cm · 2011-05-15 · 1, united states air force q~.i cm air force reserve component i! avionic comm.kunication and navigation systems afsc 455x2 (por.erly 32ex0 and 328x) afpt 90-37p-318/819

1,

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

q~.i

cm

AIR FORCE RESERVE COMPONENT I!

AVIONIC COMM.kUNICATION AND NAVIGATION SYSTEMS

AFSC 455X2 (POR.ERLY 32EX0 AND 328X)

AFPT 90-37P-318/819 IJUE 19q9

lS'009OCCUPATIONAPAKALYSIS PROGRAM

USAF OCCUPATIONAL MEASUREMENT CENTERAIR TRAINING COMMAND

RANDOLPH AFS. TEXAS 78150-500

,;PROVED FOR PUBIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION !NLI;IWTED

........

DISTRIBUTION FORAFSC 455X2 (FORMERLY 328X0 and 328X1) OSR SUPPLEMENT AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS

OSR ANL TNG JOEpSUP EXT EXT iNV

AFLMC/LGM 1 1 SetAFMPC/DPMRPQ1 2ANGSC/LGM (ANDREWS AFB MD 20331-6008) 2 1 SetARMY OCCUPATIONAL SURVEY BRANCH 1CCAF/AYX 1DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER 2DET 3, USAFOMC (KEESLER AFB MS) 1 1 Set 1 SetHQ AFISC/DAP 2HQ AFRES/LGMMT (ROBINS AFB GA 31098-6001) 2 1 SetHQ ATC/DPAE 3 1 SetHQ ATC/TTOA 2 1 SetHQ MAC/DPAT 3 1 SetHQ MAC/TTGT 1 1 SetHQ SAC/DPAT 3 1 SetHQ SAC/TTGT 1 1 SetHQ TAC/DPATJ 3 1 SetHQ TAC/TTGT I I SetHQ USAF/DPPE 1HQ USAF/LEYM 1 I SetHRL/ID 1 im Set lm/lh SetHRL/MODS 2 im Set Im SetNGB/MP (WASH DC 20310) 1NODAC IUSAF/REPX (WASH DC 20330-1000) 1USMC (CODE TE-310) 13300 TCHTW/TTGX (KEESLER AFB MS) 3 1 Set 1 Set3300 TCHTW/TTS (KEESLER AFB MS) 1 1 Set3507 ACS/,DPKI 1USAFOMC/OMDQ 1USAFOMC/OMYXL 10 2m Sets 5 Sets

Set includes 4 extracts (1 each) for 328X0 USAF Reserves, 328X0 Air National

Guard, 328X1 USAF Reserves and 328X1 Air National Guard

Acceqqo-n For

m = microficheh = hard copy

DTIC

copy By_iNSpECTEO 1

4

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

P AGENUMBER

PREFACE .. .. ................. ............. ii

SUMMARY OF RESULTS .. .......... ................ iv

INTRODUCTION. .. ................. .............

Background. .. ................. .......

SLRJEY METHODOLOGY. .. ................. ........ 2

Inventory Development .. .. ................. .....Survey Administration .. .. ...................... 2Survey Sample .. .. ................. ........ 3

SPECIALTY JOBS (Career Ladder Structur2).. ........... .... 9

Overview of Specialty Jobs ....... 9Avionic Communications (AFSC 328X0) Job Structures ....... 10Avionic Navigation Systems (AFSC. 328X1) Job Structures........19

ANALYSIS OF DAFSC GROUPS .. ......... .............. 30

Avionic Communications (AFSC 328X0) .. .. .............. 32Avionic Navigation Systems (AFSC 328X1) .. .. ............ 35Summary. .. ......... ..................... 38

ANALYSIS OF AFR 39-1 SPECIALTY DESCRIPTIONS .. .. ............ 38

TRAINING ANALYSIS. .. ......... ................. 38

First-Enlistment Data. .. ..................... 38Specialty Training Standard (STS) and Plan of Instruction (P01)Review .. .......... ................... 42

Training Analysis Summary. .. ........ ............ 50

JOB SATISFACTION ANALYSIS. .. ........ .............. 50

ADDITIONAL ISSUES. .. ......... ................. 57

IMPLICATIONS .. ......... .................... 64

APPENDIX A. .. ................. ............ 67

APPENDIX B. .. ................. ............ 68

APPENDIX C .. ......... ...................... 69

APPENDIX D0.. ......... ...................... 70

PREFACE

This report presents the results of an Air Force occupational survey ofthe Avionic Communications (AFSC 328X0) and Avionic Navigation Systems (AFSC328X1) career ladders for Air Force Reserve Component personnel in the USAFReserve and the Air National Guard. Authority for conducting specialty sur-veys is contained in AFR 35-2. Computer products used in this report areavailable for use by operations and training official.

The Air Force Occupational Survey Program has been in existence since~GE, 'hen initial rcsearzh _a. ,.2crtaken by the Human Resources LaboraLory(HPL) to develop a methodology for gathering and analyzing occupational infor-mation. In 1967, an occupational survey program was established within theAir Training Command and surveys were produced annually for 12 enlisted spe-cialties. In 1972, the program was expanded to conduct occupatiunal surveyscovering 51 career ladders annually. In late 1976, the program was againexpanded to include the survey of officer utilization Fields, to permit spe-cial management applications projects, and to support interservice or jointservice occupational analysis.

Mr William C. Cosgrove, Occupational Analyst, developed the surveyinstrument for AFSC 328X0, and Second Lieutenant Wendy Limbaugh, OccupationalAnalyst, developed the survey instrument for AFSC 328X1. Mr Cosgrove analyzedthe survey data and wrote the final report. Technical Sergeant Joe Seitz andMs Olga Velez provided computer programming support, and Mr Richard Ramos pro-vided administrative support. This report has been reviewed and approved forrelease by Lieutenant Colonel Charles D. Gorman, Chief, Airman AnalysisBranch, Occupational Analysis Division, USAF Occupational Measurement Center.

Copies of this report are distributed to Air Staff sections, major com-mands, and other interested training and management personnel. Additionalcopies may be requested from the USAF Occupational Measurement Center, Atten-tion: Chief, Occupational Analysis -. sion (OMY), Randolph AFB, Texas78150-5000.

BOBBY P. TINDELL Colonel, USAF JOSEPH S. TARTELLCommander Chief, Occupational Analysis DivisionUSAF Occupational Measurement USAF Occupational MeasurementCenter Center

iii

SUMMARY OF RESULTS

1. Survey Coverage: Inventory booklets were distributed to USAF Reserve andAir National Guard (ANG) personnel in the Avionic Communications (AFSC 328XO)a,- Avionic Navigation Systems (AFSC 328XI) career ladders during the winterand spring of 1988. Twenty-nine percent of the USAF Reserve Avionic Communi-cations personnel and 37 percent of the ANG Avionic Communications personnel:-sponded to the survey and comprise the AFSC 328X0 survey samples. The AFSC

Xl survey samples include 36 percent of the USAF Reserve Avionic Navigationystems personnel and 42 percent of the ANG Avionic Navigation Systems

p"rsonnel.

2. Career Ladder Structure: Both the USAF Reserve and the ANG Communica-tions (AFSC 328XO) survey samples had two separate jobs identified. One wasdirectly involved with the performance of technical duties and tasks withinthe career ladder, while the other consisted of supervisory duties and tasks.Jobs from the Avionic Navigation Systems (AFSC 328XI) survey data broke outslightly differently for the USAF Reserve and the ANG. Three jobs were iden-tified for the USAF Reserve: a general maintenance technically-ori-ited job,a supervisory job, and a quality assurance inspector job. The ANG survey datat -oduced four jobs. Three are the same as the USAF Reserve jobs, with thefourth being a Maintenance Controller. All jobs identified have counterpartsin the Active-duty Military survey.

. Career Ladder Progression: The 3- and 5-skill level jobs were quitetechnical in nature. Seven-skill level members continue to perform the sametechnical duties, while reporting some increase in responsibility for super-visory and managerial duties.

4. Training Analysis: Due to the RIVET WORKFORCE merger of AFSCs 328X0 and328X1 into AFSC 455X2 in October 1988, the three Specialty Training Standards(STS) developed for that AFSC were analyzed. The USAF Reserve and ANG datawere compared to the elements of all three STSs. Data for these two groupssupported all three documents, and even supported a number of elements notsupported by the Active-duty Military sample data. Survey data were also com-pared to the 45532 001 and more elements of the POI were supported than hadbeen by the Active-duty Military data.

5. Additional Issues: The ANG Bureau requested that information concerningenlistment and reenlistment incentives be gathered on Air National Guardsmen.The majority of ANG personnel sampled had not received any specific incentive

to join the ANG. The majority of those who did receive an incentive indicatedthey would have joined the ANG even without the incentive. Civilian job con-siderations was the major reason given for not remaining in the ANG.

6. Implications: Full-time USAF Reserve and ANG personnel perform some ofthe same jobs as their Active-duty Military counterparts. USAF Reserve andANG survey data support the training documents and personnel from these compo-nents should be consulted before changes are made. Surveying Air Force

iv

Reserve component personnel is feasible and should be considered where train-ing has a definite impact. Survey adminitration should be controlled throughunit distribution.

v

SUPPLEMENTAL OCCUPATIONAL SURVEY REPORTRESERVE COMPONENT PERSONNEL

AVIONIC COMMUNICATIONS AND NAVIGATION SYSTEMS CAREER LADDERS(AFSC 328X0 AND AFSC 328X1)

INTRODUCTION

This is a report on the occupational survey of Air Force ReserveComponent (USAF Reserve and Air National Guard (ANG)) personnel in the AvionicCommunications (AFSC 328X0) and Avionic Navigation Systems (AFSC 328X1) careerladders completed by the USAF Occupational Measurement Center (USAFOMC) inMarch 1989. This report is a supplement to the Active-duty Military Occupa-tional Survey Report (OSR) of the Avionic Communications and Navigation Sys-tems career ladders published in March 1989. These surveys were requested bythe 3300th Technical Training Wing, Keesler Technical Training Center, toobtain current task and equipment data for use in evaluation of each careerladder training program. A RIVET WORKFORCE-directed merger of these twocareer ladders with the Doppler portion of AFSC 328X4 into the new Communica-tion and Navigation Systems career ladder (AFSC 455X2) and the combining oftheir training programs, on 31 October 1988, dictated the results of the twosurveys be reported in one report. ' , ..

These surveys mark the first time that all traditional and full-time Air -.

Force Reserve Component (USAF Reserve and ANG) personnel of any career ladderwere included in an occupational survey. Full-time Air Force Reserve Compo-nent personnel participated in an earlier Corrosion Control Occupational Sur-vey. The inclusion of Air Force Reserve Component personnel in these surveyswas requested by the ANG Bureau with the concurrence of Headquarters, USAFReserve Components. The rationale for inclusion of Air Force Reserve Compo-nent personnel in these occupational surveys was to gather data on them asseparate groups, analyze their responses just as the Active-duty Militaryresponses are analyzed, and determine whether there are discernible differ-ences between Active-duty Military personnel and Air Force Reserve Componentpersonnel. Results of these surveys and those from the earlier AFSC 427X1,Corrosion Control survey, will help determine the feasibility and methodologyfor surveying USAF Reserve and Air National Guard personnel in the future.

Backqround

USAF Reserve and ANG personnel have held Avionic Communications andAvionic Navigation Systems AFSCs since the career fields were established in1951. Avionic Communications (AFSC 328X0) personnel provide their organiza-tions with overall maintenance support for avionic communications equipmentand test equipment. The Avionic Navigation Systems (AFSC 328X1) airmen main-tain avionic navigation systems equipment and related test equipment for theirunits.

APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED

a u nuunn m m m nnm mlm I 1

Entry into these career ladders for USAF Reserve and ANG personneloccurred in at least two ways. One was where individuals joined from Active-duty Military already qualified in the AFSC. Another was where individualsentered the USAF Reserve or ANG from civilian life and were selected to attendthe aporopriate tPchnical training school. Completion of the training schoolqualified the airmen as 3-skill level personnel in their respective fields.

Additional information concerning the backgrounds of these AFSCs can befound in the BackQround section of the Active-duty Military OSR.

SURVEY METHODOLOGY

Inventory Development

Data for these surveys were collected using USAF Job Inventory AFPT90-328-417 (October 1987) for AFSC 328X0 and USAF Job Inventory AFPT90-328-819 (October 1987) for AFSC 328XI. The development of each inventoryis described in more detail in the Inventory Development section of theActive-duty Military OSR. At least two of the subject-matter experts inter-viewed were members of the USAF Reserve.

Specific questions were added to the background section of the job inven-tory booklets of each AFSC to help identify USAF Reserve and ANG personnel andtheir duty status. At the request of the ANG Bureau, questions concerningretention of ANG personnel were also included. Data gathered on these ques-tions are discussed in the ADDITIONAL ISSUES section of this report.

Survey Administration

From December 1987 through April 1988, while Consolidated Base PersonnelOffices at operational bases worldwide were administering the respective sur-veys to Avionic Communications and Navigations Systems Active-duty Militarypersonnel, USAF Reserve and ANG personnel were also completing the Job Inven-tories at home. Unlike the first survey of Air Force Reserve Component per-sonnel in the Corrosion Control Career Ladder (AFSC 427XI), where the jobinventories were sent to points of contact at the individual's unit, these jobinventories were sent directly to the individual at his or her home address.Names and home addresses of the Air Force Reserve Component participants camefrom computer-generated mailing lists provided by the Air Force MilitaryPersonnel Center (AFMPC), Randolph Air Force Base, Texas.

All individuals who filled out an inventory first completed an identifi-cation and biographical information section. Next, they answered questions inthe background portion of the inventory, where USAF Reserve and ANG personnelanswered additional questions not required to be answered by Active-duty Mili-tary personnel. They were then directed to go through the booklet and checkeach task performed in their current job. Finally, they were asked to go backand rate eacn task they had ckiEJ . d using a 9-point scale reflecting relative

2

time spent on each task compared to all other tasks. Ratings ranged frcm I(indicating a very small amount of timc spent) to 9 (indicating a very largeawount of time spent). The relative time spent on tasks was computed by first'x~talinj all rating values on the inventory. Then the rating value for each

divided by this total and the result multiplied by 100. The percent7'-e soent ratings were used with the percent members performing values to

help describe the various groups in the career ladder.

Survey Sample

All Air Force Reserve Component personnel in each career ladder whose,name and address were on the AFMPC listings were provided survey booklets. Anaccompanying letter explained the survey and requested that the addressee com-plete and return the booklet to USAFOMC in a preaddressed postage paid enve-lope provided.

Tables 1 and 2 show the number of USAF Reserve personnel in the surveysample of each AFSC. Tables 3 and 4 provide similar information for the ANGsjrvey samples. The 141 USAF Reserve respondents in the AFSC 32?':0 surveyrepresent approximately 29 percent of those eligible, while in the AFSC 328X1survey the 168 individuals represent approximately 36 percent of the eligiblepersonnel. The 190 ANG participants in the AFSC 328X0 survey representapproximately 37 percent of the eligible personnel and in the AFSC 328XI sur-Ly the 266 airmen are approximately 42 percent of those eligible. These sur-

vey sample percentages are not as favorable as those for the Active-dutyMilitary samples reported in the Active-duty Military OSR. They are also notas high as a previous Air Force Reserve Component survey of the CorrosionControl career ladder (Ar-Se 427Xi) where L;,e samples were 51 percent for theUSAF Reserve personnel and 52 percent for the ANG. The reason for thisreduced percentage of returns appears to be the result of not having the sur-veys go through a unit for control purposes, as the Active-Duty Military sur-veys and the previous Air Force Reserve Component survey did. It should benoted, however, t~at the samples, while comparatively low, are adequate foranalysis.

Table 5 shows the percentage of survey respondents by command for theConmmunications survey and Table 6 gives the same type of information for theNavigations Systems survey. Table 7 provides selected background data forboth USAF Reserve and ANG personnel in the Communications surveys and Table 8snows similar data for both components in the Navigation Systems surveys.Although many of the respondents in each su. ey work for their specific compo-nent full-time in a civilian capacity (i.e., Air Reserve Technicians (ART),Air Guard Reserve (AGR), or Air National Guard Technician (ANGT)), they arealso military members of that component. The surveys were designed to gatherdata about the individuals as military personnel and no civilian grade struc-ture was included. The traditional Reservist or Guardsman are those personnelwho do not work full-time for their components, but perform on a part-timebasis at unit drills.

