CO2 Injection Paper

  • Upload
    abet133

  • View
    228

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 CO2 Injection Paper

    1/15

    Pressure Buildup atCO2 Injection Wells

    Sally M. Benson

    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

    Berkeley, California 94720

    Second Annual Conference on Carbon Sequestration

    May 5-8, 2003

    Main Menu Technical Sessions Plenary Sessions Poster Presentations Participants

  • 8/13/2019 CO2 Injection Paper

    2/15

  • 8/13/2019 CO2 Injection Paper

    3/15

    Applications

    Estimation of injection pressures at CO2

    injection wells Pressure transient analysis at CO2 injection

    wells

    Evaluation of the influence of CO2/water/rock

    interactions on formation permeability

    Characterization and monitoring of CO2sequestration processes and progress

  • 8/13/2019 CO2 Injection Paper

    4/15

    Physical Processes During Injection

    of CO2 into Water Immiscible displacement of water

    by CO2 Relative permeability effects

    Capillary pressure effects

    Adverse mobility ratio

    water>>CO2

    Pressure and temperature

    dependent CO2 viscosity and

    density Partitioning of CO2 into the

    water phase

    Partitioning of water into theCO2 phase

    Relative Permeablity

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1

    sw

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1krCO2

    krw

    Relative Permeablity

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1

    sw

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1krCO2

    krw

  • 8/13/2019 CO2 Injection Paper

    5/15

    Implications for Pressure Buildup

    During CO2 Injection

    Relative permeability of CO2

    and water will vary in theregion behind the CO2-front

    Saturation of CO2 and

    water will vary in the regionbehind the CO2- front

    Saturation Distribution

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    0 50 100 150 200r (m)

    Saturation Distribution

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    0 50 100 150 200r (m)

    Sharp Front

    Relative Pemeability

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    0 50 100 150 200r (m)

    Relative Pemeability

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    0 50 100 150 200r (m)

  • 8/13/2019 CO2 Injection Paper

    6/15

    A New Approximate Analytical Solution

    For Pressure Buildup Assumptions

    Buckley-Leverett type

    displacement

    Vertical equilibrium

    Horizontal reservoir

    Homogeneous reservoir

    Neglect capillary pressure

    (not required)

    Slightly compressible fluid

    Based on technique

    developed by Benson(1984, 1987)

    rw rf

    qCO2

    hk,ct,

  • 8/13/2019 CO2 Injection Paper

    7/15

    New Pressure Buildup Solution

    Solution consists of two components

    Steady state pressure buildup behind the CO2

    front (ps.s.) Pressure transient buildup outside of the front

    (pt)

    )4(4),(

    ),(

    ),(

    ),(

    ),(

    2),(

    ),(),(),(

    2

    ..

    ..

    2

    2

    2

    2

    2

    22

    kt

    cr

    Eikh

    q

    trp

    r

    dr

    trk

    tr

    tr

    trf

    kh

    q

    trp

    trptrptrp

    twf

    CO

    wCO

    ft

    r

    CO

    r

    r CO

    COCO

    wss

    ftwssw

    CO

    f

    w

    =

    =

    +=

  • 8/13/2019 CO2 Injection Paper

    8/15

    Evaluating p s.s.

    r

    dr

    trk

    tr

    tr

    trf

    kh

    qtrp

    CO

    f

    w r

    CO

    r

    r CO

    COCO

    wss ),(

    ),(

    ),(

    ),(

    2),(

    2

    2

    2

    22

    ..

    =

    Density Distribution

    After 30 Days of Injection

    700

    725750

    775

    800

    0 50 100 150

    r (m)

    CO2

    < 10% variation

    Density Distribution

    After 30 Days of Injection

    700

    725

    750

    775

    800

    0 50 100 150

    r (m)

    CO2

    < 10% variation

    Viscosity Distribution

    After 30 Days of Injection

    6.0E-05

    6.5E-057.0E-05

    7.5E-05

    8.0E-05

    0 50 100 150

    r (m)

    CO2

    < 10% variation

    Viscosity Distribution

    After 30 Days of Injection

    6.0E-05

    6.5E-05

    7.0E-05

    7.5E-05

    8.0E-05

    0 50 100 150

    r (m)

    CO2

    < 10% variation

    Assign average values for and behind the front

  • 8/13/2019 CO2 Injection Paper

    9/15

    Multi-phase Flow Behind the CO2 Front

    22

    2

    2

    2

    2

    CO

    CO

    sCO

    CO

    CO

    CO

    ss

    f

    h

    tqr

    =

    )(

    )(1

    1)(

    22

    22

    2

    22

    COrw

    wrCOCOw

    CO

    COCO

    sk

    skqq

    qsf

    CO

    w

    +

    =+

    =

    Fractional Flow of CO2

    0.00

    0.20

    0.40

    0.60

    0.80

    1.00

    0 0.2 0.4 0.6

    sCO2

    sf

    Fractional Flow of CO2

    0.00

    0.20

    0.40

    0.60

    0.80

    1.00

    0 0.2 0.4 0.6sCO2

    sf

    Buckley-Leverett Solution

    Saturation Distribution

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    0 50 100 150 200r (m)

