and set up trade unions, though the Civil Servant Law
prohibits the right to strike for civil servants. Article 8 of the
Labour Law stipulates, “Pursuant to laws, workers take part in
democratic administration through the Workers’ Congress or other
forms, or engage in negotiation on an equal footing with the
employer to protect workers’ legal rights and interests”. Article
33 stipulates, “Employees at an enterprise can sign collective
contracts with the employer on wages, working hours, rests and
holidays, occupational safety and hygiene, insurance and welfare,
etc. A draft of the collective contract should be submitted to the
Workers’ Congress for discussion and collective approval. The
collective contract is signed between a trade union representative
and the enterprise. In enterprises without a trade union, the
contract should be signed between a representative elected by
employees and the enterprise”. Article 6 of general provisions in
the Trade Union Law stipulates, “Trade unions shall coordinate the
industrial relations and safeguard the rights and interests of
employees at the enterprise through negotiation on an equal footing
and the collective contract system”. In the chapter concerning
trade union rights and duties, Article 20 stipulates, “A trade
union shall represent employees in negotiation on an equal footing
and the signing of a collective contract with an enterprise or a
public institution managed as an enterprise”. Further guarantees on
employees’ right to join and form a trade union and trade union’s
right of collective bargaining are found in Article 50 of the Trade
Union Law, which stipulates, “Any organization or individual that,
in violation of the provisions of Articles 3 and 11 of this Law,
obstructs employees' and staff members' from joining or organizing
of trade unions in accordance with law or the effort made by trade
unions at higher levels to assist and guide the employees and staff
members in establishing trade unions shall be ordered to by the
administrative department for labour to make rectification; if it
refuses to do so, the said department may apply to the people's
government at or above the county level for solution”; and Article
53 which stipulates, “Those refusing negotiation on an equal
footing without
1 Shen Lutao, “Protecting Chinese workers’ right of trade union
pursuant to the law”, People’s Daily,
2001-3-5
9
justifiable reasons…shall be ordered to make rectification and be
dealt with by the people’s governments at or above the country in
accordance with the law”. Those hindering employees from
participating in or organizing trade unions and refusing
negotiation on an equal footing shall be punished accordingly or
provide an appropriate compensation. The above examples of
legislative provisions demonstrate that China’s labour laws are
aimed at guaranteeing employees’ rights to join and participate in
trade unions and to bargain collectively with employers.
10
Part 2: Industrial Relations Actors
A. Government Under the previous centrally planned economy, the
government administered a whole range of labour and employment
issues, from allocation of the workforce to determination of wages
and other working conditions, and to the regulation of industrial
relations. In a market economy, the government’s role has changed
from one of direct intervention and administration to one of
regulating industrial relations on a macro level through legal and
policy instruments while delegating the management of industrial
relations to the social actors at the enterprise level. The
Ministry of Labour and Social Security (MOLSS) is the central
government agency in charge of labour and social policy
development, while the NPC and its Standing Committee is
responsible for law making. In 2001, a national tripartite system
(‘sanfangjizhi’) for regulating industrial relations was formally
established. One of its responsibilities is to research and analyze
the impact of economic and social policies and development plans on
industrial relations, thus to bring forward strategic ideas and
provide advice on the formulation, supervision and implementation
of laws, regulations and policies concerning industrial relations.
After the tripartite system had been established, the formulation
of important industrial relations regulations and policies are now
coordinated among the tripartite partners, i.e. MOLSS, ACFTU and
the China Enterprise Confederation (hereafter CEC). MOLSS has a
number of departments with different functions, including: legal,
planning and finance, training and employment, labour and wage,
endowment insurance, unemployment insurance, medical treatment
insurance, work injury insurance, rural social insurance,
supervision of social insurance funds and international
cooperation. The legal department of MOLSS is responsible for
administering laws regarding the labour and social security system
of the country. Its responsibilities include:
• Formulating legislative planning on labour and social insurance;
and
• Drafting and amending laws, statutes and administrative
regulations concerning labour and social insurance.
In addition, the legal department also takes responsibility in
supervising and examining the implementation of laws and statutes
on labour and social insurance, and exercises the right of
supervision and examination pursuant to law. At the same time, the
law department bears responsibility in formulating work criterion
on labour supervision and examination, directing and supervising
work of local governmental organs for labour and social insurance
supervision and examination. The department of labour and wage of
MOLSS is responsible for the coordination of industrial relations
and macro-level control over wage distribution across enterprises.
Its major responsibilities are as follows:
• Formulating general principles for industrial relations
coordination;
• Reviewing the situation of labour contracts and collective
contracts;
• Formulating policies on working hours, rests and holidays of
employees and special protection for female and juvenile
employees;
• Coordinating labour and wage policies in foreign owned
enterprises;
• Formulating macro-policies and measures on wages at the
enterprise level and bringing forward strategic advice on adjusting
income distribution;
• Examining related policies on enterprise pay guidelines;
• Examining policies on the adjustment of industry income and
policies on the income of managers in state-owned enterprises
(‘Guoyouqiye’); and
11
• Inspecting the total income of enterprises under direct
administration of the central government and income criterion for
key managers at those enterprises.
As such, the department of labour and wage has a crucial role in
the development of collective bargaining and collective agreements
– particularly wage negotiation. The Ministry of Labour and Social
Security collects and publishes statistical data every year on
labour market conditions such as employment, unemployment, wage,
workplace accidents and collective contracts, etc, which is
released in the annual Labour and Social Security Development and
Statistical Communiqué, quarterly Analysis of Supply and Demand in
Urban Labour Market and annual comprehensive statistical yearbooks
that contain complete statistics on employment and unemployment,
wage payments at enterprises, occupational training and skill
tests, industrial relations, labour protection supervision, social
security and trade union activities, among others.
B. Employers Types of Employer Organizations There is no specific
law on employer organizations in China, as the concept of an
‘employer’ did not even exist under the planned economic system.
With the transition towards a market economy, employers’
organizations have slowly emerged. In China, employers’
organizations are required to register with the Administration on
Registration of Social Groups of the State Council. In China, there
are a number of different types of ‘employers’ and/or business
organizations. First, there is a national employers’ organization –
China Enterprise Confederation (hereafter CEC), which is the only
organization recognized by both the government and ILO as a
representative of China’s employers. CEC has obtained the national
status of a legal person as a social group, approved by the
Ministry of Civil Affairs. Its predecessor organization was
established in 1984, which was primarily a socializing space for
managers of SOEs. As China’s transition towards a market economy
required collective representation of more diverse types of
employers, the CEC began to assume the role of an employers’
organization. At present, it strives to represent all types of
enterprises, protect their rights and interests and participate in
tripartite consultation processes at various levels to present the
views of employers regarding social and labour policy making. It
has independent financial sources – mainly from membership fees. It
also represents China’s employers at the ILO by participating in
the ILO’s decision-making process and other activities. In 2003,
CEC amended its constitution to provide more prominence to its role
in the tripartite consultation process as a representative of
employers. For the first time, it added the appellation of
“employers” after “entrepreneurs”. Its new constitution emphasizes
its role in participating in industrial relations coordination on
behalf of employers, and providing guidance to enterprises
associations and entrepreneurs’ associations at the lower levels
and in different industries to establish a complete tripartite
system. In addition, the CEC also offers various services for its
member enterprises such as training, consultation, research,
information exchange, publications, promotion of international
exchanges between enterprises, providing legal advice and network
services for enterprises, etc. Various activities have been
organized to share the successful experiences of enterprises,
providing a forum for exchanging knowledge and expertise on
improving management skills. Membership of the CEC is composed of
group (unit) members, individual members and honorary members.