3

TABLE I

PERSONNEL CATEGORIES OF USAF RESERVE SAMPLE(AFSC 328X0)

NUMBER PERCENTNUMBER IN OF

CATEGORY ASSIGNED SAMPLE ASSIGNED

AIR RESERVE TECHNICIAN 118 45 38%TRADITIONAL RESERVIST 372 96 26%

TOTAL 490 141 29%

UNIT RESERVIST 459 130 28%IMA RESERVIST 31 11 36%

TOTAL 490 141 29%

TABLE 2

PERSONNEL CATEGORIES OF USAF RESERVE SAMPLE(AFSC 328X1)



AIR RESERVE TECHNICIAN 156 81 52%TRADITIONAL RESERVIST 314 87 28%

TOTAL 470 168 36%

UNIT RESERVIST 454 161 36%IMA RESERVIST 16 7 44%

TOTAL 470 168 36%

4

TABLE 3

PERSONNEL CATEGORIES OF AIR NATIONAL GUARD SAMPLE(AFSC 328X0)


"ATEGORY ASSIGNED SAMPLE ASSIGNED

AIR NATIONAL GUARD TECHNICIAN 170 81 48%TRADITIONAL GUARDSMEN 339 104 31%ACTIVE GUARD RESERVE 7 5 71%

TOTAL 516 190 37%

TABLE 4

PERSONNEL CATEGORIES OF AIR NATIONAL GUARD SAMPLE(AFSC 328X1)



AIR NATIONAL GUARD TECHNICIAN 234 127 54%TRADITIONAL GUARDSMEN 390 123 32%AIR GUARD RESERVE 16 16 100%

TOTAL 640 266 42%

TABLE 5

COMMAND DISTRIBUTION OF AFSC 328X0RESERVE COMPONENT PERSONNEL

(PERCENT OF SAMPLE)

AIRUSAF NATIONAL

COMMAND RESERVE GUARD

TAC 16 53SAC 9 17MAC 62 26AFRES 9 0OTHER 4 4

TOTAL USAF RESERVE SURVEYED = 490 TOTAL AIR NATIONAL GUARD SURVEYED = 516TOTAL USAF RESERVE IN SAMPLE = 141 TOTAL AIR NATIONAL GUARD IN SAMPLE 190PERCENT SURVEYED IN SAMPLE = 29% PERCENT SURVEYED IN SAMPLE = 37%

TABLE 6

COMMAND DISTRIBUTION OF AFSC 328X1RESERVE COMPONENT PERSONNEL

(PERCENT OF SAMPLE)

AIRUSAF NATIONAL

COMMAND RESERVE GUARD

TAC 10 50SAC 5 16MAC 63 33AFRES 20 0OTHER 2 1

TOTAL USAF RESERVE SURVEYED = 470 TOTAL AIR NATIONAL GUARD SURVEYED = 640TOTAL USAF RESERVE IN SAMPLE = 168 TOTAL AIR NATIONAL GUARD IN SAMPLE = 266PERCENT SURVEYED IN SAMPLE = 36% PERCENT SURVEYED IN SAMPLE = 42%

6

TABLE 7

SELECTED BACKGROUND DATA FORMEMBERS OF 328X0 SURVEY SAMPLE

AIRUSAF NATIONAL

RESERVE GUARD

NUMBER IN GROUP 141 190

GRADE (PERCENT OF SAMPLE)

E-1 THRU E-3 3% 5%E-4 4% 12%E-5 45% 30%E-6 31% 37%E-7 17% 16%

DAFSC (PERCENT OF SAMPLE)

32830 3% 2%32850 36% 44%32870 61% 54%

PERCENT SUPERVISING 40% 30%

PERCENT PERSONNEL CATEGORIES

AIR RESERVE TECHNICIAN 33%TRADITIONAL RESERVIST 67%AIR NATIONAL GUARD TECHNICIAN 43%TRADITIONAL GUARDSMEN 55%ATR GUARD RESERVE (AGR) 2%

AVERAGE "IMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED 325 321

7

TABLE 8

SELECTED BACKGROUND DATA FORMEMBERS OF 328X1 SURVEY SAMPLE

AIRUSAF NATIONAL

RESERVE GUARD

NUMBER IN GROUP 168 266

GRADE (PERCENT OF SAMPLE)

E-1 THRU E-3 2% 5%E-4 4% 14%E-5 34% 27%E-6 43% 32%E-7 16% 22%

DAFSC (PERCENT OF SAMPLE)

32830 3% 3%32850 43% 40%32870 54% 56%

PERCENT SUPERVISING 40% 59%

PERCENT PERSONNEL CATEGORIES

AIR RESERVE TECHNICIAN 48%TRADITIONAL RESERVIST 52%AIR NATIONAL GUARD TECHNICIAN 48%TRADITIONAL GUARDSMEN 46%AIR GUARD RESERVE (AGR) 6%

AVERAGF NUMBER OF TASKS PERFORMED 361 301

8

SPECIALTY JOBS(Career Ladder Structure)

A USAF occupational analysis begins with an examination of the careerladder structure of jobs performed by personnel of the AFSC. Each individualin the sample performs a set of tasks, called a job. For the purpose of orga-nizing individual jobs into similar units of work, an automated job clusteringprogram is used. This hierarchical grouping program is a basic part of theComprehensive Occupational Data Analysis Program (CODAP) system for job analy-sis. Each individual job description (all the tasks performed by that indi-vidual and the relative amount of time spent on those tasks) in the sample iscompared to every other job description in terms of tasks performed and therelative amount of time spent on each task in the job inventory. The auto-mated system is designed to locate the two job descriptions with the mostsimilar tasks and percent time ratings and combine them to form a compositejob description. In successive stages, new members are added to initialgroups or new groups are formed based on the similarity of tasks performed andsimilar time ratings in the individual job descriptions.

The basic identifying group used in the hierarchical job structuring pro-cess is the job. When there is a substantial degree of similarity betweenjobs, they are grouped together and identified as a ob cluster. Specializedjobs, too dissimilar to fit within a job cluster, are labeled independentjobs. The job structure information resulting from this grouping process (thevarious jobs within the career ladder) can be used to evaluate the accuracy ofcareer ladder documents (AFR 39-1 Specialty Descriptions and Specialty Train-ing Standards) and to gain a better understanding of current utilization pat-terns. The above terminology will be used in the discussion of career ladderstructures.

Overview of Specialty Jobs

Each AFSC was administered separately, providing two distinct data files.The USAF Reserve and ANG data relating to each AFSC were also separated intounique files. This created, in effect, four separate and distinct groups toanalyze. The jobs for each of the four groups are individually discussed.Information for each AFSC, displayed in tabular form, will however, includeUSAF Reserve and Air National Guard data. When appropriate, Active-duty Mili-tary data will also be displayed for comparison analysis.

Within the respective component subparagraphs, each job will include astage (STG) number shown beside the title which is a reference to computerprinted information. The number of personnel in each job (N) is also shown.The jobs described in the following subparagraphs are all part of the overallAvionic Communications or Navigation Systems career ladders. For the sake ofbrevity, "Avionic Communications" or "Avionic Navigation Systems" is assumedto be an element of each job title in the respective sections and will not beincluded in the job titles identified.

9

Avionic Communications (AFSC 328X0) Job Structures

Table 9 shows the relative time spent in each duty for the Avionic Commu-

nications, (AFSC 328X0) job groups of both the USAF Reserve and ANG. Table 10provides selected background data for AFSC 328X0 jobs found in both the USAF

Reserve and ANG.

USAF Reserve Specialty Jobs: Survey data for AFSC 328X0 USAF Reserve person-nel show a career ladder with two distinct jobs. One is a job cluster withtechnical AFSC-specific responsibilities for the maintenance of avionic commu-nications equipment within their organizations. The second is a supervisorjob with very little technical responsibilities. Appendix A contains tasklistings for the jobs performed by USAF Reserve personnel within AFSC 328XO.

Based on task similarity and relative time spent, the two jobs performedby USAF Reserve 328X0 personnel are illustrated in Figure 1 and are describedbelow. These two jobs represent 91 percent of the survey population, with theremaining 9 percent performing tasks which did not group them into a specificjob or with either defined job.

I. GENERAL MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN CLUSTER (STGO08, N=118). This jobcluster is the technical AFSC-specific job with broad responsibilities in theavionic communications maintenance area and includes 84 percent of the sample.Both flightline and field shop tasks are inherent in this job. The averagenumber of tasks for this job (192) exemplifies a wide range. Thirty-six per-cent of the relative time is spent on the Ultra High Frequency (UHF) radio,Interphone, and High Frequency (HF) radio systems. Another 21 percent isspent on general avionic systems maintenance, with 8 percent devoted to admin-istrative tasks. Eight other communications systems account for 23 percent ofthe relative time spent. Three percent of the relative time is spent on eachof the flightline and field shop maintenance of navigation systems, and theremaining time is distributed among the other duties. Table 11 provides exam-ples of tasks representative of this job.

There are three subgroups in this job cluster. All subgroups work on thesame systems, but differ as to the relative time spent working on those sys-tems. As an example, personnel in each of the three subgroups report main-taining UHF Radio Systems (Duty G), but their average percent of relative timespent differs and is 11, 20, and 18.

Members of this job cluster report an average grade of E-5 with 56 per-cent having a 7-skill level DAFSC. Thirty-two percent of the incumbents arefull-time personnel, with 68 percent coming from the Traditional Reservistranks.

II. SUPERVISOR (STGO19, N=1O). This job, with 7 percent of the samplepopulation, provides nontechnical supervision for this career ladder in theUSAF Reserves and has responsibility for organizing, planning, administrating,evaluating, inspecting, directing, implementing, and training functions.

i0(

m- qd Lr) 00 00 -4 - m\J t

Cd.)j

LU

of C, LI.) %0 .0ko(DLO x- ,-4 -4 -44

DC)

ILUj 4C C\j C:)4 (n) r- M ' ) C),-4 C.) (JZ: CJ-1 Nj -4 -4-- 4

LUJ CD X-

C) C) Of -io. ~ N C ' (JN -i 4 C) , -~C! CD Zf- L-) (NJ 1-M: LJJ<LU

C) DLL- / LUL J

c1LQ 0cr : 4 ~ C%7j- OC -A> C')- C-,4' NJ f'U- LU J .: m -4

F-- C:)< -< Z: -LLU 0 < V U<L

2E C')

-< LU

L <LUJ LU >- C:) -LUL m) (A) cl C) '4 H

L) =)E M: (A H-C)- FO HLUH- LUJ m (.) ci

<'J" -4 '--' LU LU C)LU C) M JAV) J C)' H- f -jLUJ l.>- C. LU Vd)

LLJ~ ~ ~ F- Of X )x O >- M >LU ;z < LL. (A (A C.)

LLJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (Z V)--L-I- - )LJL-L

LU>- X: LU cL )LL A = CLU V--() >. of>. >- >- -. LU

~>LU (A-QLULUCDLZ F ) UUEL ELUL, H- LU(

IL r =D < = LU = LU H C) Vd) s- H- 0)(D L.) LU Or,- H - Cr - >- (A (A) LUI>- M /) i-4 -M co LU -s LUJ LL ) U(ALU(AL)>- V) Of U) 0>- Cl"DI-Z, z-Q = ~ ULAavL LL =H C) = uc-> ( UL- V(. H-'-) HA L L- V i )LUc-C) cx u

X:=)=< -- CD J C CD -4 LUC) < MC) LC)m LUJ H- C)s--3 of4O-I4C) <ZI .z<-J < V) -i -O < < LLo a- (A LU LIJ

ClQ~- -« -< < 0 w-' = = M0-XL cr w -> x - ~LUJ j m ) ce C

'- 0-4 LLUH- CC C '~ D - M H- M< L = Wx =) EZi L>- w m = DJ< W- m;m m z MLU L)L Q- ci~-- O LHLL 4-)

CD CDLU CD (D CD (D cl 0LL (D _-xCD3 u C9CD~ = = mC Z MC:z CD M 1- '-r - '-4 LU P--4 LU) t-4 -4 - .'-- LU '-

=DUH~ " V)

0 a OO - - - FHI-HHC- H-mCDC< V =W > C) 0C3P4C) -4C)ZP-

LU ceLULUL)< V)< << m <u<< LLt--4 00 -4 -'0. .a- x E E~a

M) < L) M WLL D -3 :A- -- X: )

<L)l

C,)

LL.

IL V '. 4)- V

LU u

LU <U<L

CL)=)' <CI) wU

LUU LU

.7-'LU , j

CD O

LULU o -o-'l LU C

LUV ui <) LUw-4 % 4L

Ln=

C) L) I- '-'-

'-4 0- CCD F- 0 <- )

C, ) Ln L LU m U Q-4 C -4C)

LU V LL) LU (0- <- ~V) < ~ %>~ LI)>

CU ui LU P-4II-w 0 i - Ln =- C 1-4

LU m) -N OI- cniL JLI=w) L iJ C-) Le)I I.-Ac '

C)' C) mJ :Fi 'C3 6 I -0LUi . LU4 C) F--i) =D UiV) -j

w 4 -4 I) CDUL V) LUL LA C/

r>-, = -C )L.L wV) 4 C) Ca- uLi =D Ln LL = 41

w CDi w V-)< CD t C

LA- V) < X: C) = - C<X- LU LA C L> LU M0 LL)I-C L.) C) L.-i Z

V) L-) >- M LJ <-CLI) P4 U '<-~< C < 0 o)L ) 4 4 CLU 0 (DX < <>'.<I< U'..=. LZLI L U 14LL

0- LL -0( L) M - F

0 0' J L .) ?- L

C-9F- C - C ( 3 (12

>x C-1 00) CD) C) 0 0)O

LLU '4.4 -4 ,-4

0~l

CD

< 2:

Ln < c H<LU 4 r- m~ m ~ Rd Lfl .- 4 C ) M -1. -4 cv) C\j C'l -z LO

=> LU LU

CDJ

000

C-3 C)C a )

LA- CD or-o CD C:0 C, L COf 1-4 C: C) 0O' o -C M t. K-

LUJ

V)a LU

LkU

M: -< c~j :C-1 V) 2:<

LL- <LU- -1-4 00 m Id- C O ci r)n 1 M 'L0' 00 (7

L U .f -4 '-4

CCDC,

H-I 0 <z

C-,L U i- ) L

4-" C3 H- of ULU LUi C ) C)U) <c

C-U) H-o L<cn LL0L <-- of-4 L

- L)UCH LULJ ~ J

U)J H- n ) O

0 0 LJI.L crN LJLL z L0

LU Q<. H-'~c LU V) i- C3 V)

C) 000 m< H-LU LHtLUJ~IL)q C.)L I-) (D H-Uu 0i 0j-o

CD CD M _ 1<4 L <_09 LUj H- mC =O4- D -4trz) CD4

LL a_'- < ) = 14LU U)Z V <H-< - <

01- H-H 0e)U- (A LH LU H-H--H-Hw~~a < ~ l.t-4 =)ZC = ZaZZZ <C -

C) LL-LL (J\3C' cr CI " I: M " =LJU LU ZUi=LAJ

m) C) L M LcLU m

(< ~LLU < ~ Q" < ~ LAJLU < LU LUILU LLU

13

00

C,)

QLLJ 0

~) *-

LLI n

14

-J =

<-

<C3

L41U

U

0LU

LL<ZAJ0

a.LU Ia. LULU. C

Lj VLU LU L- U.

OLU LU J cL L

flZO C.Al LLJ b4

CD LLJ LLU)Q-Ilj 0j wlLJ

.7W 0 z -0 KJ <000LA W I-- LU =(= I L&J

-e .~u0 & - LLA 4A

I..z C.I *-L C1 w~w > LUWUS L

eflU 0- LJO )I- >- 414n L" = ci =

= U -4 Wu LA U LLL

4n . LAJ 06LA. Z CLCL)I- LAJ 4JW <U M U

V) I- oo ( u -LAJ. LA.Z 39~f 0 c 3

-i~E LL. L UW

OI = m=U S- LIJLi 09 c1c

Eighty-three _Percent of the relative time of this job is taken up with tasksin those functional areas. Even though this job is not technically oriented,5 percent of the relative time is spent performing general avionic systemsmaintenance tasks, with the remaining 12 percent spread over the communica-tions maintenance responsibilities of the career ladder. The average gradefor the incumbents is E-7, with 100 percent of them having a 7-skill level.Sixty percent report being full-time personnel and 40 percent report beingTraditional Reservists. Typical tasks of the 95 average performed arereflected in Table 12.

ANG Specialty Jobs: Survey data for ANG airmen with AFSC 328X0 show a careerladder with the same two jobs found in the USAF Reserve sample. These twojobs represent 94 percent of the survey population, with the remaining 6 per-cent performing tasks which did not group them with either defined job or eachother. Task listings for these jobs are contained in Appendix B. The twojobs performed by ANG Communications personnel are illustrated in Figure 2 anddescribed below.

I. GENERAL MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN CLUSTER (STGO08, N=173). This jobcluster, with 91 percent of the ANG sample, is the technical AFSC-specific jobwith broad responsibilities in the avionic communications maintenance area.The average number of tasks performed (195) indicates a broad job whichincludes responsibility of both flightline and field shop tasks. Thirty-fivepercent relative time was spent on the UHF radio, Interphone, and HF radiosystems with another 21 percent spent on general avionic systems maintenanceand 9 percent devoted to administrative tasks. Seven other communicationssystems account for 17 percent of the relative time spent. Seven percent ofthe relative time is spent on cross utilization tasks, with the last 9 percentof the relative time spread among the remaining duties. The tasks represen-tative of this job cluster are the same as those for the Active-duty Militaryand USAF Reserve jobs (Table 11).

There are four subgroups in this job cluster. They differ because of theamount of time reported on the different systems. All of the same systems aremaintained by each subgroup, but the relative time spent on them varies. Anexample is Duty L, Maintaining Interphone Systems., where the survey datareflects the percentages of relative time spent by the incumbents of the sub-groups as 10, 20, 13, and 9.

Members of this Job cluster report an average grade of E-6 with 52 per-cent having a 7-skill level DAFSC. Fifty-four percent of the incumbents areTraditional Guardsmen, with 46 percent coming from full-time ANG Technician(43 percent) and Air Guard Reserve (3 percent) ranks.

II. SUPERVISOR (STGO19, N--6). This Job provides the nontechnical super-vision of ANG AFSC 328X0 personnel, representing 3 percent of the sample.Ninety-two percent of the relative time of this job is spent on tasks in theareas of organizing, planning, administration, evaluating, inspecting, direct-ing, implementing, and training. These supervisors spend only 8 percent of

16

F- -i

coo~ r

LLJ- L/

X:~ Of~r~0 e'LJc~

Of- I-<

Q- cOf e

LUCALJ L) L LU I

LL :z F- I-

M CU LU J V' CU-)

'-4 V t-)

LLJLL V) c- X: L)JS

LUDUCD M~ X:- LU LL. LL

I-JCZ LL ) LL U 1- = ~ 000-,=

CO ) -3 - Du M LU LUJLUP-4V (n =LU "-4 C 0 0cc-4LU MLU C) Lt/ - CL

m V) L) - M< < 2:4-) zh le lZE cC NeiaLJ D= W V) (nV)V

:e 0 i -0-LJV) 0L'C))0C 4 «<<LU v)> C )M / - =O =0 Im -I-

LUi LU 3 C ce :r W - > LL LLLL-

CL i J UIEO-LC) = < F±J- -4- 0 CDLUCL:m LLJLCD X: 0 M <LA-4-

") = 0- L. -)Du 4 =O

V), L(JQF 0- 1- J 1-4 LJ 0- <-o LILL

= ) - - -(41 Lfl =: M L : = 0

0 a c)- fC M L.). CD 0) LUU

WL<L~U <LU mL L

4-17 D(

OCJ

C11.4

V-C)

18

their time on tasks related to the technical aspects of the career ladder.,he grade for the incumbents is E-7, with 100 percent of them having a 7-skilllevel. Sixty-seven percent report being full-time personnel and 33 percentare Traditional Guardsmen. Typical tasks of the 89 average tasks performedare shown in Table 12.

