8
Class Summary Run By: Carrie Williams ([email protected]) MTM Tool: Class Summary Date Run: Dec 19 2015 From Saved Query: No Date: Dec 18 2015 Instructor(s): Williams Course: Excel 2013 Part 2 Learning Provider: New Horizons Southern California Location: New Horizons Tucson (Learning Partner) Client: Public Class Summary Student Instructor Courseware Business Results Additional Questions Learning Effectiveness Environment ANONYMOUS46478927 9.00 5.57 2.00 1.00 2.00 8.50 ANONYMOUS46479400 9.00 8.71 8.00 8.00 8.00 7.50 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 7.00 9.00 7.00 5.50 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 6.17 7.00 7.00 7.00 6.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 7.50 Average 8.87 8.09 7.38 7.50 7.38 7.75 Summary (cont) Student Average ANONYMOUS46478927 6.24 ANONYMOUS46479400 8.53 [email protected] 8.35 [email protected] 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 [email protected] 7.07 [email protected] 9.00 [email protected] 7.94 Average 8.16 Instructor Student The instructor was knowledgeable about the subject. Participants were encouraged to take part in class discussions. Instructor overall The instructor''s presentation skills were adequate. The instructor provided realworld experiences and examples. Average ANONYMOUS46478927 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 ANONYMOUS46479400 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 Average 8.88 8.86 8.88 8.88 8.88 8.87 Courseware Clarity of the training Technical depth of the The material was Effectiveness of the labs in reinforcing the knowledge/skills learned Relevance of the labs to real world Time dedicated to activities such as discussions, practices, and labs (as - 1 / 8 -

Class_Summary Dec 18 2015

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Class_Summary Dec 18 2015

Class SummaryRun By: Carrie Williams ([email protected]) MTM Tool: Class SummaryDate Run: Dec 19 2015 From Saved Query: No

Date: Dec 18 2015 Instructor(s): Williams Course: Excel 2013 ­ Part 2Learning Provider: New Horizons ­ Southern California Location: New Horizons ­ Tucson ­ (Learning Partner) Client: Public Class

Summary

Student Instructor Courseware Business Results Additional QuestionsLearning

Effectiveness EnvironmentANONYMOUS46478927 9.00 5.57 2.00 1.00 2.00 8.50ANONYMOUS46479400 9.00 8.71 8.00 8.00 8.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 7.00 9.00 7.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 6.17 7.00 7.00 7.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 7.50Average 8.87 8.09 7.38 7.50 7.38 7.75

Summary (cont) Student Average ANONYMOUS46478927 6.24 ANONYMOUS46479400 8.53 [email protected] 8.35 [email protected] 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 [email protected] 7.07 [email protected] 9.00 [email protected] 7.94 Average 8.16

Instructor

Student

The instructor was knowledgeable about the subject.

Participants were encouraged to take part in class discussions. Instructor overall

The instructor''s presentation skills were adequate.

The instructor provided real­world experiences and examples. Average

ANONYMOUS46478927 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00ANONYMOUS46479400 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 ­ 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00Average 8.88 8.86 8.88 8.88 8.88 8.87

Courseware

Clarity of the training Technical depth of the The material was

Effectiveness of the labs in reinforcing the knowledge/skills learned

Relevance of the labs to real world

Time dedicated to activities such as discussions, practices, and labs (as

- 1 / 8 -

Page 2: Class_Summary Dec 18 2015

Student content training content organized logically. in the modules job situations opposed to lecture)ANONYMOUS46478927 8.00 1.00 8.00 2.00 4.00 8.00ANONYMOUS46479400 9.00 9.00 8.00 8.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 ­[email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00Average 8.38 7.50 8.25 7.50 7.88 8.71

Courseware (cont)

Student

Language quality of the courseware (grammar, terminology, style) Average

ANONYMOUS46478927 8.00 5.57 ANONYMOUS46479400 9.00 8.71 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 7.00 6.17 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 8.00 8.00 Average 8.50 8.09

