16
COG DTP/DEP Staff Eulalie Lucas DTP Sunil Kumar DEP Testing of EPA’S MOVES Model TPB Technical Committee June 5, 2009 MOVES: Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator

COG DTP/DEP Staff Eulalie Lucas DTP Sunil Kumar DEP

  • Upload
    jess

  • View
    41

  • Download
    5

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Testing of EPA’S MOVES Model TPB Technical Committee June 5, 2009. MOVES: Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator. COG DTP/DEP Staff Eulalie Lucas DTP Sunil Kumar DEP. Major Features - MOVES Vs. MOBILE6. Transition : Mobile6.2 to MOVES Local Data Needs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: COG DTP/DEP Staff  Eulalie Lucas DTP Sunil Kumar  DEP

COG DTP/DEP Staff

Eulalie Lucas DTP

Sunil Kumar DEP

Testing of EPA’S MOVES Model

TPB Technical Committee

June 5, 2009

MOVES: Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator

Page 2: COG DTP/DEP Staff  Eulalie Lucas DTP Sunil Kumar  DEP

2

MOVES Major Features MOVES Vs. MOBILE6Geography Jurisdiction, regional or state level aggregation

possible.

Time Spans No change. Energy /emission output available by hour of the day, and month for calendar years 1990 and 1999 through 2050, with options to run at more aggregate day, month or year levels. Same as ozone & winter day and seasonal (annual)

Sources Requires conversion to thirteen vehicle types. (types are shown on a different slide )

Outputs and Pollutant Emissions MOBILE6 pollutants VOC, CO, NOx, PM2.5 & PM10, N2O, CH4, CO2, toxics; Plus new pollutants added (e.g., CO2 equivalent, individual components of PM2.5 & PM10, total energy consumption).

Emission Processes Some change. Running, start, extended idle (e.g. heavy-duty truck (“hoteling”), well-to-pump, brakewear, tirewear, evaporative permeation, evaporative fuel vapor venting, and evaporative fuel leaks. Evaporative emissions characterized differently.

Major Features - MOVES Vs. MOBILE6

Page 3: COG DTP/DEP Staff  Eulalie Lucas DTP Sunil Kumar  DEP

3

Transition : Mobile6.2 to MOVES Local Data Needs

(Assume county level application as currently done)

Required Local Datasets for County Level Analysis

Fuel Characteristics

Meteorology

I/M Program

Age Distribution (Registration data)

Population of MOVES Vehicle Types(for each county in a calendar year)

Total Base Year VMT for HPMS Vehicle Types(for each county in a calendar year)

VMT Fraction across (4) MOVES Road Types for (13) individual MOVES Vehicle Types

(for each county in a calendar year)

Page 4: COG DTP/DEP Staff  Eulalie Lucas DTP Sunil Kumar  DEP

4

Local County Level Data

Fuel Characteristics Local data available. Appropriate fuel formulation can be identified from the list

provided with the MOVES model.

Meteorology Local data available. Needs minimal formatting for MOVES application.

I/M Program Local data available. Needs minimal formatting for MOVES application.

Age Distribution (Registration data) Local data available. Two options for MOVES application

A. Use EPA tool to convert existing age distribution data available by Mobile6 vehicle types (1-25 years old) into MOVES vehicle types (0-30 years old).

B. Develop age distribution data by MOVES vehicle types (0-30 years old).

Page 5: COG DTP/DEP Staff  Eulalie Lucas DTP Sunil Kumar  DEP

5

Vehicle PopulationMOBILE & MOVES Vehicle Types

MOBILE6 Vehicle Types

VehType

Description (gas and diesel combined)

1 LDV Light-Duty Vehicles (Passenger Cars)

2 LDT1 Light-Duty Trucks 1 (0-6,000 lbs. GVWR, 0-3,750 lbs. LVW)

3 LDT2 Light-Duty Trucks 2 (0-6,000 lbs. GVWR, 3,751-5,750 lbs. LVW)

4 LDT3 Light-Duty Trucks 3 (6,001-8,500 lbs. GVWR, 0-5,750 lbs. ALVW)

5 LDT4Light-Duty Trucks 4 (6,001-8,500 lbs. GVWR, 5,751 lbs. and greater

ALVW)