.cmponent Comparisons: One of the major reasons to include USAF Reserve andANG personnel in the Avionic Communications survey was to determine if thepersonnel of each component are doing the same work as each other and if theyare doing the same types of jobs. The two jobs performed by USAF Reservepersonnel appear to be the same as those performed by ANG personnel and areDasically the same as the two jobs, with the same titles, found in the Active-cuty Military OSR. As reflected ir Table 9, the percentages of relative timespent on duties are extremely close and supports the premise that the jobs arethe same. The tasks performed by personnel in each component job listed havevery similar percent members performing statistics (Tables 11 and 12). Thisis also a strong indication that the airmen in the Active-duty Military, the6SAF Reserve, and the ANG samples perform these two jobs in common.

Avionic Navigation Systems (AFSC 328X1) Job Structures

Table 13 reflects the relative time spent in each duty for the Avionic,,avigation Systems (AFSC 328XI) job groups of both the USAF Reserve and ANG.Table 14 shows selected background data for AFSC 328X1 jobs found in both theUSAF Reserve and ANG.

USAF Reserve Job Specialty Jobs: Responses from USAF Reserve 328X1 personnelin the survey sample indicate a career ladder with three jobs. Analysis iden-tified one job cluster and two independent jobs. The job cluster is technicalin nature and AFSC-specific. The other two jobs are supervisory and adminis-trative, with limited technical tasks performed.

These three jobs represent 93 percent of the sample population, with theremaining 7 percent performing tasks which did not group them with either

defined job or each other. Based on task similarity and relative time spent,tne division of jobs performed by AFSC 328X1 personnel is illustrated in Fig-ure 3, and a description of each job is provided below. Appendix C containstask listings for the jobs performed by USAF Reserve personnel within AFSC328X1.

I. GENERAL MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN CLUSTER (STGO15, N=139). This is theAFSC-specific core job and is performed by the largest single group of 328X1USAF Reserve personnel, representing 83 percent of the survey sample. Thisjob has a wide variety of tasks performed, comprising the full range of careerladder functions, on both the flightline and in the field shop. Personnelholding this job report that almost 70 percent of their time is spent main-taining 11 navigation systems, with the preponderance of that time on AirborneIdentification, Search and Weather Radar, Tactical Air Navigation Systems, and

19

I l 00 qrl ~ f J( 0 CD) m ~ a) r, -1) -4 CC~)l4 -4 LC) C'.

LL. ~L n Ir ) 4 Cj0 r Q ~ -4 -1,-- ( K iX4j

) LL ) U

IU Cd) Cd) LUj < LU10 m - r m - O M - l)4 4L \

>L Z: C -)Cd)-'L

0J H-J <- Cd ~ C)

CD m: c -4 --1-1 -Zj CN m o -L C) - LU Cd) 4c ) MH-)LL- LU H-- >-C)I -E L

~LV) .- 4 i-i < UC) d L d Ct d0- LU -d =s 0H X: d d)C)L d

VC) -- H 4--a ) -'E ) ~ -

El ClU C-J C) >- U >- >

-j V) 0 1-V~~,sC) Vs'd ~C)0co CD ) Cd O0 X:< (D 0L L

F- UJ- V) L u<I- C4.)

0Cd) = -4 C-) L ) V V) LD ) ;KC)0: Z H-: ~- 0-, />< DL C)JJ >-i,

Lki ~ ~ -< < LL LV)-c J Loo< LL JJn L

LLJ . CD ;z H-I-c F- CO tj : < XCd<X I- ~)~ L

OLLU QCd) ) LU V))-F-- CD 0/) V) L/n>- ;z'4'-4M -UJ-4LdVCL)) ~-

C) C EC) C< UJ LU I.-F O~-4 Z: V -C) Z

Cl. CD A V)C V) V) CDV)C m CCD CL - X: t- - L-) W -4 W LL' V) cl- I e- 4 =40

r-.: -< H-J =) V) < Cd) E - - -~ C) - -4 1- a -- Q

Cd) VDC d ) L-) I-D CD' M- 14 1-D Q C-> Or-< <- '1 -4L-4 1-

Cl £X - Z kL ULUCD :l_ <<<X:<Cd << <<< P- UoCU _ -

P-4'V0 X:--cc f " 0 = C) L

H- C) : c - L <M eF

C) Xm)CLUL CD1-D)~J Li QO0 Cd) 2- M

F- e 4 C =)L.J C) - U : 20- C)S

I- -.2. -lC\j Lf)

CDbi2. ~ '

-i= I- 0

v)2 .) 2.

-) 0L i ) C.C.') Z C

CL CD< V) C.'= 2f :D V.) 2f

C:

03C- C)LDUi >- 2 -

C') LL. -4 LU ail -dr- r. C CQJtD co w -k x .iK -1~ -X -4~ iK-X-j =:) a_

L l 0

C- CDC\

I-) V)< E )U,L ) C X (D LU X2.Z(-DU I- Ui L.U LnU LU C

U- M- V U)F- ~LU V) 0: >-LU V) V)

L 4'.-U) LU ~- >- U) F- >-~ X:- F-2 C C-) (n U) U) mn U) )L w

C- Z. 02. M. ' >- 2. Z:>-)-LU - LnU V.) 4 -LU) cU) U LL-i-' -2F2--J 2. M LUJ>- m:C-) :Z, L- LU U) 4 - < CCU) )e U) V) LU U4

CD4 < >-'--CO C-) 2. X-4E ) M: 7:Of Z1 2. V) w~ 4 < W 0 U'.-. LU WU) LU

>-.o rL w. U- >- >-

LU< UC) I--ZCU LU-<.- 7. Ln :z.CD4 =))C C aU - U- U) a- i«L)I-

V) W-22 C-LU - - -CD CD<

Ofv - D DC UCD Or C)) IxnJ2 W4E .2 C~-2m.C Li- -4 U- 4< C)4l< P"U W -4W 4LD 2.

Z:LU VC) >) m .~ (.D F- .e~ C) W

CLE =.U " C-4I-D-CD =a m "4-D u- X-4 LU i-i = )2 C ) 2. I-< 2w- ;z Ot 1(

2.2.CD L D " LU4 -,-- 4 .- J CDMF e =F - :a 0 l - :a

4CCCCCCeCD CDDDDCCCC C)V :4C/' j mMZCD F-- -C-0D)<-CD WWC CD2......U. 22222222

Q- : )L:zV) ) F m - O 1-.(D a - F -:2 )mCU) C ~ U 1-4 P -. 4 U)4- 1-4 - ) -> F- 1-J < =- I--I =- (a4-

en < ) L k. C 4-) -J 2D OC0 D (D CA

(D CDCD CD = z 1- : 21Z

LU-j

0e C0 OCiC )C . CD~ C)4 CD CD.

C)

0L LUf~L) C< u a- -eo-R leW

CL rLU CD 00c' -1~Df m d ~ ~ --j < V) ) 1-

< D)

CD 0 OC)C)- n - 0Cjk *

(D LUJ0l.

m

0 7)

00 LU I Ln-4 C)-1 Lt) UW)O) m n CD o mr"- C',e) U)C~ = ) C U -40 01 )-L --4 C\J Cl) C\j c\J m' m~ LOl LO_LUj <LU C\j i

-< L.) -

LU LL L Or

-j LL I C

LL c-<L CoLA C) - 0 LoL C'CD) r- .C0')

V)

Of 0U u

LLJ 3E. ,4(N

I-J U)LL LJ-j Of m M

0L L L j 2 )V

CU <LU<CD V)(DI- L - L)-jL

0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ZDM- - L LJ; rVo cL:U(<) )= D

:;2 Of F- LL - LC) C mL LL " ") =U

L LUC-) V) U)) V)U)c- I I - X: LU<

LU. :zZ C)UiC 4= ) LL- Of

C) <1- M <LL C)C-U)D1 LUJ .J0

Cl CD C)C c- LL) -4 L

:z) I-4Y) U' rl C : C 2 M:m L L- =. L ULjLU L-i---c

22' -)L ~ <

VI.Vr)LUJ

(n) LUI 00

C)

23

Instrument Landing Systems (ILS). Twelve percent of their time is taken upwith performing general avionics system maintenance and 4 percent with admin-istrative and supply tasks. The incumbents report 8 percent of their relativetime spent on cross utilization work doing avionic communications tasks. Theaverage number of tasks performed in this job is 418, with a sample of repre-sentative tasks shown in Table 15.

Survey data show there are three subgroups within this job cluster.These subgroups differ only because of the relative time spent on the naviga-tions systems maintained. The subgroups maintain the same systems but reflectdifferent relative time spent on them. As an example, each of the three sub-groups show that Variable OMNI Range (VOR) Systems (Duty I) are maintained.The incumbents of the different subgroups, however, indicate they average 3,6, or 11 percent of their relative time working on that system.

Members of this job cluster report an average grade of E-6 and averageover 9 years in the career field. There are only 2 percent of the incumbentsreflecting a 3-skill level DAFSC, while the remaining 98 percent is splitevenly between the 5- and 7-skill levels. Half of these airmen are AirReserve Technicians and the other half are Traditional Reservists.

II. SUPERVISOR (STG023, N=8). This job provides nontechnical supervi-sion for USAF Reserve Navigation Systems maintenance personnel and consists of5 percent of the sample. Seventy-seven percent of the relative time of thisjob is spent on tasks in the organizing, planning, administrative, evaluating,inspecting, directing, implementing, and training functional areas. This jobcontains the senior personnel of the career ladder, with the average grade ofE-7. One hundred percent of the individuals in this job cluster have a7-skill level. The makeup of this job is 7 full-time Air Reserve Techniciansand one Traditional Reservist. A sample of the 173 average tasks performed isshown in Table 16.

III. QUALITY ASSURANCE INSPECTOR (STGO16, N=8). This job, representing5 percent of the sample, is different from the other two USAF Reserve jobsbecause of the specialization on tasks pertaining to inspecting and evaluat-ing. Thirty-seven percent of the relative time is spent on tasks involved ininspecting and evaluating, with 16 percent on administrative tasks, and anadditional 18 percent of relative time is dedicated to performing general avi-onic systems maintenance. The job entails a rather narrow scope, averagingonly 25 tasks performed. The average grade of the incumbents of this job isE-6, with 87 percent having a 7-skill level. Traditional Reservists make up 63percent of the personnel holding this job, with the remaining 37 percent AirReserve Technicians. Typical tasks performed by these personnel are found inTable 17

ANG Specialty Jobs: Responses from AFSC 328X1 personnel in the ANG surveysample indicate a career ladder with four jobs. Analysis identified one jobcluster and three independent jobs. The cluster is the technical AFSC-specific job accounting for the majority of the sample population. The other

?4

>- Of

UJ-I

Ln V)cCO '~ 0 - ca

LLJ~ C=C 0~ Llf CJ4'

C) <L

~~LOC)LU4 c

0i (/) 0

LL- -<XC) cr C

LU I CDiC) <LU :z -

I J LU LU- i-

-- _LJp- LU 0

>< LU LU( C LU F-

LZl4L LU0OfLU0L

V)) V) LLL- ofLI-I O

QLL - -J XU < '-C 4 3

(J)s< C)m 0 -1 LL) '-4 C)

m- U.E< = ~ c ODO: - X:mX

IUX:-j UnLnU- F- !:. LL i-j L Q .)LJ~0 u- =U Of=I-LU<- M) = ~ M- 000zX O -a

LU C- J4 Or L I P--4 LL-UCL-)= :Lu -L U C-) - -"- )V< Ne I- L J =D C , 0j 4' - _le LU LU

I- C-0 _-j V) :)< C)l -;z uj7 LU.)~ LnI I-D ) I F--I

7: P--4 W (D -j> L-Li-LLL

;Z LUC)O>4 <L<I4J< C- 00

m -4r- . 0 4-41--Cd) 0 UVd) C) u) LU I -LU c

le < (j<L -r)a- LuOC-J 0 0 =DD

w 4"( -< -,e CDC XI- MC- -4l- c-u 1 L"WLU

4)CD 0co< < <

coI m o on- o nr-- r-.='1= =V)~ 0'D0 W-IlC~ CD -4 L0 nM korwULUW- of-. <

M 2d . DLOL OL

< M

CD => LU

uJ J (V)

m = U

LL J LL

j- 001-V.o C .LL 0

V) Ul 00 1 J

o -cc LU ca LU -4< S> d M: I-- V) C-)

00- 0L r- Of<

LL- .- J m LLLU

F- <Qo I

LLI< (A 0U wLU 000u

Q- 0< =~~.U>

LJL U-I---LC0

>< - 4 00-LU3L()IZLJ -< L- C) OL ' UJLU000CU C~U U :

Cd ) w-4 C)<

>- -i m WCLL.<V) =D-1

E cd<0V) =C < wUZ)< 0LU :z C> LLU. Z C lL

-LU =U. a- C J Lu .J 000< ) a LO<I =: LU : nS.

w- = VL LU)) Un = ji 0 r1.-4 ~LU - -- ~ w ofUC.CJLC

LUEW C) .J E CDX ni3c= C f

CD00 d c LLiILU U~ J LUJ 00 Ca

PI-cr V) P-4C < L.) CeL0Lof - dL ULU Co) MLUL) )uW

m: ) C r- ) c C) fCi O LL X ) 43) LUL<L w --:ix a C LCCo L A L

F- LJ LJ j 3t .) ) C26

>- I

Id-- Ii O O L LO ~ li OIr

ce 0 W --4 C~j 1 Cl) 1.0 I) U C fl L )

LuJ

C/)~ ~ LL LUI 0 C:: LI), U)o 0C3 c~l lmx3 IS, o~ ) 0

CD ) (/) mI-4 - '-

Lu -I'-

LL~U

) )LuCILu Ll

1-- m

Ln Ln ZOU I-

-i 0) 0L c- > -03u oo 0-4Lu

X) => Lu C))-4DLU CD, Lu f -

C)~i <~ <

LLI ~ ~1 c)U LL0 C)< C 2-

-LL -, cz-L =- 0L0-0a' >< 0= C).U CL V)um:-'- co.. .JLu I.- C) =

0< 0- V) C)I VZ - )C)* .LL LL><Q- 0~l 0<->- C) cU I

C0U) (x < V) 0.

C) I--4- %- >-JJ 0: X« <CL0I-LI w < = ix -1-

Lu F '-40 '-4)<'- E- ixC 0) --

E -<'--41- - C:Z~0) L LLLLLLu ) ELL 0=) <C-=u - '.- 000

Or = CD )< a < ia V-' LJL< LuJ - 0L -j UU X: m M

U) <)Cc C) V)L-<= -< 1nmwofLL LJ N O - L.) F-< )0 0 C)DCUX)-- . I-ULu ) -x= "<)U UL-

a- --d 0 V<:c )CI- ~ V LJLJ= Lu-4-- L-,40u-)4 0) Luu

crv)~~I <<i<V -) CLU) X: 0 V) F ) nVw zL =< m4- e:3Il

LLJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U Lu) j - ::uoc:C ) u)V

F-" A- x -jF-4 -- iC- aM -<27-

three jobs are supervisory and administrative in nature with limited technicalresponsibilities. Appendix D contains task listings for the jobs performed byANG personnel with AFSC 328XI.

The four jobs represent 92 percent of the sample population, with theremaining 8 percent performing tasks which did not group them with eitherdefined job or each other. The division of jobs performed by AFSC 328X1National Guard personnel is illustrated in Figure 4, and brief descriptions ofthe jobs are provided below. Appendix D contains task listings for the jobsperformed by Air National guard personnel with AFSC 328XI.

I. GENERAL MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN CLUSTER (STGO15, N=215). This clus-ter forms the maintenance core for Avionic Navigation Systems and is comprisedof 81 percent of the ANG sample. This job encompasses a varied task composi-tion, including both flightline and field shop tasks. Personnel holding thisjob report that almost 69 percent of their time is spent maintaining 13 navi-gation systems, with most of the time spent on Airborne Identification, Searchand Weather Radar, Tactical Air Navigation Systems and ILS. Additionally, 13percent of their time is taken up with performing general avionics systemmaintenance and 5 percent with administrative and supply tasks. The averagenumber of tasks performed in this job is 357, with the tasks shown in Table 15being representative.

Survey data show there are four 3ubgroups within this job cluster thatdiffer in the amount of relative time spent working on the different systems(duties) and the time spent doing tasks within the duties. An example is DutyJ, Maintaining ILS, where the survey data reflects the percentages of relativetime spent by the incumbents of the subgroups as 10, 16, 11, and 9.

Members of this job cluster report an average grade of E-6, with only 3percent holding a 3-skill level DAFSC. Fifty-two percent of the incumbentsare ANG Technicians, 43 percent Traditional Guardsmen, with the remaining 5percent made up of Air Reserve Guardsmen.

II. SUPERVISOR (STG023, N-3. This job provides supervision of a non-technical nature, with 91 percent of the relative time spent on tasks in theorganizing, planning, administrative, evaluating, inspecting, directing,implementing, and training functional areas. This job contains senior person-nel of the career ladder with 69 percent holding the grade of E-7. One hun-dred percent of the individuals in this job cluster have a 7-skill level. ANGTechnicians comprise 69 percent of the incumbents and 31 percent are Tradi-tional Guardsmen. Examples of the average 86 tasks performed are found inTable 16.