Business Results

Student

This training will improve my job performance. Average

ANONYMOUS46478927 2.00 2.00 ANONYMOUS46479400 8.00 8.00 [email protected] 7.00 7.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 7.00 7.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 8.00 8.00 Average 7.38 7.38

Additional Questions

Student

How well did this training meet your expectations? Average

ANONYMOUS46478927 1.00 1.00 ANONYMOUS46479400 8.00 8.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 7.00 7.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 8.00 8.00 Average 7.50 7.50

Learning Effectiveness

- 2 / 8 -

Page 3: Class_Summary Dec 18 2015

Student

I have learned new knowledge/skills from this training. Average

ANONYMOUS46478927 2.00 2.00 ANONYMOUS46479400 8.00 8.00 [email protected] 7.00 7.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 7.00 7.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 8.00 8.00 Average 7.38 7.38

Environment

Student

The physical environment was conducive to learning.

The hardware was setup and functioning appropriately. Average

ANONYMOUS46478927 8.00 9.00 8.50 ANONYMOUS46479400 8.00 7.00 7.50 [email protected] 5.00 6.00 5.50 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 6.00 6.00 6.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 7.00 8.00 7.50 Average 7.63 7.88 7.75

Comments Instructor

Comments: (Instructor)[email protected] Carrie establishes what I think is the best rapport I've ever seen. And I've seen at least 40 trainers!!!ANONYMOUS46478927 He did a good [email protected] Carrie did a wonderful job explaining confusing topics. She was very patient and helpful when answering and assisting students.

User InformationFirst Name

[email protected] [email protected] AmyANONYMOUS46478927 [email protected] [email protected] Cynthia

Last [email protected] [email protected] SchoenherrANONYMOUS46478927 [email protected] [email protected] Ross

- 3 / 8 -

Page 4: Class_Summary Dec 18 2015

Phone Number

[email protected] 520­308­[email protected] 520­396­2778ANONYMOUS46478927 [email protected] 603­882­[email protected] 734­576­0130

What was your main objective for completing this [email protected] Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment)[email protected] Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment)ANONYMOUS46478927 Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment)[email protected] Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment)ANONYMOUS46479400 Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment)[email protected] Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment)[email protected] Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment)

CoursewareWhat suggestions do you have for enhancing the courseware?

ANONYMOUS46478927 I don't know how the syllabus for this class can say "advanced formulas" There wasn't a single advanced formula in the whole class! We did an "And" & "Or" function... Are you kidding me. Please provide more clarity on the course because this was a giant waste of time. The syllabus made it sound like a challenging course when it reality this course was incredibly elementary and a humongous waste of time for me!!

[email protected] N/A

Overall SatisfactionOverall, how satisfied are you with this training course? (check only one) [Student Data]

[email protected] Somewhat [email protected] Very [email protected] Very satisfiedANONYMOUS46478927 Very [email protected] Very satisfiedANONYMOUS46479400 Very [email protected] Somewhat [email protected] Very satisfied

Business ResultsBased on your response to the prior question, estimate how much of the improvement will be a direct result of this training.

[email protected] 20%[email protected] 100%[email protected] 10%ANONYMOUS46478927 10%[email protected] 100%ANONYMOUS46479400 100%

- 4 / 8 -

Page 5: Class_Summary Dec 18 2015

[email protected] 50%[email protected] 80%

Estimate how much you expect your job performance related to the course subject matter to improve in the next 12 months. Include in your estimate any performance improvements due to this training, as well as all other factors like on­the job experience, incentives, and process improvements. (For example, if you feel that you can improve your performance by 20% in the next 12 months based on this training plus all other factors, enter 20% here.)

[email protected] 20%[email protected] 30%[email protected] 10%ANONYMOUS46478927 10%[email protected] 90%ANONYMOUS46479400 10%[email protected] 50%[email protected] 40%

If you think this training will have a positive impact on your job performance, what areas will be impacted most? Check all that apply.