There are around 545,000 member enterprises and more than 300
member groups in the CEC. Member groups comprise of individual
enterprises and enterprises groups, with the latter consisting of
regional enterprises groups in provinces, 44 autonomous regions and
municipalities, 220 enterprises groups in major industrial cities,
30 national enterprises groups and 5400 member enterprises directly
under (the leadership of) CEC. Membership of CEC is voluntary and
therefore CEC membership is a not a precondition for business
registration. Among direct member enterprises of CEC, the
state-owned
12
enterprises ('Guoyouqiye') account for 51.47%, township enterprises
('Xiangzhenqiye') 15.41%, private enterprises ('Siyingqiye') 5.45%,
joint ventures 3.7%, corporate enterprises 22.75%, solely funded
enterprises 0.56% and others 0.66%. The second type of organization
consists of enterprise groups that are not classified under the
present ownership system, such as the general chamber of commerce.
In recent years, the general chamber of commerce has experienced
rapid developments. These chambers are civil business associations
organized voluntarily by enterprises, groups and individuals to
consolidate industry and commerce interests, protect the legal
rights and interests of members and offer a range of services to
enterprises. Some chambers have been involved in the field of
industrial relations, such as the General Chamber of Commerce in
Hainan which was founded in the process of establishing a
tripartite system (‘sanfangjizhi’) to represent employers’
interests in Hainan. Regional entrepreneurs’ associations under the
CEC have begun to associate with these chambers of commerce in
coordinating industrial relations. The third type of organization
is industry associations of different types, which have formed a
relatively comprehensive network in China. Responsibilities of
these associations are to safeguard the interests of industry,
cooperate with governmental macro-level regulation and assist
industry to compete in international environment. Some of the
industry associations also participate in the tripartite system of
industrial relations. The fourth type of organization encompasses
all types of employer organizations in non-state enterprises, such
as the All-China Association of Industry and Commerce, China
Association of Foreign Invested Enterprises, China Private Business
Entrepreneurs’ Association and China Individual Labourers’
Association, etc. These associations have their own underling
organizations and institutions at local levels. In recent years,
they have played an active role in the development of economic and
social policies. The fifth type consists of informal networks or
groups of employers. In localities where non- state enterprises
have gained a strong influence, individual employers tend to form
informal networks or groups to maximize their influence over
government decision-making and to coordinate their approach to
industrial relations. Often these groups are in the form of social
clubs of industry and commerce. Many of them represent foreign
enterprises at district or town level. Examples include
Japanese-funded enterprises in Dalian, Taiwanese-funded enterprises
in Fujian and Hong Kong entrepreneurs-funded enterprises in
Guangdong. Employer Organizations and Collective Bargaining The
Labour Law seems to assume that collective bargaining would be
carried out only at the enterprise level. However, the revised
Trade Union Law (2001) and particularly the new Labour Contract Law
(2007) have created a legal foundation for collective bargaining
beyond the enterprise level. Until very recently, employers’
organizations did not play any significant, direct role in the
collective bargaining process at or above the enterprise level.
However, there are emerging practices of regional and sectoral
bargaining in a number of provinces in China. This practice of
regional and sectoral bargaining is usually found in localities
where private sector enterprises of small and medium sizes are
clustered around the same sector of businesses. Faced with the
difficulty of organizing employees and bargaining collectively with
individual employers, trade union organizations at the regional
level tend to take a strategy of conducting collective bargaining
at the regional and/or sectoral level. In some localities, regional
and sectoral business associations – such as the hotel and
restaurants business association – represent employers in
regional/sectoral bargaining. However, employers usually do not
have their own organization at regional and sectoral levels. In
this case, an alternative was found in which chief employer
bargaining representatives were elected among employers in a
locality so that they can negotiate and sign a regional/sectoral
agreement with local trade union organizations. In general,
employers’ organizations are in their early stages of development.
The establishment of a tripartite consultation mechanism has
created some pressure on
13
employers to develop and strengthen their organizational capacity
as a responsible industrial relations actor at various levels. As
China’s industrial relations issues become more complex, there will
be natural pressures and incentives for employers to strengthen
their collective voices.
C. Employees Definition of a Trade Union According to the Trade
Union Law, trade unions are defined as “mass organizations formed
by the working class of their own free will. The ACFTU and all of
its trade union organizations shall represent the interests of
employees and protect the legal rights and interests of employees”.
It implies, in effect, all employees whom are members of the
working class, regardless of their nationality, race, sex,
religious beliefs or political status, have the right to
participate in and form trade unions. It also declares that the
basic role of a trade union is to represent employee’s interests
and guarantee their legal rights and interests - the most important
feature which distinguishes itself from other organizations and
institutions. In China, the various labour laws have strived to
promote universal union membership of all employees who earn their
living primarily from wages. Trade union membership and union
establishment should not be restricted by the nature of enterprise
or undertaking, as stated in the Constitution of the All China
Federation of Trade Unions (hereafter ACFTU) - “All enterprises
with different systems of ownership, public institutions and state
organs and other units at the basic level shall organize trade
union organizations pursuant to laws and establish basic-level
trade union committees.” Trade Union Organizational Structure In
China, the ACFTU is the single national peak confederation of trade
unions which all trade unions at the lower levels are affiliated
to. In other words, there cannot be trade unions at any level that
are unaffiliated to the ACFTU - “The All-China Federation of Trade
Unions and all of its trade union organizations shall represent the
interests of employees and protect the legal rights and interests
of employees.” Under the ACFTU, there is a dual structure of union
organization based on geographical and industry divisions. In this
structure, there are four key levels of hierarchy: basic-level
trade union (‘jicenggonghui’), local trade union federation
(‘difanggonghui’), industry trade union federation
(‘teshuchanyegonghui’) and the ACFTU at national level. Local trade
unions are established at the provincial (‘shengjigonghui’),
district, city, county, township, village and neighbourhood levels.
Local trade union federations can be set up at and above the county
level. Industrial unions are established at the national,
provincial, city and township levels. Industrial trade union
federations can be set up at and above the county level. According
to Article 10 of the ACFTU Constitution, “Trade unions in China
adopt the principle of organizing and leading a combination of
industrial and local unions. Members in the same enterprise, public
institution and state organ shall be organized in one trade union
organization at the basic level. In a single industry or industries
with similar features, a national and local specific industrial
union organization should be established as circumstances require.
Except for some industries under direct state administration where
the industrial unions implement a system of dual leadership of both
industrial trade union and local trade union giving priority to the
former, all other industrial unions adopt a system in which the
local trade unions play a leading role while higher-level
industrial unions provide guidance.” The most basic unit in the
overall structure is the basic-level trade union (‘jicenggonghui’).