III. QUALITY ASSURANCE INSPECTOR (STGO11, N11). This job differs fromthe other ANG jobs because of the specialization on tasks pertaining toinspecting and evaluating. Thirty percent of the time for this job is spenton Lasks nvolving inspecting and evaluating, with another 24 percent spent onadministrative and supply tasks. An additional 8 percent of relative time is

28

C,)

LJi

V/) Co LUJC.4,

C-9, L

5:

29

dedicated to performing general avionic systems maintenance. The job is arather narrow one, with an average of only 28 tasks performed. The averagegrade of the incumbents of this job is E-6, with 82 percent having a 7-skilllevel. All categories of ANG personnel are represented in the job, with Tra-ditional Guardsmen making up 64 percent of the incumbents. Typical tasks per-formed by these personnel are found in Table 17.

XI. MAINTENANCE CONTROLLER (STG064, N-5). The airmen in this job, whichis very narrow in scope, represent 2 percent of the sample. Sixty-five per-cent of the relative time in this job is taken up with administrative and sup-ply tasks. The job consists of performing the administrative tasks necessaryto control avionic navigation workflow and insure proper documentation isaccomplishea. All of the incumbents hold the grade of E-7 and average 11years in the career field. Four of the incumbents are Traditional Guardsmen,ore is an Air Reserve Guardsman. No ANG Technicians are represented in thejob. Average number of tasks performed in this job is 10 and representativetasks are found in Table 18.

Component Comparisons: A major reason to include USAF Reserve a,-d ANG person-nel in the Avionic Navigation Systems survey was to find out if the personnelof each component are doing the same work as each other and if they are doingthe same types of jobs. Based on task similarity and relative time spent induties, the three jobs performed by USAF Reserve personnel are the same asthose performed by ANG personnel and are the same as the three jobs, with thesame titles, found in the Active-duty Military OSR. The fourth job found inthe ANG sample is the same as the Maintenance Controller found in the Active-duty Military survey. As reflected in Table 13, the percentages of relativetime spent on duties are extremely close. Combine this with the similarlyhigh percent members performing tasks in each component job (Tables 15 through18) and the premise that the jobs are the same is strongly supported. Thisalso provides strong indications that the USAF Reserve and ANG jobs are basi-cally the same as similarly titled jobs in the Active-duty Mil-itary sample.

ANALYSIS OF DAFSC GROUPS

DAFSC analysis identifies similarities and differences in duty and taskperformance at the various skill levels. This information may then be used toevaluate how well career ladder documents, such as AFR 39-1 Specialty Descrip-tions and the Specialty Training Standards (STS), reflect what career ladderpersonnel are actually doing in the field.

Comparison of the duty and task performance among DAFSC 3-, 5-, and7-skill level personnel is normally accomplished. Data for the Active-dutyMilitary 3-skill level personnel for both AFSC showed that their job wasalmost the same job as 5-skill level individuals which allowed analysis of thetwo as a single combined group. The data for the Reserve Components indicates

30

F--4 00 00 LO0000 00 00 0 . 4-

>-LU

~Xv0

0

CD0000LLL)LiC3 CL

Lii Lii L L -1 0LL.

af Cd) LU F -4- <

0- Cl LU (-) a- C0 V)2-1d :3: V) ) C)-

__- v)- LL) 0L '-4n<- coD~-

Li CLU J))4 1-<

LL- V) Li0~JC Y-4 L~f L LU)=

LL < 0 L) V)

"I <e p-Oq Li)4- C-LC-) ' -0 j~ 0<<L

cL- ca t- CLU a-Cd ME _

L)J V < < -

<0 ZLu 0mD < ~-i co c

L. LUJ LLU -cc i CY)

F- CO< F- V) > J LLUV) r-= < .) <E S.- m X

LUOW(n < 2-V IC) CU CD

F- 1Z-4V CA L)C Li- L- Li-.C) LU i.4(/) LL at- :

(X = =~ Le') -0 C*-C LULW

0 e C L -4 M - V VC )~ F- 0 -

I.- C) C)" >- M : V) Ln

F- , j - -4 -4 Z: -J 0 M«)Mm c C) F-()F--J F- l-- =LU I -F-LU C)WL)=:L) L- L-) 0 -- V a)

X: Dc CD - LUCD< o-4i LLU > LL- L-

LU r) --j F- Z lF- W ' 00MF- L O- I- ;zV)-4< lN O

F- F-4Z ~ ) F-~ a P- - c L

c- 'x M F- -C0= < LULUc i

w L) -- F F-0~U0< L 9-4 9 4 0C ) w-'= =-0

CD 0<0EC) DE m U ) W UF- 4-~) CD oS.- < <

Ni cj a r, 00 en -C'.j to0 0 w =

cn C INCJO Co cl ~i M() ci) LLU

LUCDOnwLW LLw J COLU1

31

that the 3-skill level and 5-skill level personnel also have similar jobs, butnot to the extent required for analyzing them as a combined group. Therefore,they will be discussed separately in this rpport.

Avionic Communications (AFSC 328X0)

Table 19 shows USAF Reserve and ANG data on the percent time spent induties for each of the skill levels. It should be noted that there are 5 sys-tems in duties Q, R, S, T, and U that, with one exception, have so little timespent on them that they are not reportable. The data for the other dutiesindicate that the USAF Reserve and ANG breakout are sufficiently different towarrant separate discussion.

USAF Reserve DAFSC Groups: Four individuals, representing 3 percent of thissample, make up the 3-skill level group. They report having a narrow span ofresponsibility, performing an average of only 49 tasks, with 50 percent oftheir time taken up by 25 tasks. They soend the majority of their time, 76percent, on four systems (General Avionic, UHF Radio, HF Radio, and InterphoneSystems), 15 percent on Administrative functions, and the remaining time onthree of the other 12 systems. They indicate they do not pertorm any tasks inthe navigation maintenance areas. The time-spent overlap on common tasksbetween this group and the 5-skill level group is only 50 percent, which indi-cates the jobs are similar but can not be considered to be the same.

The 5-skill level group of 51 airmen has a much broader job, with anaverage of 155 tasks and 50 percent of their time taken up by 77 tasks. Theyspend the majority of their time (61 percent) on the same four duties thattake the majority of the 3-skill level time. These individuals work on 8 ofthe remaining 12 systems and also perform tasks on navigation systems. Theserespondents show a time spent overlap on common LdSKS w il, Lii 7-skill levelpersonnel of 73 percent, indicating a job very similar to that of the 7-skilllevel.

The 7-skill level group of 86 individuals has the broadest job, perform-ing an average of 195 tasks, with 50 percent of their time devoted to 116tasks. They perform technical AFSC related work with only about 31 percent oftheir relative time spent in the administrative, supervisory, managerial, andtraining areas as compared to the 49 percent spent by their Active-duty Mili-tary counterparts. Additionally, they are less likely to have a supervisoryrole, with only 58 percent reporting they supervise one or more people, com-pared to 74 percent of the Active-duty Military performing a supervisory role.

ANG DAFSC Groups: The 3-skill level for this category consists of only 5 peo-ple or 3 percent of the sample. Like the Reserve group, these individualsreport spending the majority of their time (76 percent) in four duties, butonly three of them are the same, General Avionics, UHF Radio, and HF Radiosystems. The fourth system for this group, accounting for 17 percent of theirtime, is the VHF AM/FM Radio System. This is the only skill level group toreport such a heavy concentration of time in this duty. Their job is

32

V)P, c~ qd-~-1 .z -- qd c ') LO) Cl) C J Lfo~. a) C

Z! LL) CDII

< <'

Cf

<1 Ln co "'I

-n L)

CDC"

Q LL- CO il -4'-

a_00

md Li CD

Cj LLO C'.J Id

Cl LU L

LLJD C") V <

<~~L =: 0U L)C) LLUe CD -jV)-j)rCDJ L 0 < - IEQ- -J C)

F- m 'd)X J - C )-/< EL<- < LL- C4 V -

C)< L >- e-- 0 LUJ UL LU L.4 Cd3 0 n ix

LU- 0U >- m L)(=L. V = U U U LU- V) :rUL) )>- L V) V) mCl.w w D m LUJ

(.D L )U-LI rL-(D - r VulL >- = V) - ')'-- LJz (D LU '- r- LI L n L ) u >- V) cr-C)O>- Mcc

;z :>= L. a, '- - > (-n LL</)U...Q)VLU< LDIV) a)

<J< :) U L-V i VJ< < .O C) LLL Cd)Im.EL = >-J> >-- 24= LU C~D M c LCJ S.

CJ -cc C) : C)cm D < cn CLAC) >- CD F-CD CD (5CD CD( .qC -4LIC )U L) V

< C i < Z) -4 -. <- LU L - C- V LUJ i-4 -

1-4 LjU - t==D C= CD M -DMI< I-LUJ 0-

LU )ZE C c~-c L LU< d) L =<E >< LJ << < LLuCI)4< :z <ao~ < CD

< <D (D U.. (D '-4 0 CD LL- C0 0.0 C

(D C- D D > =m M z Z C 33ZE%

cr LL I 001

CD

x- LL"I Ir

of

-4 C-) C:)

'-4 CD -4 C) ~

00 r

Li) C-) CDCD L.U C-4) LOL .- 4i 4 C - 'J c\J

=LL 001

C D -< "LuLL CD)C) -

0- 00 V)

0) VL) -'

XJ L', Lu L

* L'- Lu <l Z!-

o- c - 1)44 Z

LL> Ci V-)r-. O- -

Of 00-- 1 rLL Lu C)/'- -4D

Qu V) I-L) L 4

Cd) U~LL 0 Lu )

-i L'F Lu mi~L <L)I- ~S D=C) L.)~L "- -

-< D .- <E C-J) LLJ.W-

OjLL LL:C ;m) :'-4t=Z3 CD

<. C)1 ;z-- LJ-i<

C.) CV< 0 ( ) :z rLL- L< L ) ua- O

of CD-CDC in'- '-4 C

C) ~C) ~- _j V) r-4 M

Cd) ZO..CL:<~ 03

L. )F z-J =3 _j _jCI- 0i0 C U L-V

0L =: U/) LL- 4-)

LLJOfcn m ) ) -34

comparatively narrow, with an average of 93 tasks and 50 percent of their timespent on only 45 tasks. This group reports the least amount of time spent onadministrative functions (3 percent) of any other group. Overlap on commontasks with the 5-skill level group is 64 percent, which shows similarity butsufficient difference to say the jobs are different.

The 83 airmen in the 5-skill level group (representing 44 percent of thesurvey sample) perform an average of 165 tasks, with 78 tasks taking up over50 percent of their time. This group has a broader job than the 3-skill levelgroup, with considerably less time spent on the VHF AM/FM Radio System andmore time spent on navigation systems tasks. A 78 percent time spent overlapon common tasks with the 7-skill level personnel indicates that the two skilllevels perform jobs that are quite similar.

The 102 individuals holding the 7-skill level have the broadest job, per-forming an average of 195 tasks, with greater than 50 percent of their timespent on 116 tasks. They perform a technical AFSC-related job, with onlyabout 26 percent of their relative time spent on administrative, supervisory,managerial, and training tasks as compared to the 31 percent spent by theirUSAF Reserve compatriots, plus they are less liKely to be in a s,:pervisoryrole, with only 51 percent to 58 percent reporting thp supervision of one ormore people. These are the technical experts of the field who continue toperform the day-to-day maintenance.

Avionic Navigation Systems (AFSC 328X1)

Table 20 reflects data for the USAF Reserve and ANG on the percent timespent in duties for each of the skill levels. As with AFSC 328X0, data shownfor both the USAF Reserve and ANG are sufficiently different to warrant sepa-rate discussion of each skill level.

USAF Reserve DAFSC Groups: The 5 airmen in the 3-skill level group (repre-senting 3 percent of the survey sample) reported performing an average of 342tasks, with 50 percent of their time spent on 127 tasks. A good portion oftheir time (25 percent) is spent on the performance of general avionic systemsmaintenance tasks. The next largest amount of their time (14 percent) isspent on the cross-utilization maintenance of communications equipment. With8 percent relative time spent on administration, supply, training, and AssistTask Qualification Training (ATQT) tasks, the remaining relative time isspread over the other 14 systems. The time spent on overlap of common tasksbetween this group and the 5-skill level group is 63 percent, indicating jobsimilarity but not necessarily the same job.

The 5-skill level group of 72 airmen, making up 43 percent of the sample,have a slightly expanded job, with an average of 377 tasks and 50 percent oftheir time taken up by 198 tasks. They spend much less time performing gen-eral avionic systems maintenance (12 to 25 percent) and communications equip-ment maintenance (7 to 14 percent) tasks than the 3-skill level personnel.Their time is spent on tasks related to four main systems: Search ,.nd WeatherRadar, Tactical Air Navigation, Instrument Landing, and Airborne

35

LL - -4 j . -t-,- -4 c~ -4 M- -c 00 ',-4CY C\j, O cx:)0M < CJ 11 4 -

C3: v

CD

CD L- c

00 4LC -4C' -4~ -I Lo -4C~

LL OC)- -'< (cl'0)

C),

uII C-) -4

V)~ '-I

CD U- IL C) .-4 -I- x L ~ O mId d 4C) o -" 0 ,4 ~ : i0 d

<C-F U /)C/

V

(D C

< ILU V)4 If) L 40 - Lr-. (\JN V) J V

Of :z F J : r c U >-J UJ>U1 ) A

> A - M ( : ) X: XUJ< : <C J jV L (

LLL C e i <- - -

-iC) C) (A :z :z U) LUn zV

w =D V) < L J (A - w(A -< 4 < (A CA

V) C-) e LU A- -~ < XJ:- m =:L)~ M <)J(1-j V)C- CD CD ca: < w DLU') C -< u(U- u >- C4=4 MA : -Oa = : <<jix- j C

IL V) M:u - - I-J CD C-Z IL - U.< = M u- ' e 0

M- > C CD LU OILCC.U X :C< V1 X:D I )<(C- m) (M~C ~:

>- CD u) < D J U LU :) C

*-4LU< <(A ;z)DZ03 I-.D u) m J3 le j ) 02)m~ = f < < LULUOCD< <Z - <0C I LUL U

< j ) -J X: :-- C < -< = C3i a:z~: uJ-2 ) D 1 .- ,I <CaU -40 L) 4 <CO=W=O-4-

a- X:U m( a:0- Q ) M-4 (n (D C0 or: ami 3cfno C"- -- 4 LU-4aC/)=3 C-) (n) :E - <.4i< =~~: W o

O3 C) X: V V) m w0 L) = U 1 )- C:)" -4

<:< <- C 0 LU< - CDDDDCC D- CD 0 0 CD 0 0 DCD I

aD C CD =Z 0 < Z W = = ; -z VZ~)(D M CD P ~ ~ ~ .i- .- 4 --4 0 .. 6-4 - 1 -4 -4 :z Q)m t.CD-4-4 =c/=(= Z =Zc =) m O

I-IM~ "- t-44- " - -4M -- 4- -4 1-4 F-4U-caI- CC < U<<<LU<<<WU<< < -

(AV C 3 C ~Aa~:a-4--444->-4--4 - -4 -4 >-- 444: =oLU :- W a: LU LU '-Lw < << <<( < 0 C (A .4< < < < <<IL C

I- 0ML - 0 ) a r

36

Identification Systems, accounting for 42 percent of the relative time as com-pared to 25 percent for the 3-skill level personnel. These respondents show atime spent overlap on common tasks with the 7-skill level personnel of 80percent, which indicates the two skill levels are essentially performing thesame job.

Seven-skill level personnel (54 percent of the survey sample) perform anaverage of 349 tasks, with 157 tasks taking up over 50 percent of their rela-tive time. Sixty-seven percent of these 91 airmen report supervising one ormore individuals, but only 22 percent of their relative time is spent on tasksin the usual supervisory, managerial, training, and administrative duties.Compared to Active-duty Military 7-skill level personnel, where the percentsupervisin9 is 73 percent and relative time spent on supervisory duties is 38percent, these individuals are much more technically oriented.

ANG DAFSC Groups: There are 9 airmen with a 3-skill level, representing 3percent of the sample. This group does not reflect the same relative timespent pattern as the USAF Reserve 3-skill level does. They report performingan average of 221 tasks, with 50 percent of their time spent on 131 -.asks. Agood portion of their time (21 percent) is spent on the performance of Air-borne Identification Systems tasks, with another 38 percent spent on generalavionic, Instrument Landing, and Tactical Air Navigation Systems tasks. Only5 percent relative time spent was reported for the administrative and supply,and ATQT duties. With the exception of 1 percent relative time spent on com-munications equipment, the remaining time is spread over the other 10 systems.Time spent overlap for common tasks between this group and the 5-skill levelgroup is 72 percent, which indicates these two groups have a fairly similarjob.

Thirty-nine percent of this sample consists of 104 individuals making upthe 5-skill level group. They average 287 tasks and spend 50 percent of theirrelative time on 169 tasks. One major difference between this group and the3-skill level group is that these individuals spend less time (12 vs 21 per-cent) on the Airborne Identification Systems duty. A good portion of theirremaining time (37 percent) is spent doing tasks on the same three systemsthat the 3-skill level airmen work on: General Avionic, Tactical Air Naviga-tion, and ILS. This compares to the 38 percent for the 3-skill level person-nel. These respondents show a time spent overlap on common tasks with the7-skill level personnel of 77 percent, which indicates the two skill levelshave very similar jobs.

The 150 incumbents who hold a 7-skill level DAFSC represent 57 percent ofthe survey sample. They report averaging 314 tasks, with 207 tasks accountingfor 50 percent of their relative time. The survey data indicate that only 49percent of these airmen supervise another, to 67 percent of the USAF Reserve7-skill level personnel. Twenty-seven percent of their relative time is spenton administrative, supervisory, managerial, and training tasks as compared tothe 22 percent spent by USAF Reserve counterparts. Like them, these individ-uals are the technical experts in the field who continue to perform the day-to-day maintenance, with minimum supervisory responsibility.

