CMOS Digital Integrated Circuits 1 Lec 5 SPICE Modeling of MOSFET

CMOS Digital Integrated Circuits1

CMOS Digital Integrated Circuits

Lec 5

SPICE Modeling of MOSFET


SPICE Modeling of MOSFETS Goals

• Understand the element description for MOSFETs• Understand the meaning and significance of the various parameters

in SPICE model levels 1 through 3 for MOSFETs• Understand the basic capacitance models• Have a general notion of BSIM model parameters• Become award of some newer models• Understand the use and shortcomings of the models covered

Note: In the following, HSPICE = Star-HSPICE Rederences

• Massobrio, G., and P. Antognetti, Semiconductor Device Modeling with SPICE, 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill, 1993.

• Foty, D., MOSFET Modeling with SPICE – Principles and Practice, Prentice Hall PTR, 1997.

• StarHspice Manual, Avant! http://cmbsd.cm.nctu.edu.tw/~yumin/tutorial/hspice_qrg.pdf


The MOSFET Description LinesModel and Element

What does SPICE stand for?• Simulation Program with Integrated Circuit Emphasis

The MOSFET Model and Element Description Lines• Process and circuit parameters which apply to a particular class of

MOSFETS with varying dimensions are described for that class of MOSFETS in a single .model line in which + is used to denote line continuation.

• The dimensions are given on the element description line. In both, it is critical to watch the units; they are basically illogical!

• The SPICE element description line for a MOSFET has the following form: Mxxxxxxx nd ng ns <nb> mname <L=val W=val AD=val + AS=val PD=val PS=val NRD=val OFF IC=vds, vgs, vbs TEMP=val>

• All parameter value pairs between < and > are optional.


The MOSFET Description LinesElement Line (Continued)

• Additional optional HSPICE parameters: <RDC=val RSC=val M=val DTEMP=val GEO=val DELVTO=val>

• TEMP=val is not used on element line in HSPICE and not used for level 4 or 5 (BSIM) models.

• Parameter Definitions –

See http:\\cmbsd.cm.nctu.edu.tw\~yumin\tutorial\hspice_qrg.pdf


DC SPICE ModelsLevel 1 (Shichman-Hodges) DC Model

• Equations VT – Equation as derived previously ID – Equations as derived previously with linear mode equation times

(1+λVDS) for continuity across linear-saturation boundary. Both use Leff in place of L where:

Leff = L – 2 LD• Key Parameters: What do they represent? See Kang and Leblebici –

Table 4.1 NMOS, PMOS (obvious) – MOSFET channel type KP – process transconductance k‘

VTO (note O, not 0!) – zero substrate-bias threshold voltage VT0

GAMMA – substrate-bias or body-effect coefficient γ

PHI – twice the Fermi potential 2F

LAMBDA – channel length modulation λ


DC SPICE ModelsLevel 1 (Continued)

• Additional Parameters: What do they represent? LD – Lateral diffusion (If not present, may need to find Leff manually!) TPG – Type of gate material: 0 – A1, +1 – opposite to substrate, -1 –

same as substrate. Default +1. For the typical CMOS process, TPG = 1 for NMOS and – 1 for PMOS

NSUB – substrate impurity concentration NA (NMOS) ND (PMOS) NSS – Surface state density – Used to define surface component of VT0. TOX – Oxide thickness tox

U0 (note 0, not O) – Surface mobility µ0

RD, RS – Drain resistance, Source resistance RSH – Drain and Source sheet resistance (Ω/□□) • Derived Parameters. Note that if some parameters missing, others, if

present, can be used to derive them. E. g. NSUB to derive PHI, and TOX and U0 to derive KP. Question: What parameters to derive GAMMA? If the derivable parameters are present in the model, they will be used; if not, derived if possible from other parameters (and defaults), else, defined.


DC SPICE ModelsLevel 2

• What about defaults and units? See Table 4.1. of Kang and Leblebici• Other parameters in Level 1 are related to capacitance (later) or

irrelevant to digital applications. Level 2

• Analytical model that takes into account small geometry effects.• Equations that use most of the parameters are given in the text.• Parameters in addition to those for Level 1: NFS - Fast surface state density – Used in modeling subthreshold

condition. NEFF – Total channel charge coefficient – Empirical fitting

factor multiplied times NSUB in the calculation of the short channel effect γ. Used only in Level 2.

XJ – Junction depth of source and drain.VMAX – Maximum drift velocity for carriers use for modeling

velocity saturation.DELTA – Channel width effect on VT.


DC SPICE ModelsLevel 2 (Continued)

• XQC – Coefficient of channel charge share. Used to specify the portion of the channel charge attributed to the drain. Also, more importantly causes the Ward capacitive model to replace the Myer capacitance model. Both have their disadvantages.

• Next three parameters produce a multiplicative surface mobility degradation factor to multiply times KP and appear in Level 2 only.

UCRIT – Critical electric field for mobility degradation.

UEXP – Exponent coefficient for mobility degradation.

UTRA – Transverse field coefficient for mobility degradation. Coefficient of VDS in denominator of the factor.