According to Article 10 of the Trade Union Law, there are three
scenarios in which a trade union committee (‘gonghuiweiyuanhui’)
can be set up at the enterprise level - “the trade union of an
enterprise, public institution or state organ with 25 or more
members shall establish a basic-level trade union committee; if
there are less than 25 members, a basic-level trade
14
union committee may be established separately, or a basic-level
trade union committee may be set up jointly by members of two work
units or more; or an organizer may be elected to organize various
activities for members”. It is interesting to note that the revised
Trade Union Law in 2001 (Article 10) opened a way for employees in
township enterprises (‘Xiangzhenqiye’) and neighbourhood
enterprises (‘Jiedaoqiye’), whose small sizes generally posed
difficulties in organizing employees at individual enterprises, to
organize an association of basic-level trade unions. In effect,
there is no legislative requirement at a national level for a
minimum number of employees to set up a trade union. However it is
true that there are a number of localities where local regulations
have set some minimum requirements. For instance, the
Implementation of the Trade Union Law in Guangdong Province
stipulates, “As for enterprises, public institutions and state
organs with no trade unions, more than 10 members (who work in the
present unit and are administrated by the trade union that keeps
their member records) are needed to collectively petition the trade
union at the next higher level to declare the establishment of a
new trade union.” Once established, the basic-level trade union
must be approved by the trade union organization at the next higher
level. Article 11 of the Trade Union Law states, “The establishment
of a basic-level trade union, local trade union federation,
national or local industrial trade union organization shall be
submitted to the trade union organization at the next higher level
for approval. The trade union at the higher level may assign
personnel to assist and guide the enterprises to establish their
trade unions. ” While employees’ right to set up and participate in
trade unions is guaranteed by various laws, it is not unusual that
they encounter difficulties when employers in non-state enterprises
obstruct their efforts. This is why Article 11 further stipulates
that “no units or individuals may obstruct the effort”. If there is
any difficulty or trouble encountered in the set up of a trade
union at an enterprise, the trade union at the higher level is
entitled to offer assistance and guidance. The basic-level trade
union committee at the enterprise level is expected to be the all
encompassing organization for employees, which leaves no room for
separate unions representing different occupations or posts within
one enterprise. It is confirmed in the law that “members in the
same enterprise, public institution and state organ shall be
organized in one trade union organization at basic level”. A
basic-level trade union committee is supervised by a trade union
organization at a higher level – usually the district level. If the
trade union also belongs to an industry trade union federation, it
shall be supervised by both the local trade union federation and
the industry trade union federation. At present, there are about
1,020,000 basic-level trade union organizations nationwide. Table
2.1: Organization structure of Chinese trade unions National Trade
Union
Specific Industry Trade Unions Local Trade Unions
Statistics
All-China Federation of Trade Unions
- Trade union of agriculture, forestry and irrigation; - Trade
union of finance and trade, light textile and tobacco; - Trade
union of national defence and post; - Trade union of smelt metal
and building materials; - Trade union of energy resource and
chemistry; - Trade union of maritime and construction; - Trade
union of education, science, culture, health and physical
education; - Railway federation of trade
Provincial federations of trade unions; Municipal/city level
federations of trade unions; Federation of trade unions at township
level.
There are about 136.949 million members in All- China Federation of
Trade Unions; 1.02 million basic-level organizations; 1.935 million
units with legal person status.
15
unions; - Trade union of civil aviation; - Trade union of
finance.
Source: 2004 Blue Book of Trade Union: Protecting Legal Rights and
Interests of the Employees, China Worker's Publishing House,
November 2005. Legal personality of trade unions Pursuant to
Article 14 of the Trade Union Law, the ACFTU, a local trade union
federation or industrial trade union enjoys the status of a legal
person in the capacity of a social group, which does not require
approval from state agencies. However, different rules apply to
basic- level trade union organization. Article 14 states that “A
basic-level trade union organization meeting the legal person
requirements as stipulated by the General Principles of the Civil
Law shall be granted the status of a legal person as a social group
pursuant to the law.” The basic- level trade union needs to go
through procedures of registration in order to obtain a legal
person status. The general procedure is as follows: first the trade
union organization applies and organizes; then the trade union
organization at the higher level supervises, examines, approves,
registers and issues the certificates. No. 24 of 1997 Announcement
of ACFTU on Printing and Distributing ‘Registration Procedures of
Legal Person Status for Basic-level Trade Unions’ regulates this
process. A trade union organization, which has obtained the legal
person status of a social group, shall apply for a code certificate
at the National Administration for Code Allocation to Organizations
of the State Bureau of Quality and Technical Supervision. If a
basic-level trade union does not meet the above requirements, the
trade union at the higher level is entitled to decide whether a
legal person status should be awarded based on further examination.
Trade Union Funds Trade unions in China have a number of different
funding sources through: 1. Membership fees (0.5% of the basic
income of a member); 2. Appropriated fund of 2% (‘baifenzhier’) of
the total income of all employees, contributed by employers;
3. Financial gains generated by business and public institutions
set up by trade union organizations at various levels;
4. Allowance from the central government; and 5. Allowances and
grants from others.
There is a trade union fund distribution scheme under a management
system known as the “Uniform Guidance and Classified
Administration”. Under this scheme, the portion of funds retained
by basic-level trade unions shall be more than 60% of the
appropriated fund (‘baifenzhier’). The ACFTU retains 5% of the
appropriated fund. The distribution of the remaining 35% of the
fund shall be decided by the provincial federation of trade unions
and national industry trade unions. Trade Union Membership
According to the ACFTU, it has a total membership of 136.949
million, which indicates a unionization rate of approximately
63%.
2 Declining trade union membership was observed
during the mid 1990s, as trade unions faced a variety of
difficulties in different types of enterprises. The restructuring
of SOEs led to mass lay-offs of employees who were mostly union
members. In addition, organizing the newly emerging non-state
enterprises proved to be a challenge as private sector employers
refused to recognize trade unions and the growth of small and
medium sized enterprises made organizing even more difficult.
2 2004 Blue Book of Trade Union: Protecting Legal Rights and
Interests of the Employees, China Worker's Publishing House,
November 2005
16
In recent years, however, trade union organizers have made
impressive gains in organizing employees in different types of
enterprises. Since 2000, Chinese trade unions have gained
considerable number of new members. One of the success stories
includes the unionization of Wal-Mart malls across the country
after a strategic mobilization of union resources against the
famous non-unionised multinational company. Also there has been
innovative experimentation with different forms of trade unions –
such as unions based at the street level and even in an office
building - to organize employees in small size enterprises and the
informal economy. Another breakthrough came when the ACFTU changed
its policy towards migrant workers – as previously they were
excluded from trade union membership. In 2003, the ACFTU made a
decision to accept and organize migrant workers. Although it is
difficult to obtain a precise figure for the number of migrant
workers who are union members, it is reported that about 35 million
workers joined trade unions across the country as of October 2004.