37

Summary

Both USAF Reserve and ANG personnel at all skill levels for each of theAFSC are predominately technically oriented in their performance requirements.The 3-skill level personnel perform rather narrow jobs, with a great deal oftheir time spent on general avionic tasks. The 5-skill level airmen broadenout to include more of the maintenance of the major systems in their careerareas. The 7-skill level incumbents continue to perform technical AFSC-related tasks and spend a majority of their relative time on these tasks, butdo expand into the supervisory areas. This expansion is not, however, asgreat as the move in this direction found in the Active-duty Military popula-tion. This trend, however, does not imply job progression from the 3-skilllevel through the 5-skill level to the 7-skill level is any different thanthat of the Active-duty Military progression.

ANALYSIS OF AFR 39-1 SPECIALTY DESCRIPTIONS

Survey data were compared to the AFR 39-1 Specialty Descriptions for Com-munication and Navigation Systems Specialists and Technicians, both dated15 September 1988 and effective 31 October 1988. The description for the 3-and 5-skill levels is accurate in describing the overall jobs performed byboth USAF Reserve and ANG populations. The Communication and Navigation Sys-tems Technician, description also accurately reflcts, in general terms, thetechnical aspects of the 7-skill level job performed by both USAF Reserve andANG personnel.

TRAINING ANALYSIS

Occupational survey data are one of the many sources of information thatcan be used to assist in the development of a training program which meets therequirements of a specific career ladder. Normally the training requirementsof first enlistment (1 to 48 months TAFMS) personnel are the ones analyzed.

First-Enlistment Data

Factors which may be used in evaluating training include the overall des-cription of the job being performed by first-enlistment personnel, percentagesof first-enlistment members performing specific tasks or using certain testequipment, and the types of equipment that they work on.

Tables 21 and 22 provide data on relative time spent across the duties byfirst-enlistment personnel in both AFSC, broken down by component. Bothtables reflect that the relative time spent in the duties by Active-duty Mili-tary, USAF Reserve, and ANG airmen is very comparable. Although not

38

I P-4 LOl ic 1 -4 1-4OCD IflU LO) c\J C% cjC (NA cv)C ic (N

cr C:) e40 142jCimC q0 D c oC -4 (NA -4-4

-4 - -

<CD

LU I

< LU-4 -4 C~ 4c~ 0.v e D CNJ CJ ",J-4 CY) (Y) LOl j(-V/) V) III C~j -4 r4-4

I-4I

C) C)L

0X:LU M xLUI L- =: CD C3cr

o/) i D-- LUJ LU- a (4clLU V) < < LU m ' >-

LL u4 -U- - LUJ V

0- M0 m M- LU LUcoF -Z LUJ 0 0 ) C)

<- CD CDLUJ LUJ 0

X00>- LU LUJ >-) >.- L UC)0 03 CD ) 1-41

CD zt V) I- < LUC)~ I LU x C.) ) -J Of

<4.< 1-4 -4 LU LU 0 LU =

~LU LU< a- CL LUJ c) 1-4 < LULF-~ X: X: Ix > C COO) uo)

=~~ <c -C LL W~) V) C)'L L -,X' z-- = 0.I (

C)<L - C0 LUJ LL LUJ IL= LU. LL U- '-4 1-: D :

LU IL 2:M: 2:03 )L 0> Z - .- -U EL

m 1-4 LLU>- LI) >-LU ce>- 0nF- I- U)) >- >- C LU C)

).m ) wuC C) ILL )< c:)>-~ ~ 2EC=L = m -LU CDV LUj C)

V) =)w V)LU LUJ L-LJ - =) Ci) =L 0y =D >- 0D i-i C Or

LLD L -4 = LL LU LU C)>- V)~ w X 0 I LUc-e - = LL =C0 c O V) CfLALL I-LLULL C-) 0)

CD F-. 0-40 LL'-"ULL LL LUJ I= 1--- u

4LU< C <cC D = -CC 2: = C3 D V >- >-C Q o)X: => =-4 DCD CD0 LUO i4 CL) V)e . C~LU. -j - 0:-4 F-4 =-. m CoeflC Z2: =

< -j < (n-. = 2:-2: LL aL.) X: ZLU '.. JCL:2. -CC = *-E ~< LU:0C D~ CLCLW M: cJ =>- LL. >- -2LU -J - ) W Ue CCL

-CC= < -<CD %-,LU LU ICC ~C9CD CD- 0 F- 0 CDCDD0CD C D Q V) CD IAl

CD CD CD( : 4 c =====L t>

=J '-m =- = M 1-4 4<1-4 > - 4 >- -4 ~41-4 P-4 I<s" - 1-4 1-4 V) -4

= X:L -'-44 -4 14 0 3c "~ --40

'-4 0 0 - 1-DL E o f V ) E E = -E - " < 0 4 0 4 P 4 - - - - - 0

CD <0 0LLCM: X -4 x m .Z 0: X:0 X:x X :X : a

39

I ILOl Clj CV) - CV -4

<C

uI

(L)J CV) m

LUZ

C)if

uiC) u~l V)I

L- > ) ELU mi~ 00 X

L) I In V) C)3C:) LL0C-) C)

< L.) <

.... Lu 0XZ

ca <- <'1- -4 0~Lu < <0~

IU C).-I b4 0n -cc V

ZLf) C) C) C<u-iV s L-4 L-iJ I-4

w LLI-

M.. '' 0. Li - LLCtI V) -4 C

< ~ I- C) 1c -4<- =iC) i i - -.1 0D -' C..

C)i ~ e L -"I4 LL,

cL = C) %.. r-4 J l -4

V)= ,VC) U 0Z LC J=-1-4 V) IL)~ C) -

L.) 1-- 1- = 0 F- Ccr- 0>C LLi 1-- " M -c

<- < - mrZZZ =

(n4 CD M- - -4 LiM 1-

X: 0- = - : X:L L J

<. 0U< - LUJc Cd))ttLU I >- C) - >- X .

LUJ I CD CJ ) C/)C) C4) C3 (n) CLU-j< LU Cd) Cd) LL Cd) Cd) Cd) UL

SC3 LUJ>- M:<LJ t-i4 LUI C) 1-- < o cnle ) ) LI V)

<LI w V) ix~-2-%~ < M-~d LL I-E) .C/ Cd4 ) =« w cLU'<---*L d)Ce< -,X-W-I 0 LUJ Lnd)I -4 Cd) Cd)

X C ~Lu '.- CD m LL >- >-IL.( Cd)0 C - LU W-d L.-CdV) M Cd)

cl- -C-ldJLJW-4O. <

(Je Cl ) 0 C9 m w (D Or CD «L)I--LL. >- C = EM'-4 LU< F-4 W W wCD-4-4 cn W -- CD l-~ =: CLL. L)

U.. -J - = " U- F-) -- ~CD CD = *- "-(D < U X: D L< m = w 4-~CD LU~ =) "LU.<< '-4 XLU:-4I-4 LUZ r

CDI-- W- 0()1-e C3 LU0C mX: u9-4 LUJ< < V) V)Cd = =C3 CD L.) m~ C3 e- .) (I)

x =) w< < C) U< -JU= '- <0C I LLU 0. CCd) -j <-i~cc- M-:2' <M =;

Zj top) 03 -=:) < m I CD ix«= 4.)

= < <« CD< ~CD CD(D (D CD CDCD CD cuCD coD D C)

0D C!) (D C3 cm = z== =w m= ==0 =D m m m .- - - - 14~ - - 1-4 1-4 1-4 1-q 1-4 0-4 0= " 4C I-l-4 6--qZ Z =-

V) . w-1 n < ce w d D w - .1-4 1-41-4 V) 0- -4 > -C 1-4. 91-4 0-

I C)

C <mLCLU e _.. a-'-~~l cr 0O0c) ::3.

41

conclusive, this similarity indicates the systems where training for the threecomponents is most likely required. The tasks within the duties are moredefinitive as to the specific requirements that need to be met.

Tables 26 anu 24 show ccpresentative tasks perfoirmed by First-enlistmentpersonnel from each AFSC, with component percent members performing shown foreach task. These data reflect that the USAF Reserve and ANG personnel performthe tasks shown in relatively the same percentages as the Active-duty Mili-tary, which is another indication that first-enlistment personnel in all threecomponents perform similar jobs and have the same training requirements.

Test equipment used by more than 30 percent of first-enlistment personnelis listed in Tables 25 and 26. The data show that USAF Reserve and ANG per-sonnel use the same test equipment as their Active-duty Military counterparts.There is test equipment that less than 30 percent of the Active-duty Militarypersonnel use, but at least 30 percent of the personnel of the other compo-nents do use. This area should be reviewed by the respective proponents, todetermine if this data has any impact on the formal training requirements ofUSAF Reserve or ANG personnel.

Tables 27 and 28 show the systems equipment maintained by first-enlistment personnel. These data reflect the greatest variance among thethree categories of personnel, with the ANG airmen indicating they work onfewer types of systems equipment than the other two groups. USAF Reserve per-sonnel report working on more types of equipment in the Navigation Systemsarea than even the Active-duty Military personnel. This may indicate thatsome consideration should be given to providing extra training for USAFReserve personnel on the additional equipment.

Specialty Training Standards (STS) and Plan of Instruction (POI) Review

With information concerning the target population, first-enlistment per-sonnel, the training program documents, Specialty Training Standard (STS) andPlan of Instruction (POI), are examined in light of the survey data. Toassist specifically in the examination of the STS and the POI, technicalschool personnel from Keesler Technical Training Center matched job inventorytasks from each of the task inventories to the appropriate sections and sub-sections of the pertinent STS and POI. Avionic Communication and NavigationSystems, STSs 455X2A, 455X2B, and 455X2C, dated October 1988, were used inthis process. Avionic Communication and Navigation Systems, POIs E3ABR45532A-000, E3ABR45532A-O01, E3ABR45532B-000, and E3ABR45532C-O00, dated 20 May 1988,were also used in the match. It was this matching upon which comparison tothose documents was based. Each STS and POI match was compared to data of themajor command (MAC, SAC, or TAF) from the Communication and Navigation systemssurvey that pertained to it.

Survey data for the USAF Reserve and ANG groups support all elements ofthe three 455X2 STSs that were supported by the Active-duty Military data.Additionally, there are 17 elements in the three STS not supported by

42

m <C.jI 0 "L O 9 4- -4- 4C l D4 n_

LUI

xI < -.1

LUJ < Cu

LUJ

LUI LU I

LUL

CC)

LLJ H-C

C))

Cdi =C ) *.-J d)Cd06- X:H X: C U

0L L ) L(/) 0) < d)

LU~- H-I LUHcn ~ - d-~j V)Cd LUC -)X L

<o ZE L) C- <E Cd ZC)H- -LCJ C L O-- -i V)U

Hi , - (D~- H- LJ JLU -i <~ Md) V)>- C/ V)

:- (if 0< <d) @-4 .d) <C-) V)

oA 00 LU H-C LU D LU C) X

CD md LU OH- -4J < LU ) ) (DLUJ LU -j H- L.~) >< -- c V ~ O-j H-) Lnmr'.)~ H-i F- ;L-,I -- V '-o '-- L3UC)X:dI

0- C < 0:LI j~d Ct- cm C -) CLULU L) CLi =D V C)C'H0 U< C) < 0d c

<) LU x-LUL.)LL -j LU (1) >- >-H-~ C)- C) CA) (n =

C) 0 L H-U V~) H- =)Z C/) =D C)wof j C'J 0I ~LU LU u = J

>-ON C F- M LL L)UC c X CdE- cn L)>( "d -'-co lt~ eL -- =cp LUJ H- X ) C-) H-- m

= u LL w == P4 L::L) Z V)=D FCd) V) x = j = L C)W "(-1 LU F- u = ~C)

2: X: CeL- '-4= L0:: =U cr.0::d)IU4H - LU< -4X

IL LL >- " " LU k:C L) C-i < I-4Cd1 vx = V) C> IM LL2-=LZ - iX CO = -

o oLU.- C) u< = ZWD ~-< CD Cd)C)H- m- =- C14 F- D . DQIL IL V)C -40LL(j C ) <diC< 00000) C<< >- LUZ'= 0 WLU LUJLU>- i= LU LL J .-4 o-'LUJ

V) C L) rO L Q- H- )L)< nH-< -H-

M U -<-< < L -J-CJ.)C) C) u~ LU..JLUWZWLUL0<I=I;zL=LU LU 0 C'LU 0OOOC-4>-000 - - 0

C3 =LLWO 1-4 C) j < V)CILLULILULUJ WLU cH--HCIuH-LUJLUWU -JW LULLU H-IF-I

0) ~LJLU H -:w-2 L)LJ-< >- :L3 -4 U <<LU LJC93V)L C)wCC>" UCD0=)UC)0C(1 0 cc -) j -j-N LJ Ne .JLUJLL C ) X:w X:X:J< V)2E X:X:m< LU0C)0 LL

< 0 CC< V) LUW L0 WW L0-L LU"W < W j Cd) 0.

lie 00 0) - 0mc4ce oqr,"cj oa c n Ln t c'j oo m'

H- w LU LDL L L- L DL LL LCDU LU - j CD

43

F<DF- -4l Oll 0 oL nrMMci 3 w( Ct) 00o0LDU Lflnfl

C5 1 '-d, 0000) w Q) wr -r -r, ,r ,r r -r-. ,r-.

C- C

LLLUJCL

X:ic -ccO- c ~

a-

LU J M

<L -UO C2: II

u L. CX

LU(A(AV

UF- 0 U LU-jcli~F V)Z )C . C-)

<) =. u0F-Z LL U Q

(i -i LU < U.<N Cof ) C) CXLL C (

LUC) 0W m-4 tol -4

< <A 00EL LU L-) CD ix <<u

u- C) w) 1- 4- CD4 0LUM. LU ckX 1-4 ~ -a:C)C)C< -J 0.. < <) "CDco V)L Li~C V)C/ WZ L = V

LU CI LU C) 0: Z- X: X j1-4 XICmX( F- CX 1- C L LU LU DoC 9= wUIP

0-~u Z ' 4 L -C F-F < - F-O LULUC U- 0) V) V)=D V (n~Q C) 2 V')C-) 44 ><

L) < LU => EX ->- CL >- >- >- LUFCDLL x C-J Z< LU V) U) V) XX (AX =

< a-i v C 4L'j ) WULU w m)C) CL - Li U)-C< F- CC3 F>-F- -)- J V>- ol CD =ZE -4C)C)--4u " -4 (') c/ F-4 UnLi- OCX

mO V) qt0x)- Ln M )CD C >- >- = >- 0- LU

LU' m) O<-cm -- C) c) (D cq v) C) W) cd)w0LUZE 6 F-CX L " "«CX.-= F-4 u 1-4

=CX: CX: eZ X LJ C 1I= w " F--4C4F- X: X- UU

C-0 , C)LU CD 0C u ~L C) CDLcC)CCXDX) 0L LL l- XOC L -cDCOLM1-4' < )'W E <CD '-.<0

F- F- zui m 3K -j<ZUF~F 0LZ Li- UF-Lu<C > . o L CCD m V) V) V) w m0OV) w C

F-0- 0 =U f <-mO =J=-I-c OF- M -1-JM:L-0 L Cr 0 = 0LA-') W0ZW C) (nLFL- P- F-C -F-F-Cd)C U)U~f F-4(nU W j - - aC) =-4 a Mj j _

) U) O < =:)1-CL < ->

WLj LU w w ~<uj -J 0---J -(D2tZ- u 1-4wX- P"4 .<a4 -4C)wU< < «l-'-"iC4 <-0

P-4 X CX <0-<C-0X<Xm :CX:. MF-F-CDCXC CCZ3O2- F-- ) C-)-j LU LU LU O0<CD uO>-LUi = W C)CLJ LU F-W"LUF-F- JLC-) L-) LULILU Ui

F- 0u I-,LUW I--Lui LU <-~ «LU w< :-.:2LU LAJ UWCD 0- .< u )C)<- < 0 -j m1 F---JF<C0 0

V) E - '--JF- UF"-C) V F- F-CU F-JC X

V)

vi me')n C') - 4C C)0"CDW"O O L L n J Ln - r wc:

F- CLU LUJ CD CD CD CD w D CD LUXECD CD CDCDCD aCD C-0 LU D X

44

TABLE 25

TEST EQUIPMENT USED BY 30 PERCENT ORMORE OF FIRST ENLISTMENT AFSC 328X0 PERSONNEL

(1-48 MONTHS TAFMS)

PERCENT MEMBERS RESPONDING

AIRUSAF NATIONAL ACT-DTY

RESERVE GUARD MILITARY

TEST EQUIPMENT USED (N=19)- (N=60)- (N=522)

DIGITAL MULTIMETERS 100 93 91

THRULINE WATTMETERS 95 * 89

WATTMETERS 100 98 78

DIGITAL VOLTMETERS 84 93 75

POWER METERS 84 98 75

DUMMY LOADS 95 98 74

ANALOG MULTIMETERS 89 83 68

OSCILLATORS 95 98 67

RF SIGNAL GENERATORS 95 98 67

ALTENUATERS 94 93 63

AUDIO OSCILLATORS 95 98 63

FREQUENCY COUNTERS 89 98 63

POWER SUPPLIES 89 97 59

ANALOG VOLTMETERS 84 82 57

DISTORTION ANALYZERS 84 83 57

AUDIO METERS 84 93 56

AMMETERS 89 85 54

MODULATION/DEVIATION METERS 84 82 51

VACUUM TUBE VOLTMETERS 74 77 48

CABLE TESTERS 68 68 45

TIME DOMAIN REFLECTOMETERS 63 50 43

INTEGRATED TENCH BENCHES 63 62 *

DIFFERENTIAL VOLTMETERS 57 62 *

DIODE CHECKERS 32 48 *

PULSE GENERATORS 47 58 *

RESISTANCE BRIDGES 32 * *

SPECTRUM ANALYZERS 53 48 *

SWEEP GENERATORS 32 33 *

SWEEP SIGNAL GENERATORS 53 38 *

CAPACITOR CHECKERS * 47 *

PREAMPLIFIERS * 32 *

TRANSISTOR CHECKERS * 57 *

TUBE TESTERS * 46 *

* Less than 30 percent

45

TABLE 26


(1-48 MONTHS TAFMS)

