12
Classification of developing structures •Developing structures are typically classified by developmental biologists according to their fate. •If such terms are to find a home in CARO, they also need a structural definition

Classification of developing structures Developing structures are typically classified by developmental biologists according to their fate. If such terms

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Classification of developing structures Developing structures are typically classified by developmental biologists according to their fate. If such terms

Classification of developing structures

•Developing structures are typically classified by developmental biologists according to their fate.

•If such terms are to find a home in CARO, they also need a structural definition

Page 2: Classification of developing structures Developing structures are typically classified by developmental biologists according to their fate. If such terms

Developing structures that are structurally types of tissue(?)

Page 3: Classification of developing structures Developing structures are typically classified by developmental biologists according to their fate. If such terms

FMA Definition of tissue

• Anatomical structure which consist of similarly specialized cells and intracellular matrix, aggregated according to genetically determined spatial relationships.

Page 4: Classification of developing structures Developing structures are typically classified by developmental biologists according to their fate. If such terms

anlage (synonym: field (?))Contiguous tissue contributing all or the majority of its cells to one or a few mature structures but not (yet) having distinct morphological boundaries.

% determinate anlageContiguous tissue contributing all of its cells to one or a few mature structures but not (yet) having distinct morphological boundaries.

% non-determinate anlageContiguous tissue defined by lineage labelling as contributing the majority of its cells to some specified mature structure but not (yet) having distinct morphological boundaries.

(Also inclusive and specific, as for promordium - see next slide… but this is tangled !!!!)

Page 5: Classification of developing structures Developing structures are typically classified by developmental biologists according to their fate. If such terms

Primordium (synonym: rudiment (?))Contiguous tissue contributing all of its cells to one or a few mature structures and having morphologically distinct boundaries.

% inclusive primordiumContiguous tissue contributing all of its cells to a fewmature structures and having morphologically

distinct boundaries.

% specific primordiumContiguous tissue contributing all of its cells to a single mature structure and having morphologically boundaries.

Note – anlage, primordium distinction is largely down to presence of boundaries, should this be reflected in different structural categories?

Page 6: Classification of developing structures Developing structures are typically classified by developmental biologists according to their fate. If such terms

germ layerPrimary division of embryo established just prior to &/or during gastrulation. Initially constituting a contiguous tissue contributing all of its cells a large but limited set of mature anatomical structure.

is_a ectodermis_a endodermis_a mesoderm

compartmentContiguous tissue consisting of cells unable to cross a *compartment boundary* to mix with cells in a neighbouring tissue with which it is contiguous during development.

Page 7: Classification of developing structures Developing structures are typically classified by developmental biologists according to their fate. If such terms

Developing structures that can be structurally defined as anatomical

sets (?)

Page 8: Classification of developing structures Developing structures are typically classified by developmental biologists according to their fate. If such terms

Germ layer derivativeAn anatomical structure which is derived from the a single germ-

layer.% mesodermal derivative an anatomical structure derived from the mesoderm.

Notes:1. individual anlage and primordia can be is_a children of

these terms.2. At what stage, if any, do we stop classifying developing

structures in this way?

Page 9: Classification of developing structures Developing structures are typically classified by developmental biologists according to their fate. If such terms

These terms have multiple primordia and anlage as parts. Different parts are instantiated at different stages.

Developing system (e.g.- developing nervous system)

Developing (cardinal) body part – e.g.- developing head

Developing organ (e.g.- developing brain)

Developing X terms

Page 10: Classification of developing structures Developing structures are typically classified by developmental biologists according to their fate. If such terms

Miscellaneous structural types of developing structure

Page 11: Classification of developing structures Developing structures are typically classified by developmental biologists according to their fate. If such terms

Mesenchyme

Not defined by developmental fate or potential. Perhaps better defined purely structurally?

[Note – mesenchyme is a mass noun (as opposed to a count noun – like neuron. Should be referred to as ‘portion of mesenchyme’ according to Barry.]

compartment boundary(Genus is_a 'anatomical line' (?))A boundary that cuts across a contiguous tissue separating it into two groups of cells that do not mix during development. Compartment boundaries have few, if any, morphological correlates, at least while they function as barriers.

Page 12: Classification of developing structures Developing structures are typically classified by developmental biologists according to their fate. If such terms

Differentia

Note that there are two types of fate based differentia working to define these terms:

1. Is the fate mapping probablistic (some defined percentage of cells in the structure have a specific fate) or deterministic (all the cells in the structure have a specific fate)

2. Will the structure contribute to 1 (more) mature structures, or multiple (more) mature structures.

Can we cope with these while keeping is_a siblings disjoint?