The ACFTU and its affiliates have a system of ‘democratic
centralism’ to govern the democratic election procedures of trade
unions. According to the ACFTU Constitution, “Trade union
committees at all levels shall bear liability and report to the
general assembly at the same level or representative assembly and
be supervised by trade union members. Elected representatives and
members of the trade union committee (‘gonghuiweiyuanhui’) can be
dismissed or replaced by the general assembly and representative
assembly”. Trade union committees at all levels adopt a system
which combines collective leadership with the division of labour
among its leadership. According to this system, all major issues
will be discussed and decided by the committee in a democratic
process. Members of the committee shall perform their own
responsibilities according to collective decision and division of
labour. The peak bodies and departments at all levels shall give
briefings to the organizations at the lower levels regularly, heed
the opinions and ideas of members and organizations at lower level,
and discuss and solve any problems they raise. Organizations at the
lower level shall report to and ask for instructions from the
higher level organizations. Representatives and committee members
of the general assembly of trade unions shall be elected
anonymously, by secret ballot. The election may be carried out
directly by the method of multi-candidate election, in which the
number of candidates exceeds the number required, or a preliminary
election may be held first by the method of multi-candidate
election to produce a list of candidates and then a formal election
will be held. No organization or individual shall in any way compel
voters to elect or not elect a candidate. Trade Unions and
Collective Bargaining According to the Labour Law, Trade Union Law
and Provisions on Collective Contracts (‘jitihetongguiding’),
collective bargaining in China is presently conducted at the
enterprise level. Thus, the basic-level trade union organizations
directly take on the responsibility for collective bargaining and
the signing of collective contracts at the enterprise level. Trade
union organizations at the higher level may assist and guide
basic-level trade unions in the process, including offering
training courses, providing legal and political consultation and
assisting to coordinate and deal with disputes. Article 20 of the
Trade Union Law stipulates, “A trade union shall represent
employees in negotiation at an equal footing and signing of a
collective contract with an enterprise or a public institution
managed as an enterprise… The trade union at the next level shall
support and assist the trade union in signing the collective
contract”. In practice, a considerable number of regional and
industrial collective bargaining (‘quyuxinghehangyexingjititanpan’)
and negotiations have emerged. In general, these have been
organized and performed through the assistance of the higher-level
trade union. At present, this new method has gained some
achievements, though it is still at an experimental stage. To fully
develop a multi-level collective bargaining system, related laws
and statutes need to be formulated in the first place to regulate
such a system. Furthermore, organizations for multi-level
bargaining need to be optimized on both sides- unions and
employers. Corresponding structures have been established; however
the employer side has generally assumed a more passive position. In
many places, a tripartite negotiating system has been
17
used to facilitate a more active response on the part of employers
in relation to collective bargaining when requested by trade
unions.
18
Part 3: Legal and Institutional Framework and Practice of
Collective Bargaining
A. Rights of Bargaining Legal Sources and Relevant Legislative
Provisions As stated earlier, collective bargaining is a fairly
recent phenomenon in China. The legal framework for collective
bargaining has been gradually developed since that early 1990s. The
main legal sources for collective bargaining are provisions in the
Labour Law, Trade Union Law and the recently adopted Labour
Contract Law. Another important regulatory document is the 2004
Provisions on Collective Contract (the “Provisions”), adopted by
the MOLSS. The Provisions provide detailed rules and procedures for
collective bargaining and collective agreements. According to the
Article 33 of the Labour Law, “Employees can sign a collective
contract with the employer on wage, working hours, rests and
holidays, occupational health and hygiene, insurance and welfare,
etc. Draft of the collective contract should be submitted to the
Workers’ Congress or be discussed and passed collectively. The
collective contract is signed between the trade union
representative and the enterprise. In enterprises without a trade
union, the contract should be signed between the enterprise and the
representative elected by employees”. Similarly, the Trade Union
Law states, “A trade union shall represent employees in equal
negotiation and signing of a collective contract with an enterprise
or a public institution managed as an enterprise. The draft of a
collective contract shall be submitted to the Workers’ Congress or
plenary body of employees for discussion and adoption. The trade
union at the next higher level shall support and assist the trade
union in signing the collective contract”. In summary, the relevant
laws and statutes provide that: 1. Each employee, regardless of the
types of enterprises they work for, has the right to bargain with
the management at the enterprise on a collective basis and sign a
collective contract;
2. Representatives elected by the trade union or employees shall
represent employees in collective bargaining and signing of a
collective contract;
3. The trade union at the next higher level shall support and
assist the trade union in signing the collective contract;
4. Collective bargaining is mostly conducted at the enterprise
level, that is, in an enterprise or a public institution managed as
an enterprise.
5. Theoretically speaking, civil servants and professionals do not
have rights of collective bargaining.
B. Duty to bargain Collective bargaining and the signing of
collective contracts are legal rights for Chinese workers. As
collective labour rights, they are protected and guaranteed by
national laws. However, these laws lack detailed rules governing
the collective bargaining process and the rights and obligations of
both parties. This weakness is addressed to an extent in the
Provisions on Collective Contract, though the Provisions have a
lower level of authority compared to the national legislation
adopted by the NPC. Article 32 of the Provisions stipulates, “If
one party has a request for collective bargaining, the other party
shall respond in writing within 20 days of when the request had
been served. This request for collective bargaining shall not be
refused without justified reasons”. Article 56 further states that,
“If an employer refuses the trade union or employee
representative’s
19
request for collective bargaining without offering justified
reasons, it shall be subjected to related laws and regulations”.
The Trade Union Law further stipulates that “the employer… refusing
to make equal negotiation without justified reasons…shall be
ordered to make rectifications and be dealt with by the people’s
government at the county level or above in accordance with the
law”. Though the Provisions certainly impose obligations on
employers to engaging in collective bargaining upon receiving their
employees’ request, the Provisions do not specify what constitute
“justifiable reasons” for refusing collective bargaining and what
measures should be taken against employers who refuse collective
bargaining without justifiable reasons. Therefore it will be
difficult to find an effective solution when employers continue to
refuse collective bargaining. In practice, some regions have
established “records of bad performance” for enterprises refusing
to sign or implement collective contracts, as a way of putting
pressure on them and facilitate collective bargaining in good
faith.
C. Procedure of Collective Bargaining Rules and regulations on
collective bargaining and collective contracts constitute an
inseparable part of the labour law framework in China. Collective
bargaining is a process involving bi-partite negotiation where the
desired outcome is the successful conclusion of a collective
contract with the approval of employees. Though collective
contracts will usually be signed between representatives of a trade
union and the enterprise, it can be signed between elected
employees’ representatives and the employer in non-union
enterprises. The first step of collective bargaining at the
enterprise level is the election of representatives to form a
negotiation group. Either party may then submit a written request
for collective bargaining to the other side. The other party shall
respond in writing within 20 days of receiving the request. The
negotiating representatives shall make a series of preparations
before the formal bargaining process, such as acquainting
themselves with the relevant laws, statutes and related
information, heeding the different opinions of those they
represent, drafting the negotiation agenda and making arrangements
for the time and venue of negotiation, among other things. A
non-negotiating representative shall be appointed collectively as
the note-taker. After preparations, the formal negotiation process
shall begin. The negotiation conference shall be held in turn by
chief representatives of the two sides. In the process of
negotiation, the chief representative of one party brings forward
specific requests and demands and the other party’s chief
representative responds correspondingly. Both parties present their
own opinions on negotiated issues and a comprehensive discussion is
held. Then the chief representatives on both sides will begin to
arrive at conclusions. If an agreement has been reached, a draft of
the collective contract or special collective contract shall be
formulated and signed by the chief representatives. If an agreement
has not been reached or something unexpected has occurred, the
negotiation may be suspended with the consent of both parties.