PERCENT MEMBERS RESPONDINGAIR

USAF NATIONAL ACT-DTYRESERVE GUARD MILITARY

TEST EQUIPMENT USED (N=43) (N=95) (N=416)

DIGITAL MULTIMETERS 95 93 97MULTIMETERS 91 92 83DIGITAL VOLTMETERS 95 87 82OSCILLOSCOPES 95 87 82VOR/ILS FLIGHTLINE TEST SETS 91 88 80DUMMY LOADS 95 87 78IFF/AIMS FLIGHTLINE TEST SETS 88 79 75TACAN FLIGHTLINE TEST SETS 93 92 75POWER METERS 95 79 72FREQUENCY COUNTERS 95 91 70SIGNAL GENERATORS 95 84 68ATTENUATORS 95 83 67MODE 4 COMPUTER TEST SETS 84 78 61TACAN SHOP TEST SETS 95 91 61AMMETERS 93 75 60VOR/ILS SHOP TEST SETS 93 87 60IFF/AIMS SHOP TEST SETS 91 82 58DIRECTIONAL COUPLERS 77 53 55DIFFERENTIAL VOLTMETERS 84 78 53RADAR ALTIMETER SHOP TEST SETS 65 78 53MILLIVOLTMETERS 84 63 50POWER SUPPLIES, LOW VOLTAGE 91 73 50PULSE GENERATORS 88 69 50FREQUENCY METERS 86 64 48SEARCH AND WEATHER RADAR SHOP TEST SET 84 36 48SPECTRUM ANALYZERS 81 57 45WATTMETERS 81 74 44OSCILLOSCOPE PLUG-INS 74 46 39RADIO ALTIMETER TEST SETS 53 36 34STANDING WAVE RADIO (SWR) INDICATORS 79 63 33POWER SUPPLIES, OTHER THAN LOW VOLTAGE 70 43 32SWEEP GENERATORS 79 45 31ADF TEST PANELS 79 36 *ADF TESI SETS 81 35BOLOMETERS 53 40 *


46

TABLE 26 (CONTINUED)


(1-48 MONTHS TAFMS)

PERCENT MEMBERS RESPONDINGAIR

USAF NATIONAL ACT-DTYRESERVE GUARD MILITARY

TEST EQUIPMENT USED (N=43) (N=95) (N=416)

CABLE TESTERS 84 60 *CAPACITANCE BRIDGES 46 * *CAPACITOR CHECKERS 55 35 *CRYSTAL DIODE CHECKERS 63 40 *CRYSTAL DIODE DETECTORS 42 * *DIODE TESTERS 60 40 *DISTORTION ANALYZERS 58 44 *INTEGRATED TEST BENCHES 60 32 *INTERFACE TEST SETS 56 31 *PREAMPLIFIERS 53 * *RADAR ALTIMETER FLIGHTLINE TEST SETS 65 63 *RESISTANCE BRIDGES 47 * *SEARCH AND WEATHER RADAR FLIGHTLINE TEST SETS 56 * *SKE TEST SETS 33SWEEP GENERATOR 67 35 *TIME DOMAIN REFLECTOMETERS 74 55 *TIME MARK GENERATORS 33 * *TRANSISTOR CHECKERS 70 52 *TUBE TESTERS 67 58 *WAVE ANALYZERS 33 * *WAVE METERS 33 * *

Less than 30 percent

47

TABLE 27

AVIONIC COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT MAINTAINED BY30 PERCENT OR MORE OF FIRST ENLISTMENT AFSC 328X0 PERSONNEL

(1-48 MONTHS TAFMS)

PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING


RESERVE GUARD MILITARYAVIONIC COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT MAINTAINED (N=I9) (N=60) (N=522)

UHF RADIO AN/ARC-164 100 98 92UHF HAVEQUICK SYSTEM AkC-164 47 80 77INTERPHONE AN/AIC-18 68 * 60UHF RADIO AN/ARC-186 89 50 57HF RADIO AN/ARC-190 32 * 44HF RADIO 618T SYSTEMS 68 * 43INTERPHONE AN/AIC-IO 42 43 41SECURE SPEECH RECORDERS KY-58 * * 40COCKPIT VOICE RECORDER 53 * 34ELECTRONIC LOCATOR TRANSMITTER 53 * 33INTERPHONE AN/AIC-25 32 * 32UNDERWATER BEACONS 47 * *INTERPHONE LS-460 * 30 *


48

TABLE 28

AVIONIC NAVIGATION SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT MAINTAINED BY30 PERCENT OR MORE OF FIRST ENLISTMENT AFSC 328X1 PERSONNEL

(1-48 MONTHS TAFMS)

PERCENT MEMBERS RESPONDING


RESERVE GUARD MILITARYAVIONIC NAVIGATION SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT MAINTAINED (N=43) (N=95) (N=416)

TACAN SYSTEMS-ARN-I18 93 91 94IDENTIFICATION/INTERROGATOR SYSTEMS-KIT-lA 56 68 71IDENTIFICATION/INTERROGATOR SYSTEMS-APX-64 51 * 56SEARCH WEATHER OR MULTI-MODE SYSTEMS-APN-59 49 37 45IDENTIFICATION/INTERROGATOR SYSTEMS-KIR-lA 44 53 44VOR/ILS-ARN-127 42 43 42VOR/ILS-51R-6 30 * 38VOR/ILS-51V-4 33 * 36IDENTIFICATION/INTERROGATOR SYSTEMS-APX-72 32 45 31VOR/ILS-ARN-14 32 * 31VOR/ILS- 51Z-4 35 * *

VOR/ILS- 806A/C 30 * *

ARN-131 (OMEGA) 33 * *

ADF (COLLINS) 33 * *

ADF-DFA-73 30 * *

SW/MM APS-173 44 * *


49

Active-duty Military data which are supported when matched to USAF Reserve orANG data. The 17 elements are part of only two systems: Direction Findersand VHF AM/FM Radios. Each STS will be discussed below.

STS 455X2A (MAC). There are three elements, all part of subparagraph 13m, notsupported by Active-duty Military data, but supported by ANG MAC data in thisSTS. Table 29 provides information on these three elements.

STS 455X2B.(SAC). Table 30 shows the five elements in this STS, all part ofsubparagraph 13g, VHF AM/FM Radios, supported by the USAF Reserve and ANG SACdata. The data supports the retention of a 2b 3-level proficiency code, whichhad not been supported by the Active-duty Military data.

STS 455X2C (TAF). Table 31 reflects the two subparagraphs (13g and 131) withnine elements which are supported by USAF Reserve and ANG TAF data. The 2bskill proficiency codes in the four elements of subparagraph 13g are supportedthroughout, although the Active-duty Military data did not support them. Thefive elements of subparagraph 131 are not only supported for retention in theSTS but the data also indicate the USAF Reserve and ANG personnel might have arequirement for formal training.

POI 45532. Six of the eight blocks of the POI not supported by Active-dutyMilitary data are supported by data from the USAF Reserve and ANG samples.Table 32 provides information on those blocks supported.

Training Analysis Summary

The 455X2 STSs provide an accurate assessment of both the USAF Reserveand ANG personnel specialty training requirements and are supported by thesurvey data for those groups. The USAF Reserve and ANG sample data actuallysupport more STS elements than the data from the Active-duty Military samples.The same is true for the 45532 POI. There appear to be few major differencesbetween the training needs of the USAF Reserve, ANG, Active-duty Military per-sonnel. Data concerning test equipment used, the additional elements sup-ported in the STSs, and additional blocks supported in the POI do, however,indicate that the training needs of Air Force Reserve Component first enlist-ment personnel should be examined for possible additional or tailored trainingrequirements.

JOB SATISFACTION ANALYSIS

Examination of the job satisfaction indicators gives career ladder manag-ers a better understanding of some of the factors which may impact on job per-formance of airmen in the career ladder. Attitude questions covering jobinterest, perceived utilization of talents and training, sense of accomplish-ment from work and reenlistment intentions were included in the survey book-let. The information from these questions is provided in Table 33 for

50

On CV) LON

zt C)- CDj 0 0

z~Y LUrjN-4 c~-Ei

LUL

0i

H-u I--OJ

F-H-

LUU =

> - U~ L

LLU

M CD)

w : e C)Li-

nCl-- LUC)L

Q- (ALLJ L

<0 LU ) 4

CsJL OL- 0 a)

~ ULU LL H--j0H =: (i- 4U-

a_ ~ C) LA- Cc

LU =3 LL LXw/Q C-) LU F.- e-

En = -= : 0 >-4 -) I

s-, 0 J LLJ 0) V) W(A. 0- 0-- X

X: LL < - V

LU Z)3 /) <'

CU- C3 0E C-) H-<)

CV U - ... J-Ln -4~3:U

~4 C) ~ U51

CDc 0-)I00 0 00 0

Z <1 LO mA mA mA

0m cnI-.Jl) CD0 C C C) -4wi. 0i Cd)<O LO CU) CL) CU)

W Ln

a..

C)) m

CD C-)

LLi

m ~ C)-)

tno n .

Lni

Mi E- C) = I- F-

_nC) Lii: =0

Q- Cd) Ui 1-4 1W=LLui L w- LL- L

L ClJ C) Of C0(n<

<A . W> LL J -4 0M: w~i cn = ~ 0-w.

00C- Cii V) X: M: (J .

=i ui LL) LL f n -CL L .) Lu V~< ) =< V) x-L

E) -4 CW i )~ L

V) C L. a-LI = X Li.I4LL J- =D4-

< ILi. L U) F- < w

=d 0 - m ) w I-: C) Li(_) b.< 04-4 I-LiJi VLL i 0e C

I-J X: -L- -X: C) /) iL)U) I-Li C) : L - Li<C) m C~)Li I-< 0~ C-)C)"

U) 4 I- (J cr-) < =r

LL E-~ OL ~LOU cl4 t.)I- EW) ~ I 0 I

Lii E Li..-E O l- W- LiI- =/) J W >44 ~.I-4 -~ U

1... 0 r CJZ -H-- ~0E ~ 0E )CU

Li .~ .'~Z E U CEU UE52>1

CDIF- LI. CV) 1-41 Cz < qdv,~

CD /)-Li U- v, O= Li < -d' -d'Cv

CD -L- r--mI-C~

o ) LF--j LL 0~ 0C0Li. LLI V) =< Ln a) a) LA)

= C -4 LIi I-lLLila-

(d I= CO CO =0j- 0 0 CLiij (.1) = C\l lCC r-4UU-E

LL - ) 4C

Q-

C)i i- 30 1 -3 -4 4

M:i L)

x >- C)i LiL

u, m C c o C

LLJC-) u .)

ui U u oM-C

z Liiu

a - LU Li. LL--0l C) u ' nc -4 I-

=)DClO ui m L wi wt

tn Cl- i=< 0

C.) < LL CO LL. L)I- 0.

V). C .) X..Q cn ^) ILiC LL ii LJ LL= LLcJ V) )d

C.) ) < L <- ULJ L- LL O LLo L=- <0C) X

CL)0 = =D C/) 1- =D C Lii

a-)a- L)< LJ) 4-- i

-J M:C/ U../ I-N C)C u L0. C) 0 .UJ CCi F- = P-

= L)J C0 F- I C) Li)

C3- U 1i-4 C: X-4 0w-=i V) --- cni =2. L

C.) C0 =~~a i= C CLii 1-4 V)~Z ofX< c)E >-I

Cl) In s-4- L.V ZL LU : cn. I--0ELU < Cl) =F -

X: LiJ -1 0X:i C F- C,, C) - '0 E3t

I- - L. (n '.- X0oi V -. Dtt-4 L)> C.)L 3 l

<I 0 /)04

LL- E

53

(-LL l c 7

<C\ -4UJIF

CD CD < LLI

0Cd) ~ L C 0 CD CDL- " on - '-'L U, cDo C'.J LU LUw- V -

La~ of LI. LL C: Z :0L1 c: -I 0A 0.

:t I- LU too) - C1 CL 0dL~~U C: u- <. C: .<

=) 0- LI. = LLLZE LD L. ui< L L LL .

P-4 C-- LULie X: < LL IL LJV

U- CA 0 V) I0' ) -A I- LU ZW OJ0LU

LU LUJ LL - -I-- = L) LUJ U -C ~ L.) WI ME < :z

0 ~LZ Z=J 0 -1 : 0<=:> OC CA- 6 0 I-

!11 0:U- 0- LUIX ELi IL -c, E L.) -q. _j : 0 ~CA

-4LU I-< 0: L)CA X :L L) 0: .- j L (NLUJ QP, u- ME c: 0 c:)OF- e ) wL 0: C-1 => SC-) LU LL I - 0 LU LUj LUJ:LUJ CA -i L < _-w = ~ -Z-1 2: (n, < -1 c:) c0 V) (DLU P-4 1-4 LU XQ 0 E ofX iE)X >- 1-4V)i U- .4 CI o Lii ci, LUJ Q1 -1 0

C- LU''£J.J <F - LU . 1-- -

F- 0: 0 ('J < .) to0-4 Li24 -J\ ~ I~u

Li) < JZ V (/i.* LUJ I& C d

LU ELI- P0 E-

F-~ ff-ci r-

54

< -4 U1-W- ZDaO ju 0 e " t P :

,-.4 "-4< = l<j u .. ) D d

S<C

on <11 r- ko m~ P, c'j r-.

LU EL.1- C) C CD 3 C C

cn L U - 4I -W. 0 ' 1-O-

co <L w ( =< I, LO %.0 r~l %0 '.X: ) ) LU /

11) uLJ

V) Z-CDLU ..J LU

C)U EU C)L5L Cd) '-4 u

I-i OU LU I- L

LLU V) LU- 03

:> -< C-) U-M nc

LU a_ L..) ILE u ' -> C w

-J 0w - 1 X:(nLU w we w

M- >- U-- w co C-) P-4 w- C-)i- -

U, ~< 411d =E 2:'2:2U)o m U) C-) U L L-) :z C-) L-) = C)

DU Z< =" Z< = -cc m .

C3 wU Ln 2 LU = LU wU Of w.m LU LUJ co- 0-4 FO- CO CO1 C 0

C0 - F- C.

C-) 0. D W O m D=

0- LU a) '.0 0) 0 )

LU C'J cl. cnV m~ mfCdI) be 2:5.

C) 4-

~< L) ) LL. LL U- LLC) X < <c < < -< -C1-3 X: ) V.) F-I- I- - LA

<0C

UEL )SU

LI- t.)C- C-)j C-) At) C-)

0

U

CXC

uj 0

U 0'U

ODI- iCLU Ca :1< >C >CU

LL~"U '~ O O 55C

LI-,

cr- ' D

co

C) W 3 1 0 fi 00CD0 C'ir- O--4cli

at~

CDD

11 ~LI 000 0 00- 000- 000

C!)D

I- <

) C

cn C C!-- > r

-i .c00 wmV

C C () C-) M:

-oh) (AJC L L

L.LL ILL < -< -<Iao LU Wd oU--'

= L.) =D ": ~L) WC r-.om - 1-4 m ml- er-oCoCV C) eo , 0 1 o -4 co C

M LLL W- W 110) Cl- V~ =

(A) ' L C-)wL

I-

LU

F- c

LU -JZ

4L C) L- -) GO) LLJW Jw LU4 Z -1.~ 0-4 Z c -

L U LLJ - LL .- J .J 0) 3

0) <L w e x-j>'-F- Cl. - F- Q- -- 0) 1- -J

I-< -< L.) LU 3-LLO C) L0C C-) I- <

0: CD I 0) I-I- < co

C) co ICD LU -j ~ LU -JZ _Il LU co

3c C)I _- C)~ 3c wU 0 0 U- - wo''I3 C3 "0 _0 0- LU ix~ CU 09 i- X

LU LULU LUw >- LU LU >- LU LA. U-,cc I . = WX-4 N cic C) :> .- i -i -- 1 0 V)~ I= cn . 0)CO 1-4 W V) j I.- (n- _-. _j _-j-~ U

w I4 i~~n IM LLJ -i LA-. -J = ~ LUz 3 3 3

56

Communications (AFSC 328X0) personnel and Table 34 for Navigation Systems(AFSC 328X1) personnel. The Active-duty Military data are provided to allow acomparison among the different components.

USAF Reserve and ANG personnel in both AFSCs 328X0 and 328X1 tend to havemuch higher overall job satisfaction than their Active-duty Military counter-parts. Data concerning full-time technicians and part-time traditional per-sonnel is also displayed to give managers information as to how they compare.Overall, there does not appear to be major differences in job satisfactionbetween the technicians and the traditional personnel for USAF Reserve or ANGgroups in either AFSC.

ADDITIONAL ISSUES

ANG Bureau personnel requested data be collected on four areas. One wason reenlistment intentions of ANG airmen. Another was on the incentivesreceived to reenlist or remain in the ANG. A third was to deterr'ine if anincentive was received, would the individual have enlisted or reenlisted with-out the incentive. Finally they wanted to know what reason those choosing notto reenlist had for their decision. Reenlistment intention data were col-lected through a standard background question on the job inventory. Questionsfor the other areas were developed and placed in a special section of the jobinventory background section to be answered by ANG personnel only. Data gath-ered on the additiunal iqterest items are displayed in Tables 33 through 41.

Tables 33 and 34, dealing with job satisfaction, provide reenlistmentintent data based on personnel categories. All categories of personnel reportcomparatively high reenlistment intentions, with the full-time Air Reserve andANG technicians higher than the Traditional Guardsmen. A different perspec-tive is provided in Table 34, where a Total Active Federal Military Service(TAFMS) breakout for each AFSC is shown. A high percentage of airmen in eachgroup indicate a predilection toward probable reenlistment.