6 HDV2B Class 2b Heavy-Duty Vehicles (8,501-10,000 lbs. GVWR)

7 HDV3 Class 3 Heavy-Duty Vehicles (10,001-14,000 lbs. GVWR)

8 HDV4 Class 4 Heavy-Duty Vehicles (14,001-16,000 lbs. GVWR)

9 HDV5 Class 5 Heavy-Duty Vehicles (16,001-19,500 lbs. GVWR)

10 HDV6 Class 6 Heavy-Duty Vehicles (19,501-26,000 lbs. GVWR)

11 HDV7 Class 7 Heavy-Duty Vehicles (26,001-33,000 lbs. GVWR)

12 HDV8A Class 8a Heavy-Duty Vehicles (33,001-60,000 lbs. GVWR)

13 HDV8B Class 8b Heavy-Duty Vehicles (>60,000 lbs. GVWR)

14 HDBS School Buses

15 HDBT Transit and Urban Buses

16 MC Motorcycles (All)

MOVES Veh Type

11 Motorcycle

21 Passenger Car

31 Passenger Truck

32 Light Commercial Truck

41 Intercity Bus

42 Transit Bus

43 School Bus

51 Refuse Truck

52 Single Unit Short-Haul Truck

53 Single Unit Long-Haul Truck

54 Motorhome

61 Combination Short-Haul Truck

62 Combination Long-Haul Truck

Page 6: COG DTP/DEP Staff  Eulalie Lucas DTP Sunil Kumar  DEP

6

Annual VMT by HPMS Vehicle Types (MOVES Allocation)

Motorcycle

Passenger Car

Other 2 axle-4 tire vehicles

Single Unit Trucks

Bus

Combination Trucks

Annual VMT - DTP Vs. MOVES AllocationAnnual VMT by Facility Types (DTP Allocation)

Freeways

Major Arterials

Minor Arterials

Collectors

Expressways

Local and Ramps

Page 7: COG DTP/DEP Staff  Eulalie Lucas DTP Sunil Kumar  DEP

7

VMT Fraction across MOVES Road Types for Individual MOVES Vehicle Types

MOVES Road Type Definition

Rural restricted - roadways with restricted access for vehicles (i.e. rural interstates)

Rural unrestricted – roadways with unrestricted access for vehicles (i.e. rural arterials, collectors, and local)

Urban restricted - roadways with restricted access for vehicles (i.e. urban expressways, freeways and interstates)

Urban unrestricted – roadways with unrestricted access for vehicles (i.e. urban arterials, collectors, and local)

Off-Network – Parking lots, Driveways

Current COG/DTP VMT Fractions Allocation by:

Network traffic

Local Roads

Auto Access to transit

** VMT fractions not developed for individual vehicle types

Page 8: COG DTP/DEP Staff  Eulalie Lucas DTP Sunil Kumar  DEP

8

MOVES Inputs Local Data EPA Default

Fuel Characteristics Local data available. Appropriate fuel formulation can be identified from the list provided with the MOVES model.

Fuel formulations

Meteorology Data Local data available County data

I/M Programs Local data available. Needs formatting for MOVES. County data

Ramp Fraction (portion of roadway assigned to ramps)

Local data available National data

VMT Fraction VMT fraction across MOVES road types for each MOVES vehicle types. VMT fractions across FHWA facility types available, need to be converted in the format above (using NEI assumptions ?)

National data

Vehicle Population

Vehicle population data available by Mobile6 vehicle types can be converted to MOVES types

National data

Total Annual VMT Need annual VMT by HPMS vehicle types. Local data available by FHWA facility types need to be converted (using NEI assumption ?)

National data

Age Distribution Mobile6 based local data conversion to MOVES format possible. Direct local data development in MOVES format preferred

National data

Summary : Local Data Needs (County Level Analysis)

Page 9: COG DTP/DEP Staff  Eulalie Lucas DTP Sunil Kumar  DEP

9

Feedback from Air Agency Staff

• VDEQ:

The MOVES format for input files is definitely very different from that used for MOBILE6.  It will take some time to become comfortable with the new format and confident in the results produced

Created database containing locality-specific input data for 3 counties in various parts of the state.  Used 3 separate databases and 3 separate RunSpecs since MOVES only allows you to generate emissions for one county at a time.  (EPA plans to add batch processing in the final model.)