Issues concerning the term of suspension, time and place for the
next negotiation conference shall be negotiated between the two
parties. The draft collective contract or special collective
contract as agreed by both parties shall be submitted to the
Workers’ Congress or be discussed by the whole body of employees.
For the discussion on the draft contract, two thirds or more of
employees’ representatives or employees are required to attend the
meeting. The draft shall be approved with the consent of more than
50% of employee representatives or employees. After approval by the
Workers’ Congress, the collective contract or special contract will
be signed by the chief representatives of both parties.
Higher-level trade union organizations and employer organizations
can offer advice, guidance, services, training and coordination to
facilitate collective bargaining at the enterprise level. They can
also help their members to become acquainted with related laws and
statutes, offer background information on negotiations and provide
training courses for negotiating representatives. They can act as a
mediator if a significant dispute or conflict arises. Generally,
organizations at the next higher level shall not participate in the
process of negotiation directly unless they are requested by their
members at the enterprise.
20
D. Bargaining Agents/Parties to Collective Contracts Employees
According to Article 20 of the Provisions on Collective Contract,
“Employees representatives shall be elected and sent by the
corresponding trade union. In enterprise without trade union,
representatives may be recommended by the employees in a democratic
way and be approved with the consent of more than 50% of the
employees”. That is, the negotiating employees’ representative may
be the trade union or representatives elected by the employees. In
addition, professional personnel (‘zhuanye renyuan’) outside the
enterprise may also be entrusted as negotiating representatives.
However the number of entrusted representatives shall not be more
than one third of the total representatives on one side. As for
regional and sector/industrial collective bargaining
('quyuxinghehangyexingjititanpan'), the negotiating employees’
representatives are generally the presidents of the branch trade
union at the regional or sectoral/industrial level. Employers
Article 11 of the Provisions on Collective Contract stipulates,
“The negotiating representatives of the enterprise shall be
assigned by the legal representatives of the enterprise. The post
of chief representative shall be assumed by the enterprise’s legal
representative or other administration staff with entrusted
authority in writing.” In the process of regional and sectoral
collective bargaining, a representative of the organization with
the status of a legal person may represent the enterprise in
negotiation, or a representative of the enterprise with the status
of a legal person grants the power of attorney in writing to an
entrusted person in charge of the local economy as a chief
representative of the enterprise. Role of Organizations at Higher
Levels Organizations of trade unions at higher levels offer
guidance, assistance and training to its members on wage
negotiations, such as introducing the pay guidelines issued by
labour administrations, offering information on the economic and
social contexts of collective bargaining, consultation on policies
and laws and training for negotiating representatives, among other
services. Also, some local trade union organizations adopt a
practice where the higher level trade union organizations represent
enterprise unions in their negotiations with employers. This
approach is often taken in order to protect the enterprise union
leaders who can be unfairly treated by their employers. The higher
level trade union is independent from the enterprise management and
therefore has more autonomy and power to negotiate with the
employer. In recent years, some local trade unions have established
wage negotiation councils which compose of experts, scholars and
lawyers well-versed with labour policies and statutes as well as
other staff working in the fields of labour, capital and financing.
Responsibilities of these groups include offering guidance to trade
unions at all levels in the process of collective bargaining,
meeting needs of basic-level trade unions and participating in
enterprise wage negotiation as representatives of the trade union.
Ultimately it is the parties themselves who should reach the final
decisions and outcomes in collective bargaining. While the wage
negotiation council offers guidance to the parties, they are not
expected to impose their decisions on the parties. Wage negotiation
councils have been introduced primarily for two reasons: first and
most important, trade union representatives had neither knowledge
nor experience in wage negotiation, and second, the government and
trade unions want to ensure that wage negotiation is being
conducted in an orderly manner in line with the macro-level
parameters as set by the government.
21
E. Contents of a Collective Contract Article 33 of the Labour Law
spells out the negotiable subjects, which include wages, working
hours, rests and holidays, work safety and hygiene, insurance and
welfare, among others. However, the Provisions on Collective
Contract broadens the content of the bargaining agenda: “In signing
a collective contract or special collective contract, parties may
negotiate on the following issues: 1. labour payment; 2. working
hours; 3. rests and holidays; 4. labour security and hygiene; 5.
complementary insurance and welfare; 6. special protection for
female and juvenile employees; 7. skill training; 8. management of
labour contract; 9. rewards and discipline; 10. staff reduction,
etc”. It is not clear whether the above regulations mean that only
those issues referred to in the provisions can be negotiated, or
the parties are free to negotiate whatever issues they like. What
is clear is that collective contracts should address the issues
listed above. However, this does not necessarily mean that all of
these issues should be included in each and every collective
contract. It is up to the parties to decide whether they want to
conclude a comprehensive contract on all issues (including the ones
listed above), or sign separate collective contracts on specific
issues. In the early period of promoting the collective contract
system, more comprehensive contracts were signed. Nowadays, more
and more enterprises have begun to conclude separate collective
contracts on specific issues. As both parties gain more experience
in collective bargaining, collective contracts are becoming more
specific to the circumstances of individual enterprises. In China,
wage agreement is often concluded separately from the general
collective contract. Once wage negotiation reaches agreement, the
wage agreement may be appended to the general collective contract.
According to the Provisional Methods on Collective Wage Negotiation
(issued by Ministry of Labour and Social Security in 2000), the
wage agreement and general collective contract have the same
legally binding effect. In recent years, there has been also a
tendency of concluding separate, specialized collective contracts
on protection of female employees’ rights, specifying measures for
maternity protection and other measures of protection for female
employees. The labour legislation stipulates that the terms and
conditions of employment in a collective contract should not be
lower than the minimum standards set out in relevant laws. However,
it has been reported that it is not unusual for both parties to
simply copy or reiterate existing legal minima in their collective
contracts with a few marginal modifications, reflecting their
inexperience in and misunderstanding of collective bargaining. As
the collective contract system further develops and progresses, the
quality of collective agreements will gradually improve.