[email protected] increasing [email protected] increasing [email protected] increasing [email protected] increasing ability to [email protected] decreasing time to complete task(s)[email protected] decreasing [email protected] increasing customer [email protected] increasing employee [email protected] increasing ability to [email protected] decreasing time to complete task(s)[email protected] increasing [email protected] increasing [email protected] decreasing time to complete task(s)[email protected] increasing [email protected] increasing [email protected] decreasing time to complete task(s)ANONYMOUS46479400 increasing qualityANONYMOUS46479400 increasing productivityANONYMOUS46479400 increasing ability to innovateANONYMOUS46479400 decreasing time to complete task(s)[email protected] increasing [email protected] increasing [email protected] increasing [email protected] increasing ability to [email protected] decreasing time to complete task(s)[email protected] decreasing [email protected] increasing customer [email protected] increasing employee satisfaction

- 5 / 8 -

Page 6: Class_Summary Dec 18 2015

Additional QuestionsIs this your first time at New Horizons?

[email protected] [email protected] NoANONYMOUS46478927 [email protected] YesANONYMOUS46479400 [email protected] No

Would you recommend New Horizons to [email protected] [email protected] YesANONYMOUS46478927 [email protected] YesANONYMOUS46479400 [email protected] Yes

Other classes you are interested in taking:[email protected] Microsoft Excel 2013­part 3ANONYMOUS46479400 Excel 2013 Part 3, Pivot Tables

Would you be willing to provide a public quote about your experience taking this [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] No

Return on InvestmentWould you like to be notified about advanced or complementary courses?

[email protected] [email protected] NoANONYMOUS46478927 [email protected] YesANONYMOUS46479400 [email protected] No

Job ImpactWhat percent of your total work time requires the knowledge or skills presented in this training? Please check only one.

[email protected] 40%[email protected] 30%[email protected] 20%ANONYMOUS46478927 10%[email protected] 80%

- 6 / 8 -

Page 7: Class_Summary Dec 18 2015

ANONYMOUS46479400 20%[email protected] 50%[email protected] 40%

EnvironmentComments (Environment):

[email protected] Monitors dirty/dusty. Given the Eastern exposure with the morning sun, I had to go find a towel to wipe the monitor down for adequate viewing. Chairs and tables are quite worn.

ANONYMOUS46479400 The lab was lagging a lot and the audio connection kept breaking up.

Response RateForm Type Evaluations

Sent Evaluations Received

Response Rate

Post Event 8 8 100.00%

Report Recommendations Interpreting the ReportBelow are tips to help you understand the information in the report. For additional information, please click the Help tab above the report.Summarizes scores from each student for selected question categories and questions; compare and analyze scores for all students that completed evaluations. Student comments provide additional insight into the scores displayed within the report.Determine the students’ overall perceived value derived specifically from training to proactively manage future training events.

Recommended ActionsBelow are recommended next steps to take after reviewing the information in this report. Additionally, you'll find links to automatically run complementary reports for drilling­down further into the data or analyzing the information in another way.If any learner rated the class much lower than others, and the learner provided an email address, follow up with that person to gather additional feedback regarding the scores. Share that feedback with instructor and course managers as areas for improvement.If any learner rated the class much higher than others, especially in the areas of job impact or business results, follow up with those learners to gether additional feedback on how they were able to maximize their use of what they learned on the job. Share this feedback with course managers to ensure they share the knowledge with future learners to maximize job impact and business results.Schedule this report to be emailed automatically to the course and instructor managers on a daily basis so they are able to review performance on a regular basis.

Recommended LinksRun the Learner Comments report to review all the qualitative feedback for specific approaches to make the learning more effective and impactful.Run the Quick Question report to summarize the scale­based and multiple­choice answers for all of the evaluations.Run the Performance to Goals report to view how these results compared to your goals.

Report CriteriaReporting Date: Dec 1 2015 to Dec 31 2015 Form Type: Follow Up;

Instructor Survey; Post Event

Category: Additional Questions; Business Results; Courseware; Environment; General Questions; Instructor; Job Impact; Learning Effectiveness; Overall Satisfaction;

- 7 / 8 -

Page 8: Class_Summary Dec 18 2015

ver. 001

Return on Investment; User Information

Scale: 1 Low ­ 9 High Class: Excel 2013 ­ Part 2 Dec 18, 2015

- 8 / 8 -