The second area of interest was information concerning the types ofenlistment or reenlistment incentives Air National Guardsmen received. Of the189 Communications personnel in the ANG sample, 44 indicated they had receivedan incentive. Table 36 shows the data on the types of incentives these indi-viduals received. Data for personnel categories and TAFMS are provided in thetable. The same type of information is shown for the 64 out of 266 NavigationSystems personnel in Table 37. Enlistment and reenlistment bonuses appear tobe the incentives most people receive, with student loan repayment notreceived as often. Receiving more than one incentive seems to be the excep-tion rather than the rule.

The next type of information desired was to determine if individuals whohad received an incentive would have enlisted or reenlisted if they had notreceived the incentive. Table 38 shows the breakout of the data from 54 Com-munications personnel who indicated whether they would or would not enlist orreenlist without an incentive. Table 39 provides these data for the 76

57

ca LU C)CLr,-4- l -i P 4i % -UcLA CD LAi.

_j

U Z

LJ

W-4L I tnQ' mCD- r- 4 71 Jc 00 00 o k Y

< C

CD

Ji LLU IL

C o L4LIC3 4I m m004 C

F- uj< 9= a-4 L c 40

0'1 002-M4)

I- LOP co LUJ L

o ui (A LU'C C-) m W- -1

(A - LUC-L- < -<

C)

LU

V)

M C)

-J CD-j MI- ~ ~ V C.) -4 C A J

uj UJJ - LLUJ - C

m0 < cc < a- 1-4 i-jP-4 a- 0f- Q- 0.4- 0D = .q_

I-< < C-) LU -3C). m- >- co

C0 C)l In --I CC)0 0n 0D 'U -i u - - Je0j

--. )) 0-4 =: w =: w 0 ca IL M mN -A =

M cz a - _j m cC ujuLU >-L Luw >- w ILA I<l Q- = = X-jJ- ::: =i0 C) V) ::< (A C 0

LU0i- L (-)1 - LU -W( C) J~Ix -4( = Lj J -i LL.J -i :z Z LU j

58

LJ . )C

-J L.

C) f

oa - In L) DC

~ LU M1

LU j

LL LU< - X

C/) I-- L) I 0 '0 m ~ '

II-c

>-L -j

-J.

LLLULU ~LUC% o O

LUI

I--0 I- V) C

- Li z M:CZCl- C) - kD ' ec i

LO m0 L.) (A~ 00 Cce) LJ == C U "

LU ce 0

I- I- < V) I

LLJL LU ) 1 0

LUJLU

0< LL)

CU

LA-J

LU

LU J

(M LUJ -

LUJ -j

LUJ

-i C)

o < a

I- 0 I- I- LU

0L -1 -j -J ..0 -4 '-4 '-4 0)

59

-J Iz I

'-4 C)- -4CI

C)

LUI

L-J u<Lf)LU LO

u-

LUJ

LUJ I--

LUJ

L.UCD C..

03 LUI

03 CO) LL LU-

F- I-J

LU LU

LUJe.=Dc'.

'--4 0-C

LLLU

C3.

LL0 LU Z

LUJ C) -c0 2 LUJ 0

:> LUJ

03 LUI LU m 0LUJ C) of LU

V) c-V) >- LUJ LUJLU J < V) :::

LL o 9 0 L )LLU CI L C

Z< LUo i- 0U 0

:z LU- 7-

Cd) ,. LU 0 >-

60

-o -30F- ix qd N CV) .J O

C)D

(DLUJ

bLUI < '-4 CD CDI

LUJ LUCD0

UI)

a_ <

LU LiU

LL LUJ

F- C ) .m Il = 1 cy) cm C) 0)

F- >- I3

a- C3J LULI) =X C~JI

F- LUJC)F I-ILUJ t LIC)c w n ) L < 11 LOl C'-j - LI) X LUJ F-4 =

co i L-V) LL- V _Ij

F-LU LUJ F- LUJ

C3 crF-co

L D LUj

LU C9 F-F I)I -

LALU

=D i 0U

LI) < C -4X

C1LU LL. -

F- LU

0U LULU U

L LiC3 LU

L) C3 :>) >-J LU

1- LI) F 0C3 0L LU C)

F- FI X: LUo) F- LU 0 m

F-LU F- C u0: C ) F- u

m F- '- L LUCL~ ~ LI . L

0 F- ZL- CD

F- LUJ F-

-4LU VLL) I

61

C:\J

-< 11 CJ 1-4

o>-CDLUI

I-IU C3

-J P-4 LUJ 1 -1 0)LUI < LO) Z:z LUC D'~m0 O

C)

LU I

LUI CD' 1

M- L)I

-'L L LUJc

Cl,

LU

(I~j -4 ) -00 K

m CdM ) LL V)

. LU wt

F-~~I IL - L

LL, CD X

LU 0 Cd) X:Ui-

C ~ ~ U Cd) C)L

E I-

d ) -4i

= CC) " 1-4 :

- L U-

C)

CL C

Cd)F- F-

0-4Cd

-IJ

LUF- LUJCd) LUJ C OLU

LU 0

I*- m

m Cd) LU

< LI - = :)X: C0

crC OUj C3Co - i JLL :DMI C)- 0 D

DC :

62

-4 L

CD~D

CD

LU

I-J LU

Z: LU<I 00

LU CLU L.LD

C)

'-n LJ '-D

(D CDLU

en CD(n / C--)

(f) LU L. )

co U 0 0 LU- c\JI -<4

LD Co

V U)~~ LL)I r- .L ) :z FU-4 LO

LU < LUi

Of LUU-_

LU LU

CD'

C)

OLU

:

(/V) L.- I0-4 L

LUJ

0 u- JLu L

V) LU I0j L L

C) LUCD

UJLI- C C)33c Di

o ~463

Navigation Systems personnel selecting one of these two answers. The majorityof the personnel in both AFSCs indicate they would have enlisted or reenlistedwithout an incentive. The groups least likely to want to reenlist without anincentive are the second-enlistment personnel and Traditional Guardsmen.

The fourth area of interest is the main reason individuals do not reen-list in the ANG. Forty-three Communications personnel and 52 Navigation Sys-tems personnel indicated the reason they do not plan to reenlist. Table 40shows the Communications data and Table 41 has the Navigation Systems data.The civilian job considerations appears to be the most popular reason not toreenlist. The next most used category reason is "other." Unfortunately, therespondents did not elaborate on their meaning.

IMPLICATIONS

USAF Reserve and ANG personnel were included in this survey to determinesimilarities with each other ard between them and their Active-duty Militarycounterparts. The data support the proposition that they are very similar toeach other and do have some of the same jobs as Active-duty Military person-nel. The survey data for the USAF Reserve and the ANG support the trainingdocuments used for AFSC 455X2. It appears that USAF Reserve and ANG subject-matter experts should have input to any changes made to the AFSC 455X2 train-ing documents. Surveying USAF Reserve and ANG personnel is feasible andshould be considered for those AFSCs where these components have comparativelylarge training requirements. Job Inventories were completed in a mannercomparable to that of Active-duty Military personnel. Data provided could beanalyzed in the same manner as Active-duty Military data. Survey administra-tion for USAF Reserve and ANG survs should go through units to provide thecontrol necessary to assure a good percentage of the job inventories arereturned and that they are useable,

64

0M>- Of j 0CV4D C~ qrr

CD DLUJ <C

-jLUI

LU),

LUJ

F- LL OLL- LU

cuj -CY) - ~ C\J qj -

c'CDLL f -

LJ -4 I

C) )L < ><AI a- C/) C-4 -' -4.qd Z CLJ L0 U) LU-) V)II -- CLU " (* J Li LL.J -

L.J IC:) Of V)_

co LUJ m L0 LU.< ,- 1

LU = m

C~ LUJ

LLJL -j

<00 -4 0 lccooi

co < =) 1 -4 M

af LU

L-) V)

0~ in

CZ CD- - LAJ-L LL l I

-LU )u L

LU LU CD F-

LU L.) LL) <

co V CD '-)

oC) ~ F-LU C.3 LUF-<

< co LU

C) $- (A in LoA =r - '-

'-4 C- in CD ;z C

F- ~ '4 LA65

0 -

'-0-

0LUI

I-I

m LiUC!C) ~

0 47L1I 0 0 -

LUj

C)-

0 -0 Q-

CLLJ Lol '-D 00~

LU ~) LLlL1

iC)V) mX:) ~m L)LLI a 4 f-4

L LL C) - -

tn - L ULI -C') .4J <~ V) _)

Dr- LLU

LUI CD LU I- <

M LLU

0-44

LL -J (A0

LL

nP f C-) LU C Z

LLJ LL a- 66

APPENDIX A

SELECTED REPRESENTATIVE TASKS PERFORMED BYUSAF RESERVE PERSONNEL IN

AFSC 328X0 CAREER LADDER SPECIALTY JOBS

67

TABLE I

GROUP NUMBER AND TITLE: STGO08, GENERAL MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN CLUSTERGROUP SIZE: 118 PERCENT MEMBERS OF SAMPLE: 84%AVERAGE GRADE: E-4 AVERAGE TICF: 88AVERAGE TASKS PERFORMED: 195

TASKS ARE LISTED IN DESCENDING ORDER OF PERCENT MEMBERS PERFORMING:

PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

F163 BENCH CHECK AVIONIC SYSTEMS MOCKUP LRU 94G218 BENCH CHECK UHF RECEIVER-TRANSMITTERS 93G232 ISOLATE MALFUNCTIONS IN UHF SYSTEMS 92F203 TEST CONTINUITY OF COAXIAL CABLES 92F205 TRACE SIGNALS THROUGH CIRCUITS USING SCHEMATICS 92F199 SAFETY WIRE AVIONIC SYSTEM LRU 91G252 REMOVE OR REPLACE UHF RECEIVER-TRANSMITTERS 91E139 MAKE ENTRIES ON AFTO FORMS 350 (REPARABLE ITEM PROCESSING

TAG) 91F201 SOLDER AVIONIC SYSTEM WIRING 90F196 REMOVE OR REPLACE RADIO FREQUENCY (RF) COAXIAL CONNECTORS 90F206 TRACE SIGNALS THROUGH CIRCUITS USING WIRING DIAGRAMS 90F138 MAKE ENTRIES ON AFTO FORMS 349 (MAINTENANCE DATA

COLLECTION RECORD) 90G236 PRESET FREQUENCIES IN UHF CONTROL UNITS 89G213 ALIGN UHF RECEIVER-TRANSMITTERS 89G227 ISOLATE MALFUNCTIONS IN UHF RECEIVER-TRANSMITTERS 89G210 ADJUST ULTRA HIGH FREQUENCY (UHF) RADIO SYSTEMS 89L404 OPERATIONALLY CHECK INTERPHONE SYSTEMS 88L407 REMOVE OR REPLACE INTERPHONE CONTROL BOXES 88L398 ISOLATE MALFUNCTIONS IN INTERPHONE CORDS 88F207 TRANSPORT TEST EQUIPMENT TO OR FROM FLIGHTLINE 88F164 CLEAN COMPONENTS OR PARTS 87L395 FABRICATE INTERPHONE CORDS 87F162 ALIGN AVIONIC SYSTEMS MOCKUP LINE REPLACEABLE UNITS (LRU) 86F205 TRACE SIGNALS THROUGH CIRCUITS USING SCHEMATICS 86F209 VISUALLY INSPECT AIRCRAFT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS 86F167 FABRICATE COAXIAL CABLES 86G251 REMOVE OR REPLACE UHF RECEIVER-TRANSMITTER SUBASSEMBLIES 85F176 ISOLATE MALFUNCTIONS IN AVIONIC SYSTEMS WIRING 84F171 INVENTORY CONSOLIDATED TOOL KITS (CTK) 83F185 REMOVE OR REPLACE AIRCRAFT ACCESS PLATES OR PANELS 83

Al

TABLE II

GROUP NUMBER AND TITLE: STGO19, SUPERVISOR CLUSTERGROUP SIZE: 10 PERCENT MEMBERS OF SAMPLE: 7%AVERAGE GRADE: E-6 AVERAGE TICF: 156AVERAGE TASKS PERFORMED: 93


PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

B18 COUNSEL PERSONNEL 100C58 INSPECT COMPLETED JOBS 100A16 SCHEDULE WORK ASSIGNMENTS 100E143 ORIENT NEWLY ASSIGNED PERSONNEL 90C65 WRITE APR 90B38 WRITE CORRESPONDENCE 90819 DIRECT FIELD SHOP MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES 90D89 MAINTAIN TRAINING RECORDS 90D76 COUNSEL OJT TRAINEES ON PROGRESS 90D69 ASSIGN ON-THE-JOB TRAINING (OJT) TRAINERS 90D78 DEMONSTRATE HOW TO LOCATE TECHNICAL INFORMATION 90C56 INDORSE AIRMAN PERFORMANCE REPORTS (APR) 90D79 DETERMINE OJT REQUIREMENTS 90Al ASSIGN PERSONNEL TO DUTY POSITIONS 90C64 VERIFY MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION AND CONTROL

SYSTEM (MMICS) LISTINGS 90B20 DIRECT FLIGHTLINE MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES 90D71 CONDUCT OJT 90095 SCHEDULE PERSONNEL FOR TRAINING 90E124 MAINTAIN MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT INFORMATION AND CONTROL

SYSTEM (MMICS) WORKCENTER LISTINGS 90A4 DETERMINE WORK PRIORITIES 80B37 INTERPRET POLICIES FOR SUBORDINATES 80E116 LOCATE PART OR STOCK NUMBERS IN TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS 80E139 MAKE ENTRIES ON AFTO FORMS 350 (REPARABLE ITEM PROCESSING

TAG) 80E110 IDENTIFY PARTS USING ILLUSTRATED PARTS BREAKDOWN (IPB) 80A4 DETERMINE WORK PRIORITIES 80A2 ASSIGN SPONSORS FOR NEWLY ASSIGNED PERSONNEL 80C60 INSPECT REPORTED DISCREPANCIES 80E104 COORDINATE FLIGHTLINE MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES 80E159 UPDATE MMICS USING AF FORMS 2426 (TRAINING REQUEST AND

COMPLETION NOTIFICATION) 80E115 LOCATE MAINTENANCE INFORMATION IN TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS 70

A2

APPENDIX B

SELECTED REPRESENTATIVE TASKS PERFORMED BYAIR NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL IN


68

TABLE I



PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

L404 OPERATIONALLY CHECK INTERPHONE SYSTEMS 96G232 ISOLATE MALFUNCTIONS IN UHF SYSTEMS 96L407 REMOVE OR REPLACE INTERPHONE CONTROL BOXES 96G236 PRESET FREQUENCIES IN UHF CONTROL UNITS 96G218 BENCH CHECK UHF RECEIVER-TRANSMITTERS 95F199 SAFETY WIRE AVIONIC SYSTEM LRU 95G252 REMOVE OR REPLACE UHF RECEIVER-TRANSMITTERS 95G210 ADJUST ULTRA HIGH FREQUENCY (UHF) RADIO SYSTEMS 95F206 TRACE SIGNALS THROUGH CIRCUITS USING WIRING DIAGRAMS 95F209 VISUALLY INSPECT AIRCRAFT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS 95F164 CLEAN COMPONENTS OR PARTS 94F201 SOLDER AVIONIC SYSTEM WIRING 94F203 TEST CONTINUITY OF COAXIAL CABLES 94L395 FABRICATE INTERPHONE CORDS 94F176 ISOLATE MALFUNCTIONS IN AVIONIC SYSTEMS WIRING 94F205 TRACE SIGNALS THROUGH CIRCUITS USING SCHEMATICS 94F172 ISOLATE MALFUNCTIONS IN AVIONIC SYSTEMS CABLES 94F207 TRANSPORT TEST EQUIPMENT TO OR FROM FLIGHTLINE 94L391 BENCH CHECK INTERPHONE CONTROL BOXES 94L398 ISOLATE MALFUNCTIONS IN INTERPHONE CORDS 93G213 ALIGN UHF RECEIVER-TRANSMITTERS 93F196 REMOVE OR REPLACE RADIO FREQUENCY (RF) COAXIAL CONNECTORS 93F185 REMOVE OR REPLACE AIRCRAFT ACCESS PLATES OR PANELS 93F163 BENCH CHECK AVIONIC SYSTEMS MOCKUP LRU 92E139 MAKE ENTRIES ON AFTO FORMS 350 (REPARABLE ITEM PROCESSING

TAG) 92G227 ISOLATE MALFUNCTIONS IN UHF RECEIVER-TRANSMITTERS 92L409 REMOVE OR REPLACE INTERPHONE CORDS 92F162 ALIGN AVIONIC SYSTEMS MOCKUP LINE REPLACEABLE UNITS (LRU) 91G251 REMOVE OR REPLACE UHF RECEIVER-TRANSMITTER SUBASSEMBLIES 91F171 INVENTORY CONSOLIDATED TOOL KITS (CTK) 81

BI

TABLE II

GROUP NUMBER AND TITLE: STGO19, SUPERVISORGROUP SIZE: 6 PERCENT MEMBERS OF SAMPLE: 3%AVERAGE GRADE: E-6 AVERAGE TICF: 196AVERAGE TASKS PERFORMED: 89


PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

B18 COUNSEL PERSONNEL 100E143 ORIENT NEWLY ASSIGNED PERSONNEL 100A4 DETERMINE WORK PRIORITIES 100C58 INSPECT COMPLETED JOBS 100B38 WRITE CORRESPONDENCE 100B19 DIRECT FIELD SHOP MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES 100D76 COUNSEL OJT TRAINEES ON PROGRESS 100D69 ASSIGN ON-THE-JOB TRAINING (OJT) TRAINERS 100D95 SCHEDULE PERSONNEL FOR TRAINING 100A8 ESTABLISH PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 100C44 EVALUATE COMPLIANCE WITH PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 100E141 OPERATE MICROFICHE VIEWERS 100B37 INTERPRET POLICIES FOR SUBORDINATES 83E115 LOCATE MAINTENANCE INFORMATION IN TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS 83A16 SCHEDULE WORK ASSIGNMENTS 83E139 MAKE ENTRIES ON AFTO FORMS 350 (REPARABLE ITEM PROCESSING