F. Levels of Collective Bargaining Collective bargaining takes
place predominantly at the enterprise level, and the Labour Law
regards the enterprise level as the only level of collective
bargaining in China. But in recent years, there have been
significant changes both in terms of regulatory framework and
actual practices. The revised Trade Union Law introduced the
possibility of organizing different forms of trade unions other
than the enterprise union. Further, the 2007 Labour Contract Law
officially introduces the possibility of having collective
agreements at regional and sectoral levels. Also noticeable is the
existence of local (provincial and municipal) regulations which
encourage collective bargaining at the regional and sectoral levels
in some 20 provinces of China. For instance, on 1 June 1996, the
22
nd Session of the Standing Committee of the
Eighth People's Congress in Guangdong passed the Provisions on
Collective Contract in Guangdong Enterprises. Article 33 of the
provisions stipulates, “This provision shall be referred to in the
signing of industrial and regional collective contracts”. As
mentioned earlier, this practice of regional/sectoral bargaining is
usually found in localities where private sector enterprises of
small and medium size are clustered around the same sectors of
business. A review of this type of regional/sectoral agreement
shows that some agreements include negotiated regional/sectoral
minimum wages which are higher than
22
mandatory local minimum wage. One advantage of this type of
collective bargaining is that union representatives tend to be more
independent from individual employers’ influence, compared to
enterprise union representatives. In a situation where an
enterprise is covered by both regional/sectoral agreement and an
enterprise agreement, the general rule is that the enterprise
agreement should not contain conditions that are inferior to those
in the regional/sectoral agreement. At the end of 2004, around
143,000 collective contracts at regional and industrial levels have
been signed, covering 856,000 enterprises and 42.893 million
employees.
3
At present, one of the main problems with regional/sectoral
bargaining is the difficulty in finding employers’ organizations or
representatives as a bargaining partner. Another associated problem
is how to strengthen the democratic linkage between trade union
representatives and rank-and-file members in the bargaining
process, as there can be quite a distance between them.
G. Procedural Requirement for Concluding a Collective Contract
After an agreement has been reached, the parties would draft a
collective contract which is signed by the chief representatives on
both sides. According to laws and regulations, the draft of the
collective contract shall be submitted to the Workers’ Congress or
be discussed by the whole body of employees. As mentioned
previously, in the discussion on the draft contract, two thirds or
more of the employee representatives or employees are required to
attend the meeting. The draft contract shall get approved with the
consent of 50% or more of the attendees. After being approved in
the Workers’ Congress, the collective contract or special contract
will be signed by the chief representatives of both parties.
Article 42 of the Provisions on Collective Contract
(‘jitihetongguiding’) stipulates, “Having been signed or amended,
three copies of the collective contract or special collective
contract shall be submitted to the labour administration within 10
days of the contract being signed. The submitted collective
contract or special collective contract shall be registered with
the labour administration”. According to Article 44 of the
Provisions on Collective Contract, the labour administration will
conduct an administrative review of the submitted contract, and
examine the following issues: 1. Whether the entity of the two
parties in collective bargaining meets the requirements of relevant
laws, statutes and regulations;
2. Whether the procedure of collective bargaining observes the
relevant laws, statutes and regulations; and
3. Whether the contents of the collective contract or special
collective contract violate any national laws and/or
regulations.
In relation to the first issue on the entity of collective
bargaining agents, the enterprise must obtain legal person status
while the trade union must obtain legal person status of a social
group. In enterprises with no trade union organization,
representatives in the negotiation may be elected by employees. The
process must be based on the legal procedures which state that the
representatives shall be recommended in a democratic way and
approved with the consent of more than 50% of employees. If the
local labour administration identifies a problem in the contract
with respect to any of the three abovementioned issues, an
Examiner’s Amendment shall be sent to the negotiating
representatives of both parties within 15 days of receiving the
contract. Afterwards, both parties shall negotiate on the
amendments raised by the local labour administration and a new
collective contract or special contract shall be signed. It shall
be submitted to the local labour administration for another review.
However, the local labour administration does not have the
authority to amend the original text of the collective contract. If
there are no legal
3 “2004 Blue Book of Trade Union Protecting Legal Rights and
Interests of Employees”, China Worker's Publishing House,
2005
23
problems with the contract during the labour administration’s
review, the collective contract will then come into effect with
legally binding force. According to the Provisions on Collective
Contract, a collective contract has a term of one to three years,
while a wage agreement has invariably a one year term. Once its
term expires, the validity of a collective contract will be
suspended in accordance with arrangements agreed to by both
parties. Three months prior to the expiration date of the existing
contract, either one of the parties may request to renegotiate a
new contract or continue to keep the current contract. At present
there is no statute stipulating that the expiration date may be
extended automatically after the term expires.
H. Deadlocks in Collective Bargaining and the Amendment and
Suspension of a Collective Contract In the absence of a right to
strike, different solutions to resolving deadlocks in collective
bargaining have been introduced in China. According to the Article
35 of the Provisions on Collective Contract, “If an agreement has
not been reached or something unexpected happens, negotiation may
be suspended with the consent of the two parties. Issues concerning
term of suspension, time and place for the next negotiation shall
be negotiated by the two parties.” If a dispute emerges in the
process of collective bargaining that cannot be solved by the two
parties, an application for mediation shall be brought to the local
labour administration which will deal with the dispute in
conjunction with the trade union and employers’ organization at the
corresponding level. Essentially, there are two options for the
negotiating parties in the case of a deadlock or dispute in the
collective bargaining process: one is temporarily suspending the
bargaining based upon both parties’ consensus and arranging a
subsequent round of negotiation; another is applying for mediation
through the labour administration. In cases where no application
for mediation is submitted by both parties, the local labour
administration may coordinate with the trade union and employers’
organization at the higher level if it is deemed necessary. After
term of the contract expires, either of the two parties may request
to renegotiate or decide to keep the current collective contract as
a valid contract based on consent of the two sides. If an agreement
is reached between representatives of the two parties, the
collective contract or special collective contract may be altered
or terminated. Article 40 stipulates that the collective contract
or special collective contract may be altered or terminated under
following circumstances: 1. The collective contract or special
collective contract cannot be implemented because the enterprise
has been acquired, written off or bankrupted;
2. Conditions for altering or terminating the collective contract
or special collective contract have emerged; or
3. Other circumstances as stipulated by law, statutes and
regulations. In short, this implies that there can be three
circumstances in which a signed collective contract may be
suspended or amended: first, the term of the contract expires;
second, the two parties agreed to the alteration or termination of
the collective contract; third, conditions for altering or
terminating the collective contract or special collective contract
have surfaced.
