26
CNI - 2014 3 Questions You Should Never Ask in Evaluation/ Assessment: And a few you should! Presenters (in order of appearance) Chris Bourg, Stanford University, [email protected] Joshua Morrill, Morrill Solutions Research (MSR), [email protected] Glenda Morgan, University of Illinois Urbana, [email protected]

CNI - 2014

  • Upload
    matty

  • View
    43

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

3 Questions You Should Never Ask in Evaluation/ Assessment: … And a few you should!. Presenters (in order of appearance). Chris Bourg , Stanford University , mchris@ stanford.edu Josh ua Morrill , Morrill Solutions Research (MSR), joshua@ morrillsolutions.com - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: CNI - 2014

CNI - 2014

3 Questions You Should Never Ask in Evaluation/ Assessment:

…And a few you should!

Presenters (in order of appearance)

Chris Bourg, Stanford University, [email protected] Morrill, Morrill Solutions Research (MSR), [email protected] Morgan, University of Illinois Urbana, [email protected]

Page 2: CNI - 2014

CNI - 2014

Question #1

The ambiguous question

Page 3: CNI - 2014

Ambiguity in …• Wording

• Meaning

• Threshold

Page 4: CNI - 2014

Double-barreled questions• “Buy-back programs are a great idea for decreasing gun

ownership.”

• “Within the next 5 years, the use of e-books will be so prevalent among faculty & students that it will not be necessary to maintain library collections of hard copy books”

Page 5: CNI - 2014

Ambiguous meaning

Page 6: CNI - 2014

Less ambiguous

Page 7: CNI - 2014

Ambiguous thresholds• How much is enough?

• Fake data is your friend

Page 8: CNI - 2014

CNI - 2014

Question #2

Significance-Shminifigance…Is it meaningful?

Page 9: CNI - 2014

Overpowered Tests• Faculty use of digital resources (4400+ responses!)

• First order tests, EVERYTHING IS SIGNIFICANT! (= Slow…)• Implications for Learning Analytics

Page 10: CNI - 2014

Overpowered Tests• Faculty use of digital resources (4400+ responses!)

• First order tests, EVERYTHING IS SIGNIFICANT! (= Slow…)• Implications for Learning Analytics

If the phenomena we are trying to measure is the earthquake

The size of our sample determines if our seismograph is more or less sensitive.

Too FEW cases and we can only pick up on the BIG earthquakes.

Too MANY cases and every minor bump registers as an earthquake.

Page 11: CNI - 2014

Overpowered Tests• Faculty use of digital resources (4400+ responses!)

• First order tests, EVERYTHING IS SIGNIFICANT! (= Slow…)• Implications for Learning Analytics

If the phenomena we are trying to measure is the earthquake

The size of our sample determines if our seismograph is more or less sensitive.

Too FEW cases and we can only pick up on the BIG earthquakes.

Too MANY cases and every minor bump registers as an earthquake.

We are smarter than our tools. We can decide if we sound the alarm or not, but we need to make that decision mindfully!

GOLD NUGGET

Page 12: CNI - 2014

False Precision

• False precision (The bane of 1-10 scales)

Is there REALLY a difference between 8 & 9s? 6s and 7s?

Page 13: CNI - 2014

False Precision

• False precision (The bane of 1-10 scales)

There is error in every measurement! More scale precision does not necessarily mean more accuracy.

Is there REALLY a difference between 8 & 9s? 6s and 7s?

Good researchers are empathetic! How are the people who are participating in your research seeing/ understanding the process?

Page 14: CNI - 2014

Lots of things influence the statistical signifance / non-signifance of a finding

Chiefly…• The Sample Size

• The Effect Size

Page 15: CNI - 2014

Lots of things influence the statistical signifance / non-signifance of a finding

Chiefly…• The Sample Size

• The Effect Size

In most evaluations these are NOT optimum for significance testing…

Page 16: CNI - 2014

Lots of things influence the statistical signifance / non-signifance of a finding

Chiefly…• The Sample Size

• The Effect Size

In most evaluations these are NOT optimum for significance testing…

But --- EVEN WITHOUT SIGNIFICANCE --- evaluation results can still be important and meaningful.

Page 17: CNI - 2014

For Example…An Underpowered Test

% Agree & Strongly Agree

“The library provides a vital service to campus.”

Something going on here? …maybe but not statistically…4th Year (n=6)

3rd Year (n=4)

2nd Year (n=22)

1st Year (n=25)

Faculty (n=12)

66%

25%

85%

88%

83%

Page 18: CNI - 2014

For Example…An Underpowered Test

% Agree & Strongly Agree

“The library provides a vital service to campus.”

Something going on here? …maybe but not statistically…4th Year (n=6)

3rd Year (n=4)

2nd Year (n=22)

1st Year (n=25)

Faculty (n=12)

66%

25%

85%

88%

83%

At its best, research is a small flashlight in a dark room...

Data-driven decision making ≠ relinquishing personal judgment.

Page 19: CNI - 2014

Approach --especially underpowered data-- with these questions

Is this data suggesting something important for my core business or service?

Do I need more information in order to take action?

What --if anything--do I need to know in order to take meaningful action?

Do I REALLY

need this?

Page 20: CNI - 2014

CNI - 2014

Question #3

Questions you SHOULDN’T ask? …Probably about half of them

Page 21: CNI - 2014

The Length vs. Empathy Relationship

Research Length / Time Investment

for participants

Empathy for / with ParticipantsShort /

Low

Long

High

Page 22: CNI - 2014

Do you REALLY need to know that?

Page 23: CNI - 2014

Problems with too much data?

Page 24: CNI - 2014

The (often) false allure of longitudinal data

Page 25: CNI - 2014

A Few Suggested Readings

--From Josh-- How to Measure Anything by D.

Hubbard

--From Chris-- Evaluation: A

systematic Approach by Rossi, Lipsey &

Freeman --From Glenda-- Improving Survey Questions by F. Fowler -&- Research Methods in Anthropology by R. Bernard

Page 26: CNI - 2014

CNI - 2014

Questions for us?

Thank you!

Presenters (in order of appearance)

Chris Bourg, Stanford University, [email protected] Morrill, Morrill Solutions Research (MSR), [email protected] Morgan, University of Illinois Urbana, [email protected]