• See Table 4.1. of Kang and Leblebici.


DC SPICE ModelsLevel 3

• More empirical and less analytical than Level 2; this permits improved convergence and simpler computation while sacrificing little accuracy.

• The parameters have beyond those in Level 2 (Note that the following Level 2 parameters are deleted: NEFF, UCRIT, UEXP, and UTRA.)

KAPPA – Saturation field factor. An empirical factor in the equation for the channel length in saturation.

ETA – static feedback on VT. Models effect of VDS on VT, i.e., DIBL (Drain-Induce Barrier Lowering)

THETA – Mobility modulation. Models the effect of VGS on surface mobility.

• See Table 4.1 of Kang and Leblebici.


Capacitance Models

• Level 1 through 3 use the Myer capacitance model (see Kang and Leblebici – Fig.3.32) as the default for the channel capacitance with the option of the Ward model (see Kang and Leblebici – Fig.4.8) in Levels 2 and 3.

• For the source and drain capacitances, note the junction equation with reverse bias V with VT, the thermal voltage,

I=Is(eV/VT-1)=-Is for V-4VT

and recall that

Cj =Cj0/(1-V/0)m

where m = 1/2 for an abrupt junction and m = 1/3 for a graded junction. The parameters:

IS – Bulk junction saturation current.

JS – Bulk junction saturation current density (used with junction areas)


Capacitance Models (Cont.)

PB - 0 – Bulk junction Potential (Built-in voltage)

CJ – Zero-bias bulk junction capacitance per m2

MJ – m – Bulk junction grading coefficient

CJSW – Zero-bias perimeter capacitance per m

MJSW – m – Perimeter capacitance grading coefficient

FC – Bulk junction forward bias coefficient – used in evaluating capacitance under strong forward bias.

CGBO – Gate-bulk overlap capacitance per meter of L; should be set to 0 if modeled as interconnect instead.

CGDO – Gate-drain overlap capacitance per meter of W

GDSO – Gate-source overlap capacitance per meter of W See Table 4.1. of Kang and Leblebici


More SPICE ModelsBSIM (Level 4)

An empirical model that includes:

all of the typical small geometry effects

the nonuniform doping profile for ion-implanted devices

an automatic parameter extraction program which produces a consistent set of parameters

ΔL and ΔW for the channel For BSIM parameters, see Foty – Table 8.1 We will not look at these parameters in detail, but it is quite important to

look at the form of the electrical parameters. Each electrical parameters P is represented by three process parameters P0, PL, and Pw associated with P

W

WLWP

LDLL

PPP

effeff

WL

0


SPICE ModelsBSIM (Cont.)

L and W are drawn dimensions and DL and DW are the net size changes in the drawn dimensions due to the entire sequence of fabrication steps. The difference shown give Leff and Weff. The equation for P allows for an adjustment of the electrical parameter as a function of the effective length and width of the channel

Parameter extraction uses devices sizes. P0 is for long, wide MOSFET. BSIM also uses a new approach to capacitance modeling that avoids the

difficulties of errors and lack of charge conservation in the Meyer model and the errors and convergence problems in the Ward model.

See Massobrio and Antognetti – p. 219 for trios of parameters. Note that model file has only numerical values identified by position; this is

an alternate form of the model that cryptic.


More SPICE ModelsHSPICE Level 28, BSIM2, BSIM3

HSPICE Level 13 is BSIM HSPICE Level 28 - a very popular modification of BSIM, but can only be

used in HSPICE BSIM2 (HSPICE Level 39) – typical model today for those not using

HSPICE BSIM3 Version 3.2 (HSPICE Level 49) – a complex new public domain

model that is frequently used today. This is our model unless otherwise specified. See http:/cmbsd.cm.nctu.edu.tw/~yumin/tutorial/n96g.L49


Which Model Should I Use?

Level 1: At best, for quick estimates not requiring accuracy. Very poor for small geometry devices. Viewed as obsolete by some.

Level 2: Due to convergence problems and slow computation rate, abandoned in favor of Level 3 or higher.

Level 3: Good for MOSFET down to about 2 microns. BSIM – Level 4 (HSPICE Level 13): good for small geometry MOSFETS

with L down to 1 micron and tox down to 150 Angstroms. Problems near Vsat; negative output conductance; discontinuity in current at VT. For submicron dimensions, replaced by BSIM2 and HSPICE Level 28.

BSIM2 (HSPICE Level 39): Good for small geometry MOSFETs with L down to 0.2 micron and tox down to 36 Angstroms.

HSPICE Level 28: BSIM with its problems solved; good choice for HSPICE users.

BSIM3 Version 3 (HSPICE Level 49): Most accurate, but complex.


Summary

Learned the element description line for MOSFET Reviewed the first generation SPICE model parameters, levels 1, 2, and 3 Reviewed the device capacitances and associated parameters for the BSIM

model Obtained a sense of the form of the parameters for the BSIM model Obtained an awareness of some of the newer models Obtained a comparative viewpoint of the models and their use.

Documents

CMOS Digital Integrated Circuits 1 Lec 5 SPICE Modeling of MOSFET