I. Implementation of Collective Contract In the introductory years
of the collective contract system in the 1990s, official industrial
relations actors focused on increasing the number of signed
collective contracts. However,
24
soon they began to discover a number of problems with the
prevailing methods of collective bargaining and the quality and
effectiveness of the contracts. First of all, it turned out that
many collective contracts simply had general provisions, which were
more or less a carbon copy of legal minimum standards, without
detailed negotiation of enterprise-specific issues and working
conditions. This has led to a situation where collective bargaining
and signing of collective contracts did not generate the desired
effects of enhanced working conditions and industrial harmony, and
employees and employers alike did not take collective bargaining
and collective contracts seriously. The industrial relations actors
are now aware of these problems and have begun to take actions to
improve the quality of collective contracts and the bargaining
process. Article 35 of the Labour Law stipulates, “Legal collective
contracts have binding effect over enterprises and the whole body
of employees. The standard of labour conditions and payment in the
labour contract signed between individual employees and the
enterprise shall not be lower than that stipulated in the
collective contract”. Article 6 of the Provisions on Collective
Contract stipulates, “Collective contracts or special collective
contracts in accordance with this article have binding effect over
enterprises and the whole body of employees”. This has been further
elaborated in the 2007 Labour Contract Law. In China, there are no
legal procedures or rules that provide for the extension of a
collective contract to enterprises which are not a signatory to the
contract. In principle, a collective contract only binds the
employer and employees of an enterprise where the collective
agreement was signed. However, this may change as China experiments
further with regional and sectoral collective agreements which
would invariably require some arrangements for the extension of
collective contracts beyond the signatories. Like elsewhere, there
are two different types of disputes associated with collective
bargaining: one arising from the failure of reaching an agreement
(collective interest dispute) and another arising from the
implementation or interpretation of a collective agreement
(collective right dispute). The procedures designed to resolve
collective interest disputes have been mentioned in the previous
section. In the case of collective right disputes, both parties are
obliged to submit their cases to the Labour Dispute Arbitration
Council in accordance with Chinese law if they fail to resolve
their disputes through bi-partite process. The Provisions on
Collective Contract stipulates that negotiating parties can agree
upon the procedures and process to resolve their disputes through
collective bargaining. However, there have been few, if any,
disputes arising from the collective bargaining process and
implementation of the collective agreement. This suggests that
collective bargaining in China may have not reached a mature stage
to date. As of September 2005, 754,000 collective contracts have
been signed, covering 103.84 million employees in 1.378 million
enterprises. Among them, 84,000 collective contracts were regional
level contracts and 29,000 were industrial/sectoral level
contracts.
J. Collective Bargaining in State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) In the
legal framework and theory, there is little difference between SOEs
and non-state enterprise in the realm of collective bargaining. In
practice, there are a number of significant differences between the
two sectors of the economy. In state-owned enterprises, the
unionization rate is generally very high, with a well entrenched
system of Workers’ (Representative) Congress which is supposed to
be a key institution for the democratic management of those
enterprises. Traditionally, industrial relations in SOEs tend to be
relatively harmonious as the Party committee, management and trade
union worked very closely with each other to coordinate industrial
relations at the workplace. However, employees and employers in
SOEs may face very specific constraints on their bargaining
autonomy, because there is still the strong influence of government
administration over the operation of SOEs, including the
determination and allocation of total wage bills. This leaves
little room for both parties to carry out wage negotiation, except
for the negotiation of marginal benefits and bonuses. At the same
time, trade unions in SOE tend to be very closely
25
associated with management, creating another barrier to the
independent operation of trade unions. This situation can have a
negative impact on trade union development and collective
bargaining. During the critical period of SOEs’ restructuring,
trade unions in SOEs were tested on whether they could effectively
protect employees’ legal rights and interests in the context of
large scale layoffs resulting from the rapid changes of the SOE
sector. There have been many reported cases where employees’
legitimate rights were seriously infringed during the SOEs’
restructuring. It appears that some unions in SOEs were much more
successful than others in protecting employees’ legitimate rights
through collective bargaining. For example, some local trade unions
(‘difanggonghui’) formulated Collective Contracts on Settlement
Allowance and Property Preservation for Employees in Restructured
Enterprises and Contracts on Property Mortgage in Restructured
Enterprises to solve problems concerning the preservation of
creditors’ rights of employees in the process of SOE reform and
restructuring.
K. Workers’ Congress and Collective Bargaining Workers’
(representative) Congress is one of most important industrial
relations institutions at the enterprise level in China, which is
designed to ensure the democratic management of the enterprise by
ensuring participation of all employees in corporate decision
making. Workers’ Congress was introduced in the early days of
economic reform as a check-and-balance mechanism in the process of
decentralizing SOE management from direct state intervention. It
allowed all employees to have their voices heard through
participation in the Workers’ Congress. The Workers’ Congress finds
its legal foundations in various laws and regulations such as the
Constitution, Law on Enterprises, Law on Corporation, Trade Union
Law, Labour Law, Labour Contract Law and Provisions on Workers’
Congress in State-Owned Enterprises. Workers’ Congress is defined
as “the basic mechanism for workers in executing democratic rights
and a basic form of democratic management and democratic
supervision”. With its origins in the early days of reform of a
socialist planned economy, the Workers’ Congress is based on a
fundamental assumption that enterprises belong to all the people of
China and workers should be able to exercise their democratic
rights. As such, the Workers’ Congress is an all encompassing
organization which includes virtually everyone in the enterprise.
Under this arrangement, the enterprise union committee is defined
as a ‘working secretariat organization’ of the Workers’ Congress,
which carries out the tasks and duties as decided by the Workers’
Congress. Also, the Workers’ Congress may have a number of working
committees to deal with specific issues. In SOEs, the
responsibilities of the Workers’ Congress are defined as
follow:
• Heeding, examining and discussing reports of future development
plans and important decisions brought forward by the enterprise
director (including enterprise management principles, future and
annual business plans, important technology innovation and
proposals for enterprise restructuring/reform, etc), and providing
feedback, suggestions and advice;
• Approving or disapproving plans, through examination and
discussion, on wage adjustment and bonus distribution, schemes
concerning work safety and labour protection and important
regulations and rules on enterprise management;
• Discussing drafts of collective contracts signed by employees’
representatives and making decisions to approve or disprove;
• Examining and fixing distribution plans on housing deposit funds,
housing distribution and other important issues concerning
employees’ welfare;
• Evaluating senior staff such as the board director and general
manager, and bringing forth suggestions on regulating the
appointment and “easing out” of senior positions, rewards and
disciplinary issues, etc; and
• Electing and replacing employee representatives on the board of
directors and board of supervisors.
26
The list of mandates and responsibilities indicates that the
Workers’ Congress could be a powerful workplace institution – at
least on theoretical and legal basis. This relatively old workplace
institution is now joined by a relatively new practice of
collective bargaining. Workers’ Congress and collective bargaining
are seen as two key pillars of industrial relations at the
workplace, serving to protect employees’ rights. According to the
Trade Union Law, “Trade unions shall coordinate industrial
relations and safeguard the labour rights and interests of the
employees at an enterprise through equal negotiation and the
collective contract system”. Further, it states that “Pursuant to
laws and regulations, trade unions shall organize employees to
participate in democratic decision-making, democratic management
and democratic supervision through the Workers’ Congress or other
forms”. There is an organic link between the Workers’ Congress and
collective bargaining process. Business plans and principles
concerning employees’ interests adopted through the Workers’
Congress set a foundation and parameter for collective bargaining.
Contents of the collective agreement should be in conformity with
the decisions made through the Workers’ Congress process regarding
enterprise development objectives, operational performance and
measurement, innovation plans and wage and welfare objectives. More
importantly, the draft collective contract agreed between
representatives of trade union and management should be submitted
to the Workers’ Congress for approval through democratic
discussion. However, Workers’ Congress faces some challenges in the
modern environment of industrial relations. While the influence of
Workers’ Congress is strongly felt in state-owned enterprises, the
number of SOEs has shrunken considerably as a consequence of reform
and restructuring in this sector. It is reported that the influence
of Workers’ Congress tend to become weak in restructured SOEs. At
the same time, despite trade unions’ efforts to spread the Workers’
Congress system to the non-state sector, the result has not been
satisfactory. Considering the organic link between the Workers’
Congress and collective bargaining as established by various laws,
the weakening of Workers’ Congress poses a challenge to industrial
relations actors at the workplace, particularly since it is seen as
a main institutional channel for employees’ democratic
participation.