    Saturation Distribution

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    0 50 100 150 200

    r (m)

    Buckley-Leverett Solution

  • 8/13/2019 CO2 Injection Paper

    10/15

    Evaluating p s.s.

    r

    dr

    trk

    trf

    kh

    qtrp

    f

    w CO

    r

    r r

    CO

    CO

    COCO

    wss =),(

    ),(

    2

    ),(

    2

    2

    2

    22

    ..

    CO2 Saturation

    After 30 Days

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    0 50 100 150

    r (m)

    Numerical

    Buckley Leverett

    CO 2 Saturation

    After 30 Days

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    0 50 100 150

    r (m)

    Numerical

    Buckley Leverett

    fCO2/krCO2 30 Days

    0.00

    10.00

    20.00

    30.00

    40.00

    0 50 100 150

    r (m)

    fCO2/krCO230 Days

    0.00

    10.0020.00

    30.00

    40.00

    0 50 100 150

    r (m)

    Assign a linear variation for fCO2/krCO2 behind the front

  • 8/13/2019 CO2 Injection Paper

    11/15

    Approximate Analytical Solution),(),(),( .. trptrptrp ftwssw +=

    +=

    +=

    80907.ln4

    ),(

    ln11ln2

    ),(

    2

    ..

    2

    2

    2

    2

    2

    22

    ftwCO

    wCOft

    w

    f

    wf

    w

    rr

    CO

    w

    f

    CO

    COCOwss

    rckt

    khqtrp

    rr

    rrr

    k

    f

    rr

    kh

    qtrp

    fCO

    rsCO2=

    Qt

    h

    fCO2

    sCO2 sCO2

    Fractional Flow of CO2

    0.00

    0.25

    0.50

    0.75

    1.00

    0 0.2 0.4 0.6

    sCO2

    sf

    Fractional Flow of CO2

    0.00

    0.25

    0.50

    0.75

    1.00

    0 0.2 0.4 0.6s

    CO2

    sf

  • 8/13/2019 CO2 Injection Paper

    12/15

    Typical Pressure Buildup

    195

    197

    199

    201

    203

    0 30 60 90 120 150 180

    time (days)

    Pressure

    (bars)

    k = 100 mD

    h = 20 mqCO2= 15.86 kg/s

    initial pressure = 150 bars

    CO2= 6.5 e-5 Pa-s

    CO2= 715 kg/m3porosity = 0.12195

    197

    199

    201

    203

    0 30 60 90 120 150 180

    time (days)

    Pressure

    (bars)

    k = 100 mD

    h = 20 m

    qCO2= 15.86 kg/s

    initial pressure = 150 bars

    CO2= 6.5 e-5 Pa-s

    CO2= 715 kg/m3

    porosity = 0.12

  • 8/13/2019 CO2 Injection Paper

    13/15

    Semi-log Plot

    195

    197

    199

    201

    203

    0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00 1000.00

    time (days)

    Pressure(bars)

    0.5

    0.7

    0.9

    1.1

    1.3

    1.5

    S

    lope(ba

    rs)

    Pressure Buildup

    Slope

    195

    197

    199

    201

    203

    0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00 1000.00

    time (days)

    P

    ressure

    (bars)

    0.5

    0.7

    0.9

    1.1

    1.3

    1.5

    Slope(b

    ars)

    Pressure Buildup

    Slope

    kh

    qm

    CO

    COCO

    2

    22

    4

    =

  • 8/13/2019 CO2 Injection Paper

    14/15

    How Good Is the Approximate Solution?

    Comparison to numerical simulation generated using

    TOUGH2 (Pruess et al., 2001)

    Pressure Buildup

    190

    195

    200

    205

    210

    0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00time (days)

    Pressure(bars)

    Numerical

    sf=0.225

    sf=0.23

    Pressure Buildup

    190

    195

    200

    205

    210

    0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00time (days)

    Press

    ure(bars)

    Numerical

    sf=0.225

    sf=0.23

  • 8/13/2019 CO2 Injection Paper

    15/15

    Summary A new approximate analytical solution for

    predicting pressure buildup during CO2 injection

    into brine formations has been developed

    Comparison to numerical simulations verifies the

    applicability of this solution to typical CO2

    sequestration scenarios Pressure transient analysis may provide a useful

    tool for monitoring CO2 sequestration operations,

    including: Validation of multiphase flow processes

    Front tracking

    Detection of permeability changes from CO2 injection