TAG) 83D78 DEMONSTRATE HOW TO LOCATE TECHNICAL INFORMATION 83D79 DETERMINE OJT REQUIREMENTS 83Al ASSIGN PERSONNEL TO DUTY POSITIONS 83C60 INSPECT REPORTED DISCREPANCIES 83A15 SCHEDULE PERSONNEL FOR ABSENCES, SUCH AS LEAVE OR

TEMPORARY DUTY (TOY) ASSIGNMENTS 83B22 DIRECT MAINTENANCE OF EQUIPMENT 83C39 ANALYZE WORKLOAD REQUIREMENTS 83C55 EVALUATE WORK SCHEDULES 83D84 DIRECT OJT PROGRAMS 83D88 IMPLEMENT TRAINING PROGRAMS 83E105 DETERMINE REPAIR PRIORITIES 83E136 MAKE ENTRIES ON AF FORMS 2430 (SPECIALIST DISPATCH CONTROL

LOG) 83E140 MAKE ENTRIES ON SUPPLY TURN IN OR ISSUE FORMS, SUCH AS DO

FORMS 1577, AF FORMS 2005, OR DO FORMS 1150 83

B2

APPENDIX C

SELECTED REPRESENTATIVE TASKS PERFORMED BYUSAF RESERVE PERSONNEL IN


69

TABLE I

GROUP NUMBER AND TITLE: STGOI5, GENERAL MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN CLUSTERGROUP SIZE: 139 PERCENT MEMBERS OF SAMPLE: 83%AVERAGE GRADE: E-4 AVERAGE TICF: 114AVERAGE TASKS PERFORMED: 418


PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

G229 LOCATE MAINTENANCE INFORMATION IN AIR FORCE TECHNICALORDERS 97

G208 CLEAN LINE REPLACEABLE UNITS (LRU) 96G206 CLEAN AVIONIC EQUIPMENT 96G215 INSPECT AVIONIC EQUIPMENT FOR CORROSION 96G259 TRACE CIRCUITS USING SCHEMATICS 96G222 ISOLATE MALFUNCTIONS IN AVIONIC SYSTEMS COAXIAL CABLES 96G258 TEST CONTINUITY OF AVIONIC SYSTEM WIRING 96G219 INSPECT PARTS RECEIVED FROM SUPPLY 95G260 TRACE SIGNALS USING WIRING DIAGRAMS 95G250 SAFETY WIRE SYSTEM COMPONENTS 95M435 ISOLATE MALFUNCTIONS IN TACAN ANTENNA SELECTORS 95G223 ISOLATE MALFUNCTIONS IN AVIONIC SYSTEMS WIRING CABLES 94G227 ISOLATE MALFUNCTIONS TO AVIONIC SYSTEMS WIRING 94G256 TEST CONTINUITY OF AVIONIC SYSTEM CABLES 94G257 TEST CONTINUITY OF AVIONIC SYSTEM COAXIAL CABLES 94J324 OPERATIONALLY CHECK GLIDESLOPES USING FLIGHTLINE TEST

EQUIPMENT (FTE) 94M483 REMOVE OR INSTALL TACAN RT UNITS 94G228 ISOLATE MOCKUP MALFUNCTIONS TO SUBASSEMBLIES 93J310 BENCH CHECK LOCALIZER RECEIVERS 93J347 REMOVE OR INSTALL MARKER BEACON RECEIVERS 93H263 BENCH CHECK MOCKUP LRU 92H261 ALIGN MOCKUP LINE REPLACEABLE UNITS (LRU) 92E137 MAKE ENTRIES ON AFTO FORMS 350 (REPARABLE ITEM PROCESSING

TAG) 92H272 REMOVE OR INSTALL MOCKUP LRU 92E136 MAKE ENTRIES ON AFTO FORMS 349 (MAINTENANCE DATA

COLLECTION RECORD) 92J308 BENCH CHECK GLIDESLOPE RECEIVERS 92E139 MAKE ENTRIES ON AFTO FORMS 781 SERIES (AIRCRAFT FORMS) 92H273 REMOVE OR INSTALL MOCKUP SUBASSEMBLIES 92J306 ALIGN LOCALIZER RECEIVERS 92J331 REMOVE OR INSTALL GLIDESLOPE RECEIVERS 92H267 ISOLATE MALFUNCTIONS TO MOCKUP LRU 91J304 ALIGN GLIDESLOPE RECEIVERS 91M442 ISOLATE MALFUNCTIONS IN TACAN RT UNITS 91

Cl

TABLE I I

GROUP NUMBER AND TITLE: STG023, SUPERVISORGROUP SIZE: 8 PERCENT MEMBERS OF SAMPLE: 5%AVERAGE GRADE: E-6 AVERAGE TICF: 232AVERAGE TASKS PERFORMED: 173


PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

C72 WRITE APR 92B27 COUNSEL PERSONNEL ON MILITARY-RELATED PROBLEMS 89A6 DETERMINE WORK PRIORITIES 86B28 COUNSEL PERSONNEL ON PERSONAL PROBLEMS 86A23 WRITE EVALUATION REPORTS 85B45 INTERPRET POLICIES FOR SUBORDINATES 85A22 SCHEDULE WORK ASSIGNMENTS 82A1O ESTABLISH PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR SUBORDINATES 78C49 EVALUATE COMPLIANCE WITH PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 76A5 DETERMINE SUPPLY REQUIREMENTS 75A20 SCHEDULE LEAVES 75D93 MAINTAIN TRAINING RECORDS 75A3 DETERMINE EQUIPMENT REQUIREMENTS 74D80 COUNSEL TRAINEES ON TRAINING PROGRESS 71E110 LOCATE STOCK NUMBERS ON MICROFICHE 70A4 DETERMINE PERSONNEL REQUIREMENTS 69C64 INDORSE AIRMAN PERFORMANCE REPORTS (APR) 68Al ASSIGN PERSONNEL TO DUTY POSITIONS 68B25 CONDUCT SAFETY BRIEFINGS 68A8 DEVELOP WORK METHODS OR PROCEDURES 66A2 ASSIGN SPONSORS FOR NEWLY ASSIGNED PERSONNEL 66E109 LOCATE PART NUMBERS IN TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS 66D76 ASSIGN ON-THE-JOB TRAINING (OJT) TRAINERS 65C66 INSPECT CONSOLIDATED TOOL KITS (CTK) 64E140 MAKE ENTRIES ON SUPPLY TURN-IN OR ISSUE FORMS, SUCH AS AF

FORM 2005, OR DD FORM 1150 62C47 ANALYZE WORKLOAD REQUIREMENTS 62B41 IMPLEMENT SAFETY PROGRAMS 62C63 EVALUATE WORK SCHEDULES 61D81 DEMONSTRATE HOW TO LOCATE TECHNICAL INFORMATION 61D77 CONDUCT OJT 61

C2

TABLE III

GROUP NUMBER AND TITLE: STGO16, QUALITY ASSURANCE INSPECTORGROUP SIZE: 8 PERCENT MEMBERS OF SAMPLE: 5%AVERAGE GRADE: E-6 AVERAGE TICF: 152AVERAGE TASKS PERFORMED: 25


PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

C56 EVALUATE MAINTENANCE OF EQUIPMENT 95G215 INSPECT AVIONIC EQUIPMENT FOR CORROSION 85El05 INSPECT AFTO FORMS 244 (INDUSTRIAL/SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

RECORD) 85G217 INSPECT EQUIPMENT SHOCK MOUNTS 85C66 INSPECT CONSOLIDATED TOOL KITS (CTK) 81H265 INSPECT MOCKUPS 78A23 WRITE EVALUATION REPORTS 72B35 DIRECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMS 72G229 LOCATE MAINTENANCE INFORMATION IN AIR FORCE TECHNICAL

ORDERS 71C49 EVALUATE COMPLIANCE WITH PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 67G216 INSPECT DESICCANT CRYSTALS 67D81 DEMONSTRATE HOW TO LOCATE TECHNICAL INFORMATION 65C68 INVESTIGATE INCIDENTS 64C55 EVALUATE MAINTENANCE INSPECTION REPORT FINDINGS 60A19 SCHEDULE INSPECTIONS 60H264 INSPECT MOCKUP WIRING 60E139 MAKE ENTRIES ON AFTO FORMS 781 SERIES (AIRCRAFT FORMS) 60E142 PREPARE AFTO FORMS 22 (TECHNICAL ORDER SYSTEM PUBLICATION

IMPROVEMENT REPORT AND REPLY) 60C74 WRITE SPECIAL REPORTS 56C61 EVALUATE SUGGESTIONS 51C67 INVESTIGATE ACCIDENTS 49G219 INSPECT PARTS RECEIVED FROM SUPPLY 49E109 LOCATE PART NUMBERS IN TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS 49C70 REVIEW EVALUATION REPORTS 47G220 INSPECT WAVEGUIDES FOR CORROSION OR MOISTURE 47D90 EVALUATE TRAINING METHODS 44C59 EVALUATE SAFETY PROGRAMS 44G218 INSPECT PARTS RECEIVED FROM MANUFACTURERS 44G255 TEST AND EVALUATE AVIONIC EQUIPMENT 42D88 EVALUATE OJT TRAINEES 42

C3

APPENDIX 0

SELECTED REPRESENTATIVE TASKS PERFORMED BY

AIR NATIONAL GUARD PERSONNEL IN

AFSC 328X1 CAREER LADDER SPECIALITY JOBS

70

TABLE I



PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

G259 TRACE CIRCUITS USING SCHEMATICS 97G250 SAFETY WIRE SYSTEM COMPONENTS 96J310 BENCH CHECK LOCALIZER RECEIVERS 96J324 OPERATIONALLY CHECK GLIDESLOPES USING FLIGHTLINE TEST

EQUIPMENT (FTE) 96J308 BENCH CHECK GLIDESLOPE RECEIVERS 95J331 REMOVE OR INSTALL GLIDESLOPE RECEIVERS 95G260 TRACE SIGNALS USING WIRING DIAGRAMS 94E139 MAKE ENTRIES ON AFTO FORMS 781 SERIES (AIRCRAFT FORMS) 94G258 TEST CONTINUITY OF AVIONIC SYSTEM WIRING 94G206 CLEAN AVIONIC EQUIPMENT 93G215 INSPECT AVIONIC EQUIPMENT FOR CORROSION 93E137 MAKE ENTRIES ON AFTO FORMS 350 (REPARABLE ITEM PROCESSING

TAG) 93G257 TEST CONTINUITY OF AVIONIC SYSTEM COAXIAL CABLES 93M483 REMOVE OR INSTALL TACAN RT UNITS 93F162 OPERATE AEROSPACE GROUND EQUIPMENT (AGE), SUCH AS POWER

UNITS, HEATERS, OR LIGHT CARTS 93H263 BENCH CHECK MOCKUP LRU 92G222 ISOLATE MALFUNCTIONS IN AVIONIC SYSTEMS COAXIAL CABLES 92J310 BENCH CHECK LOCALIZER RECEIVERS 92J311 BENCH CHECK MARKER BEACON RECEIVERS 92G229 LOCATE MAINTNANCE INFORMATION IN AIR FORCE TECHNICAL

ORDERS 91G256 TEST CONTINUITY OF AVIONIC SYSTEM CABLES 91J304 ALIGN GLIDESLOPE RECEIVERS 91J347 REMOVE OR INSTALL MARKER BEACON RECEIVERS 91J323 OPERATE ASSOCIATED SYSTEMS WHILE CHECKING ILS 91J343 REMOVE OR INSTALL LOCALIZER RECEIVERS 91M432 BENCH CHECK TACAN RT UNITS 91G208 CLEAN LINE REPLACEABLE UNITS (LRU) 90G223 ISOLATE MALFUNCTIONS IN AVIONIC SYSTEMS WIRING CABLES 90J306 ALIGN LOCALIZER RECEIVERS 90

Dl

TABLE II

GROUP NUMBER AND TITLE: STG023, SUPERVISORGROUP SIZE: 13 PERCENT MEMBERS OF SAMPLE: 5%AVERAGE G ADE: E-6 AVERAGE TICF: 181AVERAGE TASKS PERFORMED: 86


PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

B36 DIRECT SHOP MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES 92227 COUNSEL PERSONNEL ON MILITARY-RELATED PROBLEMS 92E103 COORDINATE FLIGHTLINE MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES WITH WORKLOAD

CONTROL SECTIONS 92A6 DETERMINE WORK PRIORITIES 92B45 INTERPRET POLICIES FOR SUBORDINATES 92A22 SCHEDULE WORK ASSIGNMENTS 92B29 DIRECT FLIGHTLINE MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES 85237 DIRECT UTILIZATION OF EQUIPMENT 85D93 MAINTAIN TRAINING RECORDS 85C66 INSPECT CONSOLIDATED TOOL KITS (CTK) 85C47 ANALYZE WORKLOAD REQUIREMENTS 85B28 COUNSEL PERSONNEL ON PERSONAL PROBLEMS 77A23 WRITE EVALUATION REPORTS 77C49 EVALUATE COMPLIANCE WITH PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 77D80 COUNSEL TRAINEES ON TRAINING PROGRESS 77A8 DEVELOP WORK METHODS OR PROCEDURES 77076 ASSIGN ON-THE-JOB TRAININC (OJT) TRAINERS 77D81 DEMONSTRATE HOW TO LOCATE TECHNICAL INFORMATION 77A1O ESTABLISH PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR SUBORDINATES 69B25 CONDUCT SAFETY BRIEFINGS 69B41 IMPLEMENT SAFETY PROGRAMS 69AS DETERMINE SUPPLY REQUIREMENTS 62Al ASSIGN PERSONNEL TO DUTY POSITIONS 62D77 CONDUCT OJT 62

D2

TABLE III

GROUP NUMBER AND TITLE: STGO11, QUALITY ASSURANCE INSPECTORGROUP SIZE: 1 PERCENT MEMBERS OF SAMPLE: 4%AVERAGE GRADE: E-6 AVERAGE TICF: 94AVERAGE TASKS PERFORMED: 28


PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

A19 SCHEDULE INSPECTIONS 91C56 EVALUATE MAINTENANCE OF EQUIPMENT 82C66 INSPECT CONSOLIDATED TOOL KITS (CTK) 82E105 INSPECT AFTO FORMS 244 (INDUSTRIAL/SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

RECORD) 73B35 DIRECT QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMS 73C55 EVALUATE MAINTENANCE INSPECTION REPORT FINDINGS 73E142 PREPARE AFTO FORMS 22 (TECHNICAL ORDER SYSTEM PUBLICATION

IMPROVEMENT REPORT AND REPLY) 73C68 INVESTIGATE INCIDENTS 64C59 EVALUATE SAFETY PROGRAMS 64A8 DEVELOP WORK METHODS OR PROCEDURES 64E132 MAINTAIN TECHNICAL ORDER (TO) FILES 64D81 DEMONSTRATE HOW TO LOCATE TECHNICAL INFORMATION 55E150 PREPARE SF 368 (QUALITY DEFICIENCY REPORT (CATEGORY II) 55B45 INTERPRET POLICIES FOR SUBORDINATES 55A23 WRITE EVALUATION REPORTS 45C49 EVALUATE COMPLIANCE WITH PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 45E139 MAKE ENTRIES ON AFTO FORMS 781 SERIES (AIRCRAFT FORMS) 45C67 INVESTIGATE ACCIDENTS 45G215 INSPECT AVIONIC EQUIPMENT FOR CORROSION 36G217 INSPECT EQUIPMENT SHOCK MOUNTS 36G216 INSPECT DESICCANT CRYSTALS 36C74 WRITE SPECIAL REPORTS 36E109 LOCATE PART NUMBERS IN TECHNICAL PUBLICAT T

- 36C70 REVIEW EVALUATION REPORTS 36R763 ALIGN STATION KEEPING EQUIPMENT (SKE) ANTENNA PEDESTALS 36

D3

TABLE IV

GROUP NUMBER AND TITLE: STG064, MAINTENANCE CONTROLLERGROUP SIZE: 5 PERCENT MEMBERS OF SAMPLE: 2%AVERAGE GRADE: E-5 AVERAGE TICF: 137AVERAGE TASKS PERFORMED: 10


PERCENTMEMBERS

TASKS PERFORMING

E102 ASSIGN JOB CONTROL NUMBERS 100E103 COORDINATE FLIGHTLINE MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES WITH WORKLOAD

CONTROL SECTIONS 100E127 MAINTAIN SPECIALIST DISPATCH BOARDS 80E128 MAINTAIN STATUS BOARDS 80B33 DIRECT MAINTENANCE OF STATUS BOARDS 80E136 MAKE ENTRIES ON AFTO FORMS 349 (MAINTENANCE DATA

COLLECTION RECORD) 80E122 MAINTAIN PARTLY MISSION CAPABLE SUPPLY (PMCS) STATUS OF

REQUISITIONED PARTS 60E139 MAKE ENTRIES ON AFTO FORMS 781 (AIRCRAFT FORMS) 40A6 DETERMINE WORK PRIORITIES 40A22 SCHEDULE WORK ASSIGNMENTS 40Ell MAINTAIN AF FORMS 864 (DAILY REQUIREMENT AND DISPATCH

RECORD) 20E121 MAINTAIN NOT MISSION CAPABLE SUPPLY (NMCS) LISTINGS 20R763 ALIGN STATION KEEPING EQUIPMENT (SKE) ANTENNA PEDESTALS 20E11O LOCATE STOCK NUMBERS ON MICROFICHE 20A5 DETERMINE SUPPLY REQUIREMENTS 20E104 IDENTIFY PARTS USING ILLUSTRATED PARTS BREAKDOWN (IPB) 20E109 LOCATE PART NUMBERS IN TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS 20E132 MAINTAIN TECHNICAL ORDER (TO) FILES 20

D4

Documents

cm · 2011-05-15 · 1, united states air force q~.i cm air force reserve component i! avionic comm.kunication and navigation systems afsc 455x2 (por.erly 32ex0 and 328x) afpt 90-37p-318/819