27
Part 4: Trends, Issues and Debates: Social partners’ and Political
Actors’ Views and Proposals for Future development of national
Bargaining Systems
A. Major Issues and Trends in Collective Bargaining Introduced in
the 1990s, collective bargaining is relatively new to China. Given
its relatively short history, collective bargaining has spread
across many Chinese workplaces at an extraordinary pace, largely
thanks to the concerted efforts of both the government and trade
unions at all levels of the economy. In these circumstances, it was
inevitable that the official industrial relations actors have tried
to institutionalize the new system of collective bargaining in a
top-down manner, and that there have been problems with collective
bargaining processes and the quality of collective agreements which
were often little more than replication of legal minimum standards.
However, the initial learning process seems to be coming to an end,
and industrial relations actors have begun to move towards building
a genuine system of collective bargaining with a variety of
experiments in different localities. Concerted efforts of the
tripartite actors at various levels, often through newly
established tripartite consultation mechanism, are beginning to
bear fruit in institutionalizing collective bargaining practices
and also improving the quality of outcomes. It is also noteworthy
that the collective bargaining agenda has gradually been broadened,
partly thanks to the Provisions on Collective Contract which added
more negotiable items. The Provisions on Collective Contract, in
addition to the items stipulated in the Labour Law, added new
issues such as special protection for female and juvenile
employees, vocational skill training, labour contract management,
award and discipline and staff reduction onto the bargaining
agenda. In addition to general collective agreements, both parties
have begun to conclude specialized collective agreements focusing
on particular issues such as wages and female employees’
protection. In particular, the progress of wage negotiation has
been impressive. At many workplaces, collective bargaining has
achieved gain sharing among employees in well- performing
enterprises as well as ensured that the basic living requirements
of workers at struggling enterprises were guaranteed. Another new
trend is that collective bargaining has begun to take place at
various levels – not just at the enterprise level – and in a
variety of forms. As described earlier, collective bargaining has
taken place at the regional and sectoral levels in many localities,
producing regional/sectoral agreements covering large number of
employees in small and medium sized enterprises in similar
industries. This form of collective bargaining brings several
benefits for employees and trade unions. Trade unions find it
easier to organize workers and bargain collectively with employers
at the regional/sectoral level; otherwise it would be extremely
difficult to do so with hundreds of individual small-sized
enterprises. Also, it often brings quite tangible outcomes of
better working conditions, as these agreements frequently produce a
regional/sectoral minimum wage which is higher than the local
mandatory minimum wage. Finally, trade union representatives are
much more independent from any undue influence of employers in this
form of regional/sectoral bargaining than in enterprise bargaining.
Therefore, we can conclude that this type of regional/sectoral
bargaining has great advantages in China, particularly considering
the fact that enterprise union leadership is often under the
influence of management. This type of collective bargaining also
delivers desirable outcomes for employers as well.
Regional/sectoral agreements can help employers avoid the trouble
of unusually high turnovers, reduce competition among employers in
the recruitment and retention of employees, as well as reduce other
conflicts.
28
The above changes are taking place alongside with the changing
roles of the tripartite industrial relations actors. For example,
the labour administration has adjusted its role in wage
determination, switching from direct intervention and
administration to indirect control at a macro-level. Now the
government hopes that employees and employers would negotiate
wages, hopefully, in line with the macro parameters set by the
government. For this purpose, the government provides timely
information about wage trends and issues wage guidelines. It
clearly shows that the government has redefined its role in the
labour market, as a modern industrial relations system –
particularly the areas of collective bargaining and wage
negotiation – has begun to take roots in Chinese society.
Establishment of a tripartite consultation system at various levels
seem to have facilitated these changes as it allows regular
communication and consultation among the industrial relations
actors to bring forward innovations in a much more coordinated
manner. Also, it is important to note that trade unions have played
a crucial role in the transformation of industrial relations in
China. Trade unions, previously defined as a “transmission belt”,
have transformed themselves gradually so that they can explore and
experiment with more effective practices for protecting employees’
rights in a new market environment. In turn, collective bargaining
practices that are maturing will also facilitate the reform of
trade unions at the workplace. Employers’ organizations are still
weak in China due to its socialist planned economy legacy. However,
it also seems that employers are beginning to understand the
importance of harmonious industrial relations through sound
practices of collective bargaining. Particularly after the
establishment of a tripartite consultation system, employers have
begun to strengthen their organizational capacity to deal
collectively with emerging industrial relations issues in
conjunction with the government and trade union organizations. We
note that there are increasingly diverse employers’ organizations,
some of which have begun their involvement in industrial relations
processes. As with any other country, there are of course many
problems and shortcomings with the current industrial relations
system in China. Trade union governance at the workplace level may
need to become more independent from management’s influence and the
process of collective bargaining may need further improvement.
Other countries’ experiences show that the right to bargain
collectively is inextricably linked to the right to strike, which
is absent in China at this moment. However, the gradual
strengthening of industrial relations actors’ capacity to carry out
collective bargaining, the redefinition of the roles of social
actors in a new market environment and the gradual
institutionalization of industrial relations practices such as
tripartite consultation and collective bargaining will all
contribute to building a “harmonious society and industrial
relations” in China. In the relatively short time frame, China has
successfully institutionalized the modern practices of collective
bargaining and it continues to improve and develop a more
innovative industrial relations system. It may be soon that we
observe an emerging “Chinese model” of industrial relations.
29
Industrial Structure Year Economically Active Population
(Million)
Total Employed Persons (Million)
1994 681.35 674.55 2.8 12.6 124.1 20.2 47.9 31.9
1995 688.55 680.65 2.9 10.5 117.1 20.5 48.8 30.7
1996 697.65 689.50 3.0 9.6 108.3 20.4 49.5 30.1
1997 708.00 698.20 3.1 8.8 102.8 19.1 50.0 30.9
1998 720.87 706.37 3.1 7.8 99.2 18.6 49.3 32.1
1999 727.91 713.94 3.1 7.1 98.6 17.6 49.4 33.0
2000 739.92 720.85 3.1 8.0 100.4 16.4 50.2 33.4
2001 744.32 730.25 3.6 7.5 100.7 15.8 50.1 34.1 2002 753.60 737.40
4.0 8.3 99.2 15.3 50.4 34.3
2003 760.75 744.32 4.3 9.5 101.2 14.4 52.2 33.4
2004 768.23 752.00 4.2 9.5 103.9 15.2 52.9 31.9
Note 1: Source of data is from the China Statistical Yearbook of
the National Bureau of Statistics and China Labour statistical
Yearbook of the Chinese Statistic Press. Note 2: Consumer Press
Index is calculated on the base of 100 in the previous year. Note
3: Industrial structure refers to the proportion of primary
industry, secondary industry and tertiary industry in the annual
GDP (Gross Domestic Product).
30