Encountered issues with emission calculations using different time aggregation options in the model. Emissions generated using the hourly time aggregation are considerably lower than those generated using a monthly time aggregation.  Comments and sample files to EPA and their contractor is working through the issue.

• MDE:

Tested ‘National’ run (MOVES default) for Baltimore County (2005 PEI). NOx emission estimates show the same increased pattern as described in MOVES release. VOC numbers were also higher contrary to the belief.

Testing the more important ‘County’ run (with area specific inputs). The challenge is in converting MOBILE6 inputs into the MOVES-based databases. There is not adequate guidance at this point. Trial runs yield un-reasonable estimates for lack of accurate mapping of various data elements. Technical Guidance is the key to the whole process.

Page 10: COG DTP/DEP Staff  Eulalie Lucas DTP Sunil Kumar  DEP

10

MOVES Emissions Processes

Running Exhaust

Start Exhaust

Extended Idle Exhaust

Crankcase Start/Running/Extended Idle Exhaust

Evaporative/Refueling Losses Evaporative Permeation, Evaporative Fuel Vapor Venting, Evaporative Fuel

Leaks Refueling Displacement Vapor Loss, Refueling Spillage Loss

Tire Wear

Brake Wear

Well-To-Pump (energy only)

Page 11: COG DTP/DEP Staff  Eulalie Lucas DTP Sunil Kumar  DEP

11

MOVES Emissions by Source, Age, Mode

Page 12: COG DTP/DEP Staff  Eulalie Lucas DTP Sunil Kumar  DEP

12

How MOVES handles vehicle activity

• Vehicle Specific Power (VSP) – a measure of the energy the vehicle is using at a moment in time

– Affected by acceleration, road grade, resistance, etc.

• Operating Mode – what the vehicle is doing, i.e., accelerating, braking, cruising, idling

– Vehicles use different VSP in different operating modes– MOVES defines 23 operating mode bins – combinations of speed and VSP for different

running conditions plus additional operating modes for starts and evaporative emissions

• Drive Cycle – a second-by-second description of vehicle activity over time, typically including multiple operating modes

• Total Activity Distribution By Process (based on VMT, Age dist., vehicle pop., sales & VMT growth rates, etc.)

– Running, Tire/Brake Wear – Source Hours Operating (SHO)– Evaporative Fuel Permeation, Vapor Venting & Leaking – Source Hours– Start – Number of Starts– Extended Idle - Extended Idle Hours

Page 13: COG DTP/DEP Staff  Eulalie Lucas DTP Sunil Kumar  DEP

13

Operating Mode Bins

1-25 25-50 50 +30 + 16 30 40

27-30

24-27 29 39

21-24

18-21

15-18

12-15 27

9-12 15 25

6-9 14 24 35

3-6 13 23

0-3 12 22 33

< 0 11 21

VS

P C

las

s (

kW

/to

nn

e)

Speed Class (mph)

28 38

37

Page 14: COG DTP/DEP Staff  Eulalie Lucas DTP Sunil Kumar  DEP

14

2009 Draft Work Plan and Schedule

1. Review MOVES model inputs and discuss with agencies- April to September

2. Test model using default values- June and July

3. Form a joint transportation and air technical/policy group to decide on technical and policy items as they relate to MOVES implementation and application.-June/July

4. Develop inputs using local data (with help from task force and EPA technical guidance documentation)- July -August

5. Apply model using local data.- July to September

6. Compare MOVES results by pollutant with MOBILE6 runs.- September

7. Develop transportation and air agency agreement on MOVES inputs and overall process- Pending MOVES model approval by EPA

Page 15: COG DTP/DEP Staff  Eulalie Lucas DTP Sunil Kumar  DEP

15

Benefits gained from Mobile6 Task Force Inter-agency (Air Agency and DOTs) consultation on both

transportation and environmental model inputs.

Staff from COG DEP and DTP represented.

Consultant assistance: inputs were reviewed, tested and documented.

Documentation used in Air Quality Conformity and SIP reports to EPA and USDOT.

Page 16: COG DTP/DEP Staff  Eulalie Lucas DTP Sunil Kumar  DEP

16

Closing Comments

June 29 & June 30th, 2009

MOVES training scheduled (EPA/FHWA sponsored)

Location: MWCOG

MOVES website http://www.epa.gov/otaq/models/